上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]bondcroft 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's because they're not attractive. It's not that difficult to figure out.

[–]yagidy 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Na ugly guys get laid all the time, its not that.

[–]snyte 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

There is a reason for that.

[–]cheeeeeese 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

its true, op is telling the truth. now all of you fuck off

[–]VenomousMessiah 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Yeah I figured this was trolling after I noticed I have a friend who drowns in pussy while going against most of your advice.

[–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (5子コメント)

It's not trolling or advice. People whom this sub is intended for have no issues understanding the purpose of this post.

[–]StagetailCuck 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Even weeks after, normies can't sense satire.

[–]KingMe42 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Not like incels can either.

[–]StagetailCuck 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yet an incel made a post that went over 90% of the normies' heads. kek

[–]yagidy 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Hey at least I'm having consistent sex.

[–]LibStealingSpic22/M Kissless Virgin 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm better than you hehheheehhe

Ugh

[–]Cooli-OH 62 ポイント63 ポイント  (67子コメント)

You know why incels have issues meeting woman? Because some of you think you are entitled to it. Some of you have said that you demand to sleep with virgins. Some of you said that there should be a draft where girls who reach age 16 should be forced to have sex with an incel. Because, though you often claim to be intelligent and thoughtful, many of you admit that you are jobless, out of school, and living indefinitely with Mom and dad, bereft of pursuit. Your problem is you want to do the same thing over and over, but you think you deserve new results. That's the definition of insanity. Mostly, lots of you have buckled under your own anxieties. So you can blame women for it or you can work on it for yourself and get out of incel hell. Because god knows most of you would decline the opportunity to sleep with the female equivalent of yourselves. Why expect differently of others?

[–]notyouralice 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (15子コメント)

I'm an actual female and this sub is kinda scary (the weird virgin stuff) We know when you're trying too hard guys, it turns us right off. Just chill the fuck out.

[–]irritatingincel 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (7子コメント)

I'm an actual female

You know that it's sexist when you use "female" as a noun?

[–]KingMe42 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

It's grammatically correct to use female as a noun.

[–]irritatingincel 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I didn't say it's incorrect, I said it's sexist.

[–]KingMe42 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

No its not.

[–]irritatingincel 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

[–]KingMe42 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

fe·male ˈfēˌmāl/

adjective 1. of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) that can be fertilized by male gametes. "a herd of female deer"

noun 1. a female person, animal, or plant.

[–]Mickeymousetitdirt 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Your username is 100% fitting.

[–]quasarblues 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Your username is amazing. Jealous.

[–]LibStealingSpic22/M Kissless Virgin 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Right, because not trying and waiting for women to consider you a good mate (translation: being a good provider and nanny to her children) sounds like a great option, who wants to experience something other than the daily routine and emotional support, after all, we're only good for that and we should accept it.

[–]Mickeymousetitdirt 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Women don't owe it to you to "consider" you a good mate. Why don't you go out there and fucking BE a "good mate" instead of actually believing you are somehow entitled for women to somehow come to this grand realization that you're the perfect creature? Do something about it and, when it doesn't work out, move the fuck on instead of saying, "Ugh, I FUCKING KNEW IT! I KNEW it was every single woman's fault and not my own! I'm fine supreme 'mate'! They're just too stupid to know it!" Maybe the reason you're a virgin is because you are NOT the "good mate" you think you are?

If everywhere you go, you smell shit, you may want to check your own shoe.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

'Entitled' is a fairly meaningless word that does not accurately describe most of the incels on this sub or elsewhere on the Internet. On one extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men how literally believe that they should be able to force women to date them. On the other extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men who are merely frustrated or sad that they can't find anyone at all to date them. This type of frustration is reasonable, since sex and romantic relationships are regarded by many as one of the most fulfilling things in life. The problem with using the word 'entitled' for both categories of men is that it lumps them together, demonizing men in the latter category by comparing them to men in the former category. If you wish to criticize our views, please be more specific than merely calling us 'entitled.'

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]notyouralice 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Hey man, you're the self proclaimed 22yo kissless virgin

[–]LibStealingSpic22/M Kissless Virgin 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

So you're silencing me by calling me a virgin, hoorray feminism!!!!

[–]notyouralice 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Calm down, honey. I'm just saying that obviously whatever you're doing isn't working.

[–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Also I wouldn't at all decline the opportunity to sleep with female version of me. That's my favorite fantasy.

[–]Knifeandspork22 -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I dread to think what the female version of me looks like aha. But all of the attributes, good looks, funny, strong character and modesty. Oooosh.

[–]LibStealingSpic22/M Kissless Virgin 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nobody says we deserve anything.

[–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (40子コメント)

So we can't have preferences yet it's an "objective" issue we don't meet the ones you listed.

[–]Cooli-OH 33 ポイント34 ポイント  (39子コメント)

You are allowed to have preferences, but you act surprised when women also have them, then you play the victim card all over again, preemptively assuming you have no chance, instead of saying "maybe I ought to work on myself if I expect a woman to be interested in me. Sadly that would require effort on your part, when it's easier to do nothing, give up, and blame society.

[–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (38子コメント)

"Working on yourself" means becoming an acceptable beta provider? Yes it's fine to criticize popular preferences and whether or not meeting the demands even gets you what you want.

[–]certified-cheeto 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (29子コメント)

Umm, you can be an "alpha male" and still be a provider. You can still treat whatever girl you're with with respect and admiration and be "alpha". In fact, I see men who feel the need to treat anyone, not just women, like shit to seem "strong and cool and aloof" as the betas. Not trying to be harsh, but you guys just aren't looking hard enough. Trust me, I am a female and I hang with other females. I have lurked on this sub for a while and many of you? I guarantee that if you just came out of your shell and stopped chasing after "fuckgirls" (yep. That's a thing and they're even more common than their male counterparts) that you would find someone. I hear you guys out on plenty of things, trust me. I am anti feminist and believe that some women are just shit. I get that. But not all of them are and there is someone for everyone. And about looks, you know what? Most of the time, you're not even ugly. Maybe it's your attitude. And also, there is such thing as unconventionally attractive. So if the typical fake plastic Barbie doesn't find you attractive, don't sweat it, take it as a compliment. She isn't all that anyway. This is coming from a person who currently thinks Mike Pence is the most attractive person ever (despite everyone else thinking I'm crazy). I know plenty of other girls who are attracted to the "mike pences" instead of the Brad pitts. Just try a little harder. I know you're going to think "I have tried and you don't know how hard" but try this; don't look for girls on sites like Reddit or instagram. Look for more open sites. As crazy as this sounds, maybe even try fetish sites. That's how I met my boyfriend. He's not what you would consider conventionally attractive and even told me that he had always had trouble finding girls. But he tried looking in more positive and welcoming environments and he found me and we're happy. So do not give up and definitely don't let this make you a negative person.

[–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (28子コメント)

You are anti feminism and claim providers are alpha - aka a golddigger looking for a sponsor. You are attracted to a dude with high social value who also happens to be an idiot and think you're a special snowflake for it cause your liberal friends disagree - so a typical female and not very smart one at that. Plus you are obviously ugly cause you try hard to put down other girls as if you're not part of the same shit. And you think you can give me advice when you have no idea what my situation is or what I want? This is why you people should never be allowed to speak. When you do its so vapid, self serving and useless.

[–]Mr_Piddles 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Man, she just laid some real truth and advice on you, and actually encouraged you to go out and get yours, and you threw it all out because she likes traditional relationships.

Go you.

[–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (6子コメント)

No, I threw it all out because it was vapid self obsessed "I'm not like other girls" cliche that even most women with iq over 100 grow out of. Then she proceeded proving a point that she's retarded in every single sentence.

[–]Mr_Piddles 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

But that doesn't invalidate her advice. You can't disregard someone because they have a single flaw. An incel, of all people, should understand that.

[–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (4子コメント)

She didn't have a single flaw, she was a walking, breathing flaw. And her advice was useless shit.

[–]yagidy 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Man, not hard to see why you can't get laid...

[–]certified-cheeto 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (14子コメント)

Ok. You're clearly insane, but I'll humor you. I did not say all providers are alpha males. I said that you can be both at the same time. Second, you can be anti feminism and not be a bitch too. Third, his high social value has nothing to do with my attraction to him. I'm attracted to older men with a certain type of attitude. Mike Pence could literally be a homeless man and I would still find him attractive. Fourth, I am not a liberal. You should have gotten that when I said I am attracted to mike "kill the gays" Pence, lmao. I am a conservative libertarian who voted for Donald Trump (who I am not attracted to despite his high social status, to further dispel your second point.) Fifth, I am actually above average intelligence and i have taken several IQ tests administered by professionals to prove it. Sixth, I am far from the typical female. I have short hair, almost never wear makeup, am interested in politics and cars, etc. seventh, I'm also not ugly. But sure buddy. Whatever makes you feel good about yourself. Eighth, I'll speak if I want to you waste of jizz, this is America.

Edit: And I view money as a form of enslavement by the government. I don't measure things in currency. That being said, I am definitely not a "gold digger". Try again.

[–]KingMe42 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I am far from the typical female. I have short hair, almost never wear makeup, am interested in politics and cars, etc. seventh, I'm also not ugly.

AAhahahaha

[–]certified-cheeto 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes, I too find reality funny.

[–]ban_collector 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

lol we got a really special girl here guys. she is NOT like the others. doesnt wear makeup????? short hair????? interested in politics, cars etc?????? wow is all i can say

[–]certified-cheeto 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Go fuck yourself you uberfag. Yes, compared to roughly 70% of the female population, I am different. Most girls have long hair and wear makeup. I don't. You're one of those fucking assholes who think that the only person who can be special is you. And before anyone tries to report me for saying fag, I am bisexual too. So fuck off.

[–]KingMe42 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Being bi doesn't mean you can call people fag and not have it be degrading. Your different alright, most women aren't morons.

[–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (8子コメント)

No one called you liberal, learn to read stupid. You clearly are not liberal which is why to you Pence is a male with high social value. No, you would not be attracted to him as a homeless person.

I'm not surprised a girl with no self respect is validating a Chad like Trump by voting for him - he only despises your kind as do you, so of course in your endless quest to stay apart from other women you vote for a dude who made it pretty clear he has no respect for you.

Lol, at the point where you try to get credibility by talking about iq test results is where it gets especially weak and typical. Your mentality came through and you're dumber than an average redditor female. At least a rad fem has some self respect.

You think that having a shit haircut sets you apart from other women which only again makes you a typical female. Details deliberately picked to stand apart to cover being the same. I even made a thread on this but about all you normies in general and listed haircuts and style as your ways of attempting to stand out. And really, you want to list interest in politics as a sign of snowflakeness while you just totally embarrassed yourself with complete lack of understanding of the topic. I wonder what "other girls" would say to you claiming they are less informed than you. If there's something typical for every female it's the belief they are different than other females cause men that wanted to fuck them convinced them it is so. That is how you for instance live under the impression you are smart and attractive when all it takes is for you to share an opinion and it becomes obvious both couldn't be further from the truth.

Your claim that you're not a gold digger doesn't make you not a gold digger just how your claim that you're special doesn't make you special. Evidence points otherwise. It's normally what people have to actually tell you about themselves that is the opposite of truth.

And your vapid little attempt at having an opinion on economy is as stupid as your attempt at politics. Stop thinking, you'll look smarter.

I wish morons weren't allowed to vote.

[–]certified-cheeto 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Well, like I said, you're clearly insane. So I'll just let you give yourself an aneurysm getting triggered because you asked for advice and a qualified person have you the "real talk".

[–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (6子コメント)

  1. Disagreeing with you and seeing you for an idiot you are doesn't mean being triggered. Learn the meanings of words you're using.

  2. No person ever asked for your advice and mean it. I specifically didn't ask for anyone's advice.

[–]Cooli-OH 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Oh I'm sorry, you're clearly so alpha right now, better not risk it.

Honestly dude, that "alpha beta" stuff is a load of crap. You think working on yourself, being healthy, working on your career, and having a social life is "beta" then you've gotta work on your world view

[–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (6子コメント)

I'm anti self improvement, and the reward isn't worth it.

[–][削除されました]  (2子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]AutoModerator[M] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    My friend was an ugly 48 year old 5'2 guy and he was having trouble finding a woman who wanted to be with him. Do you think he just sat around and complained about it all day? Fuck no. He improved himself and now he's a tall handsome 20 year old guy and he can get any girl he wants.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–]Cooli-OH 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Ok well I guess you're gonna be an incel for a long time, I hope you're ok with it

    [–]LibStealingSpic22/M Kissless Virgin 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Oh well go fuck yourselves for not being my own dancing monkey.

    [–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I'm not ok with any option.

    [–]AutoModerator[M] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (6子コメント)

    'Entitled' is a fairly meaningless word that does not accurately describe most of the incels on this sub or elsewhere on the Internet. On one extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men how literally believe that they should be able to force women to date them. On the other extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men who are merely frustrated or sad that they can't find anyone at all to date them. This type of frustration is reasonable, since sex and romantic relationships are regarded by many as one of the most fulfilling things in life. The problem with using the word 'entitled' for both categories of men is that it lumps them together, demonizing men in the latter category by comparing them to men in the former category. If you wish to criticize our views, please be more specific than merely calling us 'entitled.'

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–]Cooli-OH 31 ポイント32 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Jesus Christ, you guys even have bots that protect you from having to take a long, hard look at yourselves. Do you guys get called entitled so much that you had to design a bot to try and make you feel better about being incel? Be real. Do you even want to stop being incel?

    [–]AutoModerator[M] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    'Entitled' is a fairly meaningless word that does not accurately describe most of the incels on this sub or elsewhere on the Internet. On one extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men how literally believe that they should be able to force women to date them. On the other extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men who are merely frustrated or sad that they can't find anyone at all to date them. This type of frustration is reasonable, since sex and romantic relationships are regarded by many as one of the most fulfilling things in life. The problem with using the word 'entitled' for both categories of men is that it lumps them together, demonizing men in the latter category by comparing them to men in the former category. If you wish to criticize our views, please be more specific than merely calling us 'entitled.'

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–]Iyernhyde 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Well now that you put it that way...

    [–]BigStereotype 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    That's this sub in a nut shell.

    [–]LibStealingSpic22/M Kissless Virgin 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    You should try reading the post before saying : THIS!!!

    [–]gnoffmselfsoon 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (6子コメント)

    basically i need to turn into a mangina

    [–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Basically this isn't advice retard.

    [–]nicaswell 37 ポイント38 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    If "mangina" means learning social skills, taking a shower, burning your video games, and having some balls, then yes.

    [–]certified-cheeto 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Ok, maybe not the video games. That's harsh, lol.

    [–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    What's with you dumb fucks and showers? Just cause you only got into a habit of doing it after you left college doesn't mean we have the same problem.

    [–]TacoinaToaster 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Personally, the few people I've met who were incels (through friends of my boyfriend) had hygiene issues. Obviously it's not everyone but the stereotype definitely comes from somewhere

    [–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    How old were they? Just the fact they had friends makes it clear they were just normies who didn't have sex yet.

    [–]TheSmallPineapple 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (16子コメント)

    What's wrong with this is men thinking that by being "good" or whatever, they deserve sex just because women are alive.

    [–]StagetailCuck 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (12子コメント)

    So bad people deserve sex and good people don't. Natural selection right? Bad people survive, good people die.

    [–]Mickeymousetitdirt 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Why do some girls go after these "bad" men guy guys are always whining about? Because these "bad" men know HOW to talk to women, know how to be charming and, above everything, they have self-confidence. I am a married woman to a man who is not the "bad boy", but a quiet and reserved sensitive loving man so stop bitching and moaning about how women alllllllways want the bad boy.

    Your self-deprecating and whiny comments that you only say so you can get pity, like the one I am replying to, are 100% turn offs.

    [–]TheSmallPineapple 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (9子コメント)

    No one "deserves" sex. It's something that happens between two consenting people. You aren't necessarily "good" or "bad". It's just something two people decide to do.

    [–]StagetailCuck 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (8子コメント)

    No one deserves to have a pleasurable experience that most people who have ever lived had?

    [–]TheSmallPineapple 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (7子コメント)

    No, sex isn't something anyone is entitled to. At all. That kind of thinking is why people get raped.

    [–]StagetailCuck 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Entitled bot, please fuck this normie up fam.

    [–]TheSmallPineapple 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I was pretty much using "entitled to" as a synonym for "deserve"

    [–]AutoModerator[M] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    'Entitled' is a fairly meaningless word that does not accurately describe most of the incels on this sub or elsewhere on the Internet. On one extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men how literally believe that they should be able to force women to date them. On the other extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men who are merely frustrated or sad that they can't find anyone at all to date them. This type of frustration is reasonable, since sex and romantic relationships are regarded by many as one of the most fulfilling things in life. The problem with using the word 'entitled' for both categories of men is that it lumps them together, demonizing men in the latter category by comparing them to men in the former category. If you wish to criticize our views, please be more specific than merely calling us 'entitled.'

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–]TheSmallPineapple 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I wasn't saying you are acting entitled. I said that if someone thinks that they are entitled to sex, that causes problems.

    [–]AutoModerator[M] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    'Entitled' is a fairly meaningless word that does not accurately describe most of the incels on this sub or elsewhere on the Internet. On one extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men how literally believe that they should be able to force women to date them. On the other extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men who are merely frustrated or sad that they can't find anyone at all to date them. This type of frustration is reasonable, since sex and romantic relationships are regarded by many as one of the most fulfilling things in life. The problem with using the word 'entitled' for both categories of men is that it lumps them together, demonizing men in the latter category by comparing them to men in the former category. If you wish to criticize our views, please be more specific than merely calling us 'entitled.'

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–]AutoModerator[M] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    'Entitled' is a fairly meaningless word that does not accurately describe most of the incels on this sub or elsewhere on the Internet. On one extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men how literally believe that they should be able to force women to date them. On the other extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men who are merely frustrated or sad that they can't find anyone at all to date them. This type of frustration is reasonable, since sex and romantic relationships are regarded by many as one of the most fulfilling things in life. The problem with using the word 'entitled' for both categories of men is that it lumps them together, demonizing men in the latter category by comparing them to men in the former category. If you wish to criticize our views, please be more specific than merely calling us 'entitled.'

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    This thread really showed me just how dumb you people are. I get told I'm a negative person but I was really optimistic when it comes to my assessment of you people's intelligence levels.

    [–]Mcheetah 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (7子コメント)

    I disagree with this. It basically sounds like some feminist "everything is always your fault because you're the guy" nonsense.

    [–]StAliaHarkonnen[S] 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Cause it's not a fucking real advice moron.

    [–]TheSmallPineapple 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Um that's literally not what feminists think at all

    [–]Haieshu 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    How then do concepts of the patriarchy and inequality, i.e. women always being the victims, the objects being acted upon by male subjects, stand at all or garner as vocal a backing as they have?

    [–]TheSmallPineapple 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    And a good chunk of those cases that have been reported, the attackers are male.

    [–]TheSmallPineapple 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    For the example you gave, out of the sexual assault, and to some extent domestic abuse, victims that come forward or are known about, are mostly women. That's not saying that it doesn't happen to men, I'm just saying out of the known people that it happens to, most of them happen to be female, or identify as female.

    [–]cloud_loud 43 ポイント44 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    More like it's your fault since you don't have any idea how to socialize or treat another human being.

    [–]CallMeBigPapaya 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    You're kidding right? You're acting like women are incapable of being bad partners.

    It's fun you have a very anti-conservative, anti-redpill approach here, but it doesn't hold water since it's not like there's a huge disparity between progressives and conservatives in relationships.

    [–]wankyshittyfuckheed 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    /u/scumyaal is also a known incel who needs help

    [–]joshuapazmino 34 ポイント35 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    TL;DR treat picking up chicks like making friends, meanwhile try to make yourself a cool person.

    [–]BigStereotype 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    I love how this guy has actually internalized a decent approach and what does he do? Makes a whiny satire on the internet to his other sad lonely buddies. People are weird.

    [–]ban_collector 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    try to get your reading above a 3rd grade level and then reread the OP

    [–]LibStealingSpic22/M Kissless Virgin 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    You can't describe what a "cool" person is so you don't get to tell people that being "cool" is what they need to do.

    [–]StagetailCuck 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    lol normies are fucking obtuse af.

    [–]Plugawy_Nedznik 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Dam son, that's well done.

    [–]Cairnsian 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Love this sub. Hilarious yet sad.

    [–]TimMeijer104 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    If that's your thing, try r/sadcringe as well

    [–]LibStealingSpic22/M Kissless Virgin 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Wow, you guys are awful people.

    [–]TimMeijer104 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Never said it was my thing, I said "if that's your thing", don't assume.

    [–]Apokalypz 82 ポイント83 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Wow, yall are nuts

    [–]HersheyShore 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Waited far too long to read that comment. Thank you!

    [–]verynormalsimple 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (36子コメント)

    Ambitious means rich. Don't call them gold diggers, this is why you can't get laid. It's not about money at all, it's about proving you can be a good provider and displaying passion for your work because the time you spend away from her working is really one of the most essential parts of your relationship.

    It's not about money at all but about having a lot of houses, assets, cars and disposable income that she (the gold digger) can enjoy. I really can't tell if the OP is trolling lol.

    [–]Goldreaper_Jr 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (34子コメント)

    Wait... so are you saying anyone who loves someone else who also has money is a gold digger by default?

    Hmmm... something doesn't seem right there.

    [–]verynormalsimple 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (33子コメント)

    I'm saying that anyone who filters their partners based on what they make and what they have are gold diggers, basically all women.

    It's not like by chance the most desirable women end up with pro-athletes and celebrities. A female supermodel or singer will never date a janitor, but their male counterparts (pro-athletes, rockstars) will consistently date women of considerably lower social status. That not only proves gold digging, but hypergamy in general.

    [–]Mickeymousetitdirt 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    This is why you don't get laid. Every single word of your comment is oozing with jealousy, resentment, and hatred.

    1) You're fucking delusional for thinking "basically all women" only date people for money. You know that's not true. But, since you never get laid, it's an easy scapegoat argument for you to make to avoid any personal responsibility for having a piss poor whiny attitude and helps you also avoid having to make any changes to yourself.

    2) You also think the "most desirable" women only date pro-athletes and celebrities. Another reason why you'll continue to never get laid: you actually think you're somehow entitled to the "most desirable women"? Likeminded people tend to be around other likeminded people; driven, successful women may want to be with other successful, driven men, not some dude who whines on the incel sub all day. Wrap your mind around the fact that you're not entitled to a supermodel. Wrap your mind around the fact that there are good women who aren't in the upper echelons of society. So sorry you have to "settle", if you ever do get laid. It's like you want to continue to be a shitty guy and yet you feel entitled to the "most desirable women". Birds of a feather, friend.

    3) Just because a rich and successful man doesn't always date other rich and successful women DOES NOT "PROVE" gold-digging. It actually just proves that these baaaad, bad rich and handsome men that are the bane of your entire existence maybe aren't as bad as you would love to make them out to be and maybe they don't always mind or care if a woman they're dating is of a lower economic class. You guys always go on about being "providers" and, yet, fail to realize maybe that's exactly what some of the guys you love to hate are doing for THEIR partners.

    This sub is absolutely mind-boggling. I don't feel sorry for you, specifically, for not getting laid because your attitude is absolutely disgusting, almost a parody of itself.

    [–]AutoModerator[M] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    'Entitled' is a fairly meaningless word that does not accurately describe most of the incels on this sub or elsewhere on the Internet. On one extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men how literally believe that they should be able to force women to date them. On the other extreme, the word 'entitled' is used to describe men who are merely frustrated or sad that they can't find anyone at all to date them. This type of frustration is reasonable, since sex and romantic relationships are regarded by many as one of the most fulfilling things in life. The problem with using the word 'entitled' for both categories of men is that it lumps them together, demonizing men in the latter category by comparing them to men in the former category. If you wish to criticize our views, please be more specific than merely calling us 'entitled.'

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–]bosscorg 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (11子コメント)

    Women date because they want to find a partner. They want to find a partner so they can make a baby. This is known as "evolution" and how our species has survived. Another method by which our species has survived is by keeping said babies fed and safe, which, although historically not requiring a car or a large home, has in modern times translated to this. The desire to find a partner whom is able to provide a comfortable life for his family is simply a parallel of historic survival skills. THAT is the reason it's so pronounced, and THAT is the reason society encourages it. Life is much easier once you accept this fact.

    [–]verynormalsimple 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Yeah, no one is denying what you said. You basically described the biological/evolutionary basis of hypergamy. Women are like that, it's in their genes.

    [–]AutismoCircus -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (7子コメント)

    Why get into a relationship then if your wealth and not you is the deciding factor?

    [–]verynormalsimple 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Simple, you don't. It's not safe anyway for 99% of the cases.

    [–]BigStereotype 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    That's very simplistic. Sometimes it isn't, sometimes that's exactly what's going on, but it really is nice for your partner to be able to provide things for you. It's nice to have money and reciprocate as well. And ambitious people with direction are more interesting and simulating to be around. If you reduce it to "women love money!" you'll get angry. If you think about it and strip away the self pity, it'll start to make sense. And it's not even universal. Plenty of desirable people of both sexes genuinely don't care about their finances or their partners but good luck finding them on a pity party on reddit. Those people are usually out there pursuing their interests.

    [–]AutismoCircus 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    I am aware that there's a pletora of views women hold. I recommend to incels who think otherwise to read r/AskWomen. It shows how they are as individualistic as men are.

    Do you know any way to better distinguish women who are more into money/ambition from women who are less into that? Because I don't have much ambition in terms of earning money.

    [–]BigStereotype -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Sure, dude, just look at em. Is her hair perfect? Does her outfit match? How is her makeup? She probably spent a lot of money on all that if so. How much free time does she have? What does she talk about? In other words...get to know her and see. It doesn't have to be one on one time, either, just practice small talk in a group setting and remembering details. Use those little details to put together the puzzle. If you're nervous about talking to someone in a group, just be a wiseass. It's amazing the shit you can get away with saying if you have a genuine grin on your face. But not like a dark, black humor wiseass, just kinda generally irreverent. You might fall on your face a few times but it's not the end of the world. You can usually laugh it off and nobody cares. Practice on EVERY person you meet. See if you can make everyone you can talk to smile at least once in every conversation. It takes time, but I promise you can do it and you'll be happier.

    [–]AutismoCircus 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Making people smile is pretty easy. That's not the Problem.

    [–]verynormalsimple 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    That is a rotten shithole and they will ban you for not agreeing with their feminazi ideals. Basically the definition of a fascist sub.

    [–]AutismoCircus 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    r/askwomen? I haven't posted anything so idk but the people seemed interesting enough and unique enough

    [–]stevenglansbergalone 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    When I was unemployed renting a single room in a shared house living off unemployment, I got laid way more than I did when I was working. Why? Because I had more time to go out and meet people and build relationships with women.

    You've just made an excuse and are sticking with it. The reason you don't see beatiful women with janitors is because the janitors you know don't have beautiful wives (in your opinion). You don't have the opportunity to see a bunch of a janitors on tv to rate them. How many janitors do you even know? Have you met their wives.

    You also need to remember that every wife of an athlete you see, probably just had her make up done by a professional on top of their field and the clothes they are wearing are all fitted and designer.

    Put the janitors wife in a designer fitted dress and get her make up done, she will probably look a lot better. And the athlete's wife probably looks drab in a Wal-Mart hoodie too.

    [–]verynormalsimple 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    I was meaning more of a relationship kind of thing. Gold digging doesn't apply for casual sex and booty calls. Also your anecdotal evidence is not indicative of anything. Also you're not talking about the quality of women in question, more time can get you laid for sure, if you're lurking 3 or 4s. A guy making good money paradoxically gets more picky on looks since more beautiful women seem to have interest in him.

    You're right on something, higher tier women are usually high maintenance, wives of celebrities usually are trophy wives full time to keep their shape, skin, hair, etc. Of course the janitor wife can look a lot better if you put her on a gym, do some surgery and put 3 layers of makeup. The thing is that the most beautiful women are already naturally better so further improvements are more optional (it's kind of obvious).

    [–]stevenglansbergalone 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Also your anecdotal evidence is not indicative of anything.

    This whole subs philosophy is based on anecdotal evidence. All it takes is a single anecdote to disprove most of the BS being spouted here as axiomatic truth.

    [–]verynormalsimple 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    There's practically no axiomatic truths in biology or sociology, a single anecdote is just that, a single anecdote, an exception. This are general rules, not absolute laws, only in physics you will find absolute laws (and we're not even sure about that).

    [–]hicctl 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (14子コメント)

    BULLSHIT, if you really want to build a life, with kids, a nice apartment for the 2 of you etc. you need to look for a partner, who is ready to work for these things, and shows it because he already does. OP nowhere said you need to be rich, or have luxury cars or any of that. It is completely normal to look for a partner, who is not a loser working minimum wage, but instead has a career and the funds to build a good life together. By no way does this mean the women expects all the money to come from the man. But let's face it, if you want to raise kids, one person in the relationship has to be there for the kids a lot, and thus cannot have a good income you can raise a family on. So by default the other partner must create the income, it is a give and take where you work as a team.

    [–]verynormalsimple 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (13子コメント)

    Well paraphrasing you just demonstrated gynocentrism. When a male "chooses" a partner he is not even allowed to filter partners by social status or looks or anything or he is called sexist or something, basically he is expected to accept whatever female comes if she has a good womb and she likes him.

    On the other hand I repeat, A WOMAN WILL NEVER DATE UNDER HER SOCIAL STATUS. Doesn't matter if she makes enough money to raise kids by herself, she will still want a male that raises her social status and possibly be able not to work ever again because uterus. But she also wants tall, muscular, handsome, etc.

    [–]Plague_Walker 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Whoa you really dont talk honestly with a lot of women on this topic, do you?

    [–]verynormalsimple 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I know a lot of women and, as any normal person, have talked to them. In general they admit themselves to be picky and to only like around 10% of guys, most important criteria being career/money, height/muscle, matching interests. My anecdotal evidence is obviously of little importance in the grand scheme of things as yours or anyone else's around here.

    [–]stevenglansbergalone 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (7子コメント)

    J Lo is married to a backup dancer, so is Madonna. Keri Russell was married to a carpenter. Evangeline Lily was going out with production designer on Lost. Christina Aquilera with a set worker from Burlesque. Scarlett Johansson has a child with a journalist. That's practically not even a real job anymore. Brittany Murphy did too. And that guy wasn't what you'd classically call a looker.

    It took two minutes of research to find that. Virtually no effort.

    [–]verynormalsimple 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Yeah it took 2 minutes of lousy work.

    J Lo has been married 3 times, her latest spouse (2014) was Mark Anthony (a very famous singer). She literally switched to better spouses each time (hypergamy someone).

    Madonna went from fuckin Sean Penn to Guy Ritchie. She's not married now. And now that she's old and has been married to 2 maximum tier guys I bet she's carousel riding some of her staff dancers.

    I don't know Keri Russel but here we go. She LEFT her former spouse (Shane the carpenter) for a higher tier guy Matthew Rhys (TV star), basically the motto of women.

    Christina Aguilera has only been married to Jordan Bratman (a BIG producer). Now dating Matthew Rutler (since 2010) but of course she won't marry, she won't risk her fortune for some guitarrist (he's supposed to do that although I think he's no more than a glorified nanny for her kids at this time).

    Scarlett Johansson I think had more boyfriends than I have fingers but having a mistake child doesn't count, she never married for a very good reason (she wanted to marry a higher tier guy). Suitable for her hypergamy were Ryan Reynolds and then Romain Dauriac.

    Brittany Murphy (RIP) was only married to Simon Monjack and I wouldn't consider her as an example since she most likely overdosed while having pneumonia.

    Thanks for demonstrating hypergamy with your examples, next time do it right though.

    [–]TheSmallPineapple 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    You don't consider Brittany Murphy as an example because she probably overdosed?? What does that have to do with anything

    [–]verynormalsimple 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    A bad marriage or bad past relationship decisions could pretty much be an important factor to be taking pills in the first place. And celebrities anyway make poor examples, although I recognize it's difficult to find the study that shows how small or big the percentage of "successful independent women" marrying men that make less money is. I would bet that the percent of men that marry up is abysmally lower than the percent of women that marry up, that's pretty much undeniable.

    [–]stevenglansbergalone 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    According to your theory they shouldn't have been with these guys in the first place. In many cases they traded down.

    [–]verynormalsimple 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    It's about place and time. Before someone jumps to fame of course they could have dated below the celebrity thereshold at some point. Anyway I don't consider celebrities to exactly reinforce any general behaviour because they're not your average person, I'm amazed I could even fin the tendency to be honest.

    [–]stevenglansbergalone 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    The examples I gave were from after they were famous. I chose celebrities because they are examples you can reference. You believe in these rules but if the rules don't fit, you just say they don't count.

    Hopeless really.

    [–]GentlemanT-Rex 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Jessica Alba is miles ahead of her husband in terms of social status. They've been married eight years and have two kids. He's also a totally normal looking guy.

    [–]verynormalsimple 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Congratulations for finding an exception.

    [–]lukeman3000 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Famous/successful people like to be in relationships with other famous/successful people. Who knew?

    [–]PorcelainPeony 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (8子コメント)

    I subscribed to this sub thinking YES I've been there. I know this feeling. Then I read these posts and realize I never blamed anyone else for my problems. Or maybe I did but I at least knew that I'd be the only one who could fix it.

    [–]Umbrellatuts 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (7子コメント)

    I'm assuming you are a woman? According to this thread, women can't really ever be incels. You seem to be the only person with logic in this subreddit.

    [–]PorcelainPeony 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Yeah I get the logic but it's ridiculous. Was I not sexually active or dating because I thought no one was into me? Yup and very bitter. Did I pull a lot of the same shit that some the of the members do here? Yup. It's not a great feeling but yeah I was an Incel. If a bunch of dudes want to tell me I didn't feel a certain way oh well

    [–]chillybot 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    What until like 16? What a joke