上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 269

[–]yesididmakeanotherWhite Nationalist 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (105子コメント)

White privilege is real, it's good for us, and we want to keep it.

Privilege is a natural result of being a member of the majority group. Japanese have Japanese privilege in Japan. Han Chinese have Han privilege in China. That's how it should be. People naturally like members of their own race more and are naturally more lenient towards them. That's a big part of why we don't want whites to be a minority in the US. It won't result in a perfect meritocracy, it'll just result in other groups having privilege over whites.

[–]YopperApe 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Pretty stupid argument. You know goddamn well all the institutions in the US are lined up against whites. You have a responsibility to know better than this if you're arguing on our behalf in r/debatealtright.

[–]upthatknowledge[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (100子コメント)

Ah, so you acknowledge it but instead of wanting equality you just lack the ability to conceive of a better future for your entire species?

[–]AngelFolcIdentitarian 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (49子コメント)

Why should we give a shit about our entire species? What benefit does that accrue to us?

You should give a shit about the largest possible group that is prepared to reciprocate in looking after you and your families' interests.

[–]upthatknowledge[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (48子コメント)

Ok...thats the species....im confused how you dont see the only known species capable of intelligent thought throughout the universe as a group that takes care of itself....

The benefit? Well the more humans working together the higher our overall productivity and the sooner we will get off this planet. Keeping all humans on a single planet is stupid, the sooner we spread ourselves to other planets, the less likely the entire species is wiped out by some random cosmic bullshit

[–][deleted] 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Well the more humans working together the higher our overall productivity and the sooner we will get off this planet.

Literally the only time humans have ever left low earth orbit was when they were explicitly working against each other. Not working together. Ever heard of the Cold War?

America and/or Europe could have gotten to Mars decades ago if they put the money into it. The required science and technology was developed, entirely by white people, during the 20th century. The reason they haven't has nothing to do with needing the assistance of Africans, as you seem to imply.

[–]upthatknowledge[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (5子コメント)

So the ISS doesnt exist in your mind?

[–][deleted] 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (4子コメント)

low earth orbit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Earth_orbit

Read the second paragraph

[–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

What difference does that make? We have a species built space station....you cant argue that haha who cares about if its in low earth orbit? It being in low earth orbit is relevant because why?

[–][deleted] 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You have to admit that your jibe "So the ISS doesnt exist in your mind?" is literally nonsense, because my original post explicitly referred to human spaceflight beyond LEO.

It being in low earth orbit is relevant because why?

Basically, I agree with what you said above:

Keeping all humans on a single planet is stupid, the sooner we spread ourselves to other planets, the less likely the entire species is wiped out by some random cosmic bullshit

This is very true. LEO satellites like the ISS do nothing to extend the reach and durability of human civilization.

Also, I'll repeat what I said above, because it's also true:

America and/or Europe could have gotten to Mars decades ago if they put the money into it. The required science and technology was developed, entirely by white people, during the 20th century. The reason they haven't has nothing to do with needing the assistance of Africans, as you seem to imply.

[–]LarqusIdentitarian 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Idk but 300km and 300,000km kinda makes a difference.

[–]TheTopSnekWhite Nationalist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Instead of downvoting people for proving you wrong in a DEBATE FORUM, why don't you just make your point?

He said "Left low earth orbit" - Low earth orbit includes the ISS.

[–]AngelFolcIdentitarian 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (40子コメント)

im confused how you dont see the only known species capable of intelligent thought throughout the universe as a group that takes care of itself.

I'm confused how the funk you could have ever gained the impression that the human species looks after itself. In case you haven't noticed we funking eat each other.

We rape, we rob, we steal. No matter who you are, you're standing on the corpses of billions of the dead. You only draw breath by dint of the fact that when all the killing, raping and eating was going on, your ancestors were the ones that eventually came out on top.

[–]DoNotBeRude 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Whoa, there! Please watch your language, u/AngelFolc.

[–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (37子コメント)

Cause it does? You realize we've wiped out parasites across the globe as a species right? Look at the bad AND the good we do..your view is horrifically narrow

[–]AngelFolcIdentitarian 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (27子コメント)

You realize we've wiped out parasites across the globe as a species right?

No far as I'm aware AIPAC is still up and running.

[–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (25子コメント)

Ah so youre giving uo cause youre wrong? Good. Cause thats what radically changing the subject is...its you giving up

[–]AngelFolcIdentitarian 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (24子コメント)

Do you even know what you want? Do you even know why you're here? What empty morally vacuous intellectually-bankrupt cause do you even think you're defending right now?

[–]upthatknowledge[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (23子コメント)

Why am I here? I want the alt right to know beyond a doubt that non sjw white men with jobs oppose you completely. I want you to know youll never get support and youre doomed to stay in your sad echo chamber jerking each other off forever. Your safe space will be as far as you EVER get

[–]google-no-agendaCapatalist 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (8子コメント)

'we' didn't do that.

White people did that. And we shared it because we're nice.

What have other cultures shared with us? Shitty music and tacos?

[–]upthatknowledge[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Go back to your tv grandpa

[–]PostPurge 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (3子コメント)

You come here to understand or to parrot bullshit? It is white people who did 99% of what you attribute to the human "species". Blacks in africa don't give a fuck about you or your desire to have on big human family. Learn about racial IQ differences and then come back and tell me that we are all the same as a species.

[–]google-no-agendaCapatalist 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (2子コメント)

>asks for facts

>presented with facts

>ad hominem

Yep, yer a liberal, harry.

[–]acantholysized 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

  1. That some ancestors did bad does not mean that all did.
  2. That some ancestors did bad does not mean that any contemporaries will do bad.
  3. That some contemporaries do do bad does not mean that all contemporaries do do bad.
  4. That anyone does bad does not mean even that anyone is not looking after the human species (e.g., to do harm to an individual is not at odds with looking out for the species).
  5. That someone is not looking after the species does not mean that everyone is not looking after the species (i.e., that no-one is looking after the species).

[–]yesididmakeanotherWhite Nationalist 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (18子コメント)

Our political opponents are not conceiving of a better future for us. They think we (whites) are irredeemably racist and sinful and they're gloating about how America will be brown in a few decades and whites will never again be able to impose their political will. We're just responding in kind.

[–]upthatknowledge[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (16子コメント)

Im your political opponent. Please link where i said anything of the sort or please stopping using strawmans to feel smart

[–]google-no-agendaCapatalist 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (15子コメント)

Please link where i said anything of the sort

The entire premise of your post.

[–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (14子コメント)

So you cant link it then? Cause im not sure youre aware...but you didnt link it (hint:because it doesnt exist)

[–]google-no-agendaCapatalist 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (13子コメント)

[–]upthatknowledge[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (12子コメント)

Still can't link it eh? How embarassing for you...

[–]google-no-agendaCapatalist 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (11子コメント)

The fact that you believe that white privilege is a thing, tells me all I need to know.

Your friend was ten times more likely to be a violent criminal than you were. The cops were right to be suspicious.

[–]acantholysized 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I'm guessing that this is the number of homicides by that race out of all homicides. It's not clear if it's only 2014 or "through 2014" or what, but it doesn't matter much here.

Additionally, this is a dishonest statistic: we have no context. We might ask: where did these take place and who was the victim (was it black violence in a white neighborhood, black violence in a black neighborhood, white violence in a black neighborhood, etc)? When you ask the question "what is the probability that this person will be homicidal given that they are black" is implicitly relying on the data that is implied by their being black. Yes, they are black, but what does that mean? Obviously melanin does not make you more prone to killing. That they are black means that they have their entire associated history influenced by being black. That is to say, if you took a white person whose history was similarly influenced as if they were black, then if we asked the question "what is the probability that this person will be homicidal given that their associated history is influenced in a "black" way", what reason do we have to believe that this white person will be less likely to be homicidal than a black person?

What happens is we forget that differences between people exist in their pasts and not in the present. Indeed, many people will act very similarly given similar pasts, no matter their present situation.

[–]upthatknowledge[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Wow granpda STILL no link....so iguess you just say shit you can back up constantly eh?

[–]bottles_n_models 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Surprisingly Id agree, anyone with a non left wing idea is immediately labeled a nazi or a white supremacist. But are you so weak minded you let them turn you bitter and make you run and hide under an ideology. Taking the intellectual easy route my friend.

[–]PlaatjeFascist 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (25子コメント)

Pretty sure most of us don't believe in 'equality' like you do.

[–]upthatknowledge[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (24子コメント)

Is it because you lack imagination or because you harbor almost nothing but hate? The only reason the equality im speaking of wouldnt exist is because YOU decide it doesnt. Impossible when refering to how humans treat each other isnt a thing, its not like saying something is impossible by the laws of physics. You can treat people however you want, if you want equality you create it

[–]NESIRGNIKWhite Nationalist 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (18子コメント)

You can treat people however you want, if you want equality you create it

No you don't because people aren't equal.

[–]acantholysized 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

  1. Why are people not "equal"?
  2. What is your operative definition of "equal"?

[–]NESIRGNIKWhite Nationalist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Why are people not "equal"?

Because evolution doesn't work that way.

What is your operative definition of "equal"?

Equal = phenotypically the same.

[–]acantholysized 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's silly: you contradict yourself. It is precisely because there is not a one-to-one correspondence between phenotype and genotype that evolution even works! If you rest your argument on evolution, then you should say "equal" is genotypic, which you most certainly shouldn't agree with.

[–][削除されました]  (14子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]PlaatjeFascist 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (11子コメント)

    Not an argument.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (10子コメント)

    Well its a question so....

    [–]PlaatjeFascist 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (9子コメント)

    You're moving away from the 'people are equal' position to the 'equal opportunity' position. These are two different things, I do believe in equal opportunity but in many cases it comes down to an individuals preference and if he prefers his people over others then so be it, he's free to do so.

    [–]NESIRGNIKWhite Nationalist 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Enjoy the ban.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Protect your safespace at all costs snowflake ;) i know you cant handle being offended by a stronger male

    [–]PlaatjeFascist 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    its not like saying something is impossible by the laws of physics.

    It's impossible because of the laws of nature. If you believe in science you believe in evolution and cultivation, are you saying this applies to all living things except humans?

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    The fuck is that comment supposed to mean? there are no laws of human interaction...evolution does not have laws of human social interaction...the fuck you trying to say?

    [–]PlaatjeFascist 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I'm saying that equality isn't possible because people aren't equal.

    [–]secEurope 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    This. Equality is a man-made idea.

    [–]DoNotBeRude 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Whoa, there! Please watch your language, u/upthatknowledge.

    [–]ICameHereToReadFascist 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    you just lack the ability to conceive of a better future

    No, we just disagree on what is a better future, we accept our more or less racist nature as either something good or as something that is not necessarily bad and should be understood if we want to build a better future.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Thats fair, its totslly bullshit and disgusting to me though

    [–]ICameHereToReadFascist 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I think everyone should love their own kind. Hating other groups is wrong, I would agree with that, but the left often considers an inevitable bias in the stupid masses equal to actual ideological hatred, discrimination or even violence and I find that absolutely ridiculous.

    [–]bobop6 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    We don't want equality.

    [–]williamtheconqueror_ 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Why should anybody want to thought police people and change their natural ways of thinking?

    [–]Hotfire-Coldice 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Whites are even more privileged than asians in asia.

    [–]bottles_n_models 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Then leave the united states then. This country at its core as always been a meritocracy. Shit ill go even further. It has always been a plutocracy. If you want a backwater shit hole where peoples only claim to fame is the color of their skin Im sure they would love you in many Balkan countries.

    [–]acantholysized 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Privilege is a natural result of being a member of the majority group. Japanese have Japanese privilege in Japan. Han Chinese have Han privilege in China.

    This is not true: privilege is a natural result of being a member of a privileged group. Wealthy have privilege in any country: and not because they are a majority there, but because of their being a member of the wealthy.

    That's how it should be.

    This is daft. When you use the word majority you are referring to a particular attribute, say, "whiteness" or "wealthiness". What actually happens to define the groups of privilege, though, are more complex: we define the groups with respect to an archetype, say, the "wealthy white male".

    People naturally like members of their own race more and are naturally more lenient towards them.

    I would agree that this is true, in general, but police mistreatment of blacks occurs even when the officers are black.

    It won't result in a perfect meritocracy, it'll just result in other groups having privilege over whites.

    No: for that to be the result there must be instead a different majority to replace whites. On the other hand, with more of a plurality you would have a lot of arguing to do to claim that some other group would have that privilege handed to them that whites currently have.

    [–]CarlotheNord 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (9子コメント)

    Right, I'll bite.

    White privilege, if it exists, exists because it was earned. Whether by founding the country and being the majority groups, or being a member of the group that has a history of not committing crimes at rates that would embarrass anyone.

    So I'm going to, for the sake of debate, assume this privilege exists. Why should I not have this privilege? My kind founded this country now? We built it and made it a super power no? So why shouldn't I receive the perks of being in such a state?

    No, a black would not be treated the same, and for good reason. As a race, they have the lowest IQ, highest crime rate across ALL crimes that don't involve banking, and have a very high tendency towards violence. They're the racial equivalent of the short bus, and no I don't care if they don't like hearing it. I don't particularly like hearing that I'm not as smart as an Asian, but facts are facts and I can't change that.

    So, a white man is less likely to be checked for drugs at a traffic stop, while a black man is. This is due to trending and suspicion. Blacks want to stop being suspects? Stop committing crime, its that easy, so easy in fact that almost EVERY OTHER RACE DOES EXACTLY THAT.

    [–]secEurope 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Exactly. Our parents built this nation so that we can have a better life than them, they did not build it for the whole world to invade and pillage.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Not even going down this rabbit hole

    [–]CarlotheNord 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Well that's not very fair is it?

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Nope, but i see no reason to treat white supremacists "fairly" they certainly dont believe in treating others fairly. Do unto others right?

    [–]CarlotheNord 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    You cannot have a discussion if you're going to just shit on your opponent from the get go. That's very bad manners. I am not a supremacist, I am most certainly not a white supremacist, at worst I'm an ethno-nationalist for all races, God forbid right?

    Anyway, I was right, you really don't want to be here at all, you came here just to prove yourself right, that the Alt-Right is full of hateful nazis and bigots. Ironic considering your replies to me. I hope you're satisfied.

    [–]JMuraco 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Mic drop. You won that big time!

    [–]bottles_n_models 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Dont you see how that system becomes incestuous and rotten? If the only criteria you have for social mobility is someones whiteness why would anyone white push themselves to do anything? They would become lazy and complacent like monarchies did in medieval Europe. Then they would be run over by actually talented and charismatic individuals from the middle and lower classes or in this scenario, non whites.

    [–]acantholysized 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    As a race, they have the lowest IQ, highest crime rate across ALL crimes that don't involve banking, and have a very high tendency towards violence. They're the racial equivalent of the short bus, and no I don't care if they don't like hearing it. I don't particularly like hearing that I'm not as smart as an Asian, but facts are facts and I can't change that.

    If you compare the black and asian societies it should be abundantly clear to you that much of the stereotyping you are doing is due to society and not race. Asian's as a whole are not "smarter" but rather their culture is one that rewards dutiful academic devotion, specific family values that reinforce personal duty, etc. Similarly, blacks are not as a whole stupider or more violent: their culture is one in which education is not as available or not as valued or whatever. Similarly, if you look historically at the asian societies that you would claim are smarter, you'd see that they're for the most part "untouched" when it comes to these parts of their culture. On the other hand, black culture is almost entirely shaped externally, especially in the US: they were imported and evolved inside a different (opposing) culture. So if "they" are a certain way, you have to consider that perhaps it's not because of who they are but how they were treated and how they live; then, you have to acknowledge that the way there are treated and how they live are due in part to white culture. Therefore, it is not true that they have the lowest IQ, it is not true that they have the highest crime rates, and it is not true that they have a tendency towards violence, when you take these claims outside of context (additionally, in context, I'd love to see some study associating IQ and race, as I've not actually seen one).

    This is due to trending and suspicion. Blacks want to stop being suspects? Stop committing crime, its that easy

    This is ridiculous. First of all, you've claimed that white privilege isn't real. But white privilege is something you are granted just for being a member of a group, whether you deserve it or not. Similarly, this unfair treatment against blacks is a "privilege" they are granted just for being a member of a group, whether they deserve it or not. So if you think that a black man in NY should be treated with suspicion because black men in CA have been unlawful, then you must by the same logic accept that white privilege exists. Moreover, it seems absurd to suggest that behavior by a group in one location should have impact on the treatment of another group elsewhere, especially when the similarity between the two groups is due solely to their race. Should poor uneducated "white trash" be stopped and checked for drugs at traffic stops too, since they're "trending" in use of not only meth but synthetic cannabinoids? Should wealthy white men in nice cars driving be stopped around 6PM and checked for drugs just because they're more likely to use cocaine?

    [–][deleted] 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (21子コメント)

    Do you have other examples of white privilege other than law enforcement leniency?

    There are huge differences between the crime rates of different races (roughly, Asians are an order of magnitude less violent than whites, who are an order of magnitude less violent than blacks), due to a variety of cultural, social, economic, and/or genetic factors [1].

    Because blacks are so much more likely to be criminals than whites, it makes a lot of sense for police officers to be more cautious and suspicious when interrogating a black suspect.

    Similarly, they should be more cautious and suspicious of young males than of middle-aged women, because young males are far more likely to be criminals than middle-aged women. Does this simple system imply the existence of "middle-aged women privelege" on a societal scale? No, of course not. And nor does your example imply the existence of meaningful "white privilege".

    1. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43 -- I realize that your response to this might be "but the justice system is biased against minorities!". I do admit that such irregularities might exist and they might explain variation in crime rates on the order of 25% or even 50%. They cannot explain variation on the order of 500% to 1000%, which is what we actually have.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (20子コメント)

    So......my examples of me breaking the law but not getting arrested completely fucks your stats. I wasnt reported for breaking the law when i did. So your whole blacks are more violent than whites bullshit is based on whats reported. Did you expect me to self report on the crimes i commited?

    [–]NESIRGNIKWhite Nationalist 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (9子コメント)

    .my examples of me breaking the law but not getting arrested completely fucks your stats.

    No it doesn't. Anecdotes don't change anything. Do you even know what an aggregate is?

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (8子コメント)

    So...my crimes never got reported, and I know im not that special...these things have happened to others. So yes...crimes that dont get reported to the stats skew the stats

    [–]NESIRGNIKWhite Nationalist 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (7子コメント)

    If you compare the arrest rates vs victimization surveys you'll see the match up perfectly. Even if some bias existed, it would not be able to override the discrepancies. http://www.amren.com/the-color-of-crime/

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (6子コメント)

    You cant calculate underreporting, by its very nature

    [–]NESIRGNIKWhite Nationalist 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    If someone gets mugged or raped the police can't ignore it. That's only possible for minor crime, which The Color Of Crime says police let off blacks for at a higher rate.

    Are you seriously suggesting that when the police get a rape victim and they ask the race of the attacker if the person says "white" they just send the victim home and and shut down the investigation?

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Read my original post, then your post, then try not to tell me what i think

    [–]NESIRGNIKWhite Nationalist 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    You're denying facts. I have nothing else to say to intellectually dishonest frauds.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    So...i outright say in the post that white privelege is complicated and nuanced, so when you say "so what you think they ask the rapists race then let them go" youre proving you genuinely cant debate this...you cant help but straw man it.

    For real...post where i said white rapists get off scott free or quit thinkimg strawmans make you smart

    [–]YopperApe 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Again, it lines up perfectly with victimization surveys, where people have no incentive to lie or underreport. And if someone is underreporting it's blacks, whom are documented to lie more frequently on surveys.

    [–][deleted] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    So......my examples of me breaking the law but not getting arrested completely fucks your stats. I wasnt reported for breaking the law when i did.

    According to your post, your crime was a moderate traffic violation. My claim had to do with violent crimes like murder, assault, rape, and robbery.

    Are you saying that if the police officer who let you off a $50 fine had seen you robbing a store instead of speeding, you think he would have let you go because you're white? That's an absurd proposition.

    So your whole blacks are more violent than whites bullshit is based on whats reported.

    Do you think that police officers regularly choose not to report murders, rapes, and robberies committed by white people in the same way that they are lenient with speeding tickets?

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Did you read my original post for this thread? Cause...it doesnt seem like you did...i wasnt put in handcuffs on three separate occasions for speeding. And the last part of my post sort of refutes your last half before you ever wrote it....it just seemsblike you didnt read the original post at all. Just...try again

    [–][deleted] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Can you elaborate on what being "put into handcuffs" means? Like, what were you doing if it was different from the speeding occurrences?

    Do you think that police officers regularly choose not to report murders, rapes, and robberies committed by white people in the same way that they are lenient with speeding tickets?

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Possession of illegal narcotics. And did you read the part about nuance, where i said being white and having face tattoos while robbing a bank doesnt apply to white privelege? Its more subtle and nuanced than that? If not go back and read that section then try again.

    [–][deleted] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Okay, you said:

    Im saying being white gives you a significantly higher chance of getting away with a crime when compared to the chances a black man would have.

    I concede that this statement might be true when talking about minor nonviolent crimes like yours: speeding, drugs, etc. I do not concede that this statement is true for serious violent crimes like murder, robbery, etc.

    Honestly I don't care very much about drugs/druggies/speeders and I don't think those are important issues. If "white privelege" just means white people can safely drive an extra 5mph on the highway, then it sounds like a pretty stupid thing to whine about.

    I'm far more interested in why blacks commit robbery, murder, assault 10 times more than whites. You haven't addressed that at all.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Well considering those three times would have cost me over $5000 to pay off and probably would have prevented me from getting my degree, and it makes a huge difference for the violent crimes you mentioned. Black men get arrested for trivial shit like this constantly at a disproportionately higher rate, leading to more single parent households. Single parenthood households with young boys usually leads to that boy commiting crimes.

    So my argument is that these "irrelevant" priveleges arent irrelevant at all, they have huge ripple effects. Me having $5000 locked up in fines and not getting my degree would have MASSIVE impacts on me, not to mention thats assuming i wasnt put in jail.

    Its not that black men just always run out, theyre punished disproportionately and this has massive impacts

    [–]google-no-agendaCapatalist 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    The plural of anecdote is not data.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    So youre saying you expect me to self report to ensure the stats are accurate? How can they be accurate if data is not present?

    [–]google-no-agendaCapatalist 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Nobody gives a shit about your shitty anecdotes.

    At scale, based on the data released by the FBI, your hypothesis doesn't hold water, as linked by /u/rusticanus above.

    [–]MelissaClick 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    my examples of me breaking the law but not getting arrested completely fucks your stats.

    No it doesn't, because the crime statistics that are generated from the national crime victimization survey are what show the disparity. They have nothing to do with arrest rates (or conviction rates).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Crime_Victimization_Survey

    By the way, NCVS racial disparities match up with arrest and conviction racial disparities, implying that a racial disparity in arrests or convictions per crime committed does not exist (or at least is very small).

    [–]NESIRGNIKWhite Nationalist 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (35子コメント)

    White privilege doesn't exist. The facts don't lie.

    Even if I did I wouldn't care, I'd be all in favor of it. Everyone deserves to have privilege in their own nation.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (24子コメント)

    So why doesnt it exist? I just laid out my experiences enjoying white privelege, and you didnt even try to refute them

    [–]PlaatjeFascist 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (17子コメント)

    Anecdotes in general hardly count as valid arguments.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (16子コメント)

    So you want stats about me not getting reported?

    [–]PlaatjeFascist 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (15子コメント)

    Not you, stats about both white and colored people being reported on or not, or whatever gives a credible validation.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (14子コメント)

    So...the results are in and youve already drawn your conclusions then?

    [–]PlaatjeFascist 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (13子コメント)

    No I'm not making any conclusions, I do in fact believe that white privilege is to an extent real (petty crimes/violations, non city jobs, ...). I believe that in any nation the majority is always a little privileged over the others, it's natural. So why would we want to become a minority?

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (12子コメント)

    If you views things so narrowly and so detached from reality..then yea, i see why youd think that

    [–]PlaatjeFascist 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (11子コメント)

    How am I detached from reality, I agree with you that privilege of the majority exists. It exists in every country, in every continent, for all of human history. And there's nothing wrong with that.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (10子コメント)

    Theres nothing wrong with it is wat detaches you from reality. You havent experienced the negativr effects first hand

    [–]NESIRGNIKWhite Nationalist 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Because the facts prove it doesn't. Blacks are punished in accordance with their crime rates.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    So..youre not going to try to refute me? Just parrot phrases?

    [–]google-no-agendaCapatalist 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    You're the one making the claim that white privilege exists. The burden of proof is on you, bud.

    [–]acantholysized 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Because the facts prove it doesn't.

    There is a difference between "there are not facts that prove it does exist" and "the facts prove that it does not exist", and you just ignored this...

    Blacks are punished in accordance with their crime rates.

    If crime rates are increased by being punished, what do you do about this loop?

    [–]NESIRGNIKWhite Nationalist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    There is a difference between "there are not facts that prove it does exist" and "the facts prove that it does not exist", and you just ignored this...

    No I didn't. Not only are there no facts to suggest white privelage does exist, there is also evidence to show it doesn't.

    http://www.amren.com/the-color-of-crime/

    http://www.amren.com/archives/reports/the-color-of-crime-2016-revised-edition/

    If crime rates are increased by being punished, what do you do about this loop?

    Then surely it would apply to every group from the egalitarian world view so it invalidates itself.

    [–]bottles_n_models 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (8子コメント)

    Why should a nation be founded on similar skin color and not similar ideas? Makes no fucking sense? You have more in common with mexicans than your average left wing white person.

    [–]NESIRGNIKWhite Nationalist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (7子コメント)

    And how are you going to found a nation of idea? Proposition nations are bullshit and have no lasting power.

    [–]bottles_n_models -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Like the USA? You fucking joking, the united states was literally only founded on ideas. Some conscious and some subconscious. Religious freedom, freedom from tyranny, freedom of speech, freedom from fucking squalor. Also some subconscious ideas too like the idea any man is able to make it if they work hard enough. Or that we are very independent and regionalistic in outlook.

    [–]NESIRGNIKWhite Nationalist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Well first off, the united states was clearly founded with a distinct people. It was a country for Nordic Europeans, specifically Anglos and Germans. In fact, the very first immigration/naturalization law in US history, passed by the first congress and signed by Washington, reserved citizenship for "free European people of good character" exclusively.

    Secondly, the US is the perfect example of why proposition nations don't work. Within years of the constitution being signed it was violated. Literally look at this list. http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/17716-a-legacy-of-violations-the-u-s-bill-of-rights-hyperlinked

    Even with a common people and culture the idea that founded the nation didn't last long.

    Also, we should stop using "nation" this way. A nation is a collection of people sharing a genetic legacy and culture. What you're thinking of is "state".

    [–]bottles_n_models 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    . It was a country for Nordic Europeans, specifically Anglos and Germans

    Oh yeah show me where it says that in the constitution? Can you not tease apart relics of their time and actual conscious beliefs?

    There is no way the European founders would ever have said, yes let everyone in. Its not because they thought about it, its because they were doing what everyone else was doing. Its like saying all white nations are equal because they are white. I bet you dont think that. Because it is what is different about a country that gives a country shape and value. Or are you going to tell me england is just as good as albania.

    Violated or evolved? Also you dont think the definition of "white" can be "violated" what will happen when people can manipulate genes (really not far off)? And blacks can look white? Is skin color really that valuable to you?

    Ok? have fun getting steamrolled by a "nation" that practices true meritocracy, then you'll have true white genocide and it will be your own damn fault.

    [–]NESIRGNIKWhite Nationalist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    This is fucking unreadable. Fix it or GTFO autiste.

    [–]bottles_n_models 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    autiste.

    Complain about readability

    Use made up words

    [–]NESIRGNIKWhite Nationalist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Your whole write up was literally unreadable.

    [–]bottles_n_models 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Idea one = the fact the founders were white carries certain subconscious implications that dont matter

    Idea two = whiteness is a social construct and can be manipulated and thus a stupid reason to create a "nation"

    Idea three = institutions that are white only are liable to crumble and get steamrolled by institutions that use other criteria for advancement

    [–]acantholysized 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    There are multiple facets to this: you have active privilege and passive privilege. Active privilege is precisely that which affects you as a white person. Passive privilege is that which affects those that are not white.

    Historically, academic positions and positions of power (political, religious, etc) have been concentrated within white (male) populations: the effects of this comprise part of passive privilege. By not being white your academic discourse was dismissed or your authority was ignored. If you were white, though, that did/does not necessarily imply that your academic discourse will be embraced or that your authority will be celebrated.

    Active privilege is that as was characterized by OP: by being white you actively benefit in situations dealing with authority; this is true both in history and presently.

    To say that "white privilege" thus characterized does not exist is patently false. On the other hand:

    Even if I did I wouldn't care, I'd be all in favor of it.

    That is a different stance that has to be argued separately, but you can not say that it does not exist.

    This is inane:

    Everyone deserves to have privilege in their own nation.

    Your nation is the nation of whites, so whites should have privilege in your country? Why, then, is your country perhaps the only one defined by skin color/race rather than ethnicity? Whites of one ethnicity/lineage are hated in many other equally white societies. So why are you attempting an unprecedented nation of privilege based on simply being "white" (with no definition of "white") and not one where privilege is doled out based on how you match some perfect archetype (the straight white wealthy masculine well-dressed chiseled well-groomed tall male)?

    [–]edessasail 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    "White Privilege" defined as preferential treatment towards a white person only exists in the context of other whites. Human beings naturally prefer their in group, and there is no way to stop this biological reality. If you go to a black ghetto you will not receive white privilege. If you get pulled over by a non-white police office you will not receive white privilege. There is nothing wrong with this form of "privilege" especially since it doesn't mean anything given this is a white country. We should be privileged here. If you want non-whites to have privilege they can go to countries where they're the majority.

    Legally speaking the opposite is true however. The government is constantly pushing for anti-white "diversity", mass non-white immigration, anti-white systemic bias in the form of H1b visas, quotas and affirmative action. So from a systemic standpoint non-whites are the one who are privileged.

    Another factor to consider is that on aggregate blacks commit significantly more crimes than whites (as shown by US Victimization Surveys which list victim reported data on the race of criminal perpetrators corroborating official crime statistics), have been shown to be significantly more likely to assault a police officer over something trivial, and murder police at a significantly higher per capita rate. The reason police treat non-whites differently than whites would likely be a result of our natural in-group preference coupled with non-white's disproportionately high amount of violence towards them and in general. On the whole treatment is equal enough though, and incidents like yours are the anomaly. It just so happens that non-whites are more criminal than whites on a per capita basis.

    [–]WhiteChristianManWhite Nationalist 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (7子コメント)

    I am white and got a ticket for sliding off of a road and doing damage to my car and nothing else.

    Anecdotal evidence isn't good evidence.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (6子コメント)

    So i said that no white people ever get in trouble? Can you link where i said that?

    [–]WhiteChristianManWhite Nationalist 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    You said that you didn't get in trouble for some things and that your black friend did. You literally formed a worldview based on the isolated experiences of one black person and one white person.

    That's naïve.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Youre so full of shit hahahaha you think i literally only use these few examples to form my opinion ? Are you a robot pretending to be human or something?

    [–]WhiteChristianManWhite Nationalist 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    You provided those anecdotes as if they were evidence. Provide some actual evidence.

    [–]notagayguy69 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (6子コメント)

    As believable as your anecdotes are, I'm calling bullshit.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Cool, then theres nothing more to discuss

    [–]notagayguy69 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    If you want to have a discussion about white privilege, present us with facts.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Hahahahaha no. Im an employed white male in the south and i oppose you :) thats really all you need to know

    [–]notagayguy69 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    If you oppose me, you oppose yourself.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Whatever you say queer

    [–]JMuraco 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    And the troll is exposed right there!

    [–]14dn 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (21子コメント)

    every single black dominate country has a low average IQ and high crime, do you think this is a coincidence? It is the same for them in the US too. recent science tells us that IQ is mostly genetic, partially environmental. low IQ is linked to high crime, so are other things like the Warrior gene. They are not our equals, they will never be no matter how much tax money we waste on them. they are privileged to live in the US and not some African shithole, and they show absolutely no appreciation for it.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (19子コメント)

    So...colonies didn't exist? Belgium didnt utterly fuck the Congo and leave lasting scars to hurt educational systems? You have auch vacuum thought its scary...

    [–]edessasail 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Transracial adoption studies prove that socioeconomic factors don't matter for the most part. Intelligence is heritable, and what your parents have is what you'll most likely have. Before Belgium there was no infrastructure in the Congo, no written language, no modern medicine. The sins of Belgians aside they objectively improved African standards of living.

    [–][deleted] 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (12子コメント)

    There are many other countries that have been colonized or otherwise brutally oppressed. Like Poland. Throughout history, Poland's educational infrastructure hasn't just been given "lasting scars"; it's literally been blown up by Russia, by Germany, by violent colonial oppressors, etc.

    Yet Poland has an average IQ of ~100, just like all other white countries.

    There is considerable scientific evidence that IQ is largely determined by genetics.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (11子コメント)

    Then your ancestors must have shoveled shit for a living

    [–][deleted] 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (10子コメント)

    Why are you being so pathetic?

    If you disagree with what I say or you think my claims are false, then state your counterarguments.

    When you come back with something stupid like that, you just increase my confidence that what I said is true.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (9子コメント)

    If youre willing to compare to Congos wealth extraction and slavery to poland being occupised then theres no point in debating you, youll just flip the table over and claim you won

    [–]14dn 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (7子コメント)

    Poland and much of Eastern Europe got completely raped by WW2 and Communist rule for decades. tens of millions of people dead. they have only been free from communism for a short time and much of it has already recovered nicely. Africa, and every island blacks control, still haven't gotten their shit together because blacks are too dumb and violent to get along with each other.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Youre too dumb to refute

    [–]secEurope 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Or you don't have a refutation because reading intellectual literature is a pursuit beyond your grasps?

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    You got it white supremacist, whatever you think is absolutely true

    [–][deleted] 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    If IQ is determined entirely by historical circumstance, then how do you explain the fact that all white countries have around the same average IQ (~100), which differs considerably from Asian countries (~107) and African countries (~70)?

    Certainly there is huge historical variation within Europe, within Asia, and within Africa. Even if it's not of the same scale as Belgium and the Congo, why does this variation not appear at all in the IQ distributions, if history is indeed the primary determiner of a country's average IQ?

    [–]bottles_n_models 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    The hereditability of intelligence is about .7. Still a .3 leeway left due to environment. Big difference in capability between someone that is average(100) and someone that is legally retarded (75). If say a black person starts with a lower number they still have a huge room to improve with education.

    [–]White_sama 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (47子コメント)

    It's not white privilege as much as it's black... disprivilege?

    Blacks are more likely to commit crimes and have violent tendencies, to be dealers etc... So it's natural that they would be searched more often. It's most likely not even intentional on the officer's part. He sees someone who looks like a "typical suspect", whatever that might be and instinctively gets more alert of that person.

    I realize that this isn't a very good explanation but I hope you get what I'm saying.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (46子コメント)

    Exactly thats white privelege. Thats all. Its nothing magical haha its subtle inherent biases

    [–]White_sama 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (34子コメント)

    Yeah. But it's not our fault. It's black people's fault for putting a bias on themselves.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (33子コメント)

    Nah, the history of the black america is more complicated than that. Nothing will improve if you just blame others. The black family structure has been devastated by unfair policing and the drug war. So many young black fathers are in jail for drugs and they were diproportionately targeted, its devastated the black family.

    [–]White_sama 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (28子コメント)

    While that may be true, the facts are that blacks ARE more likely to be criminals. It is thus an officer's job to be more careful around them.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (27子コメント)

    You realize thats a self fulfilling prophecy right?

    "We should police and arrest blacks more" "oh look blacks are getting arrested more!"

    [–]White_sama 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (26子コメント)

    I'm not talking about what happened before. I'm talking about the right now. Should we let blacks off the hook even though there is more chance that they are criminals? It's a shame the black family got destroyed and all that jazz, but we're not going to bend the knee and compromise our security just because.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (25子コメント)

    Well im certainly not suggesting you bend a knee haha my suggestion would be to look at circumstances and environment and realize what the drug war is STILL doing to the black family. I hope your response isnt "well they should stop breaking the law" because the drug war is unjust and the black community suffers because of it more than any other community.

    Also, dont worry TOO much about your security :) not all black people are those BLM pricks

    [–]White_sama 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (19子コメント)

    The drug war is... not smart, to say the least. But when you say "look at the circustances", what does it really mean? Ok, I'm gonna look at the circumstances, then what? The black man in front of me still is more likely to be a criminal in the end. So should I say "yeah but he's not genetically disposed to be a criminal so I'll let him off" (he kind of is, 85 IQ and stuff but let's leave that out), or should I still hold him to a higher standard of scrutiny (which is a normal reaction to more chances of being in danger)?

    You are advocating for us to leave blacks off the hook because they didn't choose to have their families broken up and shit. Right. But they are still criminals and that's what matters now.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (18子コメント)

    The solutions matter, dont bring up the IQ point please haha thus far ive been able to respect you but if you go down that road then that ship basically sails. The question is where do we go from here? And he answer isnt "theyre criminals, theyre on their own." We have to try to fix the black family, and ending the drug war is part of that. Ensuring good paying jobs and access to good housing is important as well...i believe in equality of oportunity and i dont believe your average black american had anywhere near the opportunities i did growing up.

    [–]rasoreLGBT 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    They suffer from the drug war more, because they do more drugs, we can see this by looking at random urine analysis studies which prove it, as when polled, they lie and self report as consuming just as much drugs as whites (which is where the myth that the drug war is racially targeting comes from).

    This article goes into the random hair/urine analysis data by race, as well as more myths pertaining to "white privilege".

    http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/white-privilege-cops-and-courts/

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Yea...i dont even need to click that link to call bullshit. And no...no they dont. They use drugs at roughly the same rate, they just get reported more. Which is sorta the whole point of my original post...which youve ignored

    [–]14dn 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    blacks are more degenerate when it comes to drug use (and everything else). drug policing is just fine for white people, blacks are incompatible with our way of life though. they need to fuck off to their own country and do things the way that fits them best.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Youre incompatible with my country,you need to fuck off and leave

    [–]14dn 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    this country was created and built by Traditionalists. your people are degenerates who started popping up a few decades ago because the Jews got their grimy hands on the media and educational system and used them to force Marxism on our children.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Cool, i was born here. My country now. Youre not compatible, fuck off.

    [–]rasoreLGBT 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (8子コメント)

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3029708/

    The kind of bias you're talking about is hardwired into every race, it's perfectly natural, you'll find Asians acting the same way with other Asians in Asia, at the expense of whites even, and that's fine - it's not going anywhere when we're biologically coded to prefer our own people.

    Also, with regard to your comments on black crime and self fulfilling prophecies etc, check out this data, Blacks are about 60x more likely to have a gene that strongly correlates with stabbings, shootings etc

    http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/maoa-race-and-crime/

    As well as higher testosterone which causes aggression, impulsivity etc (which is why police heavily disproportionately arrest men, not because the police have a systemic sexism problem)

    http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/testosterone-race-and-crime/

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (7子コメント)

    So you say, but its not required. We can and i believe SHOULD fight to elimimate it. I dont want to be on the receiving end of it, we can minimize it if we try

    [–]rasoreLGBT 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (6子コメント)

    I think that's very egoic, we are animals like every other animal, we have a nature, and to think that we can defy it, regardless of any biological hardwiring, seems very arrogant in my opinion. Trying to fight it, does a lot more harm than good, the data would suggest.

    Oxytocin is in your blood, it's in my blood, it's in everyone's blood. It induces racism, like the study I already linked shows. You can try and convince yourself that, consciously, you've overcame it, but subconsciously it'll always be there, regardless of whether you've tricked yourself into recognising it or not. It's in our DNA.

    http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/ethnic-diversity-and-social-cohesion/

    I also edited my last post and added some more data you probably want to check out.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Ill look into it, but dont doubt the power of willpower...if you want to overcome the inherent bias you can. All it takes is desire

    [–]rasoreLGBT 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    I'm a determinist, I don't believe we have free will, it makes more sense philosophically/biologically that "willpower" is just a powerful illusion, like the ego.

    We wouldn't say the same about anything else biologically hardwired into is, that if you just believe hard enough, you can overcome your need for oxygen, or change your biological hair/eye colour etc

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Thats fair, i do believe we have free will haha

    [–]rasoreLGBT 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    I think it's probably better that way, people who believe in it tend to have better life outcomes, same with people who believe in religion etc. Sadly I just can't convince myself either are philosophically valid, having assessed both to great depths.

    [–]JMuraco 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Not "bias" but fact. In law enforcement, there is a thing called the "Drug Trafficker Profile". It was based on real-life data. The resulting profile, amongst other characteristics, is a black male. Sorry you are butthurt over the truth, but the vast majority of violent crimes are committed by blacks.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Whatever you say white supremacist

    [–]cjspike1357 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    So you arent going to shadow ban everyone who disagrees with you like in r/altright?

    [–]WhiteChristianManWhite Nationalist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Mods can't shadowban. But they can ban.

    [–]ForgottenMemes 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    I'm white. I've never gotten a warning. I've never gotten free anything.

    I've also never been offered a scholarship. I've been turned down for a job for the color of my skin. I've been treated unfairly by the courts.

    Were I black (or jewish) I would have been able to easily get into an ivy league school because of my grades. If I were to apply for a government job I wouldn't get it. If I checked the minority box I would.

    But white privilege is 100% real. It's just not what people think it is.

    White privilege is the fact that because I've actually had to work for every dollar I've earned making money is easy. Everything is easy. I've developed, through hardship and not being helped in any way at any time in my life, the skills to be extremely effective at anything I try to do.

    In effect white privilege, at this point in time, is the skill set developed by a total lack of privilege.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Hahahahahaha is that what you tell yourself?

    [–]ForgottenMemes 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I pretended your OP wasn't an obvious lie for the sake of anyone lurking.

    [–]upthatknowledge[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Thats cool, if you think im lying theres nothing to discuss