114
115

Seriously? Let's talk about this. (i.reddituploads.com)

HeyJude21 が 投稿

全 57 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]HeyJude21[S] 160 ポイント161 ポイント  (29子コメント)

  • She wants women to be banned from entering schools and college campuses.

  • She wants women banned from polling places on Election Day.

  • She wants you to pay a fee to the state before you carry a woman on your person.

  • She wants some women banned simply because they look too scary.

  • She wants women banned from all airports.

[–]38SSM 47 ポイント48 ポイント  (9子コメント)

I actually agree with her...

In that I think full autos, short barrels, and silencers should not be regulated any different than any other guns, and gun-free zones should be eradicated.

[–]mrspuff202 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (7子コメント)

I mean, a business should be able to declare themselves a gun-free zone. They're a free market enterprise and should be able to declare themselves a gun-free zone if they so please, as well as whatever a free zone as they please.

Government institutions are case by case (you don't want civilians carrying guns in the White House or courthouses) but most should be fine.

Public areas, no gun free zones.

[–]38SSM 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Perhaps. But then again I already ignore all disarmament zones not enforced by metal detectors, so it's of little relevance to me.

[–]NoShit_94 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't know, that seems pretty good to me.

[–]Myte342 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Along with that... if a private enterprise declares themselves to be a gun free zone, they should then have taken responsibility for their patrons safety. As such... if something happens in which an armed citizen could have stopped it and the company refused to allow them such, and failed to protect them in lieu... they pay the price the same as anyone else who fails to responsibly keep those they are tasked with protecting safe (like parents or hospice workers etc etc).

[–]mrspuff202 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

If you feel unsafe at a "gun free zone" business, you don't need to patronize their business. It's really simple as that. Not every Domino's needs to have a tornado shelter. You take risks when you leave your house every day. Entering that business is a risk and if you don't want to take that risk, don't go.

[–]Myte342 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Bad analogy I think... a business won't have a policy specifically preventing you from protecting yourself and your loved ones from tornadoes.

Another analogy/thought process for you... if you slip and fall in a business (or otherwise become hurt) because of negligence on their part, whether by happenstance or policy, they are legally responsible in a law suit you put against them. My previous comment simply falls in line with this same line of reasoning: if they have a policy that creates an unsafe environment and someone gets hurt/maimed/killed because of that policy they should be held responsible... even if it's a policy about guns.

[–]shanuluGreedy capitalists get money by trade. Good liberals steal it. 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You can control an icy sidewalk, you can't control people.

[–]Meih_Notyou 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think my gay neighbors should have the right to protect their pot garden with machine guns the day after their marriage tbh

[–]DiabolicollyRandom 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

She wants women to be banned from purchase by felons?

[–]Zsm54 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think everyone is already banned from purchasing women, the problem is that it won't stop the criminals that want to obtain a women illegally from doing so!

[–]nothabs 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Yes, this person is stupid.

However, the overwhelming majority of people marching yesterday would not agree with this sign. I certainly don't.

[–]JustDoinThings 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (8子コメント)

What would they agree with? Why were they 'marching'?

[–]nothabs 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Many of them actually agree with Libertarian ideology and were marching to protect their civil liberties to do acts such as burning the American flag or having an abortion in their own state. Note that they weren't asking for either of these things to be done with government money -- the majority just want them to be legal to do in the first place.

[–]mrandish 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (3子コメント)

If that's what many of the marchers were marching for it's unfortunate that none of the speakers were able to articulate those as central themes.

I believe that Trump is every bit the statist that HRC would have been and equally as terrible/dangerous as her, just in somewhat different directions, however this protest was a muddled mess in terms of communicating any coherent message.

[–]techraven 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I've yet to get an answer otter then women's rights is what Saturday was about from my friends.. Like, thanks that clears it up.

[–]viirinvoluntaryist 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

It can't get more specific because they don't know what the specifics are. Who could name a right that men have that women don't? The only answer you could get would be something about the mythical wage gap, or else something about abortions being taken away... In which case perhaps they should have held a pro-choice rally instead of the nebulous protests they had that evidently no one understood.

[–]zippityd0dah 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Some would say they were "marching for women's rights around the globe". Yet, one of the organizers is pro-Sharia Law (http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=275_1485108178&comments=1)

And this mantra of "women are oppressed in America" is beyond absurd. Unless you think "oppression" means you must take responsibility for your own actions (such as, birth control).

[–]eletherosGun toting social, sexual, and political deviant 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Many of them actually agree with Libertarian ideology

You have got to be kidding me. There is no possible way you're that disconnected from reality.

[–]Toothspitignorant 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

LOLA was there, Reason highlighted them. Reality strikes back!

[–]zippityd0dah 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Note that they weren't asking for either of these things to be done with government money

They protest the idea of defunding Planned Parenthood (by revoking tax payer dollars from their subsidies). - http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/participants-in-seattle-womens-march-say-next-step-is-political-action/ ; http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2017/01/23/womens-march-organizer-were-going-to-make-sure-trump-follows-through/

[–]viirinvoluntaryist 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sadly it's more than one stupid person... This is the 3rd picture of a person (all different people) holding a variant of this sign that I have seen, and I haven't been seeking them out.

[–]eletherosGun toting social, sexual, and political deviant 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

She wants to be locked in a safe, on the chance that children (who don't live there and have no right to be there) might break into the house and steal her.

[–]ninjaluvrlibertarian party 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, that sign is ridiculously stupid.

[–]NoShit_94 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Haha and they say women aren't sensible.

[–]silver-saguaro 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (1子コメント)

All my guns are locked up.

[–]Myte342 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

All my guns are silenced.

[–]jikachu2 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I genuinely don't understand what rights women think they currently do not have. The 19th Amendment was ratified in 1920. The Equal Pay Act was passed in 1963. If I thought women were being treated unequally under the law I would march too, but I don't get it.

[–]brody24 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They want 3rd term abortions, birth control coverage as a requirement in ACA, and pro women discrimination in the work force.
-- Regarding the first one, I think abortions should be legal through 4-5 months (though personally I could never do it) but this is straight murder.
-- Regarding birth control, I haven't heard any men complaining about their condoms not being covered.
-- And for non equal pay, just fuck off. Far more often than not, women win the the tie breaker for a promotion/raise just because of their gender. The same for non-asian minorities. Just look at Silicon Valley going completely out of their way to hire under qualified minorities because people were complaining about the lack of non-white/non-asian diversity. Take a look at the ethnic breakdown of the top CS students, then tell me that hiring mostly Asians and whites is racist...

[–]trytoinjurememoral truth doesn't exist 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (2子コメント)

She wants me to have a right to own her.

Now I understand why they sympathize with Islam.

[–]mrandish 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Building on your Islam theme, there's also no minimum age a gun has to reach before you can take it to bed with you.

[–]saxophonefartmasterConservative Libertarian 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I like my women like my guns- Black, scary, made mostly of plastic, and shoved under my bed.

[–]thexeno1987 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I wonder how many gun laws she can rattle off.

[–]danteguy 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I dream one day people would stop being this degenerative

[–]YMDBass 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yea...I too hope to one day own a fully automatic woman...this sign is as stupid as the "make America Mexico again" signs

[–]8qDNVdUonwJ2nwjPk 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (3子コメント)

She knew enough people would think it's a "clever" sign, I've seen it a couple of times on social media

[–]alpha_tango_victor 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yes, she spent a lot of time trying to come up with a sign that she thought was clever enough to get shared on social media. It's not a factual or intelligent sign, but the it'll fire up the sheeple masses on her side.

[–]glastAT 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I want to believe this about the free tampons one too. Like she just thought of the most ridiculous sign that most women would not call her out on and succeeded.

[–]alpha_tango_victor 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I see some ridiculous shit shared on Facebook, sometimes by people who I assumed are reasonably intelligent. I often ask myself if they actually believe the nonsense or if they're just trying to get the attention of the ignorant.

[–]Dillfaro 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

She thinks with her heart and not a brain. There is not much of a difference between her and most people at these rallies.

[–]BigAl265 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's being pretty generous, I don't believe there was any thinking done here at all.

[–]WalterWallcarpeting -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I do know that a couple friends, whose intelligence I respect and with whom I can agree to disagree, who were at rallies. Also, my wife's friend who works as a researcher at CERN was at one. So there are exceptions.

[–]ReasonReaderHard Line Libertarian 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, seen it. Stupid sign is stupid.

[–]falk225 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Maybe she is trying to say that she wishes to be cherished and desired as much as guns. I know my wife struggles with this sometimes. "Why do you need another hand gun? Am I not enough for you?"

[–]youkai1 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

She wants half the country to pursue Common Sense Restrictions on women.

[–]KingSteevys 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

She wants to be locked in a safe.

[–]pacjaxAP4GOP 2018 make r/libertarian libertarian again 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

God people we fucking understand that private entitys should be allowed to be gun free if they want let us complain for fucks sake without someone trying to out-libertarian us

[–]Relevationsminarchist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

So would 'common sense' woman control entail banning any obese person?

[–]rmander4 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

People with mental disabilities are not allowed to have women?

[–]charlietango13 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Guns have no rights. People have rights.

[–]sweYoda 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

2nd amendment? Every man has the right to carry a woman. I wonder if the government will provide the women for every man. Joking.

[–]Sympathy_for_the_FO -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's silly, guns don't make sandwiches.