全 147 件のコメント

[–]tuseroni [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

isn't this a meta thread...i'm on to you OP...

[–]Drexelhand [スコア非表示]  (22子コメント)

i'm lost in layers of cringe for both the disguised caricature and artist that drew this. fucking why?

[–]Scattaca [スコア非表示]  (15子コメント)

The culture war of memes between SJWs and the alt-right is the most important struggle of our generation.

[–]yungvibegod [スコア非表示]  (14子コメント)

Both sides are fucking fascists

[–]IndigoCup [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

Neither side is fascist

[–]flameoguy [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Fuck Mussolini and fuck the national syndicalists.

[–]Niekisch [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

National-syndicalism hasn't been relevant since the '30s. Might as well say, "Fuck the sans-cullotes."

[–]VonFreeman [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

why bring Mussolini into this?

[–]ClashTenniShoes [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Yeah what did he ever do to anyone?

[–]Variety-Gamer [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

What didn't he do is the real burn. He didn't recreate the roman empire, he didn't win the battle of Africa, and he didn't beat back the allied invasion of Italy.

What a loser.

[–]aef823 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Both sides are fucking faggots

FTFY.

Seriously, waiting for the inevitable orgy that'll probably happen. It'll be horrible to watch. Maybe more than A Serbian Film.

[–]SNCommand [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

and artist that drew this

Why? It's a good caricature and concern trolling is a problem for all groups, you think the Bernie Sander sub enjoyed all the Trump supporters who came there to constantly shit on Clinton? Or the Clinton supporters who came there to shit on Trump and protected Clinton?

[–]hammysauswers [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

There were relatively no "Clinton supporters" on Reddit. Honestly, I don't understand why people from the_Donald always talk about "Clinton supporters". They didn't exist...

Where did you see Clinton supporters besides her sub? I never saw a single one on the_Donald or Sanders subs. Not once

[–]citizenuziAccurate [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Saying that you're going to vote for her does in fact make you a supporter, whatever your rationale for that vote may be. There were plenty of people on here (Reddit, not this sub) saying they'd vote for her rather than Trump, although the loudest ones would be on all the retarded 'progressive' subs.

[–]hammysauswers [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It's just kinda misleading to put the AntiTrump voters in there. I don't mean "misleading" as in you guys are lying or trying to push a false narrative at all, I just think of Trump and Sanders supporters as wanting their candidate to win. The "Clinton supporters" (again, just on Reddit) were almost exclusively wanting the opposing candidate to lose.

[–]SNCommand [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Oh there are Clinton Supporters, or I guess more correctly to say was now that she is luckily banished

Just take a look at /r/politics posts 3 months ago

[–]Drexelhand [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Why?

because it betrays an embarrassingly paranoid insecurity.

concern trolling is a problem for all groups

is it? i don't give it much thought.

[–]kevo7777 [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

"Some shit band nobody ever heard of." lol

[–]ThrasymachianJustice [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

I have a shit tattoo of a band nobody ever heard of :(

Can I still be a normal person?

[–]frankencastle99 [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Name it faggot. Somebody here has to know it

[–]ThrasymachianJustice [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Oh I suspect a few would. Nothing special or unique about the Blue Oyster Cult Cross, or the King Crimson Larks Tongue Symbol.

Unabashedly a fan of 70s rock.

I bet it would trigger the dude who drew the original image though

[–]Gibusmann [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

the King Crimson Larks Tongue Symbol.

Not getting a tattoo of the Death Grips hard cock cover

FUCKING NORMIEEEEE

[–]RockDrill [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

King Crimson rocks. Awesome tattoo automatically.

[–]vkgfx [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

King Crimson Larks Tongue Symbol

Nobody would know it? King Crimson is part of the hipster talking points starter kit for young boys and girls.

i love their adrian belew lineup though

[–]Chimichimichangus [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

Disagree with SJWs and they call you a misogynistic alt rightist. Disagree with the alt right and they call you a cuckolded SJW. Yeah, definitely no difference between you guys. It is hard to be a "normal person", because the moment you disagree with the biased extremist you previously agreed with on one point, all hell breaks loose.

You even do the same shit SJWs do in this case as well. They paint you as the other extreme if you disagree with them. Please do realize that human decency does exist, albeit it's rare.

[–]Martaway [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Even when he sees himself in the OP he cant break from his talking point of anti sjws being the same as sjws. Bot?

[–]Chimichimichangus [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Even when I just explained why you are similar to SJWs, you couldn't refrain from proving my point.

[–]Niekisch [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Disagree with a "normal person" and they call you an SJW or an alt rightist.

[–]Chimichimichangus [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

How do you disagree with a "normal person"? "Nah all niggers should be lynched" or "kill all men"?

You are probably one of those if that's the case.

[–]AutoModerator[M] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hey now, there's no need for such coarse language! Please use the word 'negro', which has historically been the respectful term for chocolate Americans.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]Theelout [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

there is no such thing as a middle ground. To defeat the left, right wing extremism is the only way. Down with the Democracies!

[–]Hrotiz [スコア非表示]  (24子コメント)

"Someone calls me out on retarded behaviour/ways of thinking? Better call him an SJW."

[–]harkku [スコア非表示]  (19子コメント)

Calling them an SJW isn't the point of the pic, it's pointing out that they're thinly veiled concern trolls.

[–]Hrotiz [スコア非表示]  (12子コメント)

Except they're probably not really trolls but people who call for nuance (aka objective reality). OP just calls them trolls because they're breaking through his us-vs-them fantasies.

[–]harkku [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

The whole point is to try push mods into curating content and remove things they don't like.

If you want safe, 'nuanced' cringe, /r/cringepics exists.

[–]CATHOLIC_EXTREMIST [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The whole point is to try push mods into curating content and remove things they don't like.

Exactly, it's straight out of Saul Alinsky's book Rules for Radicals.

If your opponents have a principle, push them on it to unreasonable levels make them break it. For example, if your opponent says they respond to every letter people send them, flood their office with tens of thousands of letters until they have to admit the can't respond to them all.

Alinsky's book was very influential in leftist politics from the 70's onwards. Of course, he was just compiling rules he had learned as a social agitator in the 60s

[–]Hrotiz [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

The whole point is to try push mods into curating content and remove things they don't like.

In that case, nevermind what I said. I'd rather have a free market of ideas where we're free to criticize things than a place with heavy moderation and removal of content.

[–]MattTheBlack [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Thank you. Finally someone who gets it even if you don't like the content of most post

[–]RedPillDessert [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

That's why I love this sub. I know about 50-75% of you would disagree with my alt-right stance, but I know that you'd always give me a voice in the same way I'd fight to give the cuckiest of cucks a voice too.

[–]Extermos [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Except the content is already being indirectly curated by the mods, through their attempts to alienate users. With all the "SJW faggot" and other edgy flairs that they regularly place on people who express any opinions that are remotely anti-right, as well as the shit in the sidebar, the mods are intentionally pushing away anyone who they disagree with politically. As a result the sub (which was created to be neutral) has become an echo chamber of edgy altright teens where anything remotely anti-left gets upvoted to the top regardless of whether it's actually cringe.

[–]harkku [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Except the content is already being indirectly curated by the mods

Calling someone a faggot is not the same as removing posts and banning users.

Stop trying to blur the line between words and actions.

As a result the sub (which was created to be neutral)

Lol, it was created to get away from the ridiculous overmoderation of /r/cringepics. Hence 'cringeanarchy' and the rules that mention cringepics mods.

[–]Extermos [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Calling someone a faggot is not the same as removing posts and banning users.

Stop trying to blur the line between words and actions.

I didn't say it's the same but you'd have to be retarded to not understand how moderators of a sub intentionally insulting and publicly ridiculing one group of users while praising another group would discourage the former group from participating and diminish their presence without having to actually take "concrete" action against them. Banning and deleting posts are not the only ways to censor a subreddit.

Lol, it was created to get away from the ridiculous overmoderation of /r/cringepics. Hence 'cringeanarchy' and the rules that mention cringepics mods.

I meant neutral in the sense that no specific type of content is favored or discouraged, as opposed to cringepics which tries to get rid of "mean-spirited" posts.

[–]Portismeg [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I looked through the creator's history and the sub's origins are that it was made mostly as an alternative posting venue to the other cringe subs because of their rules. The creator's last comment before making the sub was also in /r/whiterights so the modship at least seems to be consistent.

Chances are that the rules in other cringe subreddits led to this subreddit getting a lot more attention and an influx of more neutral subscribers than it started with.

[–]potatoslaughter [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

If the mods wanted to be truly anarchist (in the "spirit" of the word), they wouldn't be advertising their own politics in the sidebar or with this sticky. They'd let the users sort it out. I prefer not to have the mods of a sub whose banner has MLP diaper smut tell me their political ideology.

Goddammit, this is a place for Sonic the Hedgehog MS paint porn and hamplanets asserting their attractiveness. That's the cringe that would have been moderated at r/cringepics. Pure, unadulterated degeneracy.

[–]CrackFerretus [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

If the mods wanted to be truly anarchist

They don't

[–]mendicantbias343 [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Or perhaps left wing politics used to be actually pretty decent and was hi-jacked in recent years by identity politics and narcissism.

Then some other people obviously found fun in arguing against and making fun of them and thus the opposite spectrum was created.

I mean, I browsed 4chan for a decade and then it became a cesspool in 2012+ from the constant incessant posting about Feminists, SJWs and so on. It was amusing at first but then I realized that the demographic was shifting.

Not to mention one of my favorite political commentators before he died was Christopher Hitchens who was a left-leaning person. And no one could call him politically correct. But he had this to say:

Beware of identity politics. I’ll re-phrase that: have nothing to do with identity politics. I remember very well the first time I heard the saying “The Personal Is Political.” It began as a sort of reaction to the defeats and downturns that followed 1968: a consolation prize, as you might say, for people who had missed that year. I knew in my bones that a truly Bad Idea had entered the discourse. Nor was I wrong. People began to stand up at meetings and orate about how they felt, not about what or how they thought, and about who they were rather than what (if anything) they had done or stood for. It became the replication in even less interesting form of the narcissism of the small difference, because each identity group begat its subgroups and “specificities.” This tendency has often been satirised—the overweight caucus of the Cherokee trans-gender disabled lesbian faction demands a hearing on its needs—but never satirised enough. You have to have seen it really happen. From a way of being radical it very swiftly became a way of being reactionary; the Clarence Thomas hearings demonstrated this to all but the most dense and boring and selfish, but then, it was the dense and boring and selfish who had always seen identity politics as their big chance.

Anyway, what you swiftly realise if you peek over the wall of your own immediate neighborhood or environment, and travel beyond it, is, first, that we have a huge surplus of people who wouldn’t change anything about the way they were born, or the group they were born into, but second that “humanity” (and the idea of change) is best represented by those who have the wit not to think, or should I say feel, in this way.

The problem is, those that have gotten into anti-SJW bullshit will fail to see that this paragraph speaks about them as well.

But yeah, I'm a concern troll / SJW in disguise.

[–]harkku [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Or perhaps left wing politics used to be actually pretty decent and was hi-jacked in recent years by identity politics and narcissism.

Identity politics has been a core factor of the left since the 70s.

I mean, I browsed 4chan for a decade and then it became a cesspool in 2012+ from the constant incessant posting about Feminists, SJWs and so on. It was amusing at first but then I realized that the demographic was shifting.

4chan was always a counterculture cesspool, you only noticed when it became counter to your culture.

The problem is, those that have gotten into anti-SJW bullshit will fail to see that this paragraph speaks about them as well.

You're feeding into identity politics in exactly the same way right now though.

[–]Pirozhki [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

left wing politics used to be actually pretty decent and was hi-jacked in recent years by identity politics and narcissism.

Yeah back in the 1630s. It's been a garbage fire for more than a century.

[–]e105beta [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I'll give them dawn of the 20th century at least. Labor laws are a good thing.

[–]POOLYMOND [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

SJW is too mainstream. Shill is a better word for them now.

[–]SpartanNitro1 [スコア非表示]  (10子コメント)

Are the mods going retarded?

[–]Heideqqer [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Yes, this place has always been socialist wonderland like the rest of reddit. The mods here used to delete all hate speech, now they are posting it themselves.

[–]RedPillDessert [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The mods here used to delete all hate speech

Really? I doubt that.

[–]ItshighblackbeardFaggot [スコア非表示]  (14子コメント)

Oh god you faggots found this picture

Literally whenever some asshole who acts exactly like an SJW and gets Called out they post this.

But I'm not an SJW since I am not offended by the word faggot : ^ )

[–]whiplash588 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Why can't these conservative faggots realize that they actually are as bad as the SJW faggots? What happened to calling out bullshit or pointing out cringe for the sake of calling out bullishit or pointing out cringe? Where is the sub for level-headed moderates who think both ends of the spectrum are fucking embarrassing?

[–]Peeves22 [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

[–]flameoguy [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

inb4 some triggered 'white nationalist' comes in and says its unfair to compare them to the Nazis

[–]Waitingforaline [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

DAE LE HITLER xD

That's you, fag. That's you

[–]flameoguy [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

DAE LE GODWIN :PP

That's you, fag. That's you.

[–]HarryTheLizardWizard [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Posting political whining on a cringe sub? Pretty ironic ain't it mods?

In all seriousness though, stop being faggots, and keep the political shit to your political subreddits. I'm sure the mods are idiots about crowd control though, and instead of trying to fix the subreddit they're just gonna blame the audience

[–]CrackFerretus [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You realize the mods don't remove any content that isn't child porn and spam?

[–]I_RAPE_CAT_RAPISTS_Annoying [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Where are you seeing so much politically-based shit? There's a bit from the right and a lot from the left, most of either sides posting is actually cringey stuff though so it's all good.

[–]HonkHonkSkeeter [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It's true. These people exist. There is a feminist tattoo parlor near me in my city and I see these people all the time. It's like hell but much fatter.

[–]Lentle26 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

When the mods can't handle being made fun of, they sticky a post to make of the people who made fun of them. And still has far fewer points.

[–]Variety-Gamer [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The past couple of days;

'We want diversity and representation in the content on this sub...reeeee'.

Sound familiar?

[–]PraiseTheSun85cuck [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Both sides act like triggered snowflakes. The mods most of all. This picture being made is testament to that.

[–]sobson91Accurate [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

tattoos
bowtie
pierced ears
hipster glasses
normal

[–]DMN666 [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Well hipster fashion is pretty mainstream ever since gentrification happened. Like how all white people want to be black now.

[–]Eiforr [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

If you're not a hardcore Nazi you're not welcome on this sub.

[–]pilsung [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This meme was once fed to Mandy Flores's slave.

[–]SubjectiveHat [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

If only everyone could be honest with themselves and with each other and vote/think/act based on issues that satisfy their self interest and not try to disguise it as anything else.

[–]Secretly_psycho [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

i cant even tell what side the artist is on, if this is satire... im lost

[–]RedPillDessert [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Lol, you'll figure it out in the end. It's a classic.

[–]RedPillDessert [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Lol, it's Carl the Cuck!

[–]DMN666 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

that guy doesnt have a beard as it would be masculine.

[–]sillywanker69TRUMP 2016 [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

defining yourself as an anti SJW is retarded. the SJWs are a minor group of retards on the internet. the neo-cons are worse and a bigger threat IMO

[–]MattTheBlack [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Minor group

.

Controls the DNC and Academia

Pick one

[–]sillywanker69TRUMP 2016 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

you're mistaking bush-style neo-cons for SJWs. they both play idpol game in favor of brown people only the neo-cons do it to cover up for their own mistakes

[–]SNCommand [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

When the Hillary campaign courted the likes of Brianna Wu the neo cons and SJWs are now pretty much the same fucking group

But I prefer the term SJW as it has managed far more negative traction than neo con ever did

[–]whiplash588 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The liberal neocons pandered to the SJWs, but there is a difference between the two. They both suck though.

[–]flameoguy [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

sjews control democratig party!!!!1!

You must be kidding. The Democratic party is controlled by the same neoliberals that have controlled it since the 70s.

[–]probablyhrenrai [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

That caricature's brilliant; the skinny jeans, iPhone, that hairstyle, the hipster beard, the horned classes, the guages, the tattoos, the bowtie, the plaid shirt, the Livestrongs... it's great. Terrible, but great.

[–]dbfsjkshutup [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

more OC on cringe sub, wow.

this subreddit is fag. i'm out, you scrubs

[–]SkyDancingLeaf [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

no don't come back

[–]flameoguy [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

No, don't! Come back!

is a lot different than

No. Don't come back.

Commas, use them. Brought to you by the ministry of grammar.

[–]RedPillDessert [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Don't forget to leave the smallest violin (where nothing of value was lost) hit you on your way out.

Er.