全 87 件のコメント

[–]thedreammanalishi 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Remember, the Podestas, the Clintons and James Alefantis, the owner of this pizza joint accept foreign money, but do not register as foreign agents for each of their financial relationships with foreign entities.

This is what foreign funded political activity looks like.

It is treason.

Taking money from Sberbank through RAS and Troika, or being gifted land for multiple businesses on the same block from the Saudis, means that these are foreign agents engaged in political activity that is designed to promote divisiveness and violence.

Most countries will sentence you to death for this.

[–]Seventytvvo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I wouldn't read too much into this. PV is known for selective editing, coaxing their victims into saying things, and using all kinds of other tricks.

Check out James O'Keefe's wikipage and read up on how he tricks people into saying stuff. Plus, PV just got busted trying to pretend to be a liberal in order to incite violence.

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5n3hul/conservatives_caught_trying_to_pay_liberals_to/

Here's a better video of the same event:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOoOEnZ42O0

Go ahead... downvote. I'm just here for the facts...

[–]Mandalor1an 47 ポイント48 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Wait... is that comet pizza? lmao

[–]Lancevegas83 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

bahahahahaha...fuck people are stupid.

[–]Seventytvvo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOoOEnZ42O0

PV has no credibility. They trick these people into saying whatever they can, and then selectively edit a video. They're political fraudsters and you're falling for it.

[–]kamspy 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (1子コメント)

They will try to discredit this based on the fact the meeting took place at Comet.

They're going to try to make it a safe space for this type of activity.

[–]Seventytvvo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

How do you even know those shots are from inside CPP? How do you know James O'Keefe didn't ask them to meet him at CPP?

The fact is, Project Veritas has a long history of putting put deceptively edited videos, and essentially tricking its subjects into saying whatever they need.

In fact, they were just caught last week trying to do this to a different liberal group...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOoOEnZ42O0

[–]Pdelic1 35 ポイント36 ポイント  (1子コメント)

This should be good. Glad this guy is still doing his thing.

[–]Seventytvvo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It's probably bogus. PV has a history of selective editing and tricking their subjects into saying all sorts of stuff.

They were caught the other day trying to do this. Take a look:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOoOEnZ42O0

[–]TeslasMuse[S] 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (2子コメント)

[–]leftboot [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

There is a 'jk i was only acting retarded' meme in all of this somewhere.

[–]GTheFaceL [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Or how about a producer found guilty of selective editing meme. O'Keefe is a hack literally funded by Trump.

[–]KlehmM 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ok wait a second. So THAT they brought to authorities??

Not voter fraud....

[–]burn_reddit_burn 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's so incredible that Comet is implicated in this. I mean, this is fantastic.

BURN ALL THIS SHIT DOWN

[–]Seventytvvo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

How do you know James O'Keefe didn't ask to meet them there? Project Veritas is not trust worthy. They trick people into saying things on camera and then selectively edit it together to make videos like this.

They were caught just last week trying to do this to a different group:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOoOEnZ42O0

[–]Fuckaduckfuckaduck 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (6子コメント)

I wonder how all these SJW snowflakes are gonna handle the presence of 5k [Removed; 200k] bikers who have pledged to help keep order?

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/314429-bikers-for-trump-vow-to-form-wall-of-meat-against-inauguration

Edit - changed 200k to 5k because I don't read so good.

[–]elcad [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

There's a reason why there wasn't an Altamont Speedway Free Festival 2.

[–]paulie_purr [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Oh good, "the bikers" will protect the rebel president from worried women and concerned Americans, we can all sleep softly moving forward.

[–]UnicornShitShoveler 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

About 5000 are expected not 200,000.

[–]FranklinBeans2010 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

5k, not 200k

[–]Fuckaduckfuckaduck 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Updated my original comment. Thanks for the heads up. My apologies for misreading and providing misinformation. Wasn't my intention.

[–]FranklinBeans2010 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

All good! I've inversed my vote on your original comment 👍 👍 👍.

[–]paulie_purr [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Veritas and their absurdist Tea Party-esque framing of Trump opposition needs to sit on a big one and spin. This video is about people planning to use stink bombs for fuck's sake. Sure am glad to see these pre-emptive moves to discredit protesters exercising their 1st amendment rights (I thought this was supposed to be the most American thing doable? Oh right--as long as they protest the "correct" side of things) before any such actions can even be attempted. Look forward to bug-eyed tales of Soros cash showers and "bused in protesters" that will be debunked in a few weeks but not before they are widely believed by diehard Trump loyalists nationwide.

[–]Seventytvvo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

PV has no credibility. They were just caught on video last week trying to trick people into saying they'd support inciting violence at the inauguration. They're fraudsters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOoOEnZ42O0

[–]weedareone 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

FUCK THEM

[–]Seventytvvo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I wouldn't read too much into this. PV is known for selective editing, coaxing their victims into saying things, and using all kinds of other tricks.

Check out James O'Keefe's wikipage and read up on how he tricks people into saying stuff. Plus, PV just got busted trying to pretend to be a liberal in order to incite violence.

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5n3hul/conservatives_caught_trying_to_pay_liberals_to/

Just the facts...

[–]PuffPuff74 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (5子コメント)

At least Project Veritas is not biased

[–]_dudewhotalks 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Your political views don't mean anything if you record some group of people planning to disrupt a private event on private property when they plan on using acids to release a stink bomb in the HVAC or destroying said personal property by making all water sprinklers go off.

[–]Seventytvvo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

PV tricks people into saying what they want, and then edits the videos to show whatever they need.

They've been caught doing it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOoOEnZ42O0

They have zero credibility.

[–]Spartan1117 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Really? They were paid by trump. How are they not biased?

[–]Seventytvvo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

lol seriously... here's video evidence of them trying to trick someone into talking about inciting violence. They have zero credibility...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOoOEnZ42O0

[–]DankkTankk 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What a twist

[–]Tabnam [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I'm sorry, but how can anyone still buy into this guy's videos? He's consistently been proven to be a scam artist praying on the ignorance of the alt right.

[–]Seventytvvo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Apparently the Trump supporters do. It's the only thing they have...

[–]KlehmM 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Sounds more like 80's frat movie shenanigans than anything that'll really accomplish something. Are they just joking?

[–]trumpetspieler [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

I honestly think they may be, it doesn't matter to project veritas though, anything said while having a few drinks can and will be used against you on youtube.

[–]KlehmM [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Unless you're talking about conspiracy to commit a silly practical joke. Take that shit right to the FBI.

[–]Zukb6 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Did you people watch the video? They're clearly not just joking. This is coming from a non-Trump supporter.

[–]JimPlunkettsAssChin 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (10子コメント)

These videos are so over the top with this guys narration. The tone he takes regarding the butyric acid makes it seem much more dangerous than it is. He's acting like it's an actual bomb or something.

[–]_dudewhotalks 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (8子コメント)

It's at least vandalism or destruction of private property. I don't care if he's over the top or under the bottom, this group of people plans to break a law or laws and that's all that matters.

[–]JimPlunkettsAssChin 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (6子コメント)

I'm not condoning the behavior, just an observation about these veritas videos. They take themselves WAY too seriously.

[–]_dudewhotalks 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I think capturing people on camera planning to commit felonies at a inaugurations party is fairly significant.

[–]JimPlunkettsAssChin 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Sure, it's definitely a valid piece of investigation but the tone and cheesy production makes the whole thing seem less legit. They don't need to act all dramatic, it takes away from the evidence they are trying to expose.

[–]Tito_Our_Saviour 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree. He's trying hard to sell the story but really he doesn't need to since he had great insider information. I would almost prefer it to be more bland and informative , feels like I'm watching a knock off Dateline NBC.

[–]paulie_purr [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It's infotainment, lapped up by those who love to call everyone else sheep. 2017 is the year of mass irony.

[–]trumpetspieler [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

What if a ton of people showed up to take bong rips at the inauguration? They're breaking laws but it's kind of a silly thing to get worked up about. I'm not saying that applies in this case but your post was such a hardline I can't help but push it.

[–]trumpetspieler [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Exactly, it sounds spooky until you realize it's a stink-bomb. I don't see any extreme criminality here, just a few butthurt pseudo revolutionaries who are trying to prove a point.

[–]elcad 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (18子コメント)

Here's the post from last week showing how Project Veritas was being the provocateur: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5n3hul/conservatives_caught_trying_to_pay_liberals_to/

[–]mrgrippa 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (1子コメント)

A bunch of narrators telling me what happened versus an actual video of the people plotting violence, isn't convincing or effective at all. Even if it is week earlier.

If they knew it was a setup why bother to go through with basic level planning?

It's more likely they realized they were caught, and tried to sculpt a narrative where they weren't guilty using commentators instead of video of the actual event.

[–]Elusian_Fields 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's called "throwing shade."

Video evidence, however, is video evidence. Judge it as is and take the subjects at face value in their own words. Pretty simple. Certainly different than the preemptive damage control seen in the reddit post you've linked.

[–]TeslasMuse[S] 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (9子コメント)

that looks like some hastily thrown together propaganda, i don't find it very convincing at all

[–]elcad 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Well they predicted your post almost a week out. Guess it had to be hasty to beat the hasty video you posted. Not that hard to do, since editing the clips out of context seems to take a week.

[–]bananawhom 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well they predicted your post almost a week out.

Meaningless.

Predicting people will argue something doesn't mean their argument is wrong.

If this was the case, trials would be over as soon one side makes their opening statements.

[–]TeslasMuse[S] 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (4子コメント)

i'm not suggesting you not be suspicious of my post, i am just very suspicious of your link

[–]elcad 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

And how is the video in my link less credible than the one you posted? Mine at least predicted yours.

[–]kamspy 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Easy to do if they found out there was a mole.

[–]bananawhom 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I predict you will argue certain points.

That does not invalidate them.

[–]_dudewhotalks -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Easy to "predict" something when you realize you've been recorded. The truth of the matter is these guys plan on disrupting a private event on private property through the use of acids or water sprinkler system.

It's just a prank bruh! /s

[–]marcsmart 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well considering O Keefe was foreshadowing his next video around that time, they probably rushed out with that to preemptively discredit whatever is shown

[–]MSparta 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Isnt that someone else, not disruptdj20

[–]elcad 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Someone else that didn't go for the bait, and was not put into the video.

[–]MSparta [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

TBH these guys in the video of the OP doesn't seem baited, more that Veritas guy got invited to join it

[–]Edin8999 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Uh are they talking about a stink bomb? God help us all.

[–]Steve-2112 -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Chemical weapons

[–]krom_bom 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you want to be pedantic about it, a water balloon would count as a Chemical Weapon.

The people in the video are talking about stink bombs.

[–]trumpetspieler [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

No it's definitely a stink bomb, have you ever handled butyric acid? It smells like dead flesh blended with rotten eggs. Amazon is openly selling chemical weapons right now, just google liquid shit. I think chemical weapons have to have the ability to harm you at the very least.

[–]joomommyhappy [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

That stuff is apparently explosive if it comes into contact with open flame.

I wouldnt call it a chemical weapon, but it's clearly a couple notches above TPing a tree or soaping a window on Mischief Night.

I can easily imagine the dipshits in the video taking some kind of legal grief for their stupidity.

And this is just the first video.

[–]Seventytvvo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I have a bottle of 151 rum that is "explosive" if it comes into contact with flame...

[–]Rezasaurus -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (6子コメント)

How the fuck does an Anti-Fascist group not realize that the party and the people they support are as big or bigger Fascists than the PEOTUS. Do they not realize their are protesting against themselves?

[–]Seventytvvo [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I wouldn't read too much into this. PV is known for selective editing, coaxing their victims into saying things, and using all kinds of other tricks.

Check out James O'Keefe's wikipage and read up on how he tricks people into saying stuff. Plus, PV just got busted trying to pretend to be a liberal in order to incite violence.

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5n3hul/conservatives_caught_trying_to_pay_liberals_to/

Just the facts...

[–]trumpetspieler [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

I've never heard of an anti-fascist party, are you referring to something else?

[–]Rezasaurus [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

In the video, the guy they are talking to is part of an Anti-Fascist Coalition. I think it's ironic he is protesting the PEOTUS as the other option is no better. Don't get my wrong, fuck Fascism, just realize that both Dems and Repubs are fascists!

To be honest I'm not upset about the protest that's being planned, I'm upset at the motive. Protest against and unjust system, protest against the corruption in the DNC, but don't protest the democratically elected president! He may be a cunt, but the people chose him.

[–]trumpetspieler [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I don't consider protesting trump as equivalent to supporting Hillary. I think you're a bit too deep into the 2 party system if you think it is. People protested the DNC and it's come and gone, partisan politics is the wedge the elites use to pit friends against friends.

[–]Zukb6 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I'd like to hear more about this Anti-Fascist Party. Tell me, what is their stance on chocolate brownies.

[–]trumpetspieler [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

They require by law that a chocolate brownie contains at least 100mg of THC and 25mg CBD, they're pretty specific.