Her points aren't well thought out or explained. She says that the view that polar bears were going extinct was a myth because there are more polar bears now than when that "myth" was first "invented". The population rose in 7/13 territories. Why did that happen? Is it because bears from the other 6 migrated to the other 7 or is it because humans began concerted efforts to conserve the polar bear population or a bit of both. There's not enough information in that argument to prove the prediction was wrong and for all we know it was right up until humans altered our behavior thus changing the outcome.

The rest of her arguments are basically looking at very specific predictions about climate change that didn't come true but what she ignores is that the climate did change which is the important part of the climate change theory. Earth's climate is changing. Just because it doesn't change the way we guess doesn't mean it's not changing and it could have serious consequences over time. If the weather man predicts that it's going to be sunny today and it rains instead, that doesn't mean that weather isn't real.