Donald Trump and the pod people: How “national security” Republicans became Russian tools
Republicans love to pose as hardcore patriots. But both the party leadership and its voters have flipped for Putin
Skip to CommentsTopics: Conservatism, Conservatives, Donald Trump, Elections 2016, Espionage, Republican Party, Republicans, Russia, Russian hack, Vladimir Putin, Politics News
As indicated by a newly released report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, it appears that Russia’s intelligence agencies, as orchestrated by President Vladimir Putin, interfered with the 2016 United States presidential election with the goal of helping Donald Trump to defeat Hillary Clinton. They were successful: On Jan. 20, 2016, Trump will be sworn in as the 45th president of the United States.
The revelation that one of America’s greatest global rivals at present, and the nation’s mortal enemy during the Cold War, manipulated the 2016 presidential election (as part of a broader plan to attack Western democracies) is the stuff of spy movies and techno-thrillers. But instead of paranoia and fear, Putin’s interference has been greeted by learned helplessness on the part of many Americans, impotence from the Democrats, and a combination of indifference, obfuscation, denial and outright lying by the Republican Party.
The latter is particularly fascinating. Over the course of several decades, Republicans created a narrative for themselves (largely untrue) that they were and are the party of “national security.” For many years the Republican Party imagined itself to be the “coldest” of the Cold Warriors. Yet in a bizarre political season where American fascism is ascendant with Donald Trump, a party and right-wing movement whose political DNA consists of conspiracy-driven John Birchers, paranoid McCarthyites, Christian fundamentalists and Ronald Reagan fetishists has apparently been “flipped” (to borrow from the language of spies and espionage) to support Putin’s Russia. This is not an episode of Rod Serling’s classic science fiction TV show “The Twilight Zone.” It is the reality TV show obsessed “post truth” America of 2016, where as Neil Postman warned some years ago, “we are entertaining ourselves to death.” As a result, our political culture is in deep crisis.
In many ways, this outcome was predictable. Authoritarianism has been on the rise among the American people for at least 20 years — especially among Republicans and, of course, Donald Trump supporters. Conservatism, as a type of motivated social cognition, is attracted to demagogues and political strongmen. Crude masculinity and nationalism are also alluring to conservative authoritarians. In Trump and Putin, American conservatives have found two heroes to swoon over in a right-wing bromance.
The spymasters hold another lesson for American politics in the age of Trump. To win over an asset (in particular someone who will turn on their own country) an agent needs to identify the target’s needs, wants and vulnerabilities. Those could include money, sex, romance, ego gratification or a desire to feel a sense of belonging and purpose.
Republican elites crave power at any cost. Consequently, they chose partisanship and electoral victory over patriotism and loyalty to the common good.
But what about the rank and file Republicans (and others) who rallied to Donald Trump’s banner? How do they make sense of the revelations about Russia’s interference in the 2016 election?
As detailed in a piece last Saturday,the New York Times journeyed to “Trumplandia” in search of answers. Their reporters were told the following:
“Sour grapes,” explained Bob Marino, 79, weighing in on the recent spycraft bombshell from the corner table of a local McDonald’s.
“Sour grapes,” agreed Roger Noel, 65, sitting next to him.
“Bunch of crybabies,” Reed Guidry, 64, offered from across the table…
But interviews with Trump supporters here in Louisiana, a state the president-elect won by 20 points, and in Indiana, a state he won by nearly the same margin, found opinions about the report that ranged from general indifference to outright derision.