ログイン
|
言語
български (ブルガリア語)
čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
English (英語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Français (フランス語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
한국어 (韓国語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português (ポルトガル語)
Português-Brasil (ブラジルポルトガル語)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
简体中文 (簡体字中国語)
Español (スペイン語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
繁體中文 (繁体字中国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
Steam の翻訳にご協力ください
Could be he didn't know how he felt at the time. I've played HOI:IV for two hundreads hours and I didn't know how to feel about the game, I wasen't sure if I was midly enjoying or not. If you asked me now, would you reccomend it? I'd would point you elsewhere.
I think this is a common case for those game that just ''flop'' in a series or go under alot of change, needed or not. (FO:3/4, RE:6, HOI:IV, COD, ME3 etc, etc.)
You think and hold onto the old titles previous image and state so much you don't know how to feel about something that is plainly just not up to standard... or otherwise just plain bad.
Oh, and when it comes to the engine, studios rarely build a new engine from scratch when they already have one. Unreal 4 for example, is just a modifieed version of Unreal 3 which was a modified version of Unreal 2 and so on. It cost a lot of money/time to build an engine from scratch, so devs just update their existing code. Call of Duty for example uses an engine called IW Engine, which is actually based on the 17 year old Quake 3 engine. They've never built a new engine for COD, they just keep updating the old one. So I'm not sure why you're so obsessed with the idea Bethesda needs a new engine., the current one works fine... and you never actually state your issue with it.
As a story driven shooter with a side of open world carnage though, it did ok.