Ben Spielberg

@BenSpielberg @kylegriffin1 @wikileaks that is hardly an exortation to tax return whistleblowers. Very general.

@wycats It directly asks for them.

@BenSpielberg the level of vigor was just a liiiiiittle bit different.

@wycats I mean, not very. And to the extent it is, a little more emphasis now that he's actually president seems warranted to me.

@BenSpielberg I'm amazed you're saying this. It doesn't take a conspiracy theory to have noticed Assange's tweets re Hillary had a diff tone

@wycats You're conflating tone with content. I agree their feed was much more negative re Hillary.

@BenSpielberg OK I think we agree now. I think the tone has an effect on what is reported.

@BenSpielberg @kylegriffin1 @wikileaks Surely they have them but Putin hasn't given the green light yet?

@mikebutcher I hope that's a joke.

@BenSpielberg @mikebutcher WL refused to leak RNC documents & disseminated Clinton conspiracy theories @wikileaks are Russian Shills

@TheSoulmad Do you have any evidence whatsoever for that statement?

@TheSoulmad Can you be more specific about what part you're referencing? It's super long.

@TheSoulmad (Their publication of the Podesta emails was perfectly in line with their mission; I'm asking for evidence re your RNC claims.)

@BenSpielberg @kylegriffin1 There were #TrumpLeaks out during this past Summer on @GlobalRevLive but @wikileaks ignored them

@rousseau_ist I'm not sure what you're referencing, but why would they publish something that somebody else already had published?

@BenSpielberg to give it equal exposure In case you never followed @wikileaks - that's all they do is distribute other ppl's work

@rousseau_ist @wikileaks No, they publish things that haven't been released elsewhere.

@BenSpielberg @wikileaks Ummm https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/823337447912312832 … Other people's content all day everyday

@rousseau_ist @wikileaks There's a difference between their Twitter feed & what they publish. You're critiquing them not tweeting about what you published?