mgtow ideology is something I have been lucky enough to recognize and analyze for a long time. My father has been a lawyer for 40 years and, before the "red pill" or mgtow was a thing, he would tell me about what was happening to men in domestic court issues as a warning from a very young age. Some of these stories were actually inspiring despite being sad like a guy who decided he hated his ex-wife so much that he would rather go to jail every 6 months for 6 months instead of paying her back support or making a "genuine effort". Most of it though is simply infuriating like women who kicked husbands out of their house (the Husband's house) despite video and audio proof that her protection from abuse request to get the house to herself was a lie. Many moved BF's in the next day. It's true despite the cliche.
 However,  despite having all the guns in the world, the state never has the balls to come out and say, "hey, we are screwing you because you are a guy."
 For instance, instead of saying, "there's no way in hell that you will ever see your kids" they say "You need to pay "X" amount of support in order to exercise your custody rights". Then, when a man turns around to exercise his custody rights they say, "How can you be an attentive parent when you are working 50 plus hours a week?" The children need an available parent. You can see them every other weekend IF EVERY CHILD OF A DIFFERENT SEX HAS A ROOM TO SLEEP WHERE ONLY SIBLINGS OF THE SAME SEX ARE SLEEPING. So, god forbid you can't afford two, three bedroom houses and you have different gendered kids, good luck having your kids sleep overnight. First you need to pay for the EX's house and then your house needs to be nice enough or - too bad. 
 It gets even more interesting when two people are "really" fighting over custody and support and where Orders have already been set in place. For instance, when women pick kids up and moves them across jurisdictions (states) without proper procedure, the Judges typically want to hear from psychologists and counselors etc. before even flirting with the idea of "contempt" charge against her. Maybe what the women did was best? Don't let the law stop her from helping the kids right? 
 When men do the same thing, they don't usually jump right to "contempt" either. They shoot right past it and charge him with criminal kidnapping, child endangerment, reckless endangerment etc. 
 Then of course, children services comes in and the men (but really never the women) have to pay the state thousands of dollars to take "parenting courses" to pay for their "sins".  Then and only then are they even aloud to pay thousands of more dollars to their attorney in order to fight for the chance to see their kids. 
 Also, even if the woman lied (again) and the Court knows she lied, the men still have to take "parenting courses" because hey, once Children Services signs men up for a course, you better finish it! It doesn't matter if the reason you were forced to sign up in the first place was BS. 
  What are the conclusions I've drawn from extensive amounts of information over the years. (1) Judges really don't care about the law. They apply it when they want and ignore it when they want (when it helps men) and, so, it really doesn't even exist because it is as arbitrary as being liked or being disliked. (2) It won't change because it is never presented as "pro-female", it is always disguised. Also, if they can't disguise it, who cares? Lower Courts don't need to write opinions or justify their actions to anyone. You can point at your book all day and say, "This is the law" and they will tell you to sit down if you are a man. They know at that point you are likely too broke to appeal and, even if you do, higher Courts most routinely don't overrule lower Courts anyway. The lower Courts don't justify (write an opinion) about why they did what they did to men and the higher courts just say, "well, there wasn't overwhelming evidence that what they did was wrong so we uphold it even though they never justified it".
 I am not married and don't have kids but it is even more brutal than most redpillers even know. I am certain that single men will never adopt and/or become single parents if they want kids because the state is COMPLETELY anti-man and by the time you are done fighting with them, you won't even have the energy or will to tell your story. Watching men in domestic court forces you to throw out logic and fairness because it has no place there.