•
•

Self-promotion without contribution - A 'double standard' discussion (self.reddevils)

D1794Viva Ronaldo[M] が 投稿

Hi guys,

It's a rule on this sub that we don't allow people to spam their blog, YT channel, podcast, etc etc, without being an active member of /r/reddevils. We aren't robots you can use to gain clicks. Either join in with our other posts or you're not allowed to post your stuff. Most self-promotion gets downvoted anyway as it's easily recognized as such.

However, we've had many, many accounts recently promoting just their Youtube channel, and the videos they post are interviews, press conferences, TV discussions, etc. They get upvoted, but they're doing the exact same thing as the people spamming their blogs. They're just using us for clicks and attention.

What do you want to see allowed? It's basically creating a '1 rule for one, 1 rule for another' scenario if we let them stand and we'd like to be fair to everyone who wants to promote themselves. I personally don't like letting them stand, but seeing the upvotes i'd like to put it up to discussion. All videos do get to the sub eventually from active users, but slightly easier obtainable if we let them slide.

Thanks

全 12 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]LeorenthelaPogba 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

i think we should allow articles that promote discussion, like this one: http://statsbomb.com/2017/01/memphis-depay-why-it-hasnt-worked-out-at-man-united/

but things like top 10 goals or best de gea saves, from users who don't contribute shouldn't be allowed.

[–]D1794Viva Ronaldo[S] 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I don't think posting a link to an article written by yourself when you don't frequent the subreddit is done to create discussion.

If you actually wanted discussion, that's what self-posts are for. If you're an active member of the sub and stumble across this why not, but to write it, submit it, then fuck off once it's posted isn't done to generate anything but clicks to your site.

[–]LeorenthelaPogba 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

i ment that the article can create discussion , not that the poster did it for sake of it.

and if it does and the article is informative, so maybe don't delete it

[–]D1794Viva Ronaldo[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's the point of the post though. If it's being posted for self-promotion alone, but the actual post is informative or good content, should it stand? They're promoting themselves and using us for clicks but the content itself aint that bad.

[–]GourangaPlusPlusPartial to Martial 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The reddit 10% rule is a great rule of thumb.

If self-promotion is under 10% of a users contribution then it's allowed, if not then get rid

[–]parton90Football, bloody hell! 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It really irks me when people contribute nothing and just spam their sites/videos across multiple subs. If the primary account isn't contributing a decent amount on a regular basis then they should be removed/banned.

If users who regularly contribute are then posting the videos further down the line then, imo, the content needs to be relevant or to be removed. As mentioned on another comment, the stuff like "10 De Gea saves" being posted randomly on a Tuesday morning really doesn't contribute anything and looks like it is often being done just to garner upvotes.

EDIT - I appreciate the last bit might be a little more difficult to police.

[–]TryxtiraBlind 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've actually thought a lot about this. I really like watching the press conferences and have at times found very small Youtube channels that post it through this subreddit. I feel a little dirty for giving them views, but I also really want the content.

Could we perhaps create some sort of an "official" channel that posts press conferences?

I know I'm a low poster, I lurk a lot. Sorry!

[–]Creamy_Goodne55 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I find it funny that Howson has caught on and posts about 5 posts around the time he wants to promote his next video and then disappears until the next one is out.

I dont think we should allow any of them to be self posted. If someone from the sub finds it, thinks its interesting and posts it then fine. If its quite clearly either a upload bot or a person just uploading his videos then hes trying to force discussion on his videos and it shouldnt be allowed.

Its the exact same reason we have the tier system. You dont see Ducker or Ogden posting their own content on here, we know its (generally) reliable so we go and get it.

[–]mu_37Ibrahimovic 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

how about something like a pinned comment in the post match thread saying to put the interviews and analysis here?

i come here a lot for those kind of videos, but can understand the mods point of view here too.

so i feel like that would be a good solution.

[–]DutchTouristDaley Blind 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think the rule of self promotion is good as it is. This is a community of users, so people who post here should be users as well. What /u/MrStephenHowson does is self promotion, but he also comments on other threads, and responds to questions on his own content. I don't have a problem with that. Video's of press conferences are interesting, but there'll be users who post that content as well. If you want to make sure that your own version is posted on /r/reddevils make it a point to be somewhat active here. Make a summary of the most important quotes in a comment for example.

[–]bagombos_enough_boxFat Ronaldo 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

If the primary point of them posting is self-promotion, let's fuck it off.

However, I have no problem with people positing genuinely interesting content.

If someone posts an HD video of a full pre- or post-match press conference, for example, I couldn't care less whether or not it's branded.

[–]D1794Viva Ronaldo[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Their primary point is self-promotion. A lot of the accounts spam their videos across many different subreddits. They don't even comment anything. but sometimes that spam is an interview etc etc.