Anonymous Angry Cat 01/27/17 (Fri) 11:51:38 No.1294981

if you punch your enemies, they win Absolutely unreal, these assholes are in power. You can't just turn around on oppression and state violence. Not unless you're rich like this slovenian fisted asshole.The he brings up that shithead Ghandi that liberals like him jerk themselves off to when it was other violent groups that brought real change to India. There was another time when he was arguing against communes and full democracy when he had stressed the ease of modern society and praised alienation. The guy is the definition of a bourgeois socialist, he likes to talk about changing the system but if it were ever to affect his life in any way he would oppose it vehemently. The guy just wants his coffee in the morning and his balls scratched in the afternoon, he doesn't give a fuck about the struggle of the proletariat, it's all theoretical bullshit to him. The fat cunt probably would have killed Rosa.

Anonymous 01/27/17 (Fri) 14:29:12 No.1295627 literally let the oppressors exterminate us into exhaustion and self reflection like the british did to india. Only in india the masses were being exterminated. We only have each other and libs and right tards are gonna say, "wew violence even against oppressors is bad." "Zizek confirmed for cis plant".

Hoochie Minh!!KVhI0fSZY6 01/27/17 (Fri) 12:06:43 No.1295050>>1295065

1295036 Yes, that's why the entire bourgie left rejects it What the "bougie left" does is not necessarily indicative of being wrong, in this case, Zizek is the bougie left

Hoochie Minh!!KVhI0fSZY6 01/27/17 (Fri) 12:05:53 No.1295045>>1295070 >>1295078 >>1295450

1295027 I'm not criticizing him for "criticizing me", whatever that means. I'm criticizing him by using today's politically correct standards, IE those in Capitalist power, in order to suggest what he otherwise defends in the farther past but not today, are correct. While today is not correct. Sure, largely, the riots have been, inefficient. But what exactly does Zizek hope to see? Military trained revolutionaries? Isn't going to happen. But instead of actually clarifying his contradicting position, he full on points it out himself, invoking liberal notions of peaceful protest in such a way where he seems more than he is. He isn't. He's a liberal documentary star with a Netflix contract worried about his income

Anonymous 01/27/17 (Fri) 11:53:59 No.1294991>>1295003 >>1295124 Zizek's support for the proletariat, revolution, and the Left in general is always in inverse relation to their closeness in space and time. He is unabashedly supportive of the French Revolution, since it is impossibly far away. Absolutely, yesh, I shay, every one who got guillotined desherved it, and and so on. The early 20th century revolutions that failed (like the SDAPO in Austria) he also comes out for completely. It was a terrible thing that Austrian moderates didn't join leftist paramilitaries in the streets. Then we get closer, to the early 20th Century revolutions that were effective. The USSR, he holds up Lenin as a good example all the time, but disdains the USSR, why? Because it lasted long enough to be close to him. Mao? Far enough away that Zizek sometimes mentions him approvingly, but close enough that Zizek adopts a guarded and conservative posture. Literally anything happening now? He skews from Conservative to full on reactionary. His shit about muh immigrants was reactionary garbage.

WEW

They are attacking me in their shitstorm of a thread.