SHARE
theyarewinning
Unfortunately for us, they are very good at what they do.

The grim festival of blame-laying among progressives/the left/Democrats: Do you wish it would stop already, for the love of all that is left to cling to? OK good. You can just 100% blame right-wing media.

“Too simple!” many will protest. “The Russians, and Comey, and Hillary was a bad candidate and/or ran a bad campaign, and she won the popular vote so doesn’t count, and even then, Bernie surely would have won, plus a backlash against love winning, too many of us are sexist and stupid, and we forgot to sew the noble white laborer into our quilt of justice.”

Sure, fine. There’s some truth in there. But all that is secondary, because when you boil it all right down to the non-stick coating and char that off too, right-wing media did it.

By “it,” I mean degraded our political ecosystem to such an extent that Donald J. Trump was elected president. Right-wing media did more than any other entity to make this possible.

By “right-wing media,” I mean pretty much all conservative media, from the Alex Joneses and the Breitbarts to the David Brookses and the Wall Street Journals. Because the things conservatives want, like lower taxes on wealth, less environmental protection, less help to the poor, etc., are not popular ideas, or good ideas, those espousing them must bullshit. There is no way to make the conservative policy agenda sound nice without bullshitting. We will help more people by helping fewer of them, and we will collect more taxes when we cut them. Insinuation and hyperbole and question begging and no details, retreating into vague appeals to our freedoms. Bullshit, basically.

Who was it that relentlessly and over multiple decades portrayed Hillary Clinton as a scheming criminal when her actual record was that of a typical center-left politician, and nearly always cleaner than her detractors’? Who worked the bellows of the Tea Party, introduced us to birthers, obsessed over death panels and gun grabbing and martial law, none of which ever materialized nor were ever likely to? Who fanned fear of immigrants and Muslims and “urban youths” and socialism and atheism and other things that are not particularly dangerous, while denying that we are globally killing ourselves with fossil fuel emissions? Who took trigger warnings and safe spaces and transformed them from little things that barely even existed at liberal colleges into outrageous threats to the Republic? Right-wing media did all that!

Who saw that there was an enormous amount of money to be made in telling a common sort of person who is frightened of change, and often a bit mean (or as they would have it, “tough”), that they are right to be hateful and fearful? Why, that was the right-wing media!

Beverly Hills surgeon explains at home fix for crepey skin around the arms, legs, and stomach.

Who made it so that Republican members of Congress are more afraid of primary challenges from their right than anything else? (Gerrymandering and) the right-wing media, of course!

This has been going on for decades. In 1987, when the FCC scrapped the “Fairness Doctrine” requiring tv and radio broadcasters to balance their political programming, there was no consumer internet. There were a handful of tv stations. There was licensed radio, the national papers and magazines and maybe a few local papers. There were books. That was it.

Certainly, some of these carried right-wing messages. Right-wing media is only a bit younger than media itself. But it was filtered, through far more editorial scrutiny and far fewer outlets than today. There was no national platform, known to all, readily available 24 hours a day basically for free, perpetually refreshed with new content, that was fully committed to advancing an extreme, ideologically right-wing agenda in 1987. Today we have constellations of them.

Used to be you had to sign up for Ron Paul’s newsletter, probably at the gun show, and wait for it to come in the mail to read the latest about the coming race war. It took some non-negligible effort to absorb weird, wrong, dangerous ideas. Now you can enter a world of impending conflict and bloody struggle against your enemies anywhere and always. It can fully replace the reality you see with your own eyes. And it badly wants to, because then it can sell more things to you.

Character assassination will always be a feature of politics. There will always be people who lie and deceive for political ends, and, to a greater or lesser extent, succeed at it. There will always be conspiracy theories, and sometimes actual conspiracies, and hatred, and fear, and ignorance, and vengefulness, and all the other rots. The extent to which these rots thrive depends on the environment. There is none more hospitable to them than right-wing media, which is now everywhere and multiplying.

Maybe this will help? At any rate, best of luck to us!

[ NYT ]

Hell.No. Hats
  • Darkest Timeline Zach Morris

    I had a guy who only watches Fox News tell me to get out of my liberal echo chamber the other day. My head shot off the top of my fucking neck from irony buildup (and rising blood pressure, I eat terribly).

  • Unpresidented Ron

    How does one fight propaganda? And propaganda that the targets willingly absorb and support, at that?

  • Oblios_Cap

    we will collect more taxes when we cut them.

    In Scott’s Florida Republican utopia, despite his amazing economic aptitude we have budget shortfalls each year that require the employees not get a cost-of-living allowance, much less a raise (though he frames a COLA as a raise).

    Screw the help; Capitalism at its finest.

    • Ezio Auditore

      “If they could just pull themselves up by the bootstraps then maybe they could be successful. It wasn’t easy for me to make it with my small loan of a million dollars. Now where is that servant bell”?

      • Hobbes’ Evil Twin

        IKR, I had to sell some stocks AND pay capital gains just to make it through B school.

  • Msgr_MΩment

    Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

  • Vecchiojohn

    It’s been a long process for the right to reshape the media to their own liking. Of course the same thing is being done in other areas. See, for example, the Federalist Society.

  • Randy Riddle

    But … but … what about all the money to be made off the rubes that believe this shit?

    How will the staff of Brietbart ever survive??

    • Claire

      Ima start making money off the rubes. I’m going to go into the business of producing infomercials selling them cheap underground bunkers with adjustable beds and handrails on the toilets. Then when they’re all underground I’m going to flip the doomsday switch on the bunkers and lock them all in so the rest of us can get on with rebuilding the planet.

  • baconzgood

    This is why I only use an tarot cards to get my news.

    • Shan

      You get FUTURE news?! Why didn’t you tell us about the election?!

      • baconzgood

        I didn’t want to make people sadz

  • Michael Smith

    And the new interactive mass media has made consensus obsolete, in a way not seen for a very long time.

    The advent of internet and social media is a revolution in information access and in the ability to express that hasn’t been seen since the printing press. Or maybe even the beginning of written language itself. And the internet’s ability to disseminate formerly restricted information, and to subject that information to commentaries from charismatic amateurs – some insightful, some buffoonish, and some catastrophically dangerous – is something that I think is comparable to the Reformation.

    We are in murky waters here.

    • Paul

      That’s deep.

  • monoglot

    Between scrapping the “Fairness Doctrine,” and allowing media outlets to be held in very few hands, the chances of ever placing new sources in the service of the public again are faint.

    Greed over people, and party over country are increasingly difficult obstacles to overcome, but the very existence of country as most of us know — or knew it — depends upon fighting for legitimate information to be more widely available than propaganda is (and for propaganda to be labeled as such).

  • calliecallie

    Right wing news and its altgenda of democracide.

  • Spotts1701, Resistance Pilot

    I still remember reading David Brock’s book “The Republican Noise Machine” back when it first came out, and wondering “surely they can’t be in this for more than a money grab. It’s far easier and more profitable to throw stones at a Democratic Administration than work to elect a Republican one”.
    So much for my naïve outlook on this world.

    • beingreleased

      So many of them are just out for the money grab (see Palin, S. and Carson, B.) that it feels like they just won by accident.

  • An Outhouse for the Resistance

    “we forgot to sew the noble white laborer into our quilt of justice”
    I wove him in – right into middle and used him for stuffing until he suffocated and started to smell bad.

  • goonemeritus

    The election swung on so few votes in the critical swing states that a logical case could be made for just about any theory. To that end I blame myself for not being snarky enough to swing Pennsylvania. Sorry Hillary you deserved better, I let you down and I know it.

    • Michael Smith

      My bad there, too.

      • goonemeritus

        Nice of you to say but I’m pretty sure it was me.

    • beingreleased

      She would have lost Maryland if it hadn’t been for my tireless efforts commenting at The Wonkette.

    • Tallmutha

      I live in New York but was gonna come work for Hilz in my nearest swing state, Pennsylvania. But jeez, when the polls had her up by 12 there… I wussed out.

    • Zippy W Pinhead

      I blamed the dog*

      *he’s used to it

  • Mr. Blobfish

    And now they all have a place in the coming Trump administration. Looking at you, Betsy McCaughey.

  • Hobbes’ Evil Twin

    20-odd years ago when I first heard of fuckface von Limbaugh and I remember thinking “why in the hell would anyone think anything this guy says makes sense?”

    Silly me.

    • OrG

      Yep,I used to be on construction sites,limpballs would on the radio and I would think “Every thing this asshole is saying goes against you poor mother fuckers,WHY ARE YOU LISTENING TO THIS SHIT?!”

      • Scrofula

        The alternative is stuff like “Fresh AIr”. Terri Gross just doesn’t work at a construction site. Amy Goodman doesn’t have the syndication reach.

    • Scrofula

      Heh heh, feminazis, right?

    • UncleTravelingMatt

      I remember my first thought, something along the lines of: “At least Paul Harvey’s bullshit isn’t so repetitive.”

  • Ezio Auditore

    If there is one thing that the right-wing media is good at, it is bending the truth and appealing to people’s deep-seated fears. That’s how you get people who were claiming that Hillary Clinton was “just as bad” as Donald Trump or thinking Mexicans are at fault for loss in American jobs.

    • Tallmutha

      They’re also good at persistence. They worked this angle for decades, scoring victories here and there, but the public’s rejection of their number one target in favor of that guy was their crowning achievement–thus far.

  • Mavenmaven

    Yup. Blanchot said this a long time ago, that fascism was a response to a hyperreal world that lost its moorings to reality. And now we live again in a world in which media figures subvert the “hyperreal” directly and openly for power and profit.

  • Bitter Scribe

    Racism and sexism. That’s it.

  • FauxAntocles

    The gullibility of so many Americans also played a role – liberals tend to be skeptics and cynics while the conservatives tend to be cogs in the machine.

    • Spotts1701, Resistance Pilot

      It’s a lot less taxing to be told who to hate, who to fear, and who to blame rather than make those value judgments yourself.

  • Sister Artemis

    This lines up rather nicely with my own opinion that we should blame the left and center left less* and focus on the shit show that is the Republican party. Who handed this election to Trump? They did, more than any player in the whole scene.

    But you are correct, the wackaloon media was hand-in-hand, right there with them.

    * not that we can’t look at improving strategies on the left; not that we can’t do our own post-election autopsies. But I place the blame on the Right Wing, not on the Democrats or other lefties. Except maybe Jill Stein, cuz fuck her.

    • A_Changeling

      When Trump won, one of my first thoughts was: oh great, now we’ll get days of the left trying to figure out how this was their fault. Could they just skip that? It’s not on them, it’s on the GOP and their media. In hindsight “days” was quite naive. Looks like it’ll be years.
      But really, my outsider’s view is that the country’s biggest problem is a citizenry that is misled, misinformed and has been taught no critical thinking skills (gaslighted, as they now say). Your best defense is that there seem to be more elite dick-jokers with some sense of empathy like you lot.
      Before the election I felt the GOP was on the brink of falling apart. Nov 8th didn’t change that. I still think they’re falling apart. Dems on the other hand are coming together, ever since the convention, slowly, but still. Maybe I’m an optimist.

      • Hellhathnofury Demme

        I agree.
        We are already seeing signs of splintering in the GOP.

    • Hellhathnofury Demme

      All the damage done by the left-wing from BoBs, or if you think Bernie stayed in too long, lw hatred of Hillary, etc. pales in comparison to right-wing voter suppression, Russian hacking, Wikileaks, Comey, anti-Hillary propaganda, and a candidate that shamelessly lied and sowed fear etc.
      We did not lose as much as they won by cheating.
      No circular firing squad for me.
      There is work to be done, but my head is held high.

  • Tallmutha

    So true, so true.

  • memzilla Ω

    This is part of an ongoing Republican attack on our form of government…

    The architect of the modern conservative movement was corporate and tobacco attorney Lewis Powell, and his blueprint was “the 1971 Powell Memo,”
    titled, “Attack on American Free Enterprise System.” The memo claimed that “the American economic system” (capitalism) and “business” were “under broad attack” from “Communists, New Leftists and other revolutionaries.” It complained of “the stampedes by politicians to support almost any legislation related to ‘consumerism’ or to the ‘environment.’” It called on business as a class to “conduct guerrilla warfare” against this on “the college campus, the pulpit, the media, the intellectual and literary journals, the arts and sciences” as well as politicians the public and the courts. The goal was for business to “consider assuming a broader and more vigorous role in the political arena.”

  • Vincent Ricola

    “There is no way to make the conservative policy agenda sound nice without bullshitting.”

    Mom? Is that you mom? Or am I having a flashback to when I was a child and my parents explained why they voted Democratic instead of Republicant?

  • Unpresidented_in_Seattle

    RW media found its legs once they stopped using big words.

  • Master Contrail Program

    I do have to wonder what is the endgame supposed to be? I know the answer is money, dear boy, for the Rushes, Hannities, Bill O’s of the world. But how does having a nation of angry, easily frightened, heavily armed people that seek a fabricated reality ultimately help the shot-callers?

    I realize they can set up shop anywhere, like Leeland Gaunt after giving the country its Needful Things, but this isn’t isolated to America. We just have a very distinct variety of right-wing crazy.

    • disqus_lWwzrwNaw6

      Their role model for us all seems to be Brazil, where immensely wealthy oligarchs (who own all the newspapers and TV outlets, natch, as well as the banks and the mines and goodness knows what else) huddle in opulent gated communities guarded by private armies, while the rest of the citizenry fight for crumbs in deteriorating favelas amidst the stink, violence and misery of a failing democracy.

    • Lefty Frizzell

      Hannity’s so stupid he’s a True Believer. I can’t decide if that makes him better or worse than the hustlers.

  • Resistance Fighter Callyson
  • shivaskeeper

    I would also add the death of journalism in the modern age. News agencies as a whole were slow to react to the internet and when they did react it seemed to be all about the income generated by “breaking news”. Also filling a 24 hours news cycle and giving the fluff and puff pieces as much legitimacy as actual news.

    As soon as legitimate news sources figured out how to make the money off the clicks they got rid of copy editors and research staff wholesale. Who needs them if we get the revenue no matter what we post, write, or say?

    • disqus_lWwzrwNaw6

      Quite true. This is also complicated by the fact that the handful of corporations that own our mainstream news outlets are corporate entities, not journalism outlets: and they all–every one of them–routinely have business before committees of Congress concerning everything from mergers and acquisitions to taxes and regulations.

      As corporations concerned with maximizing profits and keeping the shareholders happy, they have no interest whatsoever in ruffling Congressional feathers (especially if those feathers happen to belong to pro-corporate, anti-tax, anti-regulatory, dark money Republicans).

      So yeah: goombye, journalism, actual reporting, as it turns out, is bad for the bottom line.

    • Spotts1701, Resistance Pilot

      Not to mention the death of local-level media. Many mid and small-market newspapers are nothing more than aggregates for the AP/Reuters with almost no staff writers let alone investigative journalists. So local politics gets the bare minimum of coverage, and it’s usually just publication of notices required by law. And local television in smaller markets may have one investigative reporter on staff, but often times the segment has become an “On Your Side”-type fluff piece to deal with whatever crank managed to get their e-mail read. Everything else is just beamed in from the national news division.

      • shivaskeeper

        I know some folks who used to work the local/regional newspapers. They’ll tell you that the first people management cut were the copy editors and research staff. That would help with the problem of losing money ti the internet content for a little while. Then as soon as the papers started losing more money because they were essentially printing misspelled dreck with no insights into what was being printed management would let staff writers go to stop hemorrhaging money. Then when that didn’t work in the long run, just become an aggregate, or sell the whole thing off and fire everybody.

  • jesuswasablack

    I remember when I was a kid in the 60’s – 70’s we used to hear how horrible the counter culture was, how we where going to lose a generation to drugs, socialism, etc all the right-wing boogymen. Now it seems we have lost a generation, a generation of olds to FAUX news!
    https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/folder880/55414880.jpg

    • pianoplayer1

      I am 64, white, and have always lived in Alabama. I never watch FOX news, for two reasons: I hate their propaganda with every fiber of my being; and I am afraid my blood pressure would rise to stroke-level within 30 seconds of viewing.

      • Sister Artemis

        It would be interesting to run a study of how watching FOX news impacts high blood pressure and other diseases. My hypothesis would be of course that watching such crap raises blood pressure and effects other stress-related responses. But then, I am a biased liebrul, so of course I’d think that.

        • jesuswasablack

          Depends (not the diapers), most righties I know would stroke out if they didn’t watch FAUX. They truly have brainwashed a good percentage of the olds!

  • ViveLaRésistance

    The Sleeping Giants (@slpng_giants) approach is an excellent start, but it can’t stop with Twitter. Until the 1% feels real pain, they’re not going to restrain Team Tangerine. Clearly there is no negotiating with the Trump flying monkeys so we have to cut their oxygen. It will take a sustained, relentless economic war that hits the overlords in their bloated bottom lines. It will be hard for many Americans to stomach that. For example, I’m embarrassed to think how long we here at Casa Resistance agonized over cutting the cord with Comcast TV.

  • Good_Gawd_Yall

    I see no hope for this country going forward. I really don’t. The mantra of “More for me! Fuck you!” is in control of every. fucking. thing. from what was once a news media actually dedicated to bringing people news (and is now nothing more than pretty people babbling between commercials) to every level of government, to neighbors who will help each other hook up a new dishwasher but lose their shit at the idea that their taxes might help that same neighbor take care of her kids if she lost her job because her company, owned by greedy assgoblins, moved overseas (and more so if said neighbor is black or brown or looks furrin). We are the antithesis of a “United” states, and getting less and less united every day. What hope is there, with the vulgar talking yam and his rapacious weasels preparing to literally take over the world?

    • shivaskeeper

      What I’m doing is one on one engagement basically. I can be pretty persuasive IRL. Only for the actual sane one though. There are some that cannot be reached and I won’t waste my time with them. As a friend and neighbor my voice carries more weight than the media. It’s slow going with not a lot to show for it, but if I can persuade a few people, maybe they can persuade a few more.

      • MΩebym

        This reminds me…I saw this posted in Pantsuit Nation about two months ago, and have no idea who the original source was (my apologies to the original poster), but I saved it to repost elsewhere because I think it makes excellent points. All emphasis is mine.

        Among many factors that led us to this moment, let me add one more that I have not heard called out: the Dem leadership’s theory of change. I think this is a root cause of why many of those I grew up with, have lived among, organized, canvassed, researched, and broke bread with did not get with her.
        Back in 1991, the Republican-led US had just invaded the Gulf, and I was motivated to put all of my 19 year old self into making a change. I volunteered for the Dems in Scranton and through the primaries did typical low-level volunteer work like petitioning to get the candidate on the ballot. My family has been doing that kind of stuff in Scranton since the 1850s when organizing was illegal and many rights we enjoy had yet to be gained. I was excited to be part of this lineage. Then I learned that the candidate Bill Clinton and his wife were coming to town for a fundraiser, I was surprised that the meal was something like 300 dollars a plate. “Will there be anything else?,” I asked the county Dem lead. Nope. He was truly excited about the event and gushing. I was a little sickened. I didn’t know anyone who could afford that kind of thing. I had joined a party that I could not attend!
        I do not blame Bill and Hillary for this. They were just two shmucks who happened to bubble up to the forefront of a generational sea-change in party leadership. The “New Democrats” were in their minds updating outmoded ideas of changemaking. Under the New Dems, the emphasis has been on donor engagement, PACs, and (later Clicktivsm). Community engagement and donor engagement can be hard to distinguish. So much so, that donorship and membership might be seen as equivocal— especially and importantly— to those on the outside looking in. Door knocking, phone bankings, and their electronic equivalents remain part of the mix but in an impoverished context. Before the generational shift that brought Bill Clinton to the presidency, ward captains were deeply engaged with the community all the time not just during elections. This leant itself to building reciprocal relationships with the community. People were heard and listened to not just episodically according to the election cycle.This created avenues for bottom up policy. Some of the best policies we have ever achieved came up in this way. A virtuous cycle. In contrast, as part of retooling the machine, the New Dems favored hiring professionals to conduct surveys and focus groups to test policies rather than building consensus through extended conversation with constituents.That was a stale an FDR cigar. At key moments in an election cycle, party organizers still turn their attention to the next-most valuable players after donors— “likely voters”. Yep, that works great, if you already have relationships in place with a lot of “likely voters.” BUT if you always target likely voters (and even them only occasionally) you only ever reach the usual suspects— and those you don’t reach have ever more reason to suspect that you do not have their interest at heart. A vicious cycle. Among other benefits, those antiquated methods that the New Dems turned their backs on contributed to huge voter turn out in places like Scranton during the hey day of the Progressive Era. In contrast, a huge portion of potential voters in this election did not vote. A progressive stronghold has become a hollowed husk. In the last few days, I heard more than one person say, it will take a generation of organizing to get out of this mess. Likely. It took a generation of NOT organizing to get us into it.”

        • shivaskeeper

          Make a whole lot of sense.

        • spacedcowgirl

          Wow… this is exactly in line with what our county Democratic Party chair has been saying and describing to our local group. I’m an introvert and live in a red county, so I don’t exactly relish talking to my neighbors (most of whom I don’t actually know yet) about this, but it does make a lot of sense that conversations and connections between people could help fix what is broken here.

    • ViveLaRésistance

      I see no hope either, at least not until there has been so much suffering the masses rise up. Frankly I don’t credit the masses with the drive and intelligence to stage a revolt. Even if we did, I fear that the rapacious weasels will have so altered our legal framework as to make recovery well nigh impossible.

    • Courser

      The enormity of it all is drowning, smothering me. I wake up each morning and wonder if I’ll make it through the day. I have to keep going, putting one step in front of another and watching the horizon fearfully, hoping I can get strong enough, soon enough. And being kind oldz, it’s tougher than ever.

    • A_Changeling

      We had a small-scale version of this in my country. A (covertly) racist, xenophobic, populist party rose from obscurity to about 20% popularity – the same as the top three traditional parties. Everyone else was shocked. The mood in the country changed. Suddenly it seemed ok to be a racist asshole. They stayed popular until they were forced into power (our governments are always coalition governments, and they avoided that responsibility as long as they could, probably knowing it’s easier to shout than to govern). Their popularity plunged. Now they’re at 7-10%.
      I used to say to U.S.Americans before the election that it’s too bad that with a two-party system you can’t afford this experiment. Well, now you don’t have a choice. But from what I’ve learned, Trump’s popularity can only go down. Maybe it’s a boil that needs to pop. We still have a lot of deplorables spewing shit, but hopefully they won’t have power any more soon.
      What’s happening to me, am I becoming an optimist?

      • tomamitai

        I thought we already had this covered after the Great Depression/WWII, when Republicans and laissez-faire economics took a big hit, but when the Democrats decided to tackle racism, the Republicans were more than happy to gather in all the disaffected racists and make a comeback. I just hope I live long enough to see the pendulum swing back the other way – towards economic justice, NOT the Dems going back to being racist friendly!

      • Good_Gawd_Yall

        Thank you. That actually makes me feel better.

  • cheetojeebus

    I know, blanket statements, over simplifying etc…But, Fuck all of them.

  • Crystalclear12

    Yes, I can get behind this!!

  • Scrofula

    I propose a national fund to support leg-y blonds, to keep them off RW TV. That’ll help diminish Grandpa’s interest, at least as a start.

    • Sister Artemis

      This makes surprisingly good sense. *sigh* The corollary, I suppose, is more leggy blondes on center to lefty news… or maybe a few Justin Trudeau types. You know, for Grandma.

  • Panika MCD

    while this is cathartic, I find it fairly unhelpful–except for the helpful assistance of NYT & Co. as to what we can do about it. but I find the circular firing squad even less helpful. did we fuck up in multiple ways on the left? of course we did. but we can’t even start to re-calibrate our strategies until we each do a self-inventory to figure out what each of us individually could have done better or more. that way, when we do come to those larger conversations about party and campaign infrastructure, we’re coming from a more humble place and have a better chance at talking to each other in such a way that our ideas will be accepted. but, yes. fuck a whole lot of the right wing media. they are 100% wrong and horrible and should go eat sugar free gummie worms until they’re stuck on the porcelain throne for the next year with the diarrheas. (real worms should not be subjected to being eaten by such filth unless K-Conn would like a nice tape worm. hook worms are also an acceptable parasite for them to ingest.)

  • Zippy W Pinhead

    Breitbart has said that it condemns racism and bigotry “in any form”.

    ROFL have these nitwits read their own website? Have they ever read their comments section?

    • YoNastyBunny

      They condemn racism against white people and bigotry against bigots… that’s what they meant.

    • CatCafe de la Resistance

      Part of being a bigot or a racist is flatly denying that you’re a bigot or a racist. It’s part of the bigotry. You’re not a bigot, you’re just “truthful.” People who call you bigoted–THEY’RE the bigots.

      • spacedcowgirl

        I’m not sure there even exists an offense anymore for which they would agree you should properly be called racist (I mean, not “reverse racist,” regular old racist), so great is their affront at being referred to as such. Even when someone kills a black or brown person in cold blood, there’s always a “good reason” and the perpetrator is judged by comments sections everywhere to be absolutely 100% “not racist.” :(

  • beingreleased

    Don’t you love it when a place you like does something you like? Nando’s Peri-Peri is my family’s go to lunch place (my kids love it). I just read this in the WaPo:

    So this week, as Nando’s Peri-Peri begins to hand out #everyoneiswelcome posters at six Washington restaurants, the South African-Portuguese chicken chain is pitching the campaign as a statement of corporate values, not a slap at President-elect Donald Trump and his supporters. Those who voted for Trump, of course, may take a different view of the poster, whose language on the back reads:

    “Nando’s Peri-Peri is an

    Immigrant EMPLOYING

    Gay LOVING

    Muslim RESPECTING

    Racism OPPOSING

    Equal PAYING

    MultiCULTURAL

    chicken restaurant where #everyoneiswelcome.”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/food/can-restaurants-take-a-stand-during-inauguration-without-alienating-trump-voters/2017/01/09/ded46ff8-d2ba-11e6-9cb0-54ab630851e8_story.html?hpid=hp_local-news_nandos-830am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.a159022fec57

    • SnarkON

      Chik-Fil-A libel!

      • ThatHat

        Chik-filibel, you mean

    • YoNastyBunny

      MMmmmmmm…. *mouth watering* Nando’s… I eat there and buy their sauces from the grocery store.

    • CatCafe de la Resistance

      I love this so much. Another company doing this is Penzeys Spices–not only my favorite supplier of herbs and spices (they are PHENOMENAL) but the owner has made strong public statements in exactly the same vein, further inviting people who don’t agree to stop shopping there. They had about 5% of their customers “unsubscribe” from their mailing list, but an overflowing support and love from their other customers, and a bunch of new business. They do mostly mail order, and I hope you’ll all support them too (if you cook, you will love). Here’s their website, but if you’re on the FB, it’s worth it to go friend them. https://www.penzeys.com/

      • alpacapunchbowl

        I am originally from the same area Penzey’s started out (southeastern Wisconsin) and can attest that their products are not only the BEST, they are also truly good people. They have always made it a priority to travel regularly to where they source from to make sure everything’s on the up and up, they establish long-standing relationships with their growers, have helped establish co-ops and they cut out middlemen as much as possible so that the growers are receiving the compensation they deserve.
        I don’t work for the company in case you’re wondering, I just LOVE them and am more than happy to go full cheerleader. Check them out, you won’t be disappointed.

  • bookish
  • SnarkON

    True story: After spending two days ensconced in a Central Florida retirement community with an ailing Old who blares the television 20 hours a day–a toxic stew of local news and “Law & Order: SVU” reruns punctuated by commercials for prescription arthritis medication, cataract surgery and the state lottery–I, too, began to suspect that the entire world was overrun with child rapists and misery. It’s pretty easy to see why segregated old people whose only window on the world is these shows would soon be scared out of what’s left of their minds.

    • CatCafe de la Resistance

      Absolutely. Fox News and hate radio bank on this. Also, these are rural people in small backwoods patches who’ve never ventured out of their tiny segregated homogenous communities. If this is the window they have onto the world, and they’re not smart enough to question it, and they don’t read (and they don’t–try to find a bookstore or even a national newspaper in any of those places), and it’s confirmation bias–as someone else said, they’re already scared of change (which is why they’ve never left their backwoods patches) and a bit mean–of course it’s easy to fan the flames

    • Usedtobeyellerdawg

      You’re lucky. My resident old (and I’m 53, so we’re talking a really-old) watches the true-crime “Forensic Files” shows all day. 18 minutes of blood and gore, a two minute hat tip to science and 10 minutes of commercials in every episode.

  • Jennifer R

    We must make use of the tools that have given them such success.

    • Sister Artemis

      my eyes are kind of blurry this morning (allergies) and I initially read that as: “We must make use of the trolls that have given them such success.”

      That kind of works too, I suppose.

      • Jennifer R

        The lure of money may bring us useful idiots.

      • Usedtobeyellerdawg

        That’s it! We need to buy some Russian trolls!

    • Martini Ambassador

      I dunno if it’s possible. They depend so heavily on the wiling ignorance and sheer stupidity of their audience. And, conservatives respond to fear messaging much better:http://www.salon.com/2016/06/06/study_liberals_and_conservatives_have_different_brain_structures_partner/

    • CatCafe de la Resistance

      It’s been tried, though. Remember Al Franken’s attempt with Air America? The problem is the left-wingers actually have jobs, and know how to think, and don’t listen all day to radio programs or sit on the internet. The worst thing is we also have something called “empathy” and “the ability to understand another point of view” and “open mindedness,” which makes us less fanatic.

      • Jennifer R

        There are other left wing news radio outfits. Air America crashed because of dipshitted management. We had this discussion on BJ a couple weeks ago and even with three major outfits left wing radio isn’t pumping out the vitriol and animosity like the right does. We have to step up our game.

      • Usedtobeyellerdawg

        Don’t forget self-examination, which often leads us to reconsidering our views, or “waffling” is conservospeak.

      • tomamitai

        Prairie Home Companion did a skit about a fictional failed attempt to do from the left what Rush and the other right wingers do on radio. As you say, the left wing character couldn’t bring himself to lie shamelessly, even in a good cause, because he had morals and principles. There were some funny bits in it, though, and it’s available on a cd set entitled “Garrison Keillor’s Comedy Theater: More Songs & Sketches From A Prairie Home Companion”.

      • spacedcowgirl

        “don’t listen all day to radio programs or sit on the internet”

        Ma’am, although you are correct that I have a job, you have otherwise grievously mischaracterized me.

    • BigCSouthside

      Can’t be done. Liberals in general like nuance and debate. Conservatives want to be told and have their biases fears thoughts confirmed even if there is no truth.

  • bookish

    Son-in-law named Trump White House senior advisor.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/09/us/politics/donald-trump-transition.html

    It has been expected for weeks. Now, Trump transition officials confirm that Jared Kushner, Mr. Trump’s son-in-law and a major real estate developer in New York, will be named senior adviser to the president.

    The rumored post has focused attention on Mr. Kushner’s myriad potential conflicts of interest, including a Chinese development deal that’s in the works. Then there’s the issue of whether a son-in-law in the West Wing violates antinepotism laws.

    But the Trump team will muscle through — as it usually does.

    People close to transition warned that Mr. Kushner’s title might be adjusted. An announcement could come as early as Tuesday.

    • CatCafe de la Resistance

      Thank god we didn’t have a “dynasty” like we would have if we’d elected Hillary!

      • bookish

        Whew…we dodged that bullet by a mere 3 million votes. Instead of a former Sec State, we have people who want to fuck Ivanka.

    • MΩebym

      Nepotism – IOKIYAR!

    • A_Changeling

      I have the same problem as Evan – I find Jared pleasant-looking, and whenever I see him I think “he seems nice” although I know better. How do I cure this? (Hides)

      • disqus_lWwzrwNaw6

        Look at old pictures of Ted Bundy. He was pleasant looking (and Republican) as well.

      • ez

        Read Wilde’s “Picture of Dorian Gray” and just keep scratching Dorian’s name out and writing in Jared Kushner?

  • bookish
    • tomamitai

      What are the odds he’ll actually have one then, or that he’ll take questions that haven’t been provided in advance?

      • disqus_lWwzrwNaw6

        Isn’t the real president supposed to give his farewell address on the 10th? Then of course Donald and his snickering Kru will want to overshadow and dominate the news cycle by horning in the very next day; and of course our national press will go along with the program. Or the pogrom. Whichever comes first.

        • HogeyeGrex

          It’s pretty much to suck all the air out of the room on the day the Senate will be confirming six of his uglier cabinet picks. All in one day, so it’s basically impossible for the press to cover how wrong even one would be, even if the story of the day weren’t the press conference.

  • bookish

    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/democrats-sponsor-bill-to-force-trump-to-divest-2017-01-09

    Congressional Democrats introduced a bill on Monday that would require the President, Vice President, and their families to disclose and sell any assets that present any potential financial conflicts of interest. Current conflicts of interest laws do not cover the two most senior members of the executive branch.

    The bill — which has basically zero chance of passage in a Republican-held Congress — comes as President-elect Donald Trump hasn’t voluntarily published his own tax returns. It also comes at a time when the Republican-led Senate is poised to begin confirming Trump’s nominees for cabinet and executive level jobs beginning on Tuesday even though, according to the Walter Shaub, director of the Office of Government Ethics, many of them have not received the legally required ethics clearances from his office.

  • Lefty Frizzell

    Since the election I have come to the conclusion that humans do have Original Sin, and it’s got nothing to do with Trees, Knowledge, Clothes or Naughty Bits.

    They are, as a whole, simply too fucking fearful, hateful, bigoted, stupid and greedy.

    They thrive on anything and everything that tells them that’s OK, from Ayn Rand, Nigerian Princes, and the Tea Party through to the NRA, Sov-Cits, the Christian Right, the Alt-Right and Trump.

    There is no solution. We are doomed.

  • IOnlyLikeCats

    You know, I honestly find it kind of strange that Hillary Clinton was expected to give a perfect campaign (personally, I think she did great, but definitely not perfect) when she was the first woman candidate from a major party. Thinking back to it, I’m honestly surprised there weren’t more hiccups.

    Also, I’d like to point out that whatever she did, the media said it was wrong. Not just the right wing either.

    Can you tell I’m still bitter?

    • Courser

      None of us is perfect.

      I truly feel nauseous when I think how Hilary Clinton has served this country all her adult life. She’s be scrutinized more carefully than practically ANY woman in American history. And we shit all over her, not once, but twice. Followed by shitting all over Obama’s legacy.

      • Me not sure

        Not just scutinized, often brutalized.

    • Historicat

      Well, there were all of those people who were disenfranchised in places like Wisconsin and Ohio and Florida. Thank goodness Chief Justice “Racism is over” gutted the VRA. Balls and Strikes!

  • Sister Artemis

    okay, so how can we promote that liberal redneck guy? Trae Crowder’s vids are awesome. And the one playing on autoplay at the youtube page below makes some good points about the hypocrisy of slamming the south and people from there. And after all, our own Evan is a Southern Person, as are many Wonkers.
    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTHsQd-vRXK1bp4vpifl6yA

  • Alan

    Well said.

  • AngryKatie

    There’s a hand-in-glove relationship between this and the death of critical thinking. The higher your ability to think critically, the less influential this kind of messaging is.

    I’ve wondered for a while now if there are parts of the country where they raise their young’uns on a diet of mountain dew, lead paint chips, straight salt, and garbage television. I kid, I KNOW there are.

    • John Resistant Tovarich Smith

      WV libelz!!!111!

      • ez

        West Virginia, #1 in opioid based OD’s.

        Makes this Mountaineer look forward to the return to the Eastern Panhandle in a year or so, not.

        • John Resistant Tovarich Smith

          You should feel blessed, I’m in the sorta southern part of the state. (Huntington)

          • ez

            Watch out for the Moth Man and be glad you’re not over in McDowell county.

  • Resistance Engineer Red Bird

    Good point. But one has to wonder if this would have worked had American society not been so conservative in the first place. I mean it would take a lot of effort to make people hate themselves but next to no effort to make them love themselves more. TLDR:yall racist AF.

  • MΩebym

    Right-wing media’s influence is particularly pernicious, but all mainstream media is culpable, with its false equivalency bullshit.

  • Paperless Tiger

    Here’s the problem. If I turn on the radio to hear the news, it’s more likely I will hear some right-wing fanatic shouting about the evils of liberalism. I never hear a leftist. I might hear some news sandwiched in between the right-wing shouters. This is a straight radio news station! Furthermore, the shouters keep insisting that the media is a liberal conspiracy. It’s crazy.

    • CindyinEncinitas

      Remember Air America? I feared that we were really fucked when it went off the air.

      • snark-lurker

        DOA because “commie/socialist/marxist” reasons.
        and i seen to recall Steff Miller trying a Maddow maneuver that flopped
        wut about Democracy Now! but that don’t count cause too cerebrul

    • Snobo

      Switch over to FM. NPR’s relatively neutral.

      • Lefty Wright

        I question the neutrality of NPR. I’ve heard several interviews where they let obvious lies and misrepresentations slide by. I think part of it is they right wing spews so many lies it’s hard to keep up and refute all of them, but the left still falls for the idea of being non-biased to the point of letting right wing lies proliferate. They do not want to offend anyone. But in doing so, they allow hate, bigotry, lies and violence to spread. Sometimes, “you are lying” is needed. Or at least,”if you do not have reliable data, I will assume you are lying. So where did those numbers come from?”

        • Snobo

          I listen to them every day and can’t recall one example of that.

          • sgt. jmk of the résistance

            Just this morning, they had a segment with Jonah Goldberg that let a few of his assertions – like the claim that Clinton just didn’t do the campaigning that she should’ve done if she wanted to win – just float by unchallenged.

        • Right (and god knows i throw things at the wall nearly every time i hear Mara liassom) but Snobo’s correct in that it’s still more center than most other news sources.

          (I totally agree with your analysis btw. It makes me sad too)

        • Marceline

          Yeah. NPR lost me through it’s non stop both sidesrism.

  • Picabo

    You can add interstate crosscheck the the things that decided the election. Read this and weep for our democracy. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-gops-stealth-war-against-voters-w435890

    • ViveLaRésistance

      The last line of the article is what makes me weep. We can barely get people to vote once, let alone twice. We’d have a better chance of fixing the problem if folks in the targeted demographics (1) registered in large numbers, (2) showed up to vote, and (3) screamed like banshees if someone tried to keep them from voting. How do we motivate that behavior?

  • snark-lurker

    i know of no usa broadcast* news source that is not middle-right at best (“at best” being pbs only)

    *i now see cable/satelite as broadcasters because they are ubiquitous

    • huggingRobot

      Rachel Maddow?

  • Banrion

    NYT is only publishing this because they want exclusive access to gently fondle Trump’s balls for the next 4 years. They have fallen all over themselves trying to get on his good side since the election.

    • disqus_lWwzrwNaw6

      They fell all over themselves taking Hillary down before the election, even after it had become clear that this meant electing Donald, so yeah: the liberal New York Times. Jesus H Christ. There is no forgiving the Times. But then, they thought Hitler and the Nazis were a terrific deal for Germany, too. It was a long time (longer than most of the Western press) before they finally came around and acknowledged that maybe the, you know, invading other people’s countries and ripping up the rule of law and comitting mass murder and the Jew stuff and the union stuff and the book burning and whatnot, weren’t so great after all, upon further reflection.

      Actually, fuck the Times..

      • OrdinaryJoe

        “All the bullshit that can fit in print.”

      • Vagenda and Tiara

        They also applauded Fidel Castro as a liberator.

  • House0fTheBlueLights

    Well, aren’t you a little ray of sunshine.

  • jesuswasablack

    I’m sure like me, many of my fellow wonketteers listen to Thom Hartman, he’s a lefty radio dude who for the most part does a pretty good job. Lately though I’ve noticed he’s having a bit of a time justifying his employment with Trump Propaganda channel RT (Russia Today). I watch RT occasionally, about a year or two ago they went full anti-Islam, anti-Hillary, anti- Merica. I was watching this weekend and they were pushing some BS stories about nice white German womens getting raped by all the brown refugees. Anyway it’s interesting to watch media folk squirm when the folks who sign the paycheck conflict with their traditional audience?
    https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TORWsQp539M/maxresdefault.jpg

  • Biel_ze_Bubba

    Just read that NYT linkie. http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/07/opinion/sunday/how-to-destroy-the-business-model-of-breitbart-and-fake-news.html
    It just might work: Limplob was hit hard when advertisers reacted with disgust when they learned their ad dollars were funding hate radio. How many corporations do you think will actually WANT their ads on not-so-Breitbart? Other than Exxon, Koch Industries, a few other actually evil businesses?

    • thewendyb

      Unless it loses them revenue, they will keep making as much money as possible by being unethical whenever they can get away with that.

  • ResistanceFighterCaptainHowdy

    There is the persistent problem of the segment of the left (the “liberal-hating” or “anti-liberal” left, No More Mister Nice Blog) who will not stop falling over themselves to trash the Democratic Party, be useful idiots for the far right, praise neo-Nazis and neo-Confederates like Assange and Paul, supply ammunition to the right by the wheelbarrow load, et cetera et cetera. Does anyone think they are going to make nice in the interest of unity? They worked hand in hand with the right in 2016, and will do so again in 2018 and 2020.

    • Other Chris

      These monkeys in the middle love to poison the well with their false equivalencies, and leave others with the impression that it’s better to give up your civic responsibilities than it is to fight against the most blatant kinds of evil.

    • Vagenda and Tiara

      Paging Susan Sarandon, paging Susan Sarandon.

  • thewendyb

    The WORST decision the Democratic Party has made is to try to win votes imitating Republicans.
    No.
    Don’t!!!

  • Shoto

    “Right-wing media is 100% of the problem.”

    “Both sides do it.”

    — Chuck Todd

    • Always appropriate: FUCK YOU CHUCKLES!

    • huggingRobot

      *gag* Somebody said Chuck Todd *gag*

    • Vagenda and Tiara

      I’m completely done with NBC now that they’ve hired Megyn Kelly.

  • Lefty Wright

    You touched on it early in the article. but it will help immensely if the members of the left realized that we are all on the same side. Some may prefer a quicker, faster paced passing game, others a few yards and a cloud of dust. But we all have the same goal line. And after the coach (the nominee for president) and the players (electors) have been determined, you should unite and support your team. I think most liberals did, but enough did not to have likely impacted turn out for the game on the player side. Regardless of who you wanted to win the primary, Clinton won. Come November 8, there were two choices and even if you think Mother Teresa should have been the nominee, she wasn’t and pretending that Clinton was the real enemy got us Trump. Who has doubled down on every complaint a small group of progressives dreamed up that Clinton would do. Next election, let’s remember those immortal words of Cicero I’m sure everyone heard in kindergarten:

    “But with respect to injustice there are two types: men may inflict injury; or else, when it is being inflicted upon others, they may fail to deflect it, even though they could. Anyone who makes an unjust attack upon a fellow human being, whether driven by anger or by some other perturbation, seems to be laying hands, so to speak, upon another human being. But also, he who fails to defend a fellow human being, or to obstruct injustice when it is within his power to do so, he is at fault just as if he had abandoned his parents or his friends or his country.”

    Don’t let your ideas of a perfect candidate allow the election another Trump and the injustice he is bringing to the US. I thought people learned that from the Bush/Gore election, but apparently not. Some voters apparently failed to obstruct injustice by skipping out completely, protest voting and continuing attacks on Clinton as a candidate. On election day, you knew between Trump and Clinton who was better. Insisting on who you thought was best did no one any favors.

    • spacedcowgirl

      I read somewhere that the difference between Democrats and Republicans is Republicans torment their candidates mercilessly in the primary to make sure they get someone who represents their values and opinions, but once the final candidate is sorted out, they are ridiculously loyal to the party at the polls regardless of whether the candidate was their preferred choice. I feel like we have a lot more “defectors” (which maybe just reflects the messy nature of progressive politics) in general elections, which ultimately hurts us.

      • I disagree that they torment their candidate to make sure they get someone who represents their values and opinions.
        I think they conflate being a blowhard with strength and whomever can survive the gauntlet best must therefore be the strongest!!
        Mostly I think they torment them just because they like to torment people

  • whitroth

    You neglect to mention who’s the biggest player of all behind it: Rupert Fucking Murdoch. Note that he bought the right-wing Wall St. Journal years ago, and the folks who worked there were appalled at where he was taking it… and that took some doing. And, of course, Faux News, and all it’s local stations, and spinoffs….

    Goddamn fascist foreigner, who’s staff got caught corrupting the UK, and where’s our investigation that was started, and disappeared? (That’s using their language against ’em).

  • Vagenda and Tiara

    Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! I’ve been trying to put my rage at the right wing media into a coherent thought, but all I come up with is “argle bargle.” I wish to dog that Fox “New” could be labeled for what it is – propaganda. It also needs a warning that it is toxic to your mental health.

    I really hope these assholes manage to actually burn the country down this time, so we can run them out on a rail, rebuild a civil society, and be done with them for the next fifty years.

  • Jared James

    Unless we’re counting right-wing religious leaders under the general heading, in which case, yes, right-wing media totally did all of those things.

    Absent their growing up trained to believe authority figures who have no fucking idea what they’re talking about, but nonetheless instruct them never to trust “liberal” (i.e. factual) sources of information like books without pictures in them, no one would find Breitbart, Rush, Bill Mitchell, or the rest of the tar-spewing disinformation complex even remotely plausible. (but lots of people grow up that way, and they vote)

  • Dolmance

    Trump’s little Reinhardt Heydrich.

Previous articleKellyanne Conway Says Meryl Streep Is The REAL Disabled-People-Abuser, This Is Our Shocked Face
Next articlePharma Douche Martin Shkreli Creeping His Gollum Hands All Over That Badass Teen Vogue Writer :/