全 37 件のコメント

[–]SytevRecovering SAWCASM 172 ポイント173 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Not to mention

brigading would fundamentally undermine the purpose of the sub, namely to point out highly rated posts that are shit.

[–]emma-_______a rogue, misandric Amazon determined to purge all men from Earth 91 ポイント92 ポイント  (4子コメント)

From Rule 2:

Pretend the rest of Reddit is a museum of poop. Don't touch the poop.

(The only thing you have to pretend about that is the museum part.)

[–]papaya255hater of frozen peaches 34 ポイント35 ポイント  (3子コメント)

its a museum in the same sense a garbage dump is an art gallery

[–]michiel13 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

So a bit like Tate gallery then?

[–]papaya255hater of frozen peaches 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Tate gallery

oi, I like the tate

[–]microsoftworm 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

For insidious reasons like proliferation of art for elitist trade and consumption, its entire foundation based in colonialist ideology, a funding model based on economic predictions instead of artistic merit or cultural relevancy, and generally doing its best to be only as radical as would not dissuade patronage, yes the Tate is bad. Just as every other national cultural institution like it is made and meant to be.

But, the Tate has also funded, showcased, and championed a great deal of important contemporary artists (many of them women and POC) over the past few decades and presents far more intrepid work that other institutions of similar stature wouldn't touch.

Generally I find the people who are most dismissive of contemporary art never bother to actually look into it and educate themselves about its histories or its workings. Which is a shame, because there are many facets to it that are beautifully challenging, political, insightful, and are capable of changing one's world view.

All this being said, if you find it garbage, sure, ok. I tend to think your opinion is a lazy one.

[–]emma-_______a rogue, misandric Amazon determined to purge all men from Earth 33 ポイント34 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is all the evidence we need to disprove the admins.

[–]True_Eaglelibrarian 59 ポイント60 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Lol this is when the manbabies start crying about upvote brigading. Because they're so sure something is going on even though they've been told a million times it isn't.

[–]papaya255hater of frozen peaches 46 ポイント47 ポイント  (6子コメント)

obviously we're upvoting to make it look like we dont brigade!!

which err doesnt make a lick of sense but then again neither does voting trump, or being straight

[–]dlgn13full of internalized misandry :( 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Clearly half of us are upvote brigading and half downvote brigading and we cancel each other out.

[–]Tymareta 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (1子コメント)

obviously we're upvoting to make it look like we dont brigade!!

This is close to one of their arguments, they like to claim that we actual reverse-brigade to make comments seem worse because they're higher upvoted than they actually are.

[–]WilletscatRicky you've got some mansplaining to do 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It 's actually both, depending on the user: if they think the post is a funny joak, then SRS is a downvote brigade ruining a goodtime. If they think the post crossed a line, then SRS is a false-flag upvote brigade.

[–]RoboCaveman 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Or being white or being a man

[–]Prodigy-IINerd BRD 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

or being straight

lmao, right on sis

[–]Knappsterbot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

or being straight

If I go to conversion therapy as a straight person, will they teach me to be gay?

[–]ReadvoterAnd your brd can sing 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Funny how the minority of posts that end up with a lower score tend to be the most repulsive ones. If we were trying to rig things to make Reddit look bad, shouldn't those be the ones that get upvoted?

It's a mystery!

[–]bangdazap 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Obvious false flag operation by SRS, they upvote horrible posts to make it seem that anti-SJWs are the brigaders. /s

[–]Trying2ionize 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (2子コメント)

From what I've heard, there are a lot of lurkers on this sub that use it to find 'best of' material.

[–]IBYMBYBMYL 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Anyone who does that has the sense of humor of a 12 year old boy. So basically par for the course for redditors.

[–]Prodigy-IINerd BRD 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think people just say they do that to be honest. There probably are a couple sad people who do it though.

[–]Turing_DecidableSelf-loathing SAWCSM 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (1子コメント)

No no no, don't you see? We sleep with the admins in order to get a select few posts removed. This way, we subtly censor Reddit and silence people who refuse to conform to the eeeeeeeeeeeevil SJW agenda, and no one will ever be the wiser!

Glory to the Fempire!

[–]xtrasneakygastro 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I keep hearing this but never get the invite to the secret admin sex party like what's up with that

[–]TheBellmanHimselfThe Femperor Protects 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (1子コメント)

This needs to be stickied. This bullshit needs to end.

[–]smugliberaltears 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

lol as if facts will ever change the mind of a redditor

[–]FungoCucked race traitor 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Damn, we really suck at brigading, huh?

Dunno about the rest of you, but the flipped upvote/downvote arrows just throw me off so much. Yeah, that must be it.

[–]frymastermeat 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I almost assume that there is a bot that upvotes posts to here. I constantly see linked posts with huge numbers yet most of the responses to said comments are highly upvoted people calling them out. Makes no sense.

[–]_Kind_Sir_ 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

or that some shit opinions happen to be incredibly popular on Reddit.

[–]FlyberiusWhite Genocide Denier 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Ultimately, without under the hood data, it seems like a really hard thing to disprove. It's probably a lot easier to prove it is happening than that it isn't.

Somehow you've got to come up with some sort of control experiment or some shit. I don't know what I'm talking about. I haven't scienced since school.

[–]nubckaeswow 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Well yeah, because you can't prove a negative

[–]smugliberaltears 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

you can, actually. that's a common misconception thrown around by nu atheists and other practitioners of internet logic. i can prove that I am not a laplander through, for instance, DNA testing. I can prove that the last post I made on reddit before this one does not contain the letter Z via a screencap.

you might be thinking about the burden of proof. it's on the people making the accusation to provide proof

[–]FlyberiusWhite Genocide Denier 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes you can. It's just hard to deduce a negative result with this kind of information. And then, even with the most compelling data, without actually seeing the reddit logs, you can't say with 100% accuracy whether the brigading has happened or not.

[–][削除されました]  (2子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]hereandnowhereelse 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    yishan is a huge troll

    [–]Sithrak 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    He is? If he lied, it would have been a well-crafted lie, woven into the whole post. Or perhaps he himself was repeating old hearsay?

    Well, I guess I will never know. Not that it matters.