They're all led by people who are literally or mentally in their early 20's, it's like Germany if the SA won and tried to rule. More mature people in their 30's and 40's should be stepping up to provide some direction, but the ones who do or are older include A) Spencer, who focuses on useless b.s. like "identity", needlessly praises Israel as "a good example," is kind of snobby and faggy and doesn't represent the people in the movement's views or interact with them much b) Brimelow, who has to pretend like immigration is a problem for its own sake instead of a form of racial replacement, and cowers at the thought of anything edgy or true about Jews because of his paleocon past C) Jared Taylor, who has to speak truth about race and wonder why his facts just die in the wind because he refuses to acknowledge that it's the system Jews have set up which forms people's attitudes and forms policy D) Greg Johnson, who is too snarky and has too many people refusing to associate with him because it's believed he's gay, and he gets into too many online feuds.
Anglin is mostly fine, but he buckles under pressure as with the Colmes interview, he's good at focusing on the issues besides the excessive stuff on women and Russia, his weird "Filipino jailbait" and "breed white people out of existence" stuff is blown out of proportion but not good for having a lot of people wanting to follow him.
The TRS guys are fine, but they're useless for creating an actual community because Enoch disdains visiting his own forum, commenting on disqus, writing articles, etc., he just likes online drama and debates with shitty liberals on Facebook and has zero interest in creating a real community. The other guys are fine for commenting on things here and there, making funny songs, whatever, but they're not serious thinkers who know anything about leadership. Not one of them will have studied people like Frederick the Great, Yue Yi, Takeda Shingen, Khalid ibn al-Walid, Hellmuth von Moltke, Cesare Borgia, or anything else in detail.
/pol/ by its nature can't take leadership of anything because of its nature. Many are trolls and contrarians for its own sake, some of whom I suspect would be the first to undermine and mock this white nationalist Christian Fourth Reich or whatever if it was actually achieved. Hence the endless "absolutely everything outside of here is just kike fag shills" mentalities on display.
What you end up with is a lot of kids in college, or recent college graduates, who are good at mocking the Left but don't have any real vision for achieving power, don't have the money to pull it off, almost all of whom enjoy internet chatting and drama more than reading and thinking, with much of the latter being done for conspicuous display to others for recognition of their intellects.
The number of people who are seriously dedicated to the advancement of our people and destruction of our enemies is simply far too low, with the number of weebs, online dramatists, petty rivalries, teens and early 20-somethings too high. This immaturity is why people get quickly bored with discussing our enemies and their plans, as it is much quicker, easier, and interesting to the obtuse mind to engage in infighting, slander, and internet drama.
This womanish, childish mentality of loving gossip and drama, in turn, throws out adults and serious people who tire of what amounts to children on the internet saying "ur a kike shill," "no you are," "no ur the kike," "nuh uh, it's you who's the kike" without end. Our thing is a fringe ideology, and it still attracts fringe figures, not quite as bad as 20 or 30 years ago but still largely ostracized young people who want to find something to waste time on rather than build something real.