全 8 件のコメント

[–]CommunizerCommunization Theory [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Lmao this guy has no fucking clue what "post-modernism" is. You're grouping both Zizek and Derrida into the same category? That's literally just fucking nonsense. Zizek is mostly a classical Hegelian critical theorist who uses Lacanian psychoanalysis, he has nothing in common with the "post-modernists."

Not only that, but post-modernism, if it's anything at all, is more a genre of art and architecture. There's no overarching philosophical position that could be described as "post-modernism," there was one guy, Lyotard, who wrote a single book about the "Post-Modern condition" which mainly tackled the issue of metanarratives as explanations for wide ranging philosophical questions, in which he posed the idea that narratives should be localized and philosophy should refuse grand theories which attempt to explain wide ranging questions under one methodology.

What you're probably trying to critique here post-structuralism, but even then most people haphazardly grouped into this genre all have different modes of discourse as well. Derrida disagreed with Baudrillard who disagreed with Foucault who disagreed with Lyotard and so on. In fact it's quite ironic you're trying to group all these names under one umbrella when genres were actually one thing Derrida critiqued heavily, as he pointed out that genres are useless signifiers and instead all philosophy and science is just discourse, so he would refuse any label you would attempt to force him into.

Moreover, the post-structuralists didn't pose the assertion that all truth is relative and nothing is more true than anything else(except maybe Foucault, but only in certain modes of inquiry, like human nature in which he denoted the historiography of the concept and advanced the concept of the episteme), in fact Derrida, towards the end of his life, clarified the fact that he did believe there existed objective truth, and refused to be associated with those who didn't believe so.

I think the bigger problem here is you've obviously gotten all your understanding of post-structuralism from dishonest, 2nd hand sources who probably also got their understanding from other 2nd hand sources. You should actually read some of their work for yourself, you'll see that your understanding of them is quite bad.

[–]TotesMessenger [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

[–]POGO_POGO_POGO_POGOEconomic Democracy [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

So what's your position on gay marriage, then?

[–]ghastly1302Individualist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You are asking a reactionary, traditional Catholic...

[–]arl99Civic Humanist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

So, you're saying leftists are petty fucks who moderate harshly because they want to prove their power?

[–]VayatePinochet did nothing wrong [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The problem with bullshit in politics is that you end up with a bunch of people who believe that bullshit. It's not a problem specific to liberals, but it's a problem liberals have more than others. I do agree that "smug, snarky asshole" isn't a good look for them and I'm not sure why they deliver their messages in that way, but I'm also 100% okay with them doing it. Never interrupt the other guys when they're in the middle of making a mistake.