1. Post #1
    tired of being tired
    Jeezy's Avatar
    August 2012
    861 Posts
    Washington (CNN): President-elect Donald Trump's transition team has signaled to congressional Republican leaders that the President-elect's preference is to fund the border wall through the appropriations process as soon as April, according to House Republican officials.
    http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/politi...ump-taxpayers/
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 10 Chrome United States Show Events Starred Starred x 2 (list)

  2. Post #2
    I'M A SHAAARK!
    Lambeth's Avatar
    October 2009
    16,210 Posts
    Congress is not Mexico, Don. Also building a wall would be a waste of money that would benefit nobody.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 10 Firefox Canada Show Events Starred Starred x 10 (list)

  3. Post #3
    Gold Member
    Drury's Avatar
    April 2011
    12,774 Posts
    hold on a minute, wasn't Mexico supposed to bankroll this

    Edited:

    what fucking phony, defenestrate him

  4. Post #4
    the fuck is this?
    Pops's Avatar
    November 2009
    18,083 Posts
    i thought things were squared with vicente fox?

  5. Post #5
    FlamingBlizza's Avatar
    January 2013
    1,393 Posts
    yeah cant wait for a useless wall

  6. Post #6
    sYnced's Avatar
    January 2008
    1,219 Posts
    broken promise, check.

    someone on the CNN news panel made the interesting fact that we may have a situation where the DEMS look to shut down the government (similiar to REPS) over a potential spending bill for the border wall.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 10 Chrome United States Show Events Starred Starred x 1 (list)

  7. Post #7
    Gold Member
    LtKyle2's Avatar
    March 2011
    6,798 Posts
    sometimes we don't put walls up to keep others out

    but to see who cares enough to knock them down :(
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 10 Chrome United States Show Events Starred Starred x 1 (list)

  8. Post #8
    Gold Member
    Boilrig's Avatar
    May 2008
    1,087 Posts
    hold on a minute, wasn't Mexico supposed to bankroll this

    Edited:

    what fucking phony, defenestrate him
    Technically if he puts a tariff on Mexican exports into the US, then in theory, they would be paying into the wall through either those companies paying that tariff, or the loss of deals US companies have with Mexico.

  9. Post #9
    Hates Ayn Rand
    1239the's Avatar
    December 2005
    999 Posts
    Build a wall around Congress.
    Finally a bipartisan effort the country can unite over.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 10 Chrome Canada Show Events Starred Starred x 1 (list)

  10. Post #10
    Gold Member
    HumanAbyss's Avatar
    March 2009
    27,329 Posts
    Technically if he puts a tariff on Mexican exports into the US, then in theory, they would be paying into the wall through either those companies paying that tariff, or the loss of deals US companies have with Mexico.
    "technically"

    it's bullshit dude

    I know there's always going to be someone to say "Trumps awesome" but this is flat out bullshit to try and "defend".
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Chrome Canada Show Events Starred Starred x 4 (list)

  11. Post #11
    Gold Member
    Boilrig's Avatar
    May 2008
    1,087 Posts
    "technically"

    it's bullshit dude

    I know there's always going to be someone to say "Trumps awesome" but this is flat out bullshit to try and "defend".
    It is why I said "technically", if they introduce tariffs on Mexican made goods by American companies, making those positions in Mexico untenable, then they are actually making Mexico pay for it without making them pay for it. I'm not saying this is good or anything, or defending Trump, but this is probably how it will be spun in the future.

  12. Post #12
    Gold Member
    Kirad's Avatar
    April 2008
    1,611 Posts
    "technically"

    it's bullshit dude

    I know there's always going to be someone to say "Trumps awesome" but this is flat out bullshit to try and "defend".
    If anything he's just arguing semantics, and he doesn't even state his opinion over it. I don't see how you can interpret his post as "Trumps awesome" or a "defense." The eagerness to label people as Trump supporters reminds me of the Salem Witch Hunts honestly.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 10 Chrome United States Show Events Starred Starred x 5 (list)

  13. Post #13
    Gold Member
    WillerinV1.02's Avatar
    September 2009
    5,009 Posts
    the wall situation is so funny to me. it's funny that building a colossal border wall across 2,000 miles was even entertained in politics, it's hilarious that it continues to get so much flak and attention. trump shoulda kept this an empty promise.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Firefox Australia Show Events Starred Starred x 1 (list)

  14. Post #14
    Gold Member

    March 2005
    5,400 Posts
    I'm expecting this to be about as successful, and ungodly more expensive than Australia's rabbit proof fence. It covers roughly the same amount of ground(if you include all of the fences) and accomplished absolutely nothing.

  15. Post #15
    Gold Member
    Water-Marine's Avatar
    January 2005
    6,957 Posts
    Better detail into the situation by Politico is cited in the CNN article. Might throw this in the OP for lazies. Interesting stuff.

    Facing heavy complaints from the Mexican government and immigrant groups, the Bush and Obama administrations pushed for a "virtual fence" on much of the border area using towers and surveillance sensors to provide security. They argued that it was a much more cost-effective approach for the physically challenging terrain. More than $3 billion was spent on the project over time. Homeland Security froze the "virtual fence" project in 2010.
    ...
    Insiders say Customs and Border Protection, at the request of the incoming Trump administration, has identified about 400 miles on the U.S.-Mexico border where structures could be erected or need to be fortified. Should Trump line that with double-layer fencing, for example, the cost would be about $4.2 billion.
    Didn't hear about this fact before. I can assume the past failure(?) of virtual fencing will be used as an argumentative point in collecting the budget. That is, of course, if it actually goes through in any conceivable way. Which is highly unlikely.

    Edited:

    If anything he's just arguing semantics, and he doesn't even state his opinion over it. I don't see how you can interpret his post as "Trumps awesome" or a "defense." The eagerness to label people as Trump supporters reminds me of the Salem Witch Hunts honestly.
    It's HumanAbyss. Everything is an attack against him personally.

  16. Post #16
    maddogsamurai's Avatar
    October 2012
    4,847 Posts
    Is he REALLY gonna build this wall? Fucking hell, I presented a goddamn speech in college on why Trump's choices will never work. Too much money to build, let alone maintain, too many workers for so little money on the BORDER(which is a desert compared to the people who worked on the Statue of Liberty). Not mention by the time its done we would have had two more president elects already. Most immigrants cross the border by planes anyway.

    "But he's gonna build a metaphorical wall!" Yeah, okay. Say goodbye to potential new workers in this economy America.

  17. Post #17
    OvB
    Facepunch resident scientist
    OvB's Avatar
    March 2007
    18,356 Posts
    Mexico was never going to directly finance anything.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply THIS BUG NEEDS FIXING, BUT I DONT KNOW WHAT CAUSES IT, SO SHUT UP AND STOP POSTING ABOUT IT. Thanks. United States Show Events Starred Starred x 2 (list)

  18. Post #18
    Gold Member
    HumanAbyss's Avatar
    March 2009
    27,329 Posts
    Better detail into the situation by Politico is cited in the CNN article. Might throw this in the OP for lazies. Interesting stuff.


    Didn't hear about this fact before. I can assume the past failure(?) of virtual fencing will be used as an argumentative point in collecting the budget. That is, of course, if it actually goes through in any conceivable way. Which is highly unlikely.

    Edited:



    It's HumanAbyss. Everything is an attack against him personally.
    Oh well thanks I didn't think it was about me what so ever but thanks

    Fucking tired of this shit I'm not even pretending to be important or acting like it's about me at all until you fucking name drop me

  19. Post #19
    hilariously terrible!
    Zingly's Avatar
    April 2010
    664 Posts
    The fact that this idea is even being thought about seriously as something we'll have to foot the bill for is giving me a aneurysm. Even if this is just rhetoric it's still dumb as all hell.

  20. Post #20
    Gold Member
    Water-Marine's Avatar
    January 2005
    6,957 Posts
    Oh well thanks I didn't think it was about me what so ever but thanks

    Fucking tired of this shit I'm not even pretending to be important or acting like it's about me at all until you fucking name drop me
    Like you namedrop people who disagree with you through ratings? You're just needlessly confrontational, man. You gotta chill.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply iPhone Safari United States Show Events Starred Starred x 1 (list)

  21. Post #21
    Gold Member
    HumanAbyss's Avatar
    March 2009
    27,329 Posts
    If anything he's just arguing semantics, and he doesn't even state his opinion over it. I don't see how you can interpret his post as "Trumps awesome" or a "defense." The eagerness to label people as Trump supporters reminds me of the Salem Witch Hunts honestly.
    The wall is factually a bad idea

    There is no reason for it to exist, it doesn't create border security or any of the other rhetoric. It's a literal money dump. Defending it in anyway shape or form is acting like it has a reason to exist, it doesn't. It's pure bluster.

    I'm not witch hunting fucking anyone. I'm saying "technically or not, it's a bad fucking idea" but I guess it's Trumps idea, so as much as speaking ill of it is just too much or something? I'm not going after him as a "Trump supporter" because he said anything of that nature.

    Edited:

    Like you namedrop people who disagree with you through ratings? You're just needlessly confrontational, man. You gotta chill.
    I would be far, far "Chiller" if you people would stop doing this and acting like you somehow have a "high ground" to talk down to me as if I was doing anything different from you.

    This is "Needlessly" confrontational, to act like every time I post, it's "about me". No. I didn't make anything there about "me".

    I made it entirely about the issue that the wall is a bad idea technically or not.

    It's bullshit. If "Bullshit" is too strong of a word to be allowed to be used here now in this context, that's fucking news to me dude.

  22. Post #22
    Gold Member
    Kirad's Avatar
    April 2008
    1,611 Posts
    Like you namedrop people who disagree with you through ratings? You're just needlessly confrontational, man. You gotta chill.
    Oh well thanks I didn't think it was about me what so ever but thanks

    Fucking tired of this shit I'm not even pretending to be important or acting like it's about me at all until you fucking name drop me
    Take it into PM's fellas.

    With the cult of personality that Trump has, I won't be surprised if the entire Wall debacle is quickly swept under the rug. I know a man personally who has demonstrated with various BUILD THE WALL signs recently tell me about the metaphorical aspect of it.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 10 Chrome United States Show Events Starred Starred x 1 (list)

  23. Post #23
    Gold Member
    thelurker1234's Avatar
    June 2011
    11,924 Posts
    Technically if he puts a tariff on Mexican exports into the US, then in theory, they would be paying into the wall through either those companies paying that tariff, or the loss of deals US companies have with Mexico.
    That'll make me even happier

    fuck up our economy to get a useless expensive wall.

  24. Post #24
    Gold Member
    Water-Marine's Avatar
    January 2005
    6,957 Posts
    The wall is factually a bad idea

    There is no reason for it to exist, it doesn't create border security or any of the other rhetoric. It's a literal money dump. Defending it in anyway shape or form is acting like it has a reason to exist, it doesn't. It's pure bluster.

    I'm not witch hunting fucking anyone. I'm saying "technically or not, it's a bad fucking idea" but I guess it's Trumps idea, so as much as speaking ill of it is just too much or something? I'm not going after him as a "Trump supporter" because he said anything of that nature.
    He wasn't even defending it, but discussing what would be a hypothetical route if it ever happened.


    I would be far, far "Chiller" if you people would stop doing this and acting like you somehow have a "high ground" to talk down to me as if I was doing anything different from you.

    This is "Needlessly" confrontational, to act like every time I post, it's "about me". No. I didn't make anything there about "me".

    I made it entirely about the issue that the wall is a bad idea technically or not.

    It's bullshit. If "Bullshit" is too strong of a word to be allowed to be used here now in this context, that's fucking news to me dude.
    I called you out once, not every time you post. I feel like you're just proving my point here.

  25. Post #25
    Gold Member
    Kirad's Avatar
    April 2008
    1,611 Posts
    The wall is factually a bad idea

    There is no reason for it to exist, it doesn't create border security or any of the other rhetoric. It's a literal money dump. Defending it in anyway shape or form is acting like it has a reason to exist, it doesn't. It's pure bluster.

    I'm not witch hunting fucking anyone. I'm saying "technically or not, it's a bad fucking idea" but I guess it's Trumps idea, so as much as speaking ill of it is just too much or something? I'm not going after him as a "Trump supporter" because he said anything of that nature.
    That's the issue though, I don't think either him nor me has said anything about it being a bad or good idea. He's just entertaining the possibility of a shifting of blame, where Trump actually half-fulfills his campaign promise. You are too emotionally invested in this Abyss, detach and take a breather.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 10 Chrome United States Show Events Starred Starred x 1 (list)

  26. Post #26
    Gold Member
    HumanAbyss's Avatar
    March 2009
    27,329 Posts
    He wasn't even defending it, but discussing what would be a hypothetical route if it ever happened.



    I called you out once, not every time you post. I feel like you're just proving my point here.
    You are not the only person to do this. I did not say "You", I said "You people".

  27. Post #27
    Gold Member
    Water-Marine's Avatar
    January 2005
    6,957 Posts
    You are not the only person to do this. I did not say "You", I said "You people".
    Okay. If multiple people are saying the same thing, I would probably agree with Kirad.

  28. Post #28
    Kiss me, I'm Irish
    Fort83's Avatar
    September 2006
    10,476 Posts
    Mexico was never going to directly finance anything.
    Don't tell Trump supporters that.

  29. Post #29
    Gold Member
    HumanAbyss's Avatar
    March 2009
    27,329 Posts
    Alright, there's nothing I can say then.

    I'm not emotionally attached to the subject. My initial post wasn't lambasting, witch hunting, or going after anyone. It was calling it a bad idea. I got "Emotional" when you decided to say something that's relatively insulting to read. That's where my "attachement" would come from. Before that post of yours, I was actually calm, regardless of what either of you think, I was calm when I wrote that reply to boilrig, I wasn't even declaring him as "defending" it, because I put the word Defend in scare quotes.

    I really don't know how to get my points across to anyone here anymore. When someone else here is mad, and expresses that, no one cares. But shit, Humanabyss said something is "bullshit"? Oh damn, he's making the whole thread about him!

    As calm as I am doing my best to be, I am annoyed. But it was never with "Trump" or "Trump supporters" in this thread.

  30. Post #30
    Gold Member
    Kirad's Avatar
    April 2008
    1,611 Posts
    Alright, there's nothing I can say then.

    I'm not emotionally attached to the subject. My initial post wasn't lambasting, witch hunting, or going after anyone. It was calling it a bad idea. I got "Emotional" when you decided to say something that's relatively insulting to read. That's where my "attachement" would come from. Before that post of yours, I was actually calm, regardless of what either of you think, I was calm when I wrote that reply to boilrig, I wasn't even declaring him as "defending" it, because I put the word Defend in scare quotes.

    I really don't know how to get my points across to anyone here anymore. When someone else here is mad, and expresses that, no one cares. But shit, Humanabyss said something is "bullshit"? Oh damn, he's making the whole thread about him!

    As calm as I am doing my best to be, I am annoyed. But it was never with "Trump" or "Trump supporters" in this thread.
    It's not the words you use themselves, it's the context of them. Written languages, especially English, have hard times getting across tone and mood, so we inference these with diction and syntax.

    Truly the only egregious part of your first post is your "I know there's always going to be someone to say "Trumps awesome" but this is flat out bullshit to try and "defend"." at the end. By saying this after directly replying to Boilrig, it appears that you are including Boilrig within the group of people trying to defend Trump, when that just isn't what he's doing. He's only presenting a hypothetical situation with no opinion attached.

    Then, in your next post replying to Boilrig's, the first line is "The wall is factually a bad idea," which isn't wrong, it's just a non sequitur. He wasn't arguing whether the wall was a good idea or not. He was simply imagining a technicality.

    Nothing is wrong with your arguments, you're just applying them to the wrong people/discussions.

    And this post especially shows that you are too emotionally attached:
    Oh well thanks I didn't think it was about me what so ever but thanks

    Fucking tired of this shit I'm not even pretending to be important or acting like it's about me at all until you fucking name drop me
    Yes, he name dropped you. Yes, he was saying negative things about you and personally insulted you, but this just isn't the place for it. Take that up with him personally in PMs. To do it here makes you both seem like you want an audience.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 10 Chrome United States Show Events Starred Starred x 2 (list)

  31. Post #31
    Gold Member
    Water-Marine's Avatar
    January 2005
    6,957 Posts
    -snip-

    Kirad said it better. I'm sorry if I upset you, feel free to discuss further over PM.

  32. Post #32
    Gold Member
    thelurker1234's Avatar
    June 2011
    11,924 Posts
    It's not the words you use themselves, it's the context of them. Written languages, especially English, have hard times getting across tone and mood, so we inference these with diction and syntax.

    Truly the only egregious part of your first post is your "I know there's always going to be someone to say "Trumps awesome" but this is flat out bullshit to try and "defend"." at the end. By saying this after directly replying to Boilrig, it appears that you are including Boilrig within the group of people trying to defend Trump, when that just isn't what he's doing. He's only presenting a hypothetical situation with no opinion attached.

    Then, in your next post replying to Boilrig's, the first line is "The wall is factually a bad idea," which isn't wrong, it's just a non sequitur. He wasn't arguing whether the wall was a good idea or not. He was simply imagining a technicality.

    Nothing is wrong with your arguments, you're just applying them to the wrong people/discussions.

    And this post especially shows that you are too emotionally attached:

    Yes, he name dropped you. Yes, he was saying negative things about you and personally insulted you, but this just isn't the place for it. Take that up with him personally in PMs. To do it here makes you both seem like you want an audience.
    It's been awhile since I've seen an avatar match a post so well
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 10 Firefox Show Events Starred Starred x 1 (list)

  33. Post #33
    Gold Member
    HumanAbyss's Avatar
    March 2009
    27,329 Posts
    It's not the words you use themselves, it's the context of them. Written languages, especially English, have hard times getting across tone and mood, so we inference these with diction and syntax.

    Truly the only egregious part of your first post is your "I know there's always going to be someone to say "Trumps awesome" but this is flat out bullshit to try and "defend"." at the end. By saying this after directly replying to Boilrig, it appears that you are including Boilrig within the group of people trying to defend Trump, when that just isn't what he's doing. He's only presenting a hypothetical situation with no opinion attached.

    Then, in your next post replying to Boilrig's, the first line is "The wall is factually a bad idea," which isn't wrong, it's just a non sequitur. He wasn't arguing whether the wall was a good idea or not. He was simply imagining a technicality.

    Nothing is wrong with your arguments, you're just applying them to the wrong people/discussions.

    And this post especially shows that you are too emotionally attached:

    Yes, he name dropped you. Yes, he was saying negative things about you and personally insulted you, but this just isn't the place for it. Take that up with him personally in PMs. To do it here makes you both seem like you want an audience.
    thank you.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Chrome Canada Show Events Starred Starred x 1 (list)