@McFaul The only skepticism is from GOP in Washington, and Trump fans.
Woodward and Bernstein also faced lots of skepticism early on about their sources when reporting on last break-in at DNC.
-
-
@McFaul I was phonebanking for McGovern campaign. The story was out, but voters didn't yet "get it", 18 months later they did. -
@McFaul Touche! -
@McFaul People also didn't believe Hitler was a real threat... -
@McFaul@AriMelber WHAT DID TRUMP KNOW AND WHEN DID HE KNOW IT? WAS THERE A ROLE FOR MANAFORT? STONE? -
@McFaul@Richard_Schiff Yes the CIA could have leaked the Russian hacking story to a news outlet, problem is public didn't take it seriously -
@McFaul@AriMelber or it could be like like Dan Rather's reporting on Bush 43's military service -
@McFaul@AriMelber Agreed. I keep telling people to look up the YEAR Deep Throat was finally identified. -
@McFaul if POTUS knew & said nothing then 2 things are true: 1. HC would win anyway 2. hack would not change election results. He was 1for 2 -
@McFaul Also possible that the Russians got many of their hacking targets and political valuation from Trump associates. -
@McFaul Skepticism is fair when the stakes are so high. Let's just hope, for the sake of journalism & the country, that the sources are good -
@McFaul Break in by foreign hostile regime is even worse for national security that break in by own government or opposing party. -
-
.
@McFaul For good reason. It was partisan then and it's partisan now. But is it TRUE? That's what honest ppl should ask. -
.
@McFaul This is just an attempt to smear Trump, delegitimatize him. Does Russia try to influence? Yes. Did they? Not in any detectable way -
@JoscoJVTeam@McFaul lol yeah Josco. -
.
@vitalsguy@McFaul That's the extent of Democrat "argument"
-
-
@McFaul Excellent point - future trivia: Ulasewicz : Watergate, _______ : Putingatehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cp9MCXSL2qA …
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。もう一度試すか、Twitterステータス(英語)をご確認ください。