全 7 件のコメント

[–]Endorsed ContributorNeoreactionSafe 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

 

What people sell you is that women are angelic and innocent and can do no wrong. This is a blatant lie and recognizing that does not harm women and it doesn’t equal hate.

 

Women are typically not angels in the Christian writings.

I know that modern Christian teachings have been inverted to mean the opposite, but the story of the Garden of Eden and such images as the Whore of Babylon are pretty clear what the bible was warning us about.

Check the picture again:

http://taylormarshall.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Whore_of_Babylon.jpg

 

We are warned against:

 

  • Women unifying with state power. (the beast)

  • Women holding power over money. (divorce rape)

  • Women openly using their sexuality to create worship of them. (the pedestal)

 

Remember that the Red Pill is eternal truth... it does not evolve or progress.

What was true 10,000 years ago is true now and will be true 10,000 years beyond.

 

[–]TyrannyVengeance 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I would say that if a woman really thought about it they would realize they actually prefer being humanized hence "Chad".

[–][削除されました]  (6子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]2Auvergnat 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Then count me out. I am not here because I am against women as a group, but because I want to understand them and learn to deal with them thanks to that knowledge.

    AWALT is not anti-women and it's not "against women" (according to your definition). AWALT means "don't make the mistake to think that your girl is somehow different than other women". I would gladly endorse saying AMALT to mean "don't make the mistake to think that your boyfriend is somehow different than other men" because it means that yes all men think about sex, yes all men are attracted to youth and beauty and yes all men would love sexual diversity. Whatever the few exceptions, it's better off thinking all men follow the basic male behaviour pattern that their hormones and brain development drive them to follow. Women who would say AMALT would not be against men, they'd be trying to understand how the male mind works.

    The fact that newbs here use "AWALT" as an automatic answer to any post a newb makes to cite an anecdote of a woman making something horrible does not mean AWALT is mysoginistic, it only means many newbs still have a long way to go to get out of the anger phase.

    Also, you're talking about "humanizing" with another definition as OP. OP meant "they're not angels, they're humans" (which is true) while you mean to use as if OP had said "they're not all the same, they're individuals" (which as you say goes against TRP dogma, but absolutely isn't what he implied).

    The rest of your post is good, but I can't agree with your idea of "owning" the qualification of being "misogynistic". It's like feminists owning the concept of being "nasty women", or "bitches", or "drinking male tears". It's a fun rhetoric to use but it's just a dumb idea that'll only make them more enemies.

    [–]LongSchlongAIDS[S] 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I get what you're saying about the terms anti-semetic and homophobia but, the dictionary definition of misogyny is a hate of women. If you hate women that's unhealthy. They are what they are biologically and I don't advocate fighting that but accepting it to better understand them for what they are which is human.

    When I say humanize I mean actually recognizing them as being human with the same flaws and biological drive. Feminists and Blue Pill men believe women can do no wrong and (especially for BP men) once that image is shattered they begin to become misogynistic. They begin to hate women. These guys come to the RP and are in the anger phase. They hate them because they were playing the game all wrong in the first place. Like my example where everyone is playing two different sports but, really there is only one sport and only one way to score.

    [–]raisins3142 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    So generalizing is no longer simply generalizing?

    Use words properly.

    For instance noticing women usually have differences from men that are predictable is not misogyny. Please convince I'm wrong.

    [–]mummersfarce_is_done 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    AWALT is not dehumanizing. It is to make us understand the underlying drives of female brain, particularly those that are different to our own. The way how each female acts upon those, is usually similar; but has varying degrees of difference. AWALT is the roots of her thinking, not the entirety of it. For this reason alone, every woman should be judged on her own individual merits. Otherwise, if we were to blame biology; then every bad thing a woman does is due to her biology, thus she simply has zero control and then we can not hold her responsible for anything. That's how pussy pass is given.

    AWALT is similar to AMALT, in the way that all men have some biological drives. But AWALT rule is much more strong in comparison, because AWALT is also much more grand, both in it's quantity of sub-rules and it's magnitude. Females are the less diverse sex and AWALT includes women's tendency towards hypoagency. AWALT means, every female will choose to follow her biological drives if given the choice. It means, they have less values because they value social cohesion, and therefore they follow the herd mentality.

    I think that's more about how you view humanising/dehumanising. If you see humanising as complete uniqueness, then I'd say; you're putting humanity on a pedestal. Humans are simply evolved monkeys. Would you say, monkeyisation to describe the uniqueness of every monkey too?

    [–]LongSchlongAIDS[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I get what you're saying about the terms anti-semetic and homophobia but, the dictionary definition of misogyny is a hate of women. If you hate women that's unhealthy. They are what they are biologically and I don't advocate fighting that but accepting it to better understand them for what they are which is human.

    When I say humanize I mean actually recognizing them as being human with the same flaws and biological drive. Feminists and Blue Pill men believe women can do no wrong and (especially for BP men) once that image is shattered they begin to become misogynistic. They begin to hate women. These guys come to the RP and are in the anger phase. They hate them because they were playing the game all wrong in the first place. Like my example where everyone is playing two different sports but, really there is only one sport and only one way to score.