use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
~69 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
Image courtesy of thenewbacklash.blogspot.com
Gender Critical is a subreddit to analyze gender from a critical perspective. We are a radical feminist and women centered community. This is a place to think critically about gender, the erasure of lesbian culture and the appropriation of women's spaces. In short this is a place to discuss radical feminism without fear.
"Women do not decide at some point in adulthood that they would like other people to understand them to be women, because being a woman is not an ‘identity.’ Women’s experience does not resemble that of men who adopt the ‘gender identity’ of being female or being women in any respect. The idea of ‘gender identity’ disappears biology and all the experiences that those with female biology have of being reared in a caste system based on sex." - Sheila Jeffreys, Gender Hurts
Here are the guidelines for this community - Please report any violation.
All posts by new accounts must be approved by a moderator. If your submission doesn't show up, message the mod team.
FOLLOW US ON TWITTER @rGenderCritical
USER FLAIR IS ENABLED. Please message the moderators about appropriate flair for your posts.
Please visit our Wiki to see the the start of a subscriber edited wiki page. By contributing, you help build a community with rules the majority can agree on.
Click here for live IRC chat on #gendercritcal - Please see this post for instructions
Our Sister Subreddits:
/r/gendercritlesbians
/r/womensliberation
/r/transgenderkids
/r/GCdebatesQT
/r/feminist_videos
/r/radfembookclub
/r/Radical_Feminists
/r/feminisms
/r/homosexualwomen
/r/anarcha
Resources:
GenderTrender
Magdalen Berns' YouTube Channel
Name the Problem: Male Violence
What is a woman?
The New Backlash
A Feminist Critique of "Cisgender"
Sex Not Gender
Culturally Bound Gender
Lost Womyn's Space
Nymeses
Gender Critical
Radical Feminism FAQs
RadFem 101
RadFem Central
RadFem Archives
Who Owns Gender?
whoiscis
Misgendering is violence? Nah, Mate! (youtu.be)
MagdalenBerns が 1日前 投稿
[–]newgcf 26 ポイント27 ポイント28 ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
This was interesting and scary. Would this really be enforceable? I know there's far more than GC feminists who "misgender" the snowflakes, and I have to think that the numbers will grow with exposure to the Danielle Muscato's of the world. Thought crime laws are disturbing stuff... wonder why the left isn't questioning why this has never been attempted with, say, the n-word, or bitch, or cunt? If the argument is that transwomen experience more violence than women or black people have(or have ever experienced?)... I assume the history classes were slept through.
[–]NoLadyBrain 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 20時間前 (1子コメント)
wonder why the left isn't questioning why this has never been attempted with, say, the n-word, or bitch, or cunt?
I actually think that the authoritarian left would be all for making certain words they consider "hate speech" illegal offenses for which one could get fined. Probably not bitch, cunt, slut, whore, etc., though, because those are just words that apply to non-people. Besides, bitch, slut, and whore are, like, fun words that have been reclaimed, right? Let's go on a slutwalk, ya slut! vomits
[–]newgcf 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 11時間前 (0子コメント)
Lol, yuck. Well, hopefully I don't give them any ideas.
[–]NotYourBFFGender Dissenter 26 ポイント27 ポイント28 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
If all you end up with is hurt feelings, it isn't violence.
[–]Sparrow8907 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
This really needs to be a rallying cry / motto.
We don't need to agree on the specifics of everything if we simply acknowledge the paramount importance of ensuring our mutual right of agreeing to disagree.
[–]Missi-Amphetamine 22 ポイント23 ポイント24 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Amazing video, as always! I so appreciate your videos, and your biting wit.
[–]Eclectic58Resistance is NOT futile 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
The comparison with religion is especially apt. In the US, we have separation of church and state - one is free to believe and practice whatever religion they please - for themselves - but they do not have the right to impose their religious beliefs and practices on others, especially through the vehicle of secular law.
Thus, trans people should have the right to believe whatever they want about themselves and to life the lifestyles they choose, but should NOT have the right to make the general public believe and behave likewise. In other words, no one should be legally compelled to humor their beliefs, nor act as if they really are the sex they claim to be. Reality should never be outlawed.
Being mis-sexes (Mis-gendered is a misnomer) is just part of the bargain when one transitions, as one cannot expect an entire population to ignore reality and to humor one's beliefs. As with many other things in different contexts, people need to learn to grow a thick shin and let things like this roll down their backs.
Real hate speech is threatening to do bodily harm to another person for being what they are and encouraging others to do so. Simply disagreeing with another person's beliefs is NOT.
Violence is actually doing physical harm to another. Free speech is NOT violence. This Orwellian re-definitions of common words, especially in the legal sense, needs to stop now.
[–]counterclockwise3 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
Wait. So it could soon become a hate crime for parents of teens who get swept up in the trans cult to be TRUTHFUL to their kids about who they are and aren’t? For trying to help their daughters and sons realise they can't change their biological sex, that for their daughters to chase the testosterone fantasy will permanently mess with their bodies and their health, and that they will still always be women no matter what the misogynist trans movement persuades them to fantasise?
Parents whose heads are screwed on sensibly about the trans cult, who are already fighting against the whole goddamned culture in daring to question it, could become criminalised if they don't lie to their kid, if they don’t refer to their daughter as their 'son'?
That it will be unlawful for them to try gently to remind their kids who they really are, by referring to a daughter within her earshot as ‘she’?
It’s Orwellian enough that schools and universities, because of the 2010 legislation shaped by trans activists, already actively misgender in the REAL sense: schools instantly call boys 'girls' and vice versa if the kid utters the magic words ‘I’m trans’. That schools unilaterally 'socially transition' students, with zero psychological assessment or questioning, zero consideration of the psychological and physical harms they are pushing, and completely behind parents’ backs.
I thought it couldn't get worse.
[–]hellamomzillatoo old for undiluted gender nonsense and queer theory 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
True story -- currently happening to me.
[–]counterclockwise3 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 18時間前 (0子コメント)
Sorry. You and many others I know of. Incredible, isn't it.
Except it's not yet officially illegal to try to help your trans-entranced daughter figure out she's still really female. (Oh, except in NYC, is that right?) And that those people on the internet who tell her that not liking make-up and dresses and feeling uncomfortable about her woman body means she's one of them, that she must thus endure a period of fashionable martyrdom-by-binder, aim toward amputating her breasts, and inject man-levels of testosterone...? Those people are not really her friends.
Can we maybe reclaim the word 'misgendering' as what the trans movement does? Put the law back on the side of biology?
[–]lavenderamethyst 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
I identify as some one who can speak their mind, not others'.
or
I identify as an inoffensive person.
I identify as mute.
. . .
Pick your backwards-logic poison.
[–]heidischallengedum spiro spero 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
I'm very worried about the mind of the victim becomes the legal point of law. In the US, determination of murder vs manslaughter is based on intent of the criminal (and other evidence to support that intent). If someone is offended, that is not a crime. This is a serious right of free speech impediment. That is what Jordan Peterson said in his first video.
[–]iheartmanhating 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 22時間前 (3子コメント)
Wouldn't that make some of your videos illegal? A family member or friend reacting to someone "coming out as trans" badly could get prosecuted over an argument or Facebook post. This is terrifying bullshit.
[–]MagdalenBerns[S] 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 19時間前 (2子コメント)
Wouldn't that make some of your videos illegal?
Yes.
[–]iheartmanhating 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 19時間前 (1子コメント)
Shit, this is getting scary. It's like if Christians tried to get a law made preventing atheists denying the existence of god.
[–]MagdalenBerns[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 18時間前 (0子コメント)
Yes, that's pretty much where we are at.
[–]endofthelinerXX-Marks-My-Sex=Female 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
I have seen some MtTs I wouldn't so much "misgender" as laugh my ass off at. Although since most MtTs don't have a sense of humor, that could be even more dangerous, eh?
Thanks for a great video, Magdalen--well done!
[–]Dimbit 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
I don't understand how we can't misgender them but they can reduce our existence down to stereotypes.
[+][削除されました] 1日前* (3子コメント)
[removed]
[–]annieareyouokayannieI am feel erased when we are not about me? 22 ポイント23 ポイント24 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
What's funnier, the idea of GC being on /r/all or "am a low-key fascist sexist conservative"?
[–]ShwiftyWizard 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Well then you have two things in common with trans activists congrats!
[–]Question-the-QuoStill Learning 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Something tells me that a "low key fascist conservative" wouldn't advertise themselves as such.
I'm betting this is someone from a neo-liberal and/or trans-focused thread.
I'm calling troll.
π Rendered by PID 27246 on app-50 at 2017-01-21 18:41:44.334741+00:00 running dc009a3 country code: JP.
[–]newgcf 26 ポイント27 ポイント28 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]NoLadyBrain 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]newgcf 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]NotYourBFFGender Dissenter 26 ポイント27 ポイント28 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Sparrow8907 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Missi-Amphetamine 22 ポイント23 ポイント24 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Eclectic58Resistance is NOT futile 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]counterclockwise3 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]hellamomzillatoo old for undiluted gender nonsense and queer theory 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]counterclockwise3 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]lavenderamethyst 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]heidischallengedum spiro spero 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]iheartmanhating 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]MagdalenBerns[S] 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]iheartmanhating 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]MagdalenBerns[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]endofthelinerXX-Marks-My-Sex=Female 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Dimbit 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+][削除されました] (3子コメント)
[removed]
[–]annieareyouokayannieI am feel erased when we are not about me? 22 ポイント23 ポイント24 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ShwiftyWizard 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Question-the-QuoStill Learning 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント (0子コメント)