•
•

Challenge: How long could you debate Nietzsche himself, while eating wings? (self.badphilosophy)

luke37philosophy joke が 投稿

Here is the look he will be equipped with.

The topic will be of your choice, however if it's a topic where most or all of the relevant works postdate his original existence, he gets a week with access to the relevant materials to prepare and synthesize his argument.

The wings will be hot, ghost pepper, but with a little bit of fruitiness. It's not a Youtube challenge level of heat, but possibly hotter than you'd normally eat. You will have milk (almond milk if vegan) to drink, taking a drink will not disqualify you, but Nietzsche will secretly consider it a personal victory if you drink before the third wing is finished.

He won't be intentionally disgusting, but that mustache will 100% start getting sketchy.

全 2 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]dsigned001 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

And Nietzsche doesn't have to eat wings? Him eating wings might be my only advantage.

Otherwise I think I'd go for something old he wouldn't necessarily be familiar with, although iirc he's much better read in eastern thought than one would expect.

Maybe contemporary East Asian Marxism. Reading the literature wouldn't necessarily help him understand the intersection of culture, Confucianism and Marxism that dominates China and Vietnam.

Moreover, I'm not sure a week would be enough to wrap one's head aid the sheer volume of paradigms that have shifted.

No one had heard of Hitler, Stalin or Mao. Trying to understand 21st century philosophy outside of its historical context would be a non-trivial undertaking to absorb.

Edit: what about Kierkegaard? Technically they don't predate his existence, but Nietzsche never got to read him. Loophole?

[–]luke37philosophy joke[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

And Nietzsche doesn't have to eat wings?

No, he's eating wings with you, it's not a speed eating contest, but you're expected to keep parity with each other.