140
141

What a novel idea. (i.redd.it)

HEADPOCKET が 投稿

全 29 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]andkongrero.com 41 ポイント42 ポイント  (22子コメント)

Women paying for shit? That's sexist! Make the government take money (mostly from men) and that's equality or something.

[–]Argosy37Anarcho-Capitalist 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (19子コメント)

And this right here is the problem. Men are the primary income earners and taxpayers, and women are the primary beneficiaries of the welfare state. Try being homeless as a man and see how much "welfare" you get.

[–]BornOnFeb2ndIf roads are the cost of government, I'll walk. 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Y'know... now that you mention it... I work in a major city.... in the...3-4 years I've been down there, I think I've only seen a single homeless female... the rest are dudes.

[–]ironclad_capillariesTruth is written in the stone. 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Got any birthday plans yet?

[–]theorymeltfool 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Don't forget men in the military.

[–]Helassaid/r/GoldandBlack 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I hear the real victims of war are the women, though.

[–]DaYooperVoluntaryist 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I'm not disagreeing, but do you have a source I can show to other folks?

[–]Argosy37Anarcho-Capitalist 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

UK source.

US government study (PDF).

Tidbits from the US study:

Adult men were heavily overrepresented in the homeless population. More than three-fifths of homeless adults were men (64.0 percent) compared to 48.7 percent of the overall population and only 39.9 percent of the poverty population. The large proportion of adult men in the shelter system probably reflected several factors. Single men who are poor may be more vulnerable to homelessness because of large gaps in the Unemployment Insurance program and because the largest safety net programs, such as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and Social Security, are for families or elderly people.

Basically, if you're a homeless woman just pop out a baby and you'll be taken care of.

[–]DaYooperVoluntaryist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Thank you!

[–]Argosy37Anarcho-Capitalist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Please note that the US source only looks at men in shelters. If you look at men on the streets it's clear at least 90% are male, but there's been almost no research on these men (unlike in the UK). I would allege it's because no one cares about them.

[–]TelcoBro 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (8子コメント)

For real, all they've done is create humans and birth them, which really isn't that big of a deal

[–]IEngineerShtuff 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (5子コメント)

It's only been done 100 billion times or so.

[–]TelcoBro 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Terrible comparison. The frequency of something doesn't make it any easier. Next time you see a pregnant gal, go tell her that what she's dealing with has happened a bunch of times before, so it should be no problem for her

[–]Argosy37Anarcho-Capitalist 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Next time you see a coal miner, tell him his job isn't really that tough - it's been done countless times before.

I'm sorry, but motherhood is of laughable difficulty compared to the dangerous jobs so many men do on a daily basis just to survive.

[–]IEngineerShtuff 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I didn't compare it to anything. Birthing a human has literally happened about 100 billion times.

[–]TelcoBro 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

So why did you say it? To to not make a point?

[–]IEngineerShtuff 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes of course, a woman who births the 100,000,000,001st child must be very brave to tread such uncharted waters.

[–]Argosy37Anarcho-Capitalist 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Motherhood, the most "difficult" job on the planet.

[–]TelcoBro 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I love Bill Burr, I listen to his podcast every week. But he just had his first kid. He's far down the list of people I'd seek an opinion from, on this subject anyways.

[–]lkmlkmsfddf -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Using 'not enough benefits' argument while calling yourself an ancap... not even surprised.

[–]Argosy37Anarcho-Capitalist 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't think anyone should be given benefits. I'm just pointing that the government treats people unequally. Yet another reason there shouldn't be one.

[–]Pc_RetroAnti-Communist 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

In New Zealand Women as a group pay no taxes. I wouldn't be surprised if it was like that in other western countries.

[–]andkongrero.com 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

the closest that the average woman will come to having a positive fiscal incidence is when she is at minus $50,000 around 55 years of age.

Yeah, but men spread their legs on public transportation. Muh reparations!

[–]crbiker. 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

And instead of being snarky and everyone mailing $50 donations to PP in Mike Pence's name, they should just do it in their own. If they did that, they'd never have to worry about federal oversight again.

[–]s1h4d0w 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Pay $150 once? A year? A month? And if they gave it once, for what period could they fund it?

[–]iamweseal 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

1 year. A cursory Google search for PP yearly budget, and simple math could tell you that.

[–]StatesidemonkAnarcho-Capitalist -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

But then it wouldn't be free.

/s

[–]Pc_RetroAnti-Communist 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Implying that these women actually think.

[–]lkmlkmsfddf -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The amount of autistic, neckbearded self-love in this thread is hilarious.