全 11 件のコメント

[–]Fargonian[S] 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Also, the post current has 40 upvotes and 5 downvotes (Literally, 89% upvoted and 11% downvoted), and they have declared it a "brigaded post." I don't think that's how brigades work.

[–]bigbossman90 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The flair pops up as soon as the thread gets linked.

[–]GiantX 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Nobody said it was brigaded except you?

[–]Fargonian[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

...It's literally tagged as a "brigaded post."

[–]GiantX 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Oh, I'm on mobile and can't see it.

[–]bigbossman90 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The mobile site or an app? I use reddit is fun and I can see it.

[–]Fargonian[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Oh u/Icc0ld, it's a shame you're just not sharp enough to realize that some of us don't care to refute the title of the post, because some of us believe that gun violence is a bigger concern than Islamic terror.

We same people just want statistically based gun control, and gun control targeting "assault weapons" absolutely isn't. It's a shame you can't come to that logical conclusion with us.

[–]Freeman001 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It doesn't count as a lie if they post it in their sub. There it's true, no matter what. But don't ask them to post in /r/theydidthemath or /r/science...

[–]vegetarianrobots 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I did not realize how dangerous beds are.

[–]ILikeBigAZ -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Busses are useful more than worth their risk, Modern Sporting Rifles™ are big boy toys.

[–]Fargonian[S] 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Barrel shrouds and pistol grips aren't that statistically risky. Even assuming that AWs are "big boy toys" and nothing more, when stacked up against other "big boy toys" like motorcycles, GA aircraft, and other "toys," AWs are ironically the safer bet in raw numbers of people dying involving their use.

But, again, statistics aren't your boys' strong suit.