105
106

Trump's Inauguration... (i.redd.it)

chabanaisSic semper tyrannis が 投稿

全 27 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]stophamertime [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I think I speak for all good people when I say I am against the clan regardless on who they are supporting on any election.

[–]Flobby17 [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

I never get stuff like this. Sure, attack a party for doing dumb stuff 20 years ago, but attack them about something 90 years ago after some major ideological shifts?

[–]Belchie [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

They're still the same racists, just better at camouflage.

[–]Thuggled [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

Please go on about ideological shifts, I'm interested in what you believe changed.

[–]ironwolf1 [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

During the 1960s, liberals began voting more for Democrats, starting with President Johnson and his civil rights reforms, and conservatives began voting for Republicans, starting with Nixon.

[–]TheDemonicEmperor [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

There's actually a counterargument to that where supposedly blacks began shifting from Republican to Democrat in the 1930s, not for racial reasons, but for the welfare that the New Deal offered, and were actually voting with conservative, racist Democrats for a while. The South supposedly started becoming more Republican as they became more liberal, culminating in Texas finally turning red in the 80s.

Besides, the 1924 election would've been Coolidge. He's like the poster boy for modern-day, small government, de-regulation Republicans.

[–]Thuggled [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Conservatives have always been republicans. The "liberals"were always democrats statist types. FDR is still praised for by Dems.

[–]tme001 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Not necessarily. The Republican Party was pretty damn liberal back in the 1860s. Liberal/Conservative shifts are definitely a thing and are not synonymous with Democrat/Republican.

[–]SAMSON_AITE [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You do know what liberal and conservative mean right?

[–]chabanaisSic semper tyrannis[S] [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

You mean like how the South switched to Republican that's how Clinton won?

[–]voicesinmyhand [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

I like where you are going with this, but... source?

[–]WolfeBane84 [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1924_Democratic_National_Convention#Ku_Klux_Klan

[–]RichGunzUSA [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Fun fact: This caused the democrats to lose the election of 1924 and Coolidge was elected with 382 electors.

[–]narutouzLibertarian Conservative [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

The parties switched. Coolidge would have been a Democrat if he was alive today. /s

[–]chabanaisSic semper tyrannis[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

FDR was a Republican and Bill Clinton win the South twice because the parties switched.

[–]chabanaisSic semper tyrannis[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

They went through 103 ballots... that was just a symptom of their many ills.

[–]voicesinmyhand [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Thanks.

[–]chabanaisSic semper tyrannis[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1924_Democratic_National_Convention

[–]TheOutlawJoseyWales1Make My Day [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Too dank and spicy for me

[–]WhitestAfricanLiberal [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Please don't become /r/the_donald, I actually enjoy coming here.

[–]C4Cypher [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You really think T_D has the market on dank memes? Teh_Donald is just /pol/'s upstart younger cousin, and not even /pol/ has complete control of the meme economy.

[–]TheOutlawJoseyWales1Make My Day [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I was actually channeling my inner r/weekendgunnit