上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]2u3e9v 2224 ポイント2225 ポイント  (1027子コメント)

Let's not forget high rent too! How can I possibly save when rent is so goddamn expensive?

[–]sonicz3r0 1547 ポイント1548 ポイント  (857子コメント)

My rent for an apartment is more than what my dad pays for his mortgage.

[–]predictableComments 744 ポイント745 ポイント  (599子コメント)

This is true. My mom pays probably around $800 for her house 3 bed 2 bath. I'm paying $1200 for a 2 bedroom 2 bath apartment

[–]Jericho85 423 ポイント424 ポイント  (387子コメント)

I'm paying 1850 for a 1 bed 1 bath... I feel your pain.

[–]rhinofinger 434 ポイント435 ポイント  (197子コメント)

I'm in San Francisco and am renting a tiny studio for a little over $3k/month. Average price in the area seems to be creeping up to $4k/month. 😭

And to buy a 1-bedroom condo, you almost certainly need to drop at least 1 million.

I need to move the hell out of here.

[–]fat_osvaldo 134 ポイント135 ポイント  (80子コメント)

It's only going to get worse unless there is a property price burst. And then the whole area's economy will tank.

[–]CNoTe820 111 ポイント112 ポイント  (19子コメント)

The price burst will happen right after a major catastrophic earthquake, that's what usually happens in the bay area. Property was super cheap in SF in the 90s.

[–]hardolaf 175 ポイント176 ポイント  (15子コメント)

The price burst will happen when people get together and elect people that don't support the protectionist housing supporters and instead vote in people willing to let the city grow upwards.

[–]MSeanF 35 ポイント36 ポイント  (52子コメント)

San Francisco is an area in which I can't see property values ever tanking. Like Manhattan, there isn't room to to sprawl out, and it would take societal collapse for either of them to become truly undesirable.

[–]hngysh 46 ポイント47 ポイント  (21子コメント)

If the city let people build higher than 3 stories maybe rent would come down.

[–]stoicsilence 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Architect here.

No. Bedrock is convenient but not a must. The skyscrapers in Chicago and LA are sitting on alluvial silt flats.

[–]jpop23mn 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Isn't new York's economy more diverse though? If there's a technology bubble that pops wouldn't it have major impact?

[–]gwailo_joe 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Correct. Prices may dip...but they won't drop. Even a major earthquake leveling 1/4 of the city would just be a boon for developers; it's true prices dropped after the '89 earthquake, and there was a recession at that time if I recall. But they didn't drop by much and it wasn't for very long. Limited space, proximity to Silicon Valley and climate (both political and natural) means SF is not suddenly going to become affordable to the average person...anytime soon. Source: born here, live here, have good job here, can't afford house here...and almost certainly never will.

[–]Emperor_Norton_2nd 77 ポイント78 ポイント  (20子コメント)

Move. I did. Born and raised in San Francisco (third generation) and now I live 20 minutes outside of Manhattan and pay a fraction of what it cost me to live 20 minutes south of SF. Yes, my wife and I make more money here too, it's why we moved in the first place, and my only real complaint is having to rake leaves several times in autumn.

[–]theturkeywhisperer 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (11子コメント)

Agreed. What's the problem with moving to a more affordable neighborhood or city? I made the decision to move from an expensive West LA neighborhood to a more affordable NE LA neighborhood where I was able to purchase a home with a monthly payment less than my previous rent. Was it a little uncomfortable at first? Of course it was, but it ended up being one of the best financial decision of my life.

[–]Bloodysneeze 177 ポイント178 ポイント  (14子コメント)

I need to move the hell out of here.

Your need to be cool won't let you.

[–]dumboy 47 ポイント48 ポイント  (4子コメント)

That depends on if you want "california cool" - beaches & extreme sports & yosemite & mansion parties...or "hipster cool who cares if its a decade out of date I'm a decade too old anyway". Which you can freaking get anywhere that has Facebook & some microbrews.

[–]OprahNoodlemantra 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Places like SF, LA, and NYC really suck for people that grew up there because of how expensive it just to live close to your family and friends.

[–]devildothack 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Damn, that is expensive. Here in south texas, I pay 550 for mortage for 3 bedroom, 2 bath 1300 sq area house. Also cost of living is cheap so is the pay. Like many point out, I think they go hand in hand.

[–]Business-is-Boomin 86 ポイント87 ポイント  (63子コメント)

Jesus Christ. My mortgage on a 3 bedroom/ 2 bathroom house is $1,198. I live in Philadelphia.

[–]Jah_Ith_Ber 60 ポイント61 ポイント  (49子コメント)

Where in Philly? I'm paying $950 for a 1 bedroom a block from the convention center. It's awful, there are people chilling on my stoop a couple times a week when I come home.

Also this was obviously once a 3 story house that my landlord split up into three separate units to maximize rent.

[–]tnecniv 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (33子コメント)

I'm paying more than that for a studio in University City and it sucks

[–]EtsaMeMario 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (26子コメント)

I pay $2,400/m in Santa Monica. It's 5 minutes from work, but FUCK, does it hurt my wallet big time.

[–]Lexvp123 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (19子コメント)

I live in Southern CA and my rent is $2,100 for a small 2 bedroom and I bathroom apartment. I pay more than my parents do for their home..

[–]Allredythere 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Studio apartment, $1250 a month, West Chester PA. It's outrageous.

Edit: Honestly, it's definitely not cheap, but I really like the experience I've had at the apartment complex and the management has been fantastic. After my previous experiences in renting, this has honestly been heaven and I'm just blessed with the fact I can even afford such a place after graduation.

[–]Cynlyn28 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I also live in Philly. I live in the northeast. My mortgage is $1,024 for a 3 bed, 2 bath.

[–]Business-is-Boomin 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Northeast people represent. I'm on a breezeway with a side yard and my own driveway. Pretty sweet.

[–]dirklejerk 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

That's a bargain for rent in Northern Liberties Philly

[–]Wohowudothat 36 ポイント37 ポイント  (47子コメント)

Damn. That will get you a 4BR, 3 full bath with attached 3 car garage here in the Midwest.

[–]adam_anarchist 101 ポイント102 ポイント  (42子コメント)

yea, but then you're in the midwest

[–]Wohowudothat 85 ポイント86 ポイント  (10子コメント)

If you watch movies and play video games, does it really matter if you're in Portland or Topeka?

[–]Bloodysneeze 26 ポイント27 ポイント  (12子コメント)

So is there a problem or not? If people are completely fine with sacrificing their ability to own a home to live in the Bay Area why do they act like something is wrong? Seems the system is working out perfectly.

[–]BIGlikeaBOSS 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Keep em out of the Midwest I say. The rent where I live is starting to get absurd.

[–]TaylorS1986 26 ポイント27 ポイント  (61子コメント)

Jesus Christ, I pay only $515/mo up here in Fargo...

[–]Seastep 106 ポイント107 ポイント  (48子コメント)

Yeah, but Fargo.

[–]TaylorS1986 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (43子コメント)

Besides our shitty winters we're actually a pretty nice city. We have 3 universities so we have a lot more cultural amenities than you would think for a city of 200,000 people. We have a booming tech sector, too.

[–]Chryst666 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Plus all of us weirdos in Winnipeg come to visit all the time!

[–]TaylorS1986 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (6子コメント)

We have a Tim Hortons, now!

[–]frostylakes 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

The Mall of America just got a Tim Horton's.

Canada is annexing the upper mid-west. I won't stop them.

[–]Rudacris 60 ポイント61 ポイント  (99子コメント)

That's subsidized housing prices in the bay area

[–]usurper7 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (98子コメント)

Why live there?

[–]Rudacris 309 ポイント310 ポイント  (12子コメント)

Because I like sourdough bread and sitting in traffic

[–]socksgin 51 ポイント52 ポイント  (6子コメント)

How do I be honest with my self like you?

[–]LittleKittyLove 57 ポイント58 ポイント  (5子コメント)

take a good hard look in the mirror and cry

[–]socksgin 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Oh, you can still cry to release dopamine to make you feel better? I just stare into the mirror, disgusted, feeling nothing.

Jk, but damn it got a little real. I'm gonna eat something healthy, maybe a jog.

[–]SpeakerOfTheOutHouse 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (40子コメント)

High tech jobs

[–]labhunchback 61 ポイント62 ポイント  (21子コメント)

Which according to reddit are the only real jobs that exist.

[–]honorary_mexican 26 ポイント27 ポイント  (15子コメント)

Everyone else is outside doing stuff.

[–]labhunchback 96 ポイント97 ポイント  (13子コメント)

Ha! Definitely.

After TAing part of a bioinformatics class, I saw firsthand students who were the personification of the reddit groupthink. Early 20 something males with an IT/Comp sci background with "edgy" pseudoliberal views that are also somehow racist and a serious case of social retardation combined with sexual frustration that manifests as anger towards women.

[–]Anonymous__Account 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Can confirm. When I talk about programming to other fellow programmers they have some sort of ego that they are better than everyone, including everyone who programs. It's actually sickening.

[–]Argos_the_Dog 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not me, there's too much snow in New York.

[–]rmwe 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (38子コメント)

Great job market, beautiful setting, tons of cultural attractions, quick access to the beach, wine country, Tahoe, over 6 million people in the region who may be your friends or family who you'd like to be close to. There are tons of reasons to live in the bay area.

[–]PeregrineFaulkner 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I moved here from the Gulf Coast. You forgot to mention the weather, the weather, and also the weather.

[–]krazykoo 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (12子コメント)

$1200? Shit I'll trade you I pay $2050 for a one bedroom......

JustVancouverThings

[–]why-this 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (4子コメント)

When did your mom sign her mortgage. Only asking because inflation and stuff

[–]das2121 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Not only inflation but how much has she paid for, how much was the initial mortgage, what was the interest rate, what type of mortgage, what is the value of the house today, etc...

[–]jetriot 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (27子コメント)

Im a millennial and I pay less than 700 a month for my mortgage and the house is a 4 bed 2 bath with a large front and back yard. Also, my commute to work is less than 5 minutes. Its all about where you live. I don't care to live in a high population/expensive area. Everyone has different priorities, Im grateful that mine mean low commute times and low cost of living.

[–]PastelFlamingo150 57 ポイント58 ポイント  (19子コメント)

How many and what kind of jobs are available in your area? People move to expensive cities because there's far more opportunities.

[–]peter_the_panda 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

$800 for that much house??? christ does she live in Wyoming? that size house in my area of Central Mass would be at least a half million

[–]work_login 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (1子コメント)

That's always been the case unless it's rent controlled. If mortgages were hire than rent, why would anyone rent their place out? Even if you buy with 3.5% down, your mortgage will be close to or less than rent. At 20% down, the mortgage is well under the rental prices, at least in my area. I'm paying $1200 a month for a house that rents for about $2000 now.

[–]HomeNetworkEngineer 169 ポイント170 ポイント  (32子コメント)

This is starting to be true everywhere. Millennials are not real people and they're only on Earth so that older people can make money off them.

[–]bigvicproton 37 ポイント38 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Millennials are not real people and they're only on Earth so that older people can make money off them.

I'm stealing this, hope to make money off it some how

[–]Thomjones 54 ポイント55 ポイント  (7子コメント)

That's what I never understood. They want this money and all these laws advantageous to them right now, with no concern for the future cuz they know they'll be dead. They don't care about the younger generation or how they leave the world. But maybe when I'm 50 I'll feel the same way who knows.

[–]EnclG4me 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (5子コメント)

No.. I doubt that. You'll still care. Like most of us. But that is what Baby-Boomers will be remembered for. Greed. They are the embodiment of the Sin.

[–]davidmac1993 37 ポイント38 ポイント  (21子コメント)

don't give up, we'll outlive them. We'll have the time to change things for the betterment of everyone no matter how hard they try to hurt us (I truly think their motto is "bleed them dry until we die"). That's what keeps me going.

[–]Saljen 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Unless, you know... they pollute the planet past the point of return.

[–]davidmac1993 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (5子コメント)

That is my biggest concern actually, as long as we can prevent that (It's the key thing to fight in my opinion as all other things are moot with a dead planet), we can win, for lack of a better term, a 'war of attrition' against their life expectancies.

[–]FauxGw2 44 ポイント45 ポイント  (105子コメント)

Moved out at 18, rent 600+ going up to 700+ after a couple years, got some great advice from an older friend in the housing business.

At age 22 bought my 1st house with a 334$ monthly payment (another 100$ ish for taxes) 440$ a month for my house.

With electric, water, garbage etc.. it comes in about 580$ a month.

[–]SettleDownButtercup 59 ポイント60 ポイント  (65子コメント)

Try that where I live. Your mortgage payment would be $3,264 per month with a 30 year mortgage.

Average home sales: $690,400
Interest rate: 3.92%
Mortgage period: 30 years

[–]FauxGw2 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (24子コメント)

But whats the average pay where you are?

[–]SettleDownButtercup 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (23子コメント)

The income per individual is $50k. The median household income is $92.5k.

[–]Player_17 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Sounds like an inflated housing market. When the average price of a home is 7.5 times higher than the average household income, there is a problem.

[–]TheJaceticeLeague 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (3子コメント)

If you have to get a jumbo loan just for an "average" house then its time to move

[–]alorahble 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (30子コメント)

Where the heck do you live where a house is that cheap? I bought my first house at 22 as well, but it's $1000 per month with the taxes and mortgage insurance, and then another $100 for electric, plus $35 a month for trash, $30 for water.

And I don't live anywhere fancy either, it's a regular 3 BR ranch, single bath.

[–]MidwestMilo 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not OP but I'm in in Central Illinois. Houses down here are fairly inexpensive if you know where to look and you have a good realtor. My roommate for example is only 26 and he just bought the house that I live in, and I'm only living here because it helps both of us save money.

As someone from Chicago, I can say without a doubt that it is so much easier to live independently when you are not in a huge metro area. I am only 24 and luckily I do have a decent job.

[–]thenewyorkgod 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Probably Midwest. Moved here a few years back. Got a really Nice 3br 2nd house with yard and basement for $65k on a nice tree lined cul d sac. Monthly mortgage with tax and insurance is under $500. This is coming from the east coast where my tiny apartment rent was $1800. So much extra money now!

[–]laowai_shuo_shenme 31 ポイント32 ポイント  (11子コメント)

Of course it is. You probably don't live in the same neighborhood as your dad. (Maybe it's a more expensive one) Your landlord needs a profit margin in there. And your dad locked in that mortgage rate maybe as many as 20 years ago.

[–]midnightblade 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Ya that's one of the major benefits of buying house. You can't exactly compare prices/rates locked in 20 years ago to today.

[–]RoboLincoln 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

By default that should be pretty reasonable though. A landlord is trying to make money, so if the mortgage is $X a landlord will charge you greater than $X if the market can support it.

[–]RollX 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's pretty much standard. Rent is usually mortgage plus a little profit for the owner, plus your dad has probably had that mortgage for a while.

[–]Kolecr01 46 ポイント47 ポイント  (7子コメント)

I've always taken a historical view on finance.... Nothing demonstrates how immutably stupid we are than bubbles. They will always form because our view is so myopic. Right now student debt is safe awesome abed full of puppies because you can't get rid of it so ABS deriving from them are great hedges. Who cares that it fundamentally compromises economical solvency over time? The models still work! But the models suck.

[–]murdermeformysins 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (1子コメント)

tragedy of the commons

as an individual investing in bubbles (or things that become bubbles) is safe and smart

when we all do it we get 2008

[–]Andrige3 64 ポイント65 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The rent is too damn high!

[–]JustifiedParanoia 118 ポイント119 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Rent is too high? No it's not, its only 70% of your pay...... Its not like its 100%............

/s

[–]Icost1221 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Then throw in things like food, cloths now and then and extra expenses, some months you are lucky if it is only 100%!

[–]youwill_neverfindme 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Can confirm, all of my clothes are falling apart and we only eat 2 meals a day. I'd be lucky if my living expenses equalled 100%.

[–]SeaMenCaptain 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's actually largely correlated with this. These companies know millennial can not afford to purchase, yet expect a certain quality. Turns out quality starts at 1500 for studio in most cities. And 2k+ in NYC, SF, Vancouver, etc.

[–]MrChri5 42 ポイント43 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I opened a new bank account recently and was asked if I wanted a savings account with it... then we both laughed and laughed.

[–]JitzChimp 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (17子コメント)

Jesus. Come to Buffalo. Good food, good people, good beer, lake, fishing, sking, cool architecture, investment is up , located right near Canada (incase you gotta bail), not too small but certainly not overwhelming . Can always find something to do and rent is not anywhere near a problem. Yeah you deal with mediocre sports teams, some rough areas and a few months of rough snow, but even the snow is is the worst just south of thr city and not the metro area. Im able to follow my passion here, because it simply does not cost much to live in Buffalo.

[–]SidusObscurus 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (3子コメント)

What jobs are available? How many? How much do they pay? How likely am I to get into them with a bachelors? A masters? A PhD? What about only 1-2 years experience/interning in the field?

Tell me that, then we can talk.

[–]XSplain 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (14子コメント)

  • Government pushes interest low.

  • Loans become easier to get

  • More people buying stuff like houses that they can't really afford

  • House prices rise to accommodate the higher limit of loans that people can qualify for

  • ???

  • Housing bubble

It's a very similar story to the student loan debt crisis. Rent pricing just got dragged along with it because real-estate is so pricey.

[–]_Lady_Deadpool_ 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (18子コメント)

Just save 40k when rent is 75% of your post tax income!

[–]oldcreaker 836 ポイント837 ポイント  (182子コメント)

What people are having hard time admitting is they are generally much poorer these days. What's shifted is instead of making dirt wages, they have huge debt. So even though income looks ok, overall the balance sheet sucks. And things like home ownership is moving again out of the reach of many people.

[–]congalines 69 ポイント70 ポイント  (15子コメント)

Even though houses are becoming increasingly more expensive in popular cities, The US has some of the most affordable places to live vs average income globally:

https://www.numbeo.com/property-investment/rankings.jsp

[–]goodDayM 151 ポイント152 ポイント  (31子コメント)

It's interesting, I just read Millennials: The Mobile and the Stuck and they mention:

The primary reason that the U.S. now has a record-high number of 18-to-34 year olds living with their parents is not because some rich white twentysomethings are taking a year after graduation to save money. It is because black and Hispanic Millennials who didn’t go to college, or did not finish college, are more likely to live with their parents than any time since the late 1800s.

[–]itsbull1 84 ポイント85 ポイント  (28子コメント)

Triple down with the fact that many blacks/hispanics live in inner cities where rents have skyrocketed making it even harder for us to move out. Then you have whole demographic shifts occurring where "gentrification" is pushing rents up as well. Unless they have city/state jobs, most people are barely getting by and everyone is trying to get into housing lotteries and affordable housing programs to subsidize rents in bigger cities.

It's funny how coming up I didn't want to live in public housing or be under some form of subsidized housing program but I'll take those options ASAP because rents compared to wages out here is crazy. My sister who is college educated but is a single mother living in a 2 bedroom apt currently pays 1,400 year to year lease. Her MGMT basically said her place at market value is at 2,500/month and they are going to increase until they get there by any means.

[–]slowsuby 191 ポイント192 ポイント  (33子コメント)

This. My salary looks really bad (I just saw my last pay stub with YTD, got depressed) but we have almost no debt. It's all about debt:income ratio.

[–]oldcreaker 103 ポイント104 ポイント  (24子コメント)

Agreed - and about living below your means. Which is really hard to do when you have to start by taking on so much debt it will take decades to repay it.

[–]TB1080 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (19子コメント)

People also have a difficult time leaving money leftover at the end of the month.

You see this in people, no matter their yearly income. If they're making 20k a year, they're driving a Charger. If they're making 300k a year, they're driving an Bugatti.

Of course this is no different than previous generations, but it's something to keep in mind if you think your income is too low. In all likelyhood, your spending is just too high.

[–]Used-Car-Salesman 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Wages are flat but the price of everything else has gone through the roof over the last 30 years. We've suffered a huge overall decline in our standard of living, and everybody knows it except those living inside the DC beltway.

[–]DegeneratePeasant 54 ポイント55 ポイント  (39子コメント)

It's not sustainable. Right now, the economy is basically running on credit and the equity that older generations have built up over the last few decades. That equity will dry up over the next decade or two, and it will be replaced with yet more debt. This is a recipe for economic collapse and I think it's going to be much worse than what we saw in 2007.

We are going to need some serious income redistribution if we are to avoid this.

[–]McGradyForThree[🍰] 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (5子コメント)

income redistribution? that's commie talk. but yea the next economic collapse is going to be 2007 times 100

[–]FrozenDonkeyWheel 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Why is it commie talk when income redistribution benefits those of lesser means? But it's "the American Way" when income redistribution benefits those with established power and money?

[–]secretvimle 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because the powerful are in control, and are thus able to more easily push their narrative.

[–]Allredythere 186 ポイント187 ポイント  (4子コメント)

I wish I could credit the redditor who said it, but the best comment I've seen about this was, "Well, what do you expect when you give a young person a mortgage and no home?"

[–]Illusi 297 ポイント298 ポイント  (24子コメント)

The bar graph is fine, but the line graph is misleading. The vertical axis starts at 26%.

In some cases, I agree that starting at 0 makes a line graph unreadable, since you can't make out the detail. But in this case it should still be clearly readable and the details aren't that important, just that it is declining. I'd like a graph to show me how fast it is declining, and this graph doesn't do that.

[–]ADdV 152 ポイント153 ポイント  (7子コメント)

I want to quickly point out that there's an issue with the bar as well. It points to total student loan debt, which will increase with the amount of students, and we're looking at percentage home ownership which you would not necessarily expect to increase with student population.

The bar graph should show average student loan debt for a proper comparison.

[–]zackks 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It should also show a time period prior to the student debt bubble--i.e. home ownership for under-30 demographics in 1975.

[–]Phantom_Absolute 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Also it should show student loan debt for only those under 30 to properly compare the two numbers.

[–]Branclon 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Can someone provide a corrected graph? It'd be interesting to see that.

[–]rich000 42 ポイント43 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I think that this is really important, because the student loan debt went up by 4x, while home ownership dropped by what looks like 10-20% (relative).

I'm sure there is a relationship, but not a terribly strong one.

[–]goodDayM 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I agree this is important. It's easy to have the scale start at 0, they did it for one graph, why not the other?

[–]RoboLincoln 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because it makes their point look better if it starts at 26%

[–]TheRealDJ 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's why dual chart graphs are almost always a bad idea. For example ggplot in R (a very popular visualization method) intentionally doesn't do that because the makers don't believe it is a good way to present data

[–]Roboculon 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Honestly, before I even looked at it I knew that would be the case. You don't get to the front page by posting data that isnt misleading. It's all about shock value.

Shouldn't this sub have rules requiring visualizations to not be misleading?

[–]phillysan 183 ポイント184 ポイント  (65子コメント)

As a 28 y/o who doesn't have any student debt and owns a home, I feel very fortunate, but it's a scary market out there. My wife and I bought just before prices really started to take off in our area. Friends who are looking to buy today, 4 years later, are shit out of luck. Prices are just too high. And we have a mortgage that's almost 3 times our combined annual income, and houses are going for 50% more now than what they were. That's probably the part that disturbs me the most.

[–]Engibeans 66 ポイント67 ポイント  (33子コメント)

I'm in the same boat. When my wife and I were looking for a home, we wanted to keep the price below 3x our combined income. We looked at houses in that price range and they were in high-crime areas, 1960-70s construction, and smaller than 1200 sqft/.15 acre. One of the most aggrivating things is seeing the house my parents started in sell for $260k when they bought it for $70k in 1985, is bigger and nicer than any home I could hope to afford. Sorry for the rant, it's a bit frustrating.

[–]DeandreDeangelo 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm in a similar situation. We were fortunate to be able to buy, but with prices increasing so much it doesn't do is any good in trying to move into a larger house for our family. Our home value has increased 25%, but at the same time so have the homes we'd want to move into. Without a 25% increase in income were stuck in the house we have.

[–]DrDan21 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

If you don't mind me asking, what is your monthly mortgage payment

[–]Gazunta1 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Does it have anything to do with debt, though? Even those without debt are struggling.

It's like joining a game of Monopoly half-way through. It doesn't matter how much money the bank gives you if there are no streets to buy and every street is filled with hotels and no one in the game wants to give you a helping hand. They only care about your money and don't care if they take it all and you lose.

Except this is real life and losing can mean being broke and homeless.

[–]SecretDragoon 338 ポイント339 ポイント  (233子コメント)

I find it extremely difficult to own a home when all of the homes in the area I work cost $300k+. Even condos cost $200k to own. I saw an offer for a Mobile home for $105k the other day.

These expectations are impossible if you want to live alone and not start a family. I make above the median wage. I cannot compete with a family with 2 or more incomes.

[–]alekzander01 110 ポイント111 ポイント  (21子コメント)

I think starting a family would make it worse, kids are expensive.

[–]FuturologyDiscussion 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Replace family with DINKs (dual-income no kids) which are also on the rise since...as you pointed out...kids are expensive.

[–]biggles1994 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

My SO's sister and her husband are both not only DINK's, but they got to live for 2.5 years totally rent and almost totally bill free. They have top end gadgets, several pets, saved for a big fancy wedding and just bought their first house a few months ago.

I promise I'm not jealous >_>

[–]iGolle 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Tax benefits on kids are remarkable though. It's currently paying half our rent.

[–]secretvimle 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

You realize you're spending way more on the kids right?

I used to do taxes for low income people and there would be tons of people having kids for the 'benefits.' And when I tried to point out to them the additional cost of feeding, clothing, and caring for a child they could only respond with, "But what about the free money??"

Many just don't understand.

[–]JuanDeLasNieves_ 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Get cats instead, they're cheaper and smarter

[–]oldcreaker 129 ポイント130 ポイント  (29子コメント)

But many of those families with 2 incomes are also combining both debts - so they aren't much better off. Add in kids and helping elderly parents and it's a mess.

[–]SettleDownButtercup 80 ポイント81 ポイント  (26子コメント)

Single childless people saying they're worse off financially than 2 parent 2 income families supporting children is laughable. Children are a considerable drain on finances because they cannot be left alone when they're young. The 2nd parent either has to give up their income or dramatically reduce their working hours in order to care for the children or the family has to purchase daycare, which is expensive and often negates the 2nd income.

This happens on top of having more expensive healthcare, food, housing, transportation, and household bills. And on top of that, yes, both parents probably have double the student debt.

[–]bass-lick_instinct 26 ポイント27 ポイント  (0子コメント)

For just a (very) brief moment I felt thankful for being single and un-fuckable after reading that. It went away, but it was a nice little moment.

[–]spryformyage 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (9子コメント)

all of the homes in the area I work cost $300k+

Add $1 million to that figure for detached homes in Toronto. Home ownership doesn't make sense with housing prices inflated as they are. Commuting doesn't make sense either, with housing prices almost as inflated in the suburbs and when you factor in the true cost of commuting. Renting is being financially responsible given current market conditions.

[–]HomeNetworkEngineer 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (32子コメント)

Don't forget your $500/month HOA fee 😀

[–]labhunchback 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (7子コメント)

I was looking at the rent-buy equation for where I am now. The property tax and HOA fees are enough that renting and investing the difference definitely looks like a winning proposition if I'm not going to stick around in the city for more than ~5 years. Since my plan is to move on in a couple years, rent it is.

[–]thatguy3O5 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (6子コメント)

99.99% of the time that'll be the case. Owning only makes sense when you factor in 5+ years of equity. Mortgages have the interest front loaded so the first few years you aren't even paying your balance down.

[–]phosphorus29 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (3子コメント)

What matters more is the transaction cost of working with a realtor. Decide to move? Boom, there goes 6% of your home's selling price.

[–]salgat 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The problem is that people don't take into account maintenance, that can eat up thousands of dollars a year over the life of your mortgage (replacing a roof alone will set you back quite a bit).

[–]adjur 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (23子コメント)

Seriously. People bragging about how much cheaper it is to buy than to rent: fine. Cobble together that down payment. Then on top of that, what is your monthly mortgage, PMI, HOA, yearly taxes, maintenance and repairs: is it still cheaper than rent? I have been running numbers for a while and I have concluded that without a massive down payment I should keep renting and attempting to save to grow my down payment.

For those who argue rent is throwing money away, I point out that very few people stay in their homes for 5+ years to recoup their hypothetical investment and until you own free and clear (for most that is a 15-30 year mortgage) the bank really owns it.

[–]bass-lick_instinct 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (3子コメント)

What I love about renting is not being tied down to a particular area. Don't like where I'm living? I can move on pretty much a moment's notice (within reason).

I owned a house when I was in my mid-20s. It took 8 months to sell the damn thing and in the end I didn't even really make money on it. Not to mention the issues that cropped up. Just in the 5 years I was there I had to replace the furnace, had to re-blow insulation, had to replace AC, and the constant upkeep - cleaning gutters, keeping the lawn in good shape so I don't piss of neighbors, etc. There are so many things I'd rather be doing, so rent it is!

[–]BeardRex 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're still gaining equity even if you dont fully own the house.

[–]almasnack 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I hate it when people say renting is throwing away money. It serves a basic need: shelter. Thanks for pointing that out.

[–]nobodyspecial 62 ポイント63 ポイント  (11子コメント)

The availability of student loans combined with hiring credentialism has let universities raise costs far faster than the rate of inflation.

In the 30's, prior to the days when the government "helped", a college student could earn enough money during summer break to fund themselves through a school year. My father-in-law paid his own way through Berkeley and a few members of the Washington Crew team that went to Berlin in 1936 did the same.

[–]Actius 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (5子コメント)

What kind of job did your father-in-law have during summer break in order to fund his tuition and living expenses (room and board, food, accessories)? I don't doubt that he was able to do that, but it's not just the cost of tuition that's a burden these days.

The average part time job for a college student pays roughly $10 per hour. Let's say 40 hours a week for three months (summer), and we get a little under $5k. Subtract taxes and that's probably closer to $4k. There is no way anyone can independently survive for nine months on $4,000 in the US, and that's without considering school costs. Even double that (work 80 hours a week) and it's still a major stretch, though impossible if you have to pay tuition. You may say, "get a better paying job" but we can all agree no one wants to hire a college kid at more than $10/hr only to have them leave in three months.

Tuition is high, I agree, but the cost of living in the US is also rather high these days and income levels are comparatively low. Your father-in-law grew up in a very lucky time. Millennials didn't.

[–]SherrifofUkpyr 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

There are also way more people going to college now too. If the loan availability was not there, the costs would not have been so inflated.

Tuitions for some of these classes should be 33 percent of what they are now.

[–]Daniilvb 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (6子コメント)

My wife and I tried to get approved for a house, we have good credit. They said the debt/income ratio was too high. Now I pay double the price I would for a mortgage in rent.

[–]ulver026 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Does this have anything to do with where people want to live and buy houses vs actually not being able to buy a house? I recently moved to the states and im not making a lot but im able to pay rent while having enough to take care of other stuff.

[–]Mcmeman 54 ポイント55 ポイント  (8子コメント)

My mortgage and taxes are about 1500$ a month plus all my utility bills I pay about 1900-2000$ a month for my 3 bed 2 bath home on a fairly small lot near the city.

Started at 1300$ a month and taxes keep going up. Takes a whole paycheck now. I am barley ahead on what I owe vs what it's worth and I think of selling to find something cheaper all the time.

My gf makes half what I do and only contributes a fee hundred each month after her student loans, car payment, and her insane medical bills as she has shit insurance.

I think about how my parents paid next to nothing for their house growing up. This generation was setup to fail... And it's awful to look around at period People I went to school with and think. These are some talented smart people who can't catch a fucking break.

[–]Laribold 24 ポイント25 ポイント  (2子コメント)

My massive amounts of student debt were the only reason I was able to buy a home, actually. During my five years of college, the repayment was deferred and marked as "paid" every month, so by the time I graduated at 22, I had a damn good credit score, got a terrible job at a factory for $10/hour, and with $4,000 saved, was approved for an FHA mortgage within six months (before the repayment period started). Then, I bought the home and rented out three of the bedrooms to friends, which covered the cost of the mortgage, the monthly repayments on my student loans, and then some. Now four years later, I've accrued enough equity to be able to pay back all of my student loans. Still, fuck student loans. It's been four stressful years of living on a financial cliff, and I lucked out every bit of the way.

[–]alphapulse 84 ポイント85 ポイント  (132子コメント)

Federal loan reform must be part of the long term solution. Currently approval is based on need. Applicant and school merit, as well as the long term fiscal viability of the applicant's choices need to somehow be part of the equation.

[–]BeerSteak 38 ポイント39 ポイント  (8子コメント)

I think universities should be tuition-free, but they get around 7.5% of a graduate's pretax income for ten years, automatically withheld.

Make it the higher education system's problem that most of the degrees they peddle are worthless.

[–]Annabellish 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (4子コメント)

It's a very dangerous idea to implement that only degrees which lead to high paying careers are useful. Society can't persist on engineering disciplines alone, nor is the pressure for everyone to go into high paying jobs necessarily a good one. Yes, we could try and get the whole workforce aiming for an $150k starting salary at some bay area startup, but we don't want to discourage people from having priorities other than money, and we don't want to discourage universities from offering courses which aren't right here and now's big thing. Nobody knows what the future will hold, and a society built entirely out of today's needs is a brittle one indeed.

[–]BD165 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

This is a straw man. He said worthless degrees, not degrees that don't pay off with a $150K salary. If 90+% of your program's graduating class is working at Starbucks, it's a worthless degree. I don't care how idealistic you wanna be.

[–]Sgtonearm01 55 ポイント56 ポイント  (24子コメント)

My advice, go to an affordable school. Unless it's Ivy League or top tier, no employers give a shit.

[–]hz77 55 ポイント56 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Went to a state school and I'm still graduating 30K in debt. If your family isn't dirt poor then you don't get many grants from financial aid, you get offered a fuckton of subsidized and unsubsidized loans though!

[–]Sgtonearm01 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Obviously hard to graduate with no debt, but 30k is a lot better than 50,60,100k for the same degree at a different school. I paid 9k a year and paid some as I worked through college.

[–]applebottomdude 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (2子コメント)

In-state schools can be expensive depending on how fucked you are and what state your parents raised you

[–]ensignlee 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's almost like having student debt inhibits your ability to own homes or something.

Like there's only a finite pool of dollars and things have to get prioritized. /s

[–]SodaAnt 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'd say the more important point than student debt is the "lack of affordable housing bit". And I don't think that's a really solvable problem either. If you want single family detached housing, that takes up a lot of space, and with cities getting bigger, and people not willing to commute two hours to work. There's limited supply, and no easy way to change that. Things like condos and high rises will stem the tide, but even those are quite expensive to make.

[–]PhiZappaKrappa 39 ポイント40 ポイント  (13子コメント)

As a guy with a master's degree and buttloads of experience in my field, I've been unable to find full-time work since graduation in June.

It fucking sucks, mostly waiting for the previous generation to die off.

[–]rusmo 39 ポイント40 ポイント  (17子コメント)

The tuition bubble is going to burst. The time is ripe for technology to seriously disrupt higher education.

[–]estrhfdtt 31 ポイント32 ポイント  (16子コメント)

May I offer a bleaker outlook: The tuition "bubble" is not going to bust. You either go to college, or you don't get a good job.

There's no other options. They could charge literally 10x more and people would still go. There's nothing to "bust" the bubble because there are no real alternative options. Yes, there's trades, but eh, nobody goes into those anymore.

The reason bubbles "pop" is because people finally say, "you know what, we really don't need thing" and then it stabilizes. College is like buying food, you need it, you don't have a choice. It's not optional like the housing market.

The reason tuition is so high is because the federal government enables the behavior. If they stopped giving out loans and grants like candy, people wouldn't be able to afford tuition, and colleges would lower it. As long as the government enables it, tuition will go up.

It's not all doom and gloom though, lots of state schools will let you go for free if you score above a certain threshhold on the ACT/SAT test. You don't need Harvard, for example you can go to cleveland state for free if you get a 27 on the ACT I believe.

[–]ZeboTheClown 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The issue that people forgot is state funding went down and students picked up the tab with federal loans.

Administrators make too much money but it isn't like colleges are rolling in their profits or paying professors.

[–]Gangsir 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (2子コメント)

The reason tuition is so high is because the federal government enables the behavior. If they stopped giving out loans and grants like candy, people wouldn't be able to afford tuition, and colleges would lower it. As long as the government enables it, tuition will go up.

Ding ding ding! The federal government gives people unlimited money through loans. Then, colleges see that people have unlimited money, and start charging unlimited amounts.

In the old days, before student loans were commonplace, there were lots of schools that most people couldn't afford. So, they went to cheaper schools. Those expensive schools saw their numbers falling, and lowered their tuition. This will continue until the government stops giving essentially unlimited loans out. Sure, there'll be a shock when the first limit them, with tons of people not being able to go to 90% of colleges, but colleges need students to stay in business, so they'll lower their prices until they start getting some money vs none.

[–]oldcreaker 45 ポイント46 ポイント  (18子コメント)

Student debt is the 21st century model of sharecropping and company towns. I read an article a while back saying that most students won't be clearing their student debt until they are like 38 years old. That's a big chunk of time making a paycheck for someone else.

[–]applebottomdude 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think people forget the massive amount of lifetime loss of wealth that occurs due to loans. Paying that much that early on in the career that drastic effects of hundreds of thousands of dollars even for typical debt load

Lifetime loss of wealth http://www.demos.org/what-cost-how-student-debt-reduces-lifetime-wealth

http://time.com/money/4132097/student-loans-ruin-life/

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2015/10/24/Report-Recent-college-grads-wont-retire-until-age-75/8801445707656/

[–]TrigTamer 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Am I reading this chart wrong or is it backwards? It looks like the chart shows debt going down and ownership going up as you move from 2005 to 2015.

[–]VirginiaDork 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Two out of control markets. Put them together and it is like being asked to chose between dying of prostate cancer or lung cancer. The government should make tuition price caps part of student loans the way they do with medical services. "Okay, we will loan your students money to attend, but those students getting government loans cannot be charged more than $X/credit hour. Don't like it, no loans for your school. Ask Devry how that is working out for them."

[–]wiegleyj 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

stop... choosing... expensive... schools.

You don't need to "Get away from your parents" as much as you need to make smart financial decisions. your local state school will educate you for peanuts compared to private schools and will do just as good of a job at it.

[–]awunderground 53 ポイント54 ポイント  (63子コメント)

I think young people's desires to live in urban areas combined with exclusionary housing practices that make it impossible to buy starter homes/condos is the bigger culprit here. I don't have data to back this up, but I don't think a double y-axis graph with aggregated student debt numbers is a strong causal argument.

In general, people's perceptions about the composition, distribution, and effects of student debt are shaped by anecdote instead of data.

[–]chowderbags 115 ポイント116 ポイント  (16子コメント)

desires to live in urban areas

They don't all necessarily want to live in urban areas but that's where most of the jobs are, especially for fields that pay well over the long term, and usually there's plenty of fallback jobs if you need them. Any young person that moved to North Dakota a few years ago for the oil boom and those high paying jobs is now looking at a major bust. If you bought land or a home out there, what do you do now?

[–]skidooer 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (9子コメント)

that's where most of the jobs are

In absolute numbers, sure. But it is also where most of the people are, which makes getting those jobs pretty competitive. The unemployment rate (which, I agree isn't a 100% perfect metric) in the rural area I live is half that of the big city though.

Within the past couple of months I have even been given a couple of unprompted job offers (like start tomorrow, not your standard recruitment email that goes nowhere) outside of my skill-set. And several more that were within my normal skill-set. It feels like employers are growing worried about not being able to find people because the people don't live here.

especially for fields that pay well over the long term

That really depends on your costs. If I wanted to buy the average house where I live compared to the average house in the nearest major city, I can have an income of $25,000 per year less and still make exactly the same amount of money, as that is how much will vanish in additional interest payments. Of course, everyone should sit down and do an honest calculation for their situation.

That said, the local median income is on par with the nearest major city, so statistically your chances of being in the same pay scale appear to be the same. Individual experiences may vary, of course.

[–]panivorous 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

outside of my skill-set

That's the key here. My boyfriend and I moved to a less populated area because he got a job offer. Everything was good for 3 years but then he was laid off. There wasn't another company anywhere nearby that could hire in his field. We ended up having to move back to an urban area for jobs.

[–]los_angeles 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (1子コメント)

We have to separate individual advice/strategies from society-wide analysis.

For one person, it may be a great idea to move to North Dakota and find a high paying job. But that is not a society-wide solution; everyone moving from NYC to upstate New York wouldn't solve any employment issues.

[–]bluemoosed 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

There's an interesting book called, "Who's Your City" about where people are choosing to live and why, by Richard Florida.

IMO, if you have a specialized education/field, jobs are concentrated to the point where you are picking between 5-10 cities in North America where you can find jobs in your industry. If you're a couple, that narrows it down further. It seems like a stronger influence than a preference for urban areas.

[–]SapperInTexas 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're right, there is more to declining ownership than just debt loads. Living with parents or other family members, renting an apartment, moving to dense urban centers, all of those come into play, on top of the inability to take on a mortgage.

[–]Rhueh 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Yes, this is definitely a case where correlation could be too easily confused with causation.

I also agree with your point about where young people want to live. I live in a city divided by a river. One side is regarded as much more desirable than the other, and I know lots of people who could afford a house on the 'bad' side but simply won't go there, even though there's no objective reason not to (other than possibly a longer commute.)

To be fair, though, house prices are alarmingly high even here on the 'bad' side of the river. They're telling me that my house is worth double what I paid for it in 2008, which is not a sustainable growth rate in price.

[–]articulateantagonist 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (5子コメント)

This hits home pretty hard. My husband and I (both millennials) make a decent amount between us, definitely enough to put down a payment on a house if we were debt-free... but with so much of our money tied up in $60K worth of student debt, we're struggling to save up enough for a payment on even the cheapest houses in our state. And then if something goes wrong with a car, if our dog gets sick, that sets us back by months.

[–]joh2141 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I feel like with the way things are, purchasing and investing in homes is not worth the payoff unless you already have the money to spend it anyways. But if you're budgeting and buying, it can actually be a huge mistake depending on the circumstances.

[–]BlossomingPetals 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sounds about right. Age 30, just finished graduate school. Significant student loan debt and do not qualify for a home mortgage. Living the dream!

[–]choojack 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

idiots are going to schools that they can't afford. You can go to a public university and work to pay off your tuition. Stop taking out student loans and get a degree that will actually get you a fucking job. If you have to work 40 hours a week and only take 12 hours of classes a semester then that's what you have to do.

[–]Rogoverre 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (11子コメント)

If someone else, who is also working, is living with you, the rent goes down by half. If you are Romantically Involved with that person, you no longer have dating and socializing expenses. When the two of you are bored, instead of Going Out, you have friends over for dinner. The next goal is to get rid of the commutes. This involves living near work, possibly with two or even three other committed couples, because rent is high near the business district. You have a disciplined culture, and you put up massive bookcases for walls.

You might have a bathroom schedule, and a designated cook and a designated cleaner-upper. The others would compensate them by buying the food. You have a freezer and eat cheap. A lot of soups, rice, potatoes, home brewed coffee instead of getting it outside. And slow cooker stews.

If some children come of all this, you forget private school, and have two or three designated Home Schoolers.

The people who do well coming to the US from other places are willing to do two things: one is live crowded. The other is assignment of tasks.

Do not give your money to the coffee makers, the sandwich makers, the transportation system, and the dating, bar and club, system.

Get a few really trustworthy pals, some headphones, and a slow cooker and watch your life come together.

[–]myheadsabovemyneck47 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (16子コメント)

what do you expect when you got high ass tuition, as well as needing some sort of EXTRA education after 18 years of bullshit in order to be able to sustain yourself, but after doing so you might just fall into crippling debt where you gotta work it off the rest of your life. thats one side of the life cycle of the work force. fuck the rich fuck the system