https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses

shittiest article ever corroborated by NASA check your facts before making ridiculous judgements

if you dont blindly agree with me, you are scientifically illiterate

cool. not really an argument but sounds good.

temperatures are rising

alright. this problem has little to no tangible effect in human quality of life; the nitpicky regulation that has been proposed does little to nothing to fix this; in fact nothing short of a complete reduction of production and industry to return to pre machine era technology would have any noticeable affect on this, and that would cause hundreds of millions, if not billions of people, to starve and would reduce human quality of life far lower and than any short term rise in temperature would.

sea levels are rising

again no real affect on quality of life, ive lived on south florida for most of my life and the beaches are pretty much the same. we havent "gone under" like your 90 something percent of climatologists have been predicting for 40 years

sea acidification

most animals affected by this are bottom dwelling and even the most generous estimates dont see any noticeable effects to populations of these species until at least 2100, by then we'll have likely ramped up efficiency, developed atmosphere cleaning methods, or be eating fish out of fish farms anyways so it doesnt really matter.

more extreme weather

climatologists have repeatedly flip flopped on this complaining that climate change has caused more hurricanes then complaining that it causes fewer hurricanes, that isnt science, just conforming the results to a preconceived narrative, sounds more like politics if you ask me. and again i point to florida, which prior to hurricane andrew hasnt been touched by a hurricane in years. weather is as tame as its ever been.

and the consensus is over 90%.....Faggot

nothing is more indicative of a failing industry than widespread consensus that changes whenever it's wrong. just look at the media in the last election, here was widespread "consensus" by "experts" that hillary would win in a landslide, and she didn't. it doesnt matter what the consensus is, modern climatologist keep making models for climate change and effects of current change, then the time comes for their prediction, they're inevitably wrong, then the push the prediction back another 10 years. that isn't real science. it's closer to doomsday predictors who say the world is gonna end every couple of years and push the date back whenever they are wrong, because they are always wrong, like climatologists.

i won't deny any of the "facts" i am just of the opinion that this "consensus" is meaningless, and is predicated and a faulty approach to climatology that has been widely adopted by the industry. and has done about as much to help stop climate change as a consensus that the sun is gonna die eventually has done to prevent it. please stop crying "THE EARTH IS DYING LISTEN TO MY FEARMONGERING" and take an actual objective approach to solving issues on a case by case basis with actual objective facts rather than citing some "consensus" like it's some infallible bible, and that you are gonna burn in the hell of rising global temperatures if you don't blindly follow.