Dave Weigel認証済みアカウント

@daveweigel GOPs depend on Dems doing the right things while the GOP does the wrong things with impunity.

@daveweigel The full quote isn't any better, really. Why are democrats unable to vote their own interests?

@daveweigel how about dems grow a backbone & treat gop in exactly same way - obstruct obstruct obstruct & plus their ideas suck ass

@daveweigel seems like the same toothless quote to me

@daveweigel nah, even what he grants is too much. Primary his ass

@daveweigel Who cares about his rationale for caving in?

@daveweigel But does "a vote" mean a cloture vote or a floor vote on the nomination?

@daveweigel the difference is trivial.

@daveweigel 140 chars lead to sick burns.

@daveweigel fucking bullshit, I've seen some of the votes anyone voting anything other than a no across the board is a goddamn sellout

@daveweigel Two concerns: libs eat libs, while conservatives grin and bare it = this election; some of those rages are trolls inciting us

@daveweigel and now they are fucking complaining. It's you all damn fault we are in this shit hold

@daveweigel we wouldn't have been in this fucking situation if all Dems came out and fucking vote. Some didn't or vote for Stein and

@daveweigel even if all the dem senators opposed him. He is still going to be on the court. The GOP have the Senate and the nuclear option

@daveweigel the un-truncated versi k changes nothing. He's still caving, and needs to be primaried by someone who will fight Trump/GOP

@daveweigel Right, Ds want a hearing to expose Gorsuch's out of mainstream views, Rs did not want hearing b/c Garland was moderate.

@daveweigel I see the difference but it reads the same to me

@daveweigel Truncation here only matters if you think Gorsuch should get a vote at all, which many leftists argue he should not.

@daveweigel I think theyll still be angry?

@daveweigel that would be the fault of the person misreporting the quote