Radeon RX 480 vs HD 4290 IGP |
Released June, 2016
AMD Radeon RX 480
- 1.1 GHz
- 8 GB GDDR5
by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2016)The “boost” clock of 1266 MHz is actually the maximum clock speed of the GPU (without overclocking) and its highest voltage state.
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 1,120 MHz | vs | 498 MHz | Around 2.2x higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better floating-point performance | 5,834 GFLOPS | vs | 39.84 GFLOPS | Around 146.5x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher texture rate | 182.3 GTexel/s | vs | 1.99 GTexel/s | More than 91.5x higher texture rate | |||
| Many more shading units | 2,304 | vs | 40 | 2264 more shading units | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 40.5 GPixel/s | vs | 1.99 GPixel/s | More than 20.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Many more texture mapping units | 144 | vs | 4 | 140 more texture mapping units | |||
| Significantly more compute units | 36 | vs | 2 | 34 more compute units | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 4 | 28 more render output processors | |||
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the ATi Radeon HD 4290 IGP vs the AMD Radeon RX 480. | |||||||
Features Key features of the Radeon RX 480 vs HD 4290 IGP
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
compute units Discrete cores within the GPU
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon RX 480 | vs | HD 4290 IGP |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | ATi | |
| GPU name | Ellesmere | RS880D | |
| Clock speed | 1,120 MHz | 498 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None |
raw performance | Radeon RX 480 | vs | HD 4290 IGP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shading units | 2,304 | 40 | |
| Texture mapping units | 144 | 4 | |
| Render output processors | 32 | 4 | |
| Compute units | 36 | 2 | |
| Pixel rate | 40.5 GPixel/s | 1.99 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 182.3 GTexel/s | 1.99 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 5,834 GFLOPS | 39.84 GFLOPS |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
| | VS | |
| ￥31,459 | ￥28,011 | |
| Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| ￥31,459 | ||
| Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce GTX 1070 | ||
| | VS | |
| ￥31,459 | ||
| Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce GTX 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| ￥31,459 | ||
| Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce GTX 1080 | ||
| | VS | |
| ￥31,459 | ||
| Radeon RX 480 vs 470 | ||
| | VS | |
| ￥31,459 | ||
| Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| ￥31,459 | ||
| Radeon RX 480 vs R9 390 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| ￥31,459 | ￥28,011 | |
| Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| ￥28,011 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| ￥28,011 | ||
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| Radeon RX 470 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | ||