JEWISH PHYSICS

This is a transcript of an excerpt of an interview/AMA Weev and some of his associates had, hosted here:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bACz77taipk

 

The full interview can be found here:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BFx8XsyNIw

 

YTC:

What is Jewish Physics?

 

PHILLIP:

Theoretical Physics- like things that don’t produce tangible, useful results. Like math on paper only.

 

YTC:

Like String Theory. Like how you can’t really-

 

PHILLIP:

String Theory, Special and General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, things like that, that don’t have actual, tangible applications in the world. It’s just math.

 

YTC:

So you’re saying that Special and General Relativity have no [actual, tangible applications in the world]-

 

PHILLIP:

No [, they don’t have any actual, tangible applications in the world]. The only argument you’ll find is that General Relativity is always referred to as “Oh, you can’t have GPS without it”, but GPS satellites actually don’t use it. They just use the difference in time-stamps. It’s a bunk argument.

 

YTC:

But, for approximations of, like, moving bodies and stuff- like Newtonian Physics got us there for a period of time- is it not a more accurate mathematical representation of how to model the World?

 

PHILLIP:

There is no empirical evidence to suggest that there is. It’s almost immeasurable. And then, there’s competing ideas, that are mathematically equivalent too, but have different philosophical implications.

 

YTC:

Like, not involving Jews, so therefore it’s a-

 

PHILLIP:

Yeah. Well you know Einstein- I’m not going to hijack this chat to go off on this thing- but Einstein’s entire deal was just that he suggested kind of a philosophical reimagining where there no preferred place of rest, right. But his math, he actually didn’t come up with any math. It was all a guy named Hendrik Lorentz, who was a Dutch physicist.

 

YTC:

Like, the guy that did Lorentz Transformations and stuff?

 

PHILLIP:

Yeah, yeah. Like literally, like the math is Lorentz’s math, but-

 

YTC:

He gave it to Einstein, and said, like, “Einstein, you take the fall for this. You become the most genius guy, and people will use your name as a noun to-

 

PHILLIP:

No. Well, no. Lorentz has already published ten, twenty years earlier, all of that stuff,  but as a different, like a different physical reasoning behind it, and then Einstein just said “Let’s pretend that light is magical, and there’s no way to tell if you’re at rest, there’s no preferred like- this is not moving.” That’s all he said. That’s it.

 

YTC:

And appropriated Lorentz’s math for his Jewish Physics?

 

PHILLIP:

Yeah, exactly. Like, the Lorentz Transformation is Special Relativity.

 

YTC:

Right.

 

PHILLIP:

But it’s  Einstein’s Theory of Special Relativity. Right. This is what I mean by “Jewish Physics”, right. All the Jewish physicists have, like- I can’t build anything by saying that “there is no preferred reference frame” or “the speed of light is constant in all reference frames”. It doesn’t help make anything, right. It’s purely mind-games.

 

YTC:

Well, measurements, for instance how we take the distance- like a light year- how we determine the distance between stars and planets and bodies and shit like that, that’s all done via the speed of light as a constant-

 

PHILLIP:

But Einstein didn’t discover the speed of light. He said the speed of light doesn’t change.

 

YTC:

And that it’s the speed limit. That nothing can go faster than light without mass.

But the atomic bomb wouldn’t work without Energy-Mass-Equivalence.

 

PHILLIP:

Actually, Energy-Mass-Equivalence was- what was the guy’s name? Oh, Millikan. E=mc^2 was not Einstein, it’s Millikan.

 

YTC:

Millikan?

 

PHILLIP:

Millikan, he was the guy who did the electric charge. He quantized it. Real famous for the Millikan Oil Drop Experiment.

Energy-Mass-Equivalence- they started toying with that idea in like the 1840s, and I think for a while they were saying it was 0.5mc^2, and then Millikan formalized it to mc^2.

 

YTC:

Let’s see here. This equation looks way more fucking complicated than- the Oil Drop Experiment?

 

PHILLIP:

Well the Oil Drop Experiment, I’m just saying that’s what he’s famous for. That wasn’t related. That was related to quantities of charge.

 

WEEV:

If I wrote a paper, and didn’t cite everyone in it to the degree that Einstein didn’t cite his sources, I would be expelled for plagiarism. Like, done. No-questions-asked. There was very little of substance that Einstein contributed to his theory. Like, it was rhetoric, basically, was what he contributed. And then with bad rhetoric.

 

PHILLIP:

Mmhmm. It’s philosophical. It’s not like anything empirical. That’s my quip with Jewish Physics. You find a Jew, you find an idea- you can’t test it. You can’t measure it. It’s just a philosophy. That’s where you get things like the Multiverse shit about, you know, Quantum Mechanics and infinite universes. You can’t test that. You can’t build-

 

YTC:

People talk about that all the time. If it’s not provable, it’s not Science.

 

PHILLIP:

Yeah.

 

YTC:

You need to have like a hypothesis, and data-

 

PHILLIP:

Yeah. You need to test it. There needs to be some empiricism involved.

 

YTC:

Scientific Method.

 

PHILLIP:

Like, all that went out the window a hundred years ago, so, whatever. Thanks Jews.

 

YTC:

So the experiments with the gravitational lensing and stuff, that supposedly during the full eclipse where they measured the stars’ positions and stuff, are you saying that Einstein, his theory-

 

PHILLIP:

There’s two issues with that, and one of them is that there are multiple competing ideas that were not- people did not like Einstein’s explanation for why that happened- that are basically mathematically equivalent. And the second is that they actually didn’t- they’ve never gotten good data for those. If you actually look at the raw data, it’s very cherry-picked. Like, there’s no positive experiment.

 

YTC:

At this point- what was the breakthrough at the Laser Center, LIGO [Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory]?

 

PHILLIP:

Do you want me to go hijack your hijack your fucking thing and talk about this?

or do you want t

 

YTC:

Please.

 

PHILLIP:

Or do you want to talk about something else?

 

YTC:

Please. Let’s do it. School everyone on Jewish Physics, please.

 

PHILLIP:

Now, disclaimer here, I don’t want anyone to think that Weev endorses my crackpot physics ideas, right? Okay. So, the whole LIGO thing, with the gravitational waves, is that they used essentially a really fine-tuned version of a tool called  a Michelson Interferometer. Have you ever heard of that, before?

 

YTC:

I have not. I have no idea. Reddit just locked my AMA

 

PHILLIP:

There you go. [Laughter]

 

YTC:

[Laughter] This is officially Jewish Physics chat now.

 

PHILLIP:

Okay, Jewish Physics. Let’s go. Okay, so they used what’s called a Michelson Interferometer . This is originally envisioned some time in the 19th century as a- there used to be an idea that “light is a wave, it has to propagate through a physical medium, just like sound” right. You couldn’t hear me if I was talking to you in a vacuum, because there’s nothing for the wave to be-

 

YTC:

Right. Fluid Dynamics.

 

PHILLIP:

So, the commonly held thing, until Einstein, who was largely the one who popularized throwing away this idea, was that a medium [is] pervading space, empty space, called the Luminiferous Aether.

 

YTC:

Correct.

 

PHILLIP:

And that light coming from the Sun to the Earth traveled through that. And so Lorentz- Lorentz Transformation is his mathematical model for how light propagates through the Luminiferous Aether, so basically the terminal velocity of an electromagnetic wave in otherwise empty space in the Aether. That’s what the Lorentz Transformation was originally. Einstein’s contribution was that he came around and said “Pretend there’s no Aether, and it’s just moving through empty space. That’s it.” That’s Special Relativity, right there. So in order to test this, a guy named Michelson, actually Michelson and Morley, [who] were two physicists who designed a thing, and what is: is you take a beam of light

 

YTC:

The Michelson-Morley shit is like what the fucking, the guys who think the Earth is concave reference. Like, the Flat Earth people.

 

PHILLIP:

That’s a whole different argument, but yeah. So the Michelson Interferometer, they used to think that “the Earth is rotating around its axis, and it’s revolving around the Sun. It is going to-there’s going to be a wind, kind of like when you stick your hand out of a car window, right.” They said “Well if light travels through this medium of the Aether, we should be able to see kind of it getting ‘blown’ from the motion of the Earth through the Aether in space”.

 

So, they set up, basically it’s two arms, with a bunch of mirrors and- just mirrors, right. So you start a light, and you shine it straight ahead, and it diverges through a half-silvered mirror off two paths: one of them goes straight ahead; one of them goes off to the left. They reflect off mirrors, they come back, combine at the point in the middle, then they go off to the right to a detector, and since light is a wave, it will have interference patterns, right. They’ll combine to have areas that are intense, and then will cancel each other out, depending on the phase of the waves. If the Earth is moving, and you line up one of those arms in the direction of the motion, right- so you have one of the arms pointing due east- then it’s going to cause the phase to come back in a different position in one arm than it would in the other, and you would see a pattern of fringes on the screen. So that’s an interference pattern. So instead of seeing just a blob of light, you’d see a bunch of lines.

 

So then, the thought is then: so as you rotate that interferometer so that one arm is pointing East and the other arm is pointing Northeast or whatever, the interference pattern should shift, because you’re experiencing a different ‘wind’ from the ‘Aether’. So they did that experiment. They did not experience a shift in the fringes, and so that was what inspired Lorentz to come up with his whole aether theory, and the Lorentz Transformations to explain how there’s aether but there’s no shift.

 

So LIGO is just some Michelson Interferometer, it’s the same exact thing, except what they do is that they have lasers, they have really precise detectors, and along the two arms that go off at right angles, they have mirrors that are like, I don’t know what percentage, I can’t remember, but basically like once the light goes through, every time it comes back and hits the mirror, it will only allow like one percent of the light to come through. So, effectively, you’ve got this super, miles-long path as the light bounces back and forth before it finally combines and goes to the detector, right.

 

So, then they just set that thing up, and left it for years. And, on September 14th last year- oh, what a coincidence, that was the Shmita day, but we don’t need to get into that-

 

YTC:

What’s the Shmita?

 

PHILLIP:

Seven year forgiveness of debts for the Jews, they always coincide with market crashes, right. That doesn’t really mean anything, it’s just a nice coincidence that it happened on that day of all days. So, basically on September 14th of last year, they saw for about ten microseconds I believe it was, was the signal length, they saw an oscillation in the phase that was the recombined at the detector. It was just like a ten microsecond signal, and then that’s it. So that’s the entirety of the experiment that they have.

 

Not all this stuff about Black Holes and everything, what they’re saying is “it must have been gravity that was, like, two Black Holes that were spinning around each other real quick as they got super close to each other, and that caused like a perturbance in the gravity that caused this shift, and like, wiggled the light on one of the arms more than the others. Now, it’s more correct to say, and this is what the paper says, actually, if you read the actual journal article, is what they detected was a Longitudinal Electromagnetic Wave, which is something extremely rare, and doesn't necessarily mean anything about Black Holes or anything like that. But, it is interesting, because that would be one of the first times that a  Longitudinal Electromagnetic Wave has ever been directly observed. But that’s not what they’re talking about.

 

YTC:

So it does have scientific implications-

 

PHILLIP:

It does, but substantially different if you just throw out all the untestable things about Black Holes, stuff we’ve never seen, we can’t look at, and everything [like that], and look at what

“What did we measure?” We measured a Longitudinal Electromagnetic Wave, which is- you know the difference between a Longitudinal and a Transverse Wave?

 

YTC:

I’m assuming-

 

PHILLIP:

A Transverse Wave is like a sine wave, right.

 

YTC:

Right.

 

PHILLIP:

A Longitudinal Wave is like a compression wave. It would be like a wave in the ocean, like coming back and forth. Like sound waves are compression waves. So it’s not like a sine wave, it’s like the air being compressed, and then having areas of less density in between it, kind of wiggles back and forth along the direction of travel.

 

YTC:

So it’s like moving the paper the graph of the wave is on?

 

PHILLIP:

Or like a slinky. That is what they detected. Now that does not have really anything to do with Black Holes, but it is interesting because Maxwell, kind of the father of Electromagnetism, he originally predicted that there should be Longitudinal Electromagnetic Waves, and there were a lot of physicists talking about them in the 1800s, but they never really came up. Then Oliver Heaviside formalized the current versions of Maxwell’s equations, and they wrote out the whole Longitudinal Wave thing and forgot about it. So, it has some interesting implications, to go back and re-examine that maybe there was something there in Electromagnetism that’s missed, but as Black Holes-

 

YTC:

.. considers like a Fundamental Force, like, elecro, weak force, like magnetism is all the same shit or whatever, like that was what Maxwell did, he did all the Electromagnetic- he did  Maxwell's [unintelligible] hot, not-

 

PHILLIP:

Yeah, he didn’t mention thermo. As far as Electromagnetism, he kind of, when he talked about like unified fields, right, he kind of showed how there’s a relationship between an electric field and a magnetic field, and like one influence the presence or behavior of another from the same motion of an electron basically.

 

YTC:

Tie this all up. So which Jew issued the edict down for the fucking physics paper that now it’s become this ninety percent conspiracy

where everyone says it’s-

 

PHILLIP:

It’s not- the whole Jew thing isn’t really a conspiracy thing. It’s not there’s a whole bunch of Jews in hoods sitting around at a table worshipping Satan, doing all this.

 

YTC:

And deciding the mathematical properties of the Universe.

 

PHILLIP:

No. But, there are a lot of Jews that have a lot of influence, and they just, it’s just their nature, it’s reflexive, almost, for them to pull things in directions that they like. They pull things toward their philosophies. They pull things toward what’s beneficial towards them. There’s a big academic circle-jerk in Physics for the last decades about all this meaningless Jew science where you can have a whole career in String Theory, or fucking Relativity this, or Parallel Universes that, and never  fucking do one experiment in a lab, and have an entire career about it. It’s like the epicycles from astronomy centuries ago. The whole system of the Earth is the center of the Universe, so in order to explain the motion of the planets, they had these whole spirograph  

 

YTC:

I’ve seen those. That shit’s insane. Heliocentric vs Geocentric-

 

PHILLIP:

At one time that was the standard belief system of science, and you were considered a lunatic if you questioned it. Not based on anything empirical, but “this is the way things are, we know better, you’re an idiot for questioning this, we already figured it out”. But that’s kind of what it is now.

 

YTC:

With number theory, i mean for a long time- now it’s like extrapolating something on paper- i mean basically at the root of everything is mathematics. There is a lot of things you can’t- the way we understand, you know, practical science, as far as Physics, like F=ma- that type of thing is measurable. We have experiments that do that. But a lot of math is theoretical.  String Theory makes sense on paper. Does it prove what the universe is made of? No

 

PHILLIP:

It’s just math. I do take a different stance from you and say that most useful math is useful, that math should be pursued for its usefulness, whatever the application. If you’re talking about math as it related to physical sciences, what value does it have to talk about it if I don't have something empirical to back it up.

 

YTC:

But in the case of Relativity and stuff, it does help predict motion of galaxies, and models

 

PHILLIP:

Well it doesn’t. You ever hear of Dark Energy, and Dark Matter?

 

YTC:

Well that’s the whole missing part of the equation we don’t understand.

 

PHILLIP:

It’s a band-aid, because according to a lot of the theoretical physics ideas of the last century, when you observe distant stellar bodies, they don’t move right, and so they say “Oh, well they must be moving differently, because there’s this invisible, untestable thing”. It’s a band-aid. There’s a lot of astrophysicists who have a huge problem with that whole Dark Energy kind of thing.

 

YTC:

Let’s say, if we can account for eighty percent of the mass in the Universe-

 

PHILLIP:

Basically, what happens is they have all these equations that were worked out, not by experiment, but just by doing math, right, and then they say “I’m going to look at this thing, and I’m calculating that this thing is this far away, and it’s moving this way, and I think it should be doing this”, and you watch it through your telescope or whatever tool, and it doesn’t behave that way. Historically, science would say “I have a problem in the idea that I used to predict what I think this thing should have done, because I said it would do this, and it did something differently”.  

 

YTC:

You’re observing something differently than the mathematical model, right.

 

PHILLIP:

Well, instead, what they just did was they invented this concept of Dark Matter and Dark Energy to say “Well, if we just pretend there’s this invisible thing here, that there’s no way to observe, than I can give it whatever properties I need to, to make it- like squeeze in with the math that I’ve already worked out”. That’s all it is.  

 

YTC:

Then, fundamentally, it just becomes another variable in the fucking equation, like the Cosmological Constant, well mostly taken out, and put back in, like with the Universe accelerating. We have, obviously our understanding of the universe changes, and we update our theories. It’s one thing about, like, we rewrite science  if science is wrong.

 

PHILLIP:

Well, now, we don’t update them based on empirical things. We update them based on, like, factual philosophies. That’s the problem, and that’s a very recent thing in the last, like, hundred years or less, that we’ve started doing. I’m a big fan of Phillip Lenard. He won a Nobel Prize for his work on cathode rays, and that was his whole argument, and an argument that a lot of people kept through the 1960s was “why are we abandoning empiricism and science -and we’re just going to work something out on paper; if it seems cool let’s just try to shoehorn it to match whatever we can possibly do experiments for, or just forget about doing experiments  altogether- what does that do anybody?”

 

YTC:

What’s the point?

 

PHILLIP:

What did you say?

 

YTC:

I was just about to say: what’s the point of science if you’re not doing experiments?

 

PHILLIP:

Exactly. There isn’t a point to it. That’s the problem that I have with it is: why the hell are you studying Physics to shuffle numbers around on a piece of white paper? That doesn’t do anybody any good.

 

YTC:

[Mockingly] Neither does racism. Racism is bad.

 

PHILLIP:

Yeah racism does plenty good. Look at Germany in the 1930s. It was fucking great.

 

YTC:

That’s one of those track shifts- I don’t even know what fallacy argument that is. It’s not an attack. I was derailing.

 

PHILLIP:

I’m not big on my fallacies, but I know, I know, I know. But that my- I have a problem with Jewish Physics like that.

 

YTC:

I’ve never heard that before- the Jewish Physics lobby.

 

PHILLIP:

You can get a very slanted view of it from the Wikipedia article on the Deutsche Physik movement, but of course it paints Philipp Lenard that was a fanatical racist, that was a failed physicist, and all this shit, and it’s just not even remotely true, but there’s been a lot of that, and it kind of got stamped out, you know, because we’ve had this big cultural shift in the last century, and then in the same time, like, Western Nations and academia have become completely run by Jews, so of course you can never talk bad about the Jews anymore. I can’t say “Look at all these fucking Jews.

 

YTC:

You’re doing it right now! No one’s showing up and-

 

PHILLIP:

Well yeah. Nobody’s doing that, but if I was a professor at a university in the Physics Department and I said “I would like to investigate the implications of these Longitudinal Electromagnetic Waves that LIGO detected last week, and look at them in light of what it might have meant for Maxwell” I’m going to get fucking kicked out of the department for being

“crazy”.

 

YTC:

Because you’re not feeding into the narrative, the Jewish narrative

PHILLIP:

Yeah, and it’s not necessary “We must defend the Jews” that all the other people in the departments are saying, but this is like what’s in vogue, and what’s acceptable. You can’t go to a college today, like that fucking kid that got kicked out of whatever school in Missouri or whatever for getting on YikYak and saying “I don’t think that Black women are attractive”, you know, like a couple months ago. Like there’s this little box that you have to think inside, and that’s all that’s acceptable.