The title sums it up. They released an article when he was first elected and have taken every opportunity to endorse him in the editorial.
Here is their most recent article.
My favorite excerpts:
[The First Amendment] grants the citizens of the United States of America the right to peacefully protest ... There is a difference, however, in standing your ground and destroying property. Setting fire to vehicles and breaking windows does nothing for your cause, and is hardly the way to gain respect for your opinion.
So, despite your opinions on Donald Trump as president and despite who you voted for in the most recent election we should take a note from our outgoing president Obama, and all the former presidents, and allow Trump to take control of our government. Trust that Trump is not planning to ruin the country we love, and trust him to make the right decisions for our country, just like all of the past presidents.
What I saw was a not-so-thinly-veiled jab at recent protests with a side of false premise. In my opinion, unconditional trust should not be given to political leaders. Our trust should be based on Trump's actions and plans. Moreover, past US presidents have made poor decisions. Take the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII (an executive order by FDR).
I am probably preaching, but I had to post my thoughts somewhere. I posted a similar reply in the comments section of the referred article, but it hasn't been approved by moderation for nearly a week. Thanks for reading.
ここには何もないようです