3dshacks 内の PriaChatta によるリンク How These Bricks Happen

[–]FallacyExplnationBot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman":


A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win over bystanders.

Unintentional misrepresentations are also possible, but in this case, the misrepresenter would only be guilty of simple ignorance. While their argument would still be fallacious, they can be at least excused of malice.

bigdata 内の based2 によるリンク Apache Beam established as a new top-level project

[–]FallacyExplnationBot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem":


Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not seek to rebut the person's argument. Of note: if the subject of discussion is whether somebody is credible -- eg, "believe X because I am Y" -- then it is not an ad hominem to criticize their qualifications.

news 内の GuacamoleFanatic によるリンク The widow of the Orlando nightclub gunman knew about the attack ahead of time and then hindered the criminal investigation when she lied to FBI agents after the shooting, say prosecutors who will be in a California court Wednesday to discuss transferring her to Florida.

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman":


A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win over bystanders.

Unintentional misrepresentations are also possible, but in this case, the misrepresenter would only be guilty of simple ignorance. While their argument would still be fallacious, they can be at least excused of malice.

NeutralPolitics 内の vreddy92 によるリンク Why is Ben Carson trying to become HUD Secretary after turning down HHS?

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman":


A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win over bystanders.

Unintentional misrepresentations are also possible, but in this case, the misrepresenter would only be guilty of simple ignorance. While their argument would still be fallacious, they can be at least excused of malice.

TwoXChromosomes 内の seapancake1187 によるリンク Men's Rights Activists

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman":


A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win over bystanders.

Unintentional misrepresentations are also possible, but in this case, the misrepresenter would only be guilty of simple ignorance. While their argument would still be fallacious, they can be at least excused of malice.

news 内の GuacamoleFanatic によるリンク The Pittsford man convicted of harassing an autistic teenage cross-country runner in Cobb's Hill Park in October was sentenced in Rochester City Court on Tuesday to three years of probation and 80 hours of community service.

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman":


A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win over bystanders.

Unintentional misrepresentations are also possible, but in this case, the misrepresenter would only be guilty of simple ignorance. While their argument would still be fallacious, they can be at least excused of malice.

PoliticalHumor 内の ff0094ismyfavourite によるリンク Trump caught pandering to ISIS.

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem":


Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not seek to rebut the person's argument. Of note: if the subject of discussion is whether somebody is credible -- eg, "believe X because I am Y" -- then it is not an ad hominem to criticize their qualifications.

news 内の ShellOilNigeria によるリンク Assange 'standing by' offer to be extradited to US

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem":


Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not seek to rebut the person's argument. Of note: if the subject of discussion is whether somebody is credible -- eg, "believe X because I am Y" -- then it is not an ad hominem to criticize their qualifications.

CringeAnarchy 内の Lordd_Humungous によるリンク Kid forgets he's not on the internet, runs for his life.

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem":


Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not seek to rebut the person's argument. Of note: if the subject of discussion is whether somebody is credible -- eg, "believe X because I am Y" -- then it is not an ad hominem to criticize their qualifications.

videos 内の the_television によるリンク Firearm malfunctions during shooting competition- everything goes right

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman":


A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win over bystanders.

Unintentional misrepresentations are also possible, but in this case, the misrepresenter would only be guilty of simple ignorance. While their argument would still be fallacious, they can be at least excused of malice.

funny 内の Garry_t によるリンク Fun Game For Kids Of All Ages

[–]FallacyExplnationBot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman":


A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win over bystanders.

Unintentional misrepresentations are also possible, but in this case, the misrepresenter would only be guilty of simple ignorance. While their argument would still be fallacious, they can be at least excused of malice.

CringeAnarchy 内の Lordd_Humungous によるリンク Kid forgets he's not on the internet, runs for his life.

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem":


Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not seek to rebut the person's argument. Of note: if the subject of discussion is whether somebody is credible -- eg, "believe X because I am Y" -- then it is not an ad hominem to criticize their qualifications.

CringeAnarchy 内の Lordd_Humungous によるリンク Kid forgets he's not on the internet, runs for his life.

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem":


Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not seek to rebut the person's argument. Of note: if the subject of discussion is whether somebody is credible -- eg, "believe X because I am Y" -- then it is not an ad hominem to criticize their qualifications.

AskTrumpSupporters 内の lakechampagne によるリンク After Trump's officially POTUS on Friday, what can you say/do that you couldn't before due to PC culture?

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman":


A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win over bystanders.

Unintentional misrepresentations are also possible, but in this case, the misrepresenter would only be guilty of simple ignorance. While their argument would still be fallacious, they can be at least excused of malice.

TheRedPill 内の CaptainCringeworthy によるリンク How to lead a fascinating life with minimal effort

[–]FallacyExplnationBot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem":


Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not seek to rebut the person's argument. Of note: if the subject of discussion is whether somebody is credible -- eg, "believe X because I am Y" -- then it is not an ad hominem to criticize their qualifications.

news 内の Marwin-gill によるリンク Texas teacher who had sex with 13-year-old student almost daily gets 10 years in prison

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman":


A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win over bystanders.

Unintentional misrepresentations are also possible, but in this case, the misrepresenter would only be guilty of simple ignorance. While their argument would still be fallacious, they can be at least excused of malice.

nihilism 内の iam4real によるリンク Nihilistic Maury

[–]FallacyExplnationBot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem":


Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not seek to rebut the person's argument. Of note: if the subject of discussion is whether somebody is credible -- eg, "believe X because I am Y" -- then it is not an ad hominem to criticize their qualifications.

news 内の topredditgeek によるリンク Americans who want to protest against Donald Trump are asked to load the White House website on inauguration day and refresh it frequently to take it down.

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman":


A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win over bystanders.

Unintentional misrepresentations are also possible, but in this case, the misrepresenter would only be guilty of simple ignorance. While their argument would still be fallacious, they can be at least excused of malice.

worldnews 内の marius77 によるリンク Biden to Davos: Top 1% 'not carrying their weight' - BBC News

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman":


A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win over bystanders.

Unintentional misrepresentations are also possible, but in this case, the misrepresenter would only be guilty of simple ignorance. While their argument would still be fallacious, they can be at least excused of malice.

Battleborn 内の the_V0lum3 によるリンク "where is our Toby even at?" AKA the joys of being matched with lvl 15s

[–]FallacyExplnationBot 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman":


A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win over bystanders.

Unintentional misrepresentations are also possible, but in this case, the misrepresenter would only be guilty of simple ignorance. While their argument would still be fallacious, they can be at least excused of malice.

btc 内の yippykaiyay012 によるリンク I Think I'm Switching...

[–]FallacyExplnationBot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Appeal to Authority":


An argument from authority refers to two kinds of arguments:

1. A logically valid argument from authority grounds a claim in the beliefs of one or more authoritative source(s), whose opinions are likely to be true on the relevant issue. Notably, this is a Bayesian statement -- it is likely to be true, rather than necessarily true. As such, an argument from authority can only strongly suggest what is true -- not prove it.

2. A logically fallacious argument from authority grounds a claim in the beliefs of a source that is not authoritative. Sources could be non-authoritative because of their personal bias, their disagreement with consensus on the issue, their non-expertise in the relevant issue, or a number of other issues. (Often, this is called an appeal to authority, rather than argument from authority.)

DebateAChristian 内の M1A1M1A1 によるリンク What is the Evidence the Bible is Divinely Inspired?

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Strawman":


A straw man is logical fallacy that occurs when a debater intentionally misrepresents their opponent's argument as a weaker version and rebuts that weak & fake version rather than their opponent's genuine argument. Intentional strawmanning usually has the goal of [1] avoiding real debate against their opponent's real argument, because the misrepresenter risks losing in a fair debate, or [2] making the opponent's position appear ridiculous and thus win over bystanders.

Unintentional misrepresentations are also possible, but in this case, the misrepresenter would only be guilty of simple ignorance. While their argument would still be fallacious, they can be at least excused of malice.

PoliticalHumor 内の FUNKYDISCO によるリンク Born to Run

[–]FallacyExplnationBot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem":


Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not seek to rebut the person's argument. Of note: if the subject of discussion is whether somebody is credible -- eg, "believe X because I am Y" -- then it is not an ad hominem to criticize their qualifications.

CringeAnarchy 内の provaut によるリンク TED, not TEDx, is starting to upload more and more Feminist propaganda, now they start disabling comments and dislikes

[–]FallacyExplnationBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "Ad Hominem":


Argumentum ad hominem (from the Latin, "to the person") is an informal logical fallacy that occurs when someone attempts to refute an argument by attacking the source making it rather than the argument itself. The fallacy is a subset of the genetic fallacy as it attacks the source of the argument, which is irrelevant to to the truth or falsity of the argument. An ad hominem should not be confused with an insult, which attacks the person but does not seek to rebut the person's argument. Of note: if the subject of discussion is whether somebody is credible -- eg, "believe X because I am Y" -- then it is not an ad hominem to criticize their qualifications.

gatekeeping 内の musicguyguy によるリンク American Muslims are "Muslim-lite" and not true Muslims. (deleted thread on /r/The_Donald)

[–]FallacyExplnationBot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hi! Here's a summary of the term "No True Scotsman":


The No True Scotsman NTS fallacy is a logical fallacy that occurs when a debater defines a group such that every groupmember posses some quality. For example, it is common to argue that "all members of [my religion] are fundamentally good", and then to abandon all bad individuals as "not true [my-religion]-people". This can occur in two ways:

During argument, someone re-defines the group in order to exclude counter-examples. Instead of backing down from "all groupmembers are X" to "most groupmembers are X", the debater simply redefines the group.

Before argument, someone preemptively defines some group such that the group definitionally must be entirely "good" or entirely "bad". However, this definition was created arbitrarily for this defensive purpose, rather than based on the actual qualities of the group.

NTS can be thought of as a form of inverted cherry picking, where instead of selecting favourable examples, you reject unfavourable ones.