It is time friends that we begin to unravel the unmitigated nonsense that alt right white supremacists love to parrot in hopes of swelling the stinking mass that comprises their hive-mind.
In light of recent events, particularly white nationalist Dylan Roof admitting that his act of mass murder against innocent black church goers, was at least in part, motivated by internet conspiracies that claim blacks are raping white women (over a hundred a day according to his confession interview) to death in their jew controlled “genocide” against the white race, we should explore the extremely narrow and biased alt right assertion that blacks are inherently more violent than whites, seeing as how this belief forms the crux of the white nationalists delusional calls for their european ethno-state utopia.
I will first state that I do not believe whites are more violent than blacks, or that blacks are more violent than whites, I simply believe that if one looks at the history of the human species it should become clear that as a species we are very violent primates that have a propensity for destructive tribalistic warring against one another. Blacks are not immune from this, whites are not either.
Your garden variety white supremacist er… I’m sorry “nationalist” will usually pipe up at this point and hand you all sorts of purposefully biased interpretations of crime statistics that will prove that blacks commit violent crime at a higher rate than whites. They will say that the FBI statistics show this or the CDC statistics show that and they will then infer, or sometimes straight up declare that these crime statistics serve not only as proof that blacks are committing more violent crime on average, but that this crime is a result of an inherent trait of blackness, that it is some pseudoscientific innateness to the African genome that causes them to behave as such.
These people would have you believe that a black gang member in, let’s say Oakland who killed another black gang member, or even worse (according to them) a white person is pulling the trigger of his weapon in the name of the black race. For some reason however, they do not burden the white race with such guilt by association. Because if they did they would have to admit that whites are just as violent, but are simply more likely to view acts of white violence as acceptable or necessary.
In other words, statistics showing that blacks are disproportionately committing violent acts are lain at the feet of the black race while statistics showing whites committing acts of violence are somehow explained away or accepted as having had to have occurred or framed in some sort of rationalization.
Let us take for example the most violent single endeavor the human species has ever engaged in… the second World War. We are talking about acts of mass murder on a scale that dwarfs anything that has proceeded it. Tens of millions of people extinguished, the attempted erasure of entire racial and ethnic groups. Put simply, the Second World War was what happens when millions of human beings decide to do nothing but violence to each other and succeed beyond their wildest expectations.
The white supremacist conveniently does not lay responsibility for the various European nation states that, let’s face it, got together and unleashed the largest sustained act of violence ever seen in world history on whits as a group.
And they would be right not to, this post does not seek to blame white people for World War II, what it instead seeks to do is to point out the hypocrisy in expecting blacks as a whole to take blame for every black act of violence to ever occur while shielding their own race from their role in such a disastrous conflict.
You will hear over and over again when the topic of slavery is brought up from white supremacists the retort of;
“Hold on I didn’t enslave anyone why should I get blamed for what someone else of the same racial group as I am did?”
They will never say why non violent black individuals should bear the blame for the acts of a violent black individual. They will look to blame the state of blackness itself on the genetic level for black violence, yet they will never then make the same leap and blame their own race for unleashing the cataclysm of not one, but two world wars onto our species.
The europeans that started world war II are of course not genetically different than the europeans of present day. Nature has not changed the European genome in any significant way since then, it couldn’t have. Why do non violent blacks get the blame for violent blacks but violent europeans, which if one really wants to keep tabs, have unleashed the most violent wars in human history, are somehow disconnected from the endeavors of the white race white nationalists are so fond of ?
The answer is simple, white nationalists wish to trumpet any thing good europeans have ever done, and downplay anything bad they have ever done, while being careful not to afford the same luxuries to blacks, or muslims or jews or pretty much anyone that is not like them.
To reiterate once again, I do not believe that Europeans are more prone to violence than any other race, Or that blacks or asians or whoever are. I am simply using the alt rights racist logic against itself. When white nationalist neo nazis begin their incessant caterwauling about the Zionist Jewish conspiracy to foment white genocide wherever they can play their dirty zio-Jew games and trickery, they invariably point to the disproportionate presence of Jewish folks in power in media/Hollywood etc.
They do not however point to the fact that many police departments are disproportionately white (even in areas where the citizens are mostly minority ) nor do they propose the fact that a disproportionate share of judges are white or a disproportionate amount of presidents are white or politicians or… well I could go on, as being indicative of some vast white conspiracy against non whites.
It would be pretty ridiculous if they did, and yet this conspiratorial nonsense is what is used by white nationalist to villainize entire groups of people relentlessly until it is internalized and religiously believed by their zealots inevitably resulting in cases such as Dylan Roof. One of the more unstable among them snap and shoot to death a bunch of innocent people in a church for the crime of being born the wrong skin color and being in the vicinity of one of these dangerous right wing radicals when he’s all hocked up on the latest alt right propaganda piece.
This is the main difference between how the alt right and white nationalists view the world and how a normal reasonable person views it. A normal person views something like world war II as individuals (who happen to have been white in the majority) going to war against each other over very complex reasons. That same reasonable person forcing him/herself to view white folks in the same twisted way that white nationalists view blacks would force them to conclude that whites are a genetic borg-people that routinely go batshit insane and start costly violent wars with each other and the rest of the world every few decades.
White nationalists take extremely biased snapshots of black America and black communities ravaged by drugs, poverty and dysfunction and hold it up to the world as proof positive that blacks are lazy gun toting perma-criminals that can’t change even if they wanted to. Yet they will resist with every fiber of their being an attempt to tie something such as British colonialism and the violence that unfolded under it to the white race. They refuse to accept any unflattering snapshot of their own racial groups while hypocritically taking the worse possible snapshot of every other racial group they delude themselves into believing is orchestrating the downfall of the European race or whatever.
Whenever they see a white woman with a black man, they prefer to assuage their racial hygiene fears with a multitude of racist mental gymnastics designed to vilify the man and excuse the woman.
These mental gymnastics range from “the Jews brainwashed her to like black men” all the way up to the oft used “she must be unattractive” because, of course, no attractive white woman would ever experience a natural attraction to a black man, there must ALWAYS, be some Jewish subterfuge at play.
They will accuse every last one of the billion muslims on this planet of misogyny because some muslims force women to wear burkas or ban them from driving (which is indeed wrong) but they reserve an extreme form of misogyny for “race traitor” white women who have dared to exercise their own agency enough to choose to act on her attraction to a non white man.
Even worse, in instances when a non white man rapes or murders a white woman these “white nationalists” cackle with glee and celebrate a chance to say “I told you so” to the slain woman. Isn’t it interesting that the only time you’ll actually see white nationalists celebrate violence against whites is when they can leverage it into an opportunity to scare white women into liking them, lest they fall victim to the black menace…
We will continue this discussion folks. For now we will leave it here.
