上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 380

[–]anotherSven 1507 ポイント1508 ポイント  (41子コメント)

Since birth, I tell you. I even insisted they use a hammer and sickle for the C-section

[–]Spidertech500 879 ポイント880 ポイント  (40子コメント)

This explains the brain damage

[–]chrassth_ 253 ポイント254 ポイント  (24子コメント)

S A V A G E

A

V

A

G

E

[–]shawarma_law 133 ポイント134 ポイント  (9子コメント)

hi im new is this a pepe

EDIT: confirmed as trump nazi symbol, pepe, thanks guys.

[–]chrassth_ 37 ポイント38 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I'm not sure I just see people do this a lot so I tried my hand at it and it seems to have worked though we can't be totally positive just yet

[–]HughJamerican 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm glad you said that, cuz I just assume everybody who does that knows some crazy obscure things about meme culture

[–]chrassth_ 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's a trial and error thing for me

Monkey see monkey do

[–]Crown118 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Im 12 and what is this

[–]_8ball_ 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (9子コメント)

S A V A G E

A V A G E S

V A G E S A

A G E S A V

G E S A V A

E S A V A G

[–]Jitnaught 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (3子コメント)

 S

SA

SAV

SAVA

SAVAG

SAVAGE

[–]shawarma_law 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (1子コメント)

This is called a stutter.

[–]chrassth_ 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Momma tickled his feet when he was a baby

[–]BurgerLaowai 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (14子コメント)

"I don't understand greed, so I want everyone with stuff I don't have to not have it..." - greed in the form of jealousy and wrath = communism

[–]ShamelessFeline 255 ポイント256 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Bet his 5th bday party was Karl Marx-themed and all the kids got a copy of Capital, vol I. in their goodie bags.

[–]quitrk 56 ポイント57 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Then they all clapped, while tears were streaming down their little faces.

[–]_tx 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Capital

That's actually a pretty good book

[–]RainWelsh 354 ポイント355 ポイント  (35子コメント)

I have access to rare footage of these discussions. Let me get you an excerpt.

"Tell me about the Indians again, daddy!"

"Sorry, Assbutt, daddy has to go to work."

"Why, daddy?"

"To make money, so he can pay for your toys!"

"I want a velociraptor."

Oh, wait, that's the whole thing. Eh.

[–]FeyWizard 78 ポイント79 ポイント  (25子コメント)

I used to want to be a velociraptor ...

... until I worked out what "extinct" meant.

[–]RainWelsh 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Follow your dreams, buddy, don't let a little thing like extinction tell you how to live your life.

Maybe update to a Utahraptor, though. Velociraptors are essentially lizard-chickens.

[–]FeyWizard 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Damned Texans, always got to have the biggest and most badarse ... oh, Utah. Well, same thing, yes?

I don't think they had invented Utah when I was smaller.

[–]Morella_xx 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Utah is the one full of Mormons.

[–]VicisSubsisto 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

So do utahraptors wear ties and ride bikes?

[–]FeyWizard 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh! Yes. I'm sure I knew that one. It's just that they all sound alike.

[–]OpinesOnThings 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Utahraptor is the jurassic park raptor. How old are you?

[–]FeyWizard 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Well, the wife liked trilobite stew but I never tasted any. I missed them by a few weeks and we didn't have room-sized chest freezers in those days.

[–]OpinesOnThings 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Oh grandads would be funner if they told stories about dinosaurs rather than sad wars

[–]IRENE420 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ohh cool!! (I just googled that)

[–]AgentFlynn 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Never lose your dinosaur!

[–]FeyWizard 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I can't. My home is too small for that.
I could lose the population of a medium-sized country in my garden.

[–]IKillYourPotatoes 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I believe in you buddy, you can do it

[–]FeyWizard 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thank you. I'm not sure the cosmos does.

[–]Justice_Prince 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

They try to trick you into getting excited about it by putting the word "stink" in there.

[–]FeyWizard 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I thought that was Chemistry? Some of the things we did with that one were ... interesting.

[–]lemurtarcat 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I used to want to be Yasser Arafat. Mostly because he was often on TV and thought he always had cool scarves.

[–]FeyWizard 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I never liked him. But I never liked Jimmy Savile or Idi Amin, either, not that I met any of the three but they always seemed to be unpleasant characters.

I did like Lady Penelope.

[–]Xperr7 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I wanted to be a Velociraptor even more after learning what extinct meant

[–]FeyWizard 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Perhaps it's just me but I rather disliked the idea of it applying to me in particular. It's a "this is dead boring" sort of thing.

[–]orestes1 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I used to want to be a velociraptor ...
... specially after I worked out what "extinct" meant.

[–]FeyWizard 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Cool. Also courageous. And sort of sweet.

[–]robbysaur 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (4子コメント)

I would have sold all the Native Americans for a pack of Yu-Gi-Oh cards as a four-year-old.

[–]0asq 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You know, some kids can "question capitalism" at like 5, but for the most part they have no idea what they're talking about and are just repeating their parents' view.

I remember teachers getting pissed at me in elementary school because I was making fun of the police, but I was just repeating the kind of shit my dad would rant about.

That's why it strikes me as tremendously narcissistic when a parent says "Today my toddler asked why we let racists run the county... so proud of them."

You're proud that they're repeating the ideas you told them without questioning or understanding them?

[–]Mike77321 306 ポイント307 ポイント  (62子コメント)

I hated when we 'went' to capitalism. It was so much better before when the entire world was communist.

[–]aqouta 95 ポイント96 ポイント  (1子コメント)

A return to mercantilism or feudalism or whatever you can call that shit before property rights.

[–]freakingalex 82 ポイント83 ポイント  (53子コメント)

You reminded me of this girl in one of my classes. She is firmly against capitalism and will bring literally any discussion back to it. Talking about virtue in English literature? Brings it back to capitalism. Talking about feminism in 18th century England? Brings it back to capitalism. Talking about the Renaissance? Capitalism. All capitalism, all the time. Everything is apparently intrinsically capitalist and therefore we should abolish it immediately. Oh, btw... Capitalism.

[–]MrWaffler 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (4子コメント)

My problem with 99% of the arguments I've seen against capitalism is that most nations don't use purely capitalist environments.

If you think the US market is a true capitalist market boy-howdy do I have a reality check for you.

In fact, most of our major changes against capitalism have been implementing the better aspects of other systems. The reason the United States has worked so well thus far, and hopefully will continue to, is because we compromise. We don't adhere ourselves to one standard, we melt the best aspects of multiple options into an alloy that's stronger than the sum of its parts. Imposing restrictions on businesses to benefit workers, minimum wages, monopoly control, medicare/caid, all of those things are staunchly anti-capitalist. Pretty soon we'll move to nationalized healthcare, UBI in the distant future, and a minimum wage that fluctuates based on inflation and current minimum costs of living. These things are all horribly out of line with capitalism. Yet we already implement similar social systems.

[–]jshiggy 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Individual controls the capital generated by others labor = capitalism, dont confuse free market with state influenced but it's all still capitalism.

[–]SamusCroft 37 ポイント38 ポイント  (45子コメント)

I have the same. A guy who clearly has no knowledge of commerce or why communism fails, arguing that communism is better. His side was always just going back to 'money only has the value we give it, I'm enlightened'. Yes. Yes it is. And the sky is blue. You still haven't convinced me, just because you read something in Tumblr.

Basically, fuck everyone who tries to push communism, trying to be edgy or different. Usually they have no real knowledge of the problems or solutions. Like they just skipped history.

[–]mainfingertopwise 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (4子コメント)

money only has the value we give it

"Fine, let's use gold and silver." Boom, roasted.

[–]Artyloo 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Mmm there's not a lot of gold to go around though. Maybe we could use little pieces of paper and say, like, one of these is worth 1/100 of a pound of gold?????? idk just an idea

[–]BillTheCommunistCat 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Maybe those pieces of paper could come in multiple amounts to make carrying a lot easier? That seems like it might work.

[–]Artyloo 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

well now don't be ridiculous

[–]mshm 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

But even under the gold standard it was largely only valuable because we chose that metal as our marker. There are loads of rare things we could have chosen. Those seemed to be chosen because they were pretty. Also, the gold standard scales horribly.

[–]mainfingertopwise 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Don't people realize that things like this - even if desirable - don't just "happen?" According to them, capitalism is part of everything, but their plan is to abolish it.

What happens to "everything" in the mean time?

[–]wildlifeisbestlife 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I always liked, "Capitalism is the single worst economic system we've ever come up with... except for every other economic system we've tried."

[–]TresChanos 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

We'll say that about the next one too. Wish someone would hurry up and invent it.

[–]2Fab4You 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You know there are other potential systems, right?

I think, IIRC, that Marx claimed all societies will inevitably go from hunter-gatherer to feudal to capitalist to socialist to communist system.

[–]mightbeabotidk 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

We peaked during feudalism :/

[–]Metropolis9999 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Feudalism was historically prior to capitalism.

So-called "Communist" attempts (not Communism at all) came hundreds of years after capitalism took root.

[–]im_thecat 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

We "went" to capitalism around the same time Washington "went" to Jamaica.

[–]LedZeppelin18 114 ポイント115 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Ah yes, I remember interrogating my parents about why we went to capitalism.

[–]FeyWizard 31 ポイント32 ポイント  (0子コメント)

My parents knew little. Interrogations yielded few useful results and became boring.
Aliens from the crashed ships were more fun.

[–]KingOfDavid 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I know you were there dad! I know you personally signed the papers agreeing we would all switch to capitalism. Why the FUCK did you do it dad???

[–]IConsumePorn 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Interrogating! Not just questioning or curious, but interrogating. This is one woke AF 4 year old.

[–]grimbley 41 ポイント42 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Did I say 4? I meant to say 40.

[–]KingOfDavid 56 ポイント57 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Haha I imagined a 40 year old man yelling up the stairs from his parents basement that he "can't get a job cuz fuck capitalism!"

[–]wraith20 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Are you talking about Bernie Sanders?

[–]Josephrules 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

He doesn't need to live in his parents' basement. He bought a nice beach house with all the money people donated and gave the rest to Hillary's campaign!

[–]swabianne 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (4子コメント)

[–]wolfman1911 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I don't know, he's claiming to not understand simple concepts like capitalism and greed. I know he's trying to say that he's 'above it all' but I would rather mark this as a candidate for r/iamverystupid.

Also, I don't know if I should be really surprised, or not at all, that that's an actual sub.

[–]Jhphysiker 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

People featured on r/iamverysmart often claim to be too smart to understand simple concepts that everyone understands at least at a base level. This person would probably claim that they spent five minutes trying to understand capitalism and greed but then became so bored by how beneath them it was that they never bothered to come back to it.

[–]wolfman1911 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I don't know if it's true, but I've actually heard that being easily bored is more a sign of low intelligence than high. I guess the presumption is that if you are really smart, you would be smart enough to find ways to keep yourself entertained.

[–]Jhphysiker 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, the only people who actually think these people are smart are themselves, so that would make sense.

[–]hamfraigaar 49 ポイント50 ポイント  (6子コメント)

I find it mildly amusing that he brags that he has questioned capitalism, since, like, forever, then he goes on to brag that not a single thing that he has learned in all that time has made it through his thick skull.

"I studied capitalism for 16 years. I learned literally nothing." That doesn't make you an expert on capitalism, that just means that the doctor hasn't diagnosed your learning disability yet.

Wow. A whole life wasted questioning capitalism, and he still doesn't grasp the basic concepts. That fucking sucks, man. I mean, don't get me wrong, I'm not a Viking in the middle ages, but I can imagine how awesome they must have felt going on conquests, raping and plundering. I understand it. And you kind of have to, in order to realize that you don't agree with it. "I hate capitalism! I don't understand what it is, but I fucking hate it! Why would anyone agree with something I can't comprehend?"

[–]player-piano 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (5子コメント)

well he doesnt say anything like that. he says he doesnt understand greed.

[–]KevWill 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (0子コメント)

He's so evolved. We have much to learn from this communist.

[–]IcecreamDave 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I believe this.

"I want a pony"

"We can't afford a pony"

"Why"

"We don't have the money"

"Why"

"Our jobs don't pay us enough money to make it affordable"

"Why"

"Our skills do no allow us to demand higher pay"

"Why"

"Because free markets require a consensual relationship between employers and employees."

"Why"

"Becuase that's how capitalism works"

"I hate capitalism! We should be like the Indians! Indians had ponies!"

[–]_Azonar_ 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

All these Einsteins who remember interrogating at 4 years young are just kids who were told one too many times that they were the "smartest little 4 year old they knew" by mommy and daddy.

[–]thekarmabum 62 ポイント63 ポイント  (29子コメント)

Capitalism is a pretty easy concept, you work for something, and people pay you for it.

[–]ReliablyFinicky 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (2子コメント)

4-year old cognitive milestones

Your 4-year-old should begin to recognize and name a few colors, starting with primary colors of red, yellow and blue

Your child will begin to identify numbers of objects and count from one to 10

Four-year-olds are also beginning to understand the concepts of "same" and "different."

Seems good.

[–]OmegaZero55 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

No, no. This is capitalist propaganda. 4-year-olds obviously know about the plight of the common man by age 4. Nap time is oppression!

[–]OvaltineShill 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I found a childhood photo of the person in question. Maybe this really did $100% happen?!?!

[–]Beagus 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Makes total sense that he'd know the complex history behind those issues at the wee age of 4, after all that is one of the first things you learn in preschool: how to count to 5, how to finger paint, and the trials and tribulations of the Native Americans in response to European immigration. That's baby stuff.

[–]Justice_Prince 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If he doesn't understand greed then wouldn't that mean that he also doesn't understand the flaws in capitalism?

[–]ATN-Antronach 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Bitch at 4 you barely understand the concept of ownership, let along greed.

[–]orestes1 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I used to interrogate my parents about capitalism, but then the CIA interrogated me about communism.

[–]awesomesprime 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I feel like this could be from /r/latestagecapitalism or /r/im14andthisisdeep because you know pretty much the same thing.

[–]crbowen44 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (7子コメント)

I find it funny that some of the best illustrations of greed overpowering a system is the sovialist regimes. Capitalism harnesses that basic human trait, socialism would have to run in the face of it.

[–]18aidanme 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

>implying USSR is socialist

[–]oraqt 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Humans are molded by their environment. We're greedy because mercantilism, capitalism, feudalism, etc. has always been a self-centered, watch-out-for-number one system. That's how it's needed to be, with scarce resources and many other hazards, but it's rapidly getting to the point where such selfishness will no longer be necessary. Most past socialisms collapsed because of infighting, outside pressure, and scarcity of resources, but this doesn't mean that socialism is not the next step economically. It just means that we haven't reached the stage where it is feasible, resource-wise.

[–]Artist_X 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (17子コメント)

TIL that capitalism, in all forms, equals greed.

[–]OrangeOctoberLibra 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (16子コメント)

It supports Greed better than any other economic system, yes.

[–]XkF21WNJ 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Well, it's more like an economic system supported by greed. Which is usually fine, except when you end up with greedy people in control of vital infrastructure.

Saying it 'supports greed' is a bit confusing, since unchecked capitalism clearly doesn't handle greedy people well.

[–]Artist_X 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (5子コメント)

The issue, like you mentioned, is when greedy people become in control of the infrastructure.

It's the crony capitalism where we have a government so large and run by corporations that they get to make all the rules.

Look at Sam Adams. They lobbied so that a "craft beer" could include up to 600,000+ bottles per month...year?

And now they are a national brand, which they wouldn't be if they held to the same standards as they used to be.

Likewise, when larger corporations and industries profit off of the laws and regulations passed that make smaller companies either go out of business or have to stop being competitive.

With the FDA passing laws on vaping, guess who know can AFFORD those regulations and push all the small companies out? Big tobacco, since they are getting into it, now, as well.

[–]XkF21WNJ 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

I agree that rent seeking is bad, although it's slightly unclear if it's an inevitable consequence of capitalism. Lenin seemed to think it is, most liberal capitalist think it's a consequence of excessive regulations.

The kind of problems I was thinking of when I said 'capitalism can't handle greed', was really more things like the way Comcast treats its customers, sure they also participate in rent seeking behaviour, but even without it they still wouldn't have any immediate competition. Only some large company like Google can even consider entering the same market, and even then I'm not sure Google Fiber could have been competitive if Comcast spent even a little on innovation.

[–]Artist_X 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Honestly, I hardly consider rent seeking a consequence of capitalism, since the only reason they need to do it is to fight current regulations. Lobbying, for instance.

Monopolies exist because of the government. Pure and simple. I can't go and immediately compete with Walmart, because I don't have NEAR the legal, regulatory, and tax-related finances to start a business of that size.

Governments and anti-trust groups like to say that monopolies would exist if it weren't for them, but that's simply not the case. They have made it nearly impossible to compete, to the point that anyone who CAN afford the excessive tax rates can, because they are large enough. Same goes for things like minimum wages.

Right now, you're seeing NUMEROUS companies in Washington state dropping like flies, because they cannot afford to pay their employees that much money. You know who can? They national, big-box neighbors who are supposedly the ones that people lobbied AGAINST.

I'll bring up the vaping scenario, again. I don't personally vape, so it doesn't affect me, but those of my friends who own vape cafes or even their manufacturers will have to stop producing or quadruple their prices, because the FDA is going to pass HUGE testing and sampling regulations that the only people who can afford to stay in business are the tobacco companies who will now take over the market.

Comcast dictating the area exists, because other companies can expand into that market due to regulations. The FCA and FCC alone will make sure that doesn't happen. Then you have the EPA and other environmental groups putting the stop on any further line digging.

Reduce regulations = less restrictive economy.

[–]XkF21WNJ 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

That's an interesting list of agencies to criticize. I mean it's possible that some of the regulations are excessive, but do you really want to argue that there's no need to prevent people from selling harmful drugs / food, interfering with public communication, or messing up the environment?

Also, all of your arguments kind of follow the same pattern of arguing that the economy of scale means that smaller businesses can't afford to follow as many regulations as large businesses, therefore any legislation at all reduces competition. However this doesn't address the problem that the economy of scale means that big companies will always have an advantage, and that some regulations are necessary.

[–]Artist_X 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

The hardest thing to imagine is a world in which people are willing to take their own risks.

Look at the myriad of companies who release a product that hurts someone. HUGE backlash, but because the government backs them with bailout or federal corporate insurance, it's no big deal. lookin' at you Samsung

Then look at the number of companies who have poor business practices, and people abandon them. They go out of business. Small, micro examples of the free market at work.

A company simply isn't going to create a product that will hurt people. It might have side effects, but I'm not talking about ZERO government here. I'm talking about people taking responsibility for their own local market.

Walmart wouldn't be as huge as it is, if smaller companies were allowed to compete.

(your second point) Well, that's a double edged sword. Same as gun control. You present a situation where SOME form of regulation could have stopped it. So you enact it. Then something else happens, and you make that regulation more strict. Then, you hear backlash from the rest of the population that's it's too hard to function NORMALLY, because purchasing a gun has now become so expensive, that those who would do it legally and morally no longer can do so.

Ideally, sure. I would LOVE a situation in which there was ZERO regulations on business. Would we have pollution? Sure, more than we do now? Maybe. But then again, the rest of the commissioning bodies would still exist. They would see that a company is dumping a lake, and people would stop supporting that business until they stopped.

In a COMPLETELY free market, the community would have actual power over companies. Yelp reviews would actually mean something, because there would be more businesses to choose from.

However, much like how I wish we didn't NEED a police force, we sadly, do. It would be a great world where 100% laissez faire capitalism existed, but until we get to the point of where people are terrified of something they can't pronounce, it will never be.

I can speak first hand from watching company after company fall apart, because of local, city, and state regulations constantly changing and making the business soak up costs. Watching my friends' businesses shrivel up, because new taxes, new restrictions on product testings, etc, etc.... my own mother had to stop making dresses for little girls (she sews), because of the testing regulations put on hand manufactured items. Would have cost her over $2k each BATCH of hand made dresses she made. Even if they were cut from the same yard of cloth.

Just to keep kids safe from lead.

Oh, China's reaction? Switching to cadmium.

BTW, VERY much so enjoying our discussion. Rare to find a civil conversation partner.

[–]Artist_X 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Whose greed? The people who spend the sweat, time, and money to MAKE money?

Or the politicians in other economic systems who simply have to pass laws, inflate their salary, jack up tax rates to justify making millions on state income, and cause anyone else to be poor?

In one system, you have to be an entrepreneur.

In the other, you just have to be in power.

[–]TedFartass 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

"I went to school, I did my homework, and at age 11 I audited my parents. Believe me, there were some discrepancies and I was grounded."

[–]Odoul 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

We call it personal responsibility. Socialists call it greed.

[–]sorenion 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I like how 80% of people who criticize capitalism don't even understand what communism is.

[–]FeyWizard 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (22子コメント)

Greed is easy to explain.
Imagine I have a car. I'm happy with it. I like it a lot, use it a lot and help friends and family go places by driving them around in it. I use my car for shopping trips because buying large loads makes each item cheaper and cars carry more than I could without it. I even go on holidays using the car.
That's just life.
If I see a motorcycle, boat, aeroplane, spaceship, starship, balloon, second home, motor-home, scooter, push-bike or pair of roller-skates and I want them, too, that also is just life. It is only sensible to want a large boat, a yacht to travel to places the car can't go and to carry the car so I can go places the boat can't visit.
It's the same principle with the aeroplanes, helicopters, fourth house, jet-ski and sno-cats. I need and want the skates so I can more conveniently get from the cars to the boat without walking too far, for example.
These are all normal things that I should want and probably need to complete my lifestyle.

However ...
If you are one of my lower level employees and you want a raise so your children don't suffer rickets from an inadequate diet then you are a selfish bastard and that is greed.

[–]aqouta 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (13子コメント)

I'm just trying to reduce the surplus population.

[–]FeyWizard 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (12子コメント)

If there are jobs needing to be done then there is no "surplus", just bodies that haven't been hired, yet.

Capitalism in action means total employment.

[–]player-piano 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

uh no, capitalism inherently has an underclass so the proletariat keep working so they dont become part of the underclass. without the underclass the proles wouldnt work

[–]FeyWizard 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, without the underclass, I would. I don't but I would if I really, really had to, which I never will - if I'm lucky.
Hell, I used to be the "underclass". I didn't like it. Too much like hard work without the rewards.
I feel sympathy for those who are hard done to.

[–]aqouta 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Are there no prisons? Are the union workhouse still in operation?

[–]FeyWizard 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Prisons are for offenders. Offenders are not officially employed. They may work and be paid but that is a minor consideration.
Workhouses have always been inefficient and expensive. They were also usually poorly managed and unproductive.
Keeping a supply of loose labour in the wild is cheaper and far more cost-effective - in that it doesn't actually cost Capital much if anything. The bridges they sleep under are already paid for.

[–]aqouta 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Through taxes I help to support the establishments I have mentioned -- they cost enough. Those who are badly off must go there.

[–]FeyWizard 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (6子コメント)

In some countries, you also support prisons by buying from mail-order catalogues and other schemes.
One reason why prison is seen as a good idea by Capitalists.

[–]aqouta 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (5子コメント)

That's not my business. It's enough for a man to understand his own business, and not interfere with other people's. Mine occupies me constantly.

[–]FeyWizard 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Good philosophy. Though if everyone followed it we'd have a rather dramatic reduction on government.

[–]aqouta 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

It's the even handed dealing if the world. Nothing that the world is harsher on than poverty and nothing people pretend to condemn so much as the persuit of wealth. It is wise to lose noble aspirations.

[–]IVIaskerade 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

3edgy

[–]FeyWizard 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Also the fundamental theorem of hypocrisy but that's in lecture two in the Psychohistory course.

[–]headphones66 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

didn't understand greed, still don't

Usually said by someone who still has their parents pay for everything. People get greedy once it's clear they need to be to survive.

[–]g10greg56 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Seems legit, most 4 year olds know what capitalism is and have opinions on it

[–]TonyFuckingDanza 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I can absolutely believe a 4 year-old said stupid shit .

I think I believe this one guys.

[–]Kokopuffdaddy 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What's not to understand about greed? People want things. It's actually that simple.

[–]zombie-rat 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This seems plausible to me, if he grew up in a socialist family which installed those beliefs from an early age.

[–]Begotten912 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If there's one thing toddlers and small children don't understand it's greed.

[–]Klumm 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Shit I didn't realise it was a simple as "hmm feudalism sucks"... "let's change it to capitalism" "ok" USA is now capitalist.

[–]NovaNardis 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm so smart I still think the same way I did when I was 4!

[–]digitalpizza 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah kids are pretty fucking stupid when you actually talk to them, same with some adults.

[–]Boy32Bit 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh, a 4 year old says capitalism sucks! Wow, we should really respect their opinion and completely change our entire economic system!

[–]Vicious43 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'd bet any amount of money that he still lives with his parents and has never had a job.

[–]Pannra 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (13子コメント)

Everyone is greedy, we're born greedy thanks to evolution. The squirrel that gives his nuts away before winter is a dead squirrel.

[–]OrangeOctoberLibra 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

ITT: "Because most of us live in a Capitalist Society, we shouldn't be anything else or think anything else".

[–]jb4427 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Socialists are the worst.

[–]wolfman1911 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (4子コメント)

We don't know for sure that he's a socialist. Given all that he's said, I think there is a fairly compelling argument that he's just not very smart.

[–]FReakily 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Let me explain this "greed" to you. You have access to the internet and a device to type that post. Not everyone has that, so you should give some of it up. Wait, what? That's ridiculous you say? Yes, yes it is.

[–]player-piano 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

yes your comment is ridiculous and shows a complete misunderstanding of the goals of socialism.

[–]Dallasphoto 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

And yet dangles the modifier leaving us to wonder if he was 4 or capitalism was 4...grammar, apparently not one of his gifts.

[–]TheSuperUserJj 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The great part of capitalism is you get to decide to be charitable or greed filled. Nobody forces you to be good and you only have yourself to blame if you don't live up to that standard you hold other to.

[–]BurgerLaowai 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sounds like some greedy capitalists dropped their kid on the head...

[–]BlackICEE32oz 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Rainbow Wolf strikes again.

[–]iiSisterFister 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Tbh there was a new kid back in like grade 6 who said he was a communist. Read Karl Marx and talked shit to us about it capitalism, while wearing his mass produced Che Guevara t-shirt from hot topic.

4 seems a little young for communism tho

[–]lydocia 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just because you don't have much greed in you, doesn't mean you don't absolutely excel at the other six deadly sins.

[–]MrRobotsBitch 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I tried talking to my 5 yo about some Aboriginal issues recently. His reply was "but mommy... today I ate all my dinner!"

[–]clexecute 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The late great rocky balboa once said, "if you know what you're worth go out and get what you're worth, but you've gotta be willing to take the hit."

[–]amnsisc 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is our toddler sleeping? Nah, he woke af.

[–]JHoff233 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

To be fair I remember being young and wondering why money exists. Like why can't people be nice and have everything be free

[–]legreenboat 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I didn't understand greed, still don't.

Because not understanding things makes you sound smarter!

[–]TheRoRo1971 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That greedy Eskimo's name? Anyone? Anyone?

[–]ashley_f50 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Next time don't just go and to carry the car so I don't really have anything to do literally everything that makes us human?

[–]Atotallyrandomname 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Poor ignorant bastard doesn't understand the free market system and profit incentive...

[–]j-awesome 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, well I read animal farm in 10th grade.

[–]Rocky_Bukkake 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

interrogate is a fancy way of asking why the natives got killed off. kids don't ask like that, they can seem authoritative and smart, but they just don't, lol.

if he interrogated, then i interrogated my parents about blues clues.

[–]phil670 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Eventually it would be the same standards as they used to want to be poor?

[–]_Cjr 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Probabaly said something like "why do you guys need jobs why can't we just hunt like the Indians?"

[–]Filifresh 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

"I understood a complex economic model/ principle at 4, yet I couldn't comprehend why someone would want to amass resources/power"

[–]Breubz 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This also belong in /r/iamverysmart

[–]plspirit 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

never understood greed, meaning s/he never wanted something she didn't have and never was afraid to lose something they had...

[–]VicisSubsisto 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

"I'm so woke I don't understand fundamental concepts of human psychology."

[–]the_calibre_cat 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No no, this one is entirely plausible.

[–]abusedgrapple 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

To be fair, saying he hasn't understood capitalism since he was 4 isn't that hard to believe, I mean I haven't understood women since birth hahaha... :(

[–]Draegur 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Watch out for THIS wild renegade!

Almost qualifies for /r/madlads (but not quite)

[–]BryanRK 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

He can run an interrogation on his family at the age of 4, but he can't understand the concept of greed as an adult? I'm starting to think there are aspects of his story that are untrue.

[–]miterpowersaw 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

He probably doesn't understand a lot of things.

[–]fukkmedaddy 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ugh, I almost reflex downvoted after reading that shit.

[–]thrashette 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

He meant 4 o'clock, duh.

[–]FkIForgotMyPassword 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I used to interrogate my parents [...], at 4.

He means he used to interrogate his parents at 4 o'clock. He was 32, back then.

[–]Arkeolith 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wow, someone developed laughably slowly. When the doctors used a stethoscope to listen to my heartbeat, they heard me say from inside my mother's womb, "I have deep misgivings about the Reagan administration's belief in the suspect field of trickle-down economics, as well as its insufficient action in response to the AIDS epidemic. Therefore, I've decided to endorse Michael Dukakis in the 1988 election, alas, I am not yet old enough to vote."

[–]Mr_A 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, Greed is a 1924 domestic epic directed by Erich von Stroheim and starring Gibson Gowland and ZaSu Pitts. What's not to understand?