全 3 件のコメント

[–]Budee01 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Prior to 1965 there was no reliable birth control. Then the pill came out. Boom, sex and procreation were no longer linked and women could now have careers while being married and/or having sex.

Before then, biology ruled and women had babies. Often quite frequently. That kept them in the home and dependent on the husband. He's working the wife is not. The wife couldn't have a career so how could she act as if she was better than her husband. They had a division of labor so to speak. This was the pattern throughout history.

After 1965, the pill is widely used. Women can work more or less unhindered by a pregnancy. Toss in the fact that advertisers cater to women and then the media shifts to the new paradigm that women are smart and brilliant in almost everything. Here is an example of that, from 1980.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jA4DR4vEgrs

You see the woman can do it all. Work, be a mom and have sexy time with the husband. Women became super women suddenly in the media.

[–]Charles_Offdensen 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's an appeal to women's vanity and their inferiority complex.

[–]scorched_throwaway 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

yes. things have become altered states.

movies back then.. a woman might speak up in a serious, what about, nonsense.

..and be shutdown, clearly and concisely, so the main character, her and the viewer all knew and understood, why she was wrong..

things changed. here's a good example against men,


Galbrush Paradox

A male can be a lecherous drunk. A woman can't or it's sexist. Sexualizing women and what all. A male can be a mentally disturbed soldier who's mind is unraveling as he walks through the hell of the modern battlefield. A woman can't or you're victimizing women and saying they're all crazy.

Consider Guybrush Threepwood, star of the Monkey Island series. He's weak, socially awkward, cowardly, kind of a nerd and generally the last person you'd think of to even cabin boy on a pirate ship, let alone captain one. He is abused, verbally and physically, mistreated, shunned, hated and generally made to feel unwanted.

Now let's say Guybrush was a girl. We'll call her Galbrush. Galbrush is weak, socially awkward, cowardly, kind of a nerd and generally the last person you'd think of to even cabin boy on a pirate ship, let alone captain one. She is abused, verbally and physically, mistreated, shunned, hated and generally made to feel unwanted.

Now, you might notice that I've given the exact same description to both of these characters. But here's where things deviate. While no one cares if Guybrush takes a pounding for being, for lack of a better term, a less than ideal pirate, Galbrush will be presumed to be discriminated against because of her gender. In fact, every hardship she will endure, though exactly the same as the hardships Guybrush endured, will be considered misogyny, rather than someone being ill suited to their desired calling.

And that ending. She goes through ALL that trouble to help, let's call him Eli Marley, escape the evil clutches of the ghost piratess Le Chuck, it turns out he didn't even need her help and she even screwed up his plan to thwart Le Chuck. Why, it'd be a slap in the face to every woman who's ever picked up a controller. Not only is the protagonist inept, but apparently women make lousy villains too!

And that's why Guybrush exists and Galbrush doesn't. Men can be comically inept halfwits. Women can't. Men can be flawed, tragic human beings. Women can't. And why? Because every single female character reflects all women everywhere.

don't you hate talking monkeys, right about now..