They can't win this argument.

We had plenty of people inside.

We had even more people waiting outside to get in, but were blocked by asshole protesters.

We had a left-centric city, during a time of unrest, where people were being assaulted for openly supporting the President, and videos of domestic terrorists planning attacks -- all which would easily have swayed some people against attending in person.

Then on top of all that, we had the entire internet! Hundreds of millions of views across all the various YouTube streams, Twitter, Facebook, various websites hosting livestreams, the news sites, etc etc. -- all at a time when the internet has more users than ever.

We obviously had more viewers.

So when Sean Spicer gets up there and says exactly that, it's pretty fucking rich that they turn around and rag on him, pretending that he didn't include "and everyone online".

Then the pics: the two they use as "proof" are both misleading as fuck. The first was taken 3 hours before the Inauguration began, and the other was taken over an hour after it was finished. No photos during his speech? All those cameras, and not one had a picture of the crowd during the peak of the event? Hard to believe.

They've got nothing they can say. We were the underdog, we did really well despite that, and even better online. We smashed it, and they have to use misleading pics, and misrepresenting Spicer, to try to make a lame ass "point" about something that doesn't matter.