全 13 件のコメント

[–]WodashitParticle physics[M] 36 ポイント37 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I personally agree with this message.

[–]derivative_of_life 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Oh boy, here we go. I'll see you guys on /r/SubredditDrama.

[–]CarbonRodOfPhysics[S,M] 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I know I started this, but I really do want it to end civilly and productively. I think the solution I proposed is fair. I don't need to tear down u/quaz4r. I just want to know that if I put my time and effort into this sub that I won't have my work shit-canned someday and find myself de-modded because I got on the wrong side of an issue.

[–]derivative_of_life 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, your post seems perfectly reasonable to me given that I know absolutely nothing about the issue. It's still probably gonna cause a bunch of drama, though.

[–]Sysiphuslove 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It has to stop sometime. Half the site is unusable (or at least wildly annoying).

[–]myotherpasswordCosmology 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's fair. Being a mod really does imply that you are doing your part and at least clearing out the spam and whatnot.

[–]BAN_ANIME 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is not scientific content.

[–]CondMatTheorist 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I didn't follow the stickied thread, except to read it when initially posted. However, your links hardly combine to make a compelling case:

You don't moderate, except to sticky your posts and silence your critics.

One stickied post, and one suspended user who, let's be real, doesn't do himself any favors in his defense ("go protest and kill and riot like the rest of your politically like minded morons" ... Woof. If he was behaving like that before the suspension, is that not suspension worthy?)

There's no such thing as "political neutrality." If this sub refuses to address issues at the intersection of Physics and Politics, it is making a political choice. One that, in some situations, could be unforgivable (since we're all playing slippery slope here, is it going to be okay to comment here on Donald Trump's ban of Jewish Physics?) and that would, and should!, alienate a different segment of "sincere subscribers."

We've hardly seen your account over the years. When you do show up, it's to push your own agenda by stickying and mod-flairing your appeals.

Just this recent one, unless there's something I'm missing? The only other thing in the list that's mod-flaired is facilitating an in person meet-up at an APS meeting (which is the kind of thing that builds community on a subreddit, and that good mods should want to facilitate...), so unless by "agenda" you literally mean "schedule" I'm not sure what agenda is being pushed in that list.

So, it's not like I even disagree with the request, I just don't see what the hell the big deal is and why you couldn't have handled this in a private communication with /u/quaz4r. This just looks really self-serving on your part.

[–]CarbonRodOfPhysics[S,M] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

One stickied post,

While it did interfere with the bot that keeps the usual stickies operating smoothly, and did make more work for us, that's not the point. The point is that u/quaz4r won't communicate, won't work with me, won't work with the mod team, won't even give us a heads up, and then acts to undercut us.

There's no such thing as "political neutrality." If this sub refuses to address issues at the intersection of Physics and ...

Again, you're focusing on the wrong thing. If you look through my history you'll find my emphatic defense of the appropriateness of politics in this sub, and my commitment to defend political discussion in the future. I want a calm, even, and fair discussion, u/quaz4r's posts don't support that style. If she would be willing to work with us, we could get a lot more done, actually present balanced rhetoric that could have a chance of winning support instead of just stirring up the passions of the polarized bases.

This just looks really self-serving on your part.

Of course it's self-serving. I want something. I want to keep donating my time to r/physics. But I can't do that knowing that there is a random top mod who could fire me at any for crossing her.

[–]Esparno 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm not sure I follow the logic in this post. What purpose does the top mod removing himself have if it just goes to the next person in line?

I'm not well-versed in how the reddit moderator system works. Is there some sort of hierarchy? Otherwise you're just replacing a stable, if somewhat absent, person with an unknown.