Totally fine, I love questions...
So, to give you the quick and dirty version, people often think of the U.S. revolution as being created by the rich upper class people like Washington, Adams, Jefferson, etc pretty much ex nihlo , as if they pulled an apathetic rabble kicking and screaming into revolt with a slick combination of their liberal rhetoric, strength of will and bootstraps -- but that really isn't the case. In reality the population was dealing with some pretty terrible economic and social conditions, and that prompted them to be eager to revolt against the British. They were already rioting and looting, the colonial upper class just used rhetoric and their social wealth and power to harness that widespread discontent into a revolution that put themselves in power instead of the British that they had revolted against.
But once the British state was gone, the lives of the poor didn't improve. In fact, it often got worse, as the new colonial ruling class tried to squeeze even more money out of them then the British had, and often refused to pay veterans the money they were owed, which led to even more foreclosures and poverty.
So the discontent that had made poor farmers willing to fight the British now caused them to turn on the new ruling class as well. Throughout the country the mentality of revolt that proposed "no more courts, nor sheriffs, nor collectors nor lawyers." started taking hold. Such a mentality actually took over Rhode Island by legislative means, and Vermont was such a hot bead with it that it prompted the U.S. to go ahead and annex the territory in order to get a handle on things. And, most famously of all, it also prompted Shays Rebellion, where people tried to militantly take control of Massachusetts.
The Constitution was the response to such an environment. It was expressly created so that the new ruling class could create a stronger more centralized authority by which to keep control of the population, and to protect their power and wealth from the discontent of the people -- the very discontent and people who had fueled the revolution in the first place.
It is actually very parallel to what happened in Russia -- where a discontent populous had a revolution, but then Lenin and the Bolsheviks took over it and then constructed a more centralized and authoritarian state to protect themselves as the new ruling class from the very discontent that fueled the revolution that put them in power, and then they went back an rewrote the history to make it seem like they had created and led the revolution themselves.
Funny, no matter what color of flag they fly, authority and power always acts the same.