Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Men have to please women
This topic contains 40 replies, has 21 voices, and was last updated by Atton 11 minutes ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
So, it was happened when I was 11-12 years old boy at the school. Our classroom teacher had decided to make a quiz. So we were split by two teams – boys and girls. We, the boys, won. So what did that bitch? She told us:”Guys, you should give your win to the girls, because men have to please women.”
Fuck! Ass! So, from the childhood, women raise boys in understanding that they are nothing in front of women. One of them take the Red Pill in years later, the others turn into manginas who know that they are to serve a woman, not to lead.Just enjoying my the only life.
I don’t have to please shit!
manginas who know that they are to serve a woman, not to lead.
One little word caught my eye.
“lead”.
That’s also “serving a woman” in another way. You don’t exist to “lead” her either. In theory it’s treating like like an inferior as well. In practice, it’s “being the man SHE wants” — >> instead of being the man YOU always wanted to BE.
Big difference.
Women make a VERY big production out of making it clear that “a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle”. MGTOW take her word for it and hold her to her own standard.
“If you say so, sweetie”.
There is tremendous value in not being her dancing partner at all.
Men have to please women
And NO. We don’t.
https://www.mgtow.com/video/how-not-to-be-a-simp/
I don’t have to please shit!
^^ He’s got his head on right. And he’s right to say it out loud with emphasis because women STILL walk around with this ludicrous idea in their heads while lecturing men on what they NEED to do. But women NEED to be corrected.
If a man does anything for her, it’s a fucking gift – not an expectation.
• “Men have to please women”
• “Men exist to serve women”
• “Men exist to protect women”
• “Men exist to take bullets women”That fucking idea went down with the Titanic.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.One little word caught my eye.
“lead”.
Women follow a strong man, doesn’t matter if he wants that or doesn’t. So he is a leader anyway.
Just enjoying my the only life.
Women follow a strong man, doesn’t matter if he wants that or doesn’t. So he is a leader anyway.
Not exactly. Wherever men go, women WILL follow. That’s visible everywhere. But that’s not the same as “leading” her. If you ignore her, she will be just as likely to come running after you. But that’s not like grabbing her hand and saying “come with me”.
If I turn and walk away from her and she starts trailing behind, I’m not “the leader”. She is “the follower”.
She may be looking for a “leader” type, but MGTOW aren’t interested in that. They are “leading” their own lives and carving their own paths. Whether she follows or not.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.That fucking idea went down with the Titanic.
This made my day! 🙂
MenManginas have to please womenEnjoy your cats, cunts.
Anymore I take great pleasure in not pleasing them.
I used to work so hard at it. What an idiot! Ha
"Your lack of empathy has rubbed off on me" Some one on here
She may be looking for a “leader” type, but MGTOW aren’t interested in that. They are “leading” their own lives and carving their own paths. Whether she follows or not.
Ok, Keymaster, lets take the example that is a familiar to both of us. Is Alexander the Great more of “a leader” type or MGTOW type?
Just enjoying my the only life.
Ok, Keymaster, lets take the example that is a familiar to both of us. Is Alexander the Great more of “a leader” type or MGTOW type?
I’ll answer that another way.
Where women are concerned, which is more of a MGTOW type , and which is more of a “leader”.
Han Solo, or James Bond?
007/Bond almost always lead and protected women grabbing them by the hand and saying “come with me”. He is the man women WANT.. and the man other men want to BE. But he is still fundamentally a disposable bitch for queen and country – first and foremost – before all other things.
Solo was not. His hero stunt at the end of EPIV was a positive side-effect and secondary consideration, not his Manspiration.
In EPV, when he took Leia’s hand to “get her out in the Falcon” it was only out of a sense of duty and a detour….. he was already on his way out, and she was running after him to give him shit for not being the “leader” SHE would prefer.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.A women following me when Im not intending to lead her is a..stalker.
"Your lack of empathy has rubbed off on me" Some one on here
Han Solo, or James Bond?
Keymaster, I gave the example of Alexander because a king is more likely a leader. Based on Oxford dictionary.
Leader – The person who leads or commands a group, organization, or country
Leading – Guidance or leadership, especially in a spiritual context.
Guidance – Advice or information aimed at resolving a problem or difficulty.
Leadership – The action of leading a group of people or an organization, or the ability to do this
There is no a word about being a person someone wish you to see. Leader is a strong and an independent person, who goes its own way. James Bond exactly serves to women. He is not a leader at all.Just enjoying my the only life.
I will just roll on the name of the thread .
I don’t please woman anymore but please myself in the shower from time to time . (Pun)
You cant beat the machine but you can damage it.
Anymore I take great pleasure in not pleasing them.
I used to work so hard at it. What an idiot! Ha
Same here. Ironically the more you do that the less likely they’ll be interested in you. But treat them like shit and ignore them they’ll come running to you. What can I say, female logic.
Keymaster, I gave the example of Alexander because a king is more likely a leader. Based on Oxford dictionary.
Except in the game of CHESS – which is more like a marriage than a monarchy.
The QUEEN can move anywhere she wants – and can pick off any player in her path.
The “KING”… is only permitted to move One. Square. At. A. Time.
He’s not a “leader” at all.In HenryVIII’s case, when she failed to please HIM, it was divorce and off with her head. But even that’s not a demonstration of a “leader”. That’s a failure at being a leader and he couldn’t even lead 6 wives properly.
You remember the film “Gladiator”?
Who was the more admirable leader?Maximus? Or Commodus who ruled like a coward. A king’s crown is not a reliable indicator of an ability to lead. Even Lucilla had the ‘gina tingles for Maximus…. who wanted nothing to do with her.
They are all fascinating examples of a MGTOW character – with no interest in pleasing women – compared and contrasted to a stereotypical (or perceived) “leader”.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.In the Chess either the queen or the king can do nothing without will of the player. And here is we come to the conclusion that is only an independent person who has the will can goes its own way. Coward has no will, because cowardice kills the will. And back, a gladiator has the will, but he has no independence. They both can’t go their own way.
So, to be a leader you should have both indepencence and power of will. That’s why I don’t make a difference between both being a leader for a woman and being MGTOW. Leader is leading and a servant is serving. No matter which way they do it.
Just enjoying my the only life.
In the Chess either the queen or the king can do nothing without will of the player.
That’s just a technicality. Was not intended to be taken literally. It’s a metaphor.
And back, a gladiator has the will, but he has no independence.
But that’s what he’s fighting for and defending above all other things – his own SOVEREIGNTY.
Pleasing & leading women is not on the fucking menu.That’s the only distinction I am trying to make here.
That’s why I don’t make a difference between both being a leader for a woman and being MGTOW
You still don’t get it, but I just bolded it above. MGTOW are not interested in leading women, controlling women, or being the man she wants to “lead” her. That’s a different kind of “mangina” where a woman is still a primary consideration.
manginas who know that they are to serve a woman, not to lead.
You started out saying “manginas who know that they are to serve a woman, not to lead” — implying “leading women” is the preferred alternative. (for mgtow)
It isn’t.
Where women are concerned, a man’s basic options are SERVE, LEAD, or IGNORE.
Women will strongly prefer #1, #2, or a combination of those.
Some men are perfectly OK with miserably resigning themselves.But a MGTOW takes door #3 – which may or may not have anything to do with her at all. To him, a woman is a secondary consideration and/or a temporary pleasure at best.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.Going your own way is when you tell the bitch to quit following you.
"Your lack of empathy has rubbed off on me" Some one on here
That’s just a technicality. Was not intended to be taken literally. It’s a metaphor.
And I have shown you that they have no will. So their individual possibilities play no role.
Pleasing & leading women is not on the fucking menu.
Agreed.
But that’s what he’s fighting for and defending above all other things – his own SOVEREIGNTY.
It’s more like the saying:”Man plays the game, woman knows the score”. Whether a gladiator gets independence or not, it doesn’t depend on him. He decides nothing. Very close to male-female relations.
MGTOW are not interested in leading women,
I read you clear. And I was never arguing with that.
A MGTOW takes door #3.
Only a hermit in the deep of the forest can takes that door. In the society, you can’t hide from that, you either a leader or a servant (in my opinion).
Just enjoying my the only life.
That’s just a technicality. Was not intended to be taken literally. It’s a metaphor.
And I have shown you that they have no will. So their individual possibilities play no role.
Pleasing & leading women is not on the fucking menu.
Agreed.
But that’s what he’s fighting for and defending above all other things – his own SOVEREIGNTY.
It’s more like the saying:”Man plays the game, woman knows the score”. Whether a gladiator gets independence or not, it doesn’t depend on him. He decides nothing. Very close to male-female relations.
MGTOW are not interested in leading women,
I read you clear. And I was never arguing with that.
A MGTOW takes door #3.
Only a hermit in the deep of the forest can takes that door. In the society, you can’t hide from that, you either a leader or a servant (in my opinion).
You are close to understanding.
Until you recognize that door number 3 is available to all men, not just hermits, you will not be able to grasp our air.
Behind door number 3 a woman ceases to be the center of your thoughts, desires, impulses, etc.
They are just hazy beings that go whaa whaa whaa.
The decisions you make are your decisions based on what you …..
The real danger is that young boys will be exposed to single mothers
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
MGTOW | Men Going Their Own Way.
