r/Anarcho_Capitalism discusses race and gender. Starring the Dork Enlightenment, suspicious references to Jews, and the Dunning-Kruger Effect

Kennen_Rudd · 1年前

"Suspicious references to Jews" is an interesting way of describing literal Nazis with '14 Words' as their flair talking about how the the Jews were the real villains of WWII.

thatoneguy54 · 1年前

I'm gonna pull choice quotes from this guy:

As a heterosexual, I'm sexually prejudiced.

The premise of the above is that patriarchy is natural; it's what both genders ultimately want. It's only a vocal minority that has a problem with it.

Most women want a dominant man; never let a feminist convince you otherwise or you'll end in a fate as psychologically deranged as them.

I'm anti-feminist precisely out of defense of women.

He's gotta be, what, 13, 14 tops?

Edit: Oh my god! Then this guy says,

now, let me direct you to some of my own drafted, unpublished work.

He uses himself as a source! His own unpublished, unfinished work as a source!

MistakeNotDotDotDot · 1年前

I wouldn't be surprised if anti-patriarchy happens at near the same rate as rape.

Gee, I don't understand why people don't subscribe to this lovely ideology.

commentsrus · 1年前

FYI, many mative American tribes were matrilineal or matriarchal for thousands of years. If you're interested, I suggest you read some of Robert Briffault's work

now, let me direct you to some of my own drafted, unpublished work [on a completely different tribal society which somehow contradicts your evidence]

Top minds in this sub.

Snugglerific · 1年前

I think we need a thread just for that link in the OP. Goldberg claims finding any gender egalitarian society would falsify his hypothesis. According to the Leacock review linked in the Wikipedia article, he has to pull a sleight of hand where those societies can be ignored. TL;DR, those societies may exist but they don't count because they will inevitably be destroyed by patriarchal societies. Here is the passage:

Goldberg recognizes, however, that in societies like the Mbuti, role differentiation is minimal, perhaps the minimum allowable by biology he states. "The male advantage in biological aggression" is of little moment in such societies, he writes, because "status for the fittest is relatively unimportant when all must play the same economic role if the society is to survive" (p. 119). Since the emergence of Homo sapiens as a species took place under the same conditions, Goldberg's argument for adaptive differentiation is in trouble. However, his lack of any attention to historical or development problems (and ignorance, no doubt, of relevant anthropological materials), allows him to ignore the significance of the few peoples who maintained foraging-hunting lifeways into recent times. Their historical import to him is not the profound insight they afford into our human nature, but that they are doomed by their "inefficient" utilization of male aggression:

Where the Pygmy society minimizes the effect of the male advantage in biological aggression, the very nature of the modem, industrial society forces such a society to give aggression relatively free play ... Given the reality of an industrializing world, the lovely, gentle societies, such as that of the Pygmy, will not survive when challenged by societies whose methods of organization and whose methods of channeling aggression into efficient authority systems render them more efficient [p. 121; his italics].

Eleanor Leacock. Reviewed Work: The Inevitability of Patriarchy by Steven Goldberg. American Anthropologist New Series, Vol. 76, No. 2 (Jun., 1974), pp. 363-365

http://www.jstor.org/stable/674209?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

EvanHarper · 1年前

That has nothing to do with ancap and makes us look like sexist bigots.

We wanna be sexist bigots, obviously, but please don't make it so apparent to the outside world.

numandina · 1年前

What in the flying fuck is going on over there...

SnapshillBot · 1年前

Snapshots:

This Post - 1, Error

^{I am a bot.} ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)

BadSocialScience

調停者