Make no mistake, this is not an endorsement of sex robots, pedophilia or beastility, but an argument pertaining to them and feminist legislative attempts.
Women have already tried to outlaw female sex robots, while completely being okay with male sex robots.
So, with the underhanded leftist culture pushing pedophilia as acceptable and beastility being legal (in Canada), how long before it's instantly one sided on those fronts.
I am not advocating for pedophilia or beastility.
However, I expect there to be the same one sided laws to come to bear, say, with beastility. A woman can convict a male animal of rape if it doesn't fuck her correctly.
Any male doing anything with an animal will be convicted of rape and the animal will be put down as well.
Beastiality will only be legal when women have a successful and enjoyable experience with an animal of their choosing.
Or as a finishing move in Mortal Kombat.
Here's why I'm bringing this up. They will then blur the lines between these other forms of sex and heterosexual contact between humans.
They will use established case law citing the names of the animals/robots and neglecting to state that they aren't human, to push more rape culture and men into jail for the crime of being born male.
ここには何もないようです