this time Canada is changing their rules on pornography

Topic by Right Coast Canada

Home Forums MGTOW Central this time Canada is changing their rules on pornography

This topic contains 7 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by  thisistheguy123 11 minutes ago.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #369178

    Right Coast Canada
    Participant
    63

    Commons committee to study health effects of violent online pornography

    “The worldwide revenue from porn is estimated at $57 billion, which is more than Microsoft, Google, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo or Apple,” Harder told the Commons. “The mainstreaming of pornography increases daily. This is having a significant impact on how boys grow up perceiving woman and thus treat them during adulthood.

    “One in three women will experience sexual assault in their lifetime. One in three women will be harassed, inappropriately touched, taken advantage of, or forced into sexual acts against their will.”

    I knew I would be discouraged if I viewed the above article from Canada’s Liberal voice, the CBC. But, I did, and I was. By Elizabeth Thompson and showing the cheek of a dark, white man with 5 days growth on his face in the lead photo. Their purpose and scope changes frequently through the article but it is clear we are joining the intrusion into pornography, and the lives of anyone involved in the production, distribution, and indulgence in this entertainment.

    What compelled me to post the link and the quotations was to show the blatant and biased gynocentrism Canadians actually financial support. This daily journalism is thrown in our faces like a haughty laugh. I was tempted to put this in the Political Corner because the news about censorship these days seem to be a common fascination with most countries. What we have become socially, and in media, directly translate into political influence and control. Everything mainstream is a political issue, but if you read the attached article I am sure you will have a few shake your head moments.

    #369179
    +5

    Machiavelli
    Participant
    4078

    “One in three women will experience sexual assault in their lifetime. One in three women will be harassed, inappropriately touched, taken advantage of, or forced into sexual acts against their will.”

    On what evidence?

    Oh there isn’t any. Just another feminist lie then.

    Mgtow is the solution they are asking for, there will be no sexual assault, harassment or inappropriate touching when all men go their own way. We are giving them everything they ask for.

    We have no demands to present to you, no terms to bargain about, no compromise to reach. You have nothing to offer us. We do not need you.

    #369256
    +1

    Puffin Stuff
    Participant
    5367

    Rapid packs of wild sex beasts running around raping everything in sight. It’s not about sex, however. It’s about power. Everything in the world is about “having” by “controlling” a woman.

    Wouldn’t porn relieve the pressure of sex from men and thus decrease the desire to go out and rape.

    Hanging out here I can certainly say that the men here deal with excluding the modern harridan social justice warriors and man haters by watching porn, getting a fleshlight and occasioning honest women who exchange their needs for a mans needs.

    They should really be cracking down on written chick porn, vibrators and dildoes. In the 19th century they “knew” that these devices were only for hysterical women, which was all women back then.

    Women used to go to the doctor to get jerked off and the medical community at the time encouraged it. If it keeps the woman married and avoiding Chad, it was good to go. Instead she got Dr. Chad. Women back then “liked” their doctors, especially gynocologists.

    You’ll see at the end of this excerpt in 2000 we now know what thousands of years of knowledge was all caused by the “Patriarchy”.

    lol.

    In 1653 Pieter van Foreest, called Alemarianus Petrus Forestus, published a medical compendium titled Observationem et Curationem Medicinalium ac Chirurgicarum Opera Omnia, with a chapter on the diseases of women. For the affliction commonly called hysteria (literally, “womb disease”) and known in his volume as praefocatio matricis or “suffocation of the mother,” the physician advised as follows:

    When these symptoms indicate, we think it necessary to ask a midwife to assist, so that she can massage the genitalia with one finger inside, using oil of lilies, musk root, crocus, or [something] similar. And in this way the afflicted woman can be aroused to the paroxysm. This kind of stimulation with the finger is recommended by Galen and Avicenna, among others, most especially for widows, those who live chaste lives, and female religious, as Gradus [Ferrari da Gradi] proposes; it is less often recommended for very young women, public women, or married women, for whom it is a better remedy to engage in intercourse with their spouses.

    As Forestus suggests here, in the Western medical tradition genital massage to orgasm by a physician or midwife was a standard treatment for hysteria, an ailment considered common and chronic in women. Descriptions of this treatment appear in the Hippocratic corpus, the works of Celsus in the first century A.D., those of Aretaeus, Soranus, and Galen in the second century, that of Äetius and Moschion in the sixth century, the anonymous eighth- or ninth-century work Liber de Muliebria, the writings of Rhazes and Avicenna in the following century, of Ferrari da Gradi in the fifteenth century, of Paracelsus and Paré in the sixteenth, of Burton, Claudini, Harvey, Highmore, Rodrigues de Castro, Zacuto, and Horst in the seventeenth, of Mandeville, Boerhaave, and Cullen in the eighteenth, and in the works of numerous nineteenth-century authors including Pinel, Gall, Tripier, and Briquet. Given the ubiquity of these descriptions in the medical literature, it is surprising that the character and purpose of these massage treatments for hysteria and related disorders have received little attention from historians.

    The authors listed above, and others in the history of Western medicine, describe a medical treatment for a complaint that is no longer defined as a disease but that from at the least the fourth century B.C. until the American Psychiatric Association dropped the term in 1952, was known mainly as hysteria. This purported disease and its sister ailments displayed a symptomatology consistent with the normal functioning of female sexuality, for which relief, not surprisingly, was obtained through orgasm, either through intercourse in the marriage bed or by means of massage on the physician’s table. I shall place this disease paradigm in the context of androcentric definitions of sexuality, which explain both why such treatments were socially and ethically permissible for doctors and why women required them. Androcentric views of sexuality, and their implications for women and for the physicians who treated them, shaped the development not only of the concept of female sexual pathologies but also of the instruments designed to cope with them.

    http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/m/maines-technology.html

    Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

    #369270
    +2

    Triklops
    Participant
    882

    But the most violent of the pornography found on the internet are by women on men. Mainstream pornography is just simple sex and may appear a bit disempowering to women but just delve into the realm of darker fetish porn like BDSM where only the softcore stuff is men on women but the more hardcore you get the rules get reversed.

    A friend of my cousin’s used to be addicted to that shit until he had a breakdown seeing some really ugly stuff and had to go through counseling. He told me he got into that stuff thanks to his ex-gf who had hard drives full of that shit and some of them included actual gruesome castration videos from farm animals to actual men by women, some even performed on stage in front of a live audience.

    Makes you wish you were never born on this planet.

    I am a Man. Hath not a Man eyes? Hath not a Man hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? Fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as a Woman is? If you prick us, do we not bleed? If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us, do we not die? And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?
    #369279
    +2

    Puffin Stuff
    Participant
    5367

    I was at a live show in Hollyweird where a guy with severe cystic fibrosis did a bdsm performance art piece in which he put a nail through his head live on stage.

    His lower head.

    Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

    #369305
    +1

    Triklops
    Participant
    882

    You know I know this guy, he’s in my guild in Diablo 3 and he’s a resident psychologist in some hospital in Hollywood CA and also does private practice he once told me that almost 90% of his female patients have castration fantasies and it includes women of all races whites, blacks, hispanics, asians and even natives. Swell.

    Sigmund Freud must be like..

    I am a Man. Hath not a Man eyes? Hath not a Man hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? Fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as a Woman is? If you prick us, do we not bleed? If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us, do we not die? And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?
    #369314
    +1

    Skeptisk
    Participant
    1685

    You know I know this guy, he’s in my guild in Diablo 3 and he’s a resident psychologist in some hospital in Hollywood CA and also does private practice he once told me that almost 90% of his female patients have castration fantasies and it includes women of all races whites, blacks, hispanics, asians and even natives. Swell.

    Must be penis-envy for women to even consider castration. What would their reaction be of anybody suggested to cut off their tits? Forcefully and without consent? It boggles my mind why some women haven’t already been sent to their “safe spaces” (read: padded cells) yet [#KillAllMen – should give an indication of this diseased mentality].

    "Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

    #369335

    thisistheguy123
    Participant
    710

    I’m pretty sure porn has stopped a lot more rapes and assaults than it has caused

    And I’m in the mindset that I don’t like porn and try my best to stay away from it…But I’m not an idiot in understanding a man is less dangerous after busting a load than before.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

The MGTOW Forums are for registered red-pill Men only. There are no exceptions. All females may exit immediately. Have you read The MGTOW Forums Guidelines (Last Updated 2015.01.02)? Please check it occasionally. Before you submit a post, kindly remember you are an important representative of
MGTOW | Men Going Their Own Way.

Trigger Warning EMERGENCY EXIT