0
0

What's up with the Moon? (self.conspiracy)

Glassclose が 投稿

So.. this has been bothering me for the past week or so. I noticed earlier, probably a week ago or so that the Moon was very low in the skyline, like just above a 2 story house. Then the next night, it was way higher up in the sky, and I wondered why one night it would be so low, and the next it would be up high.

Again just two nights ago, the moon was low, just above a second story house, and then the next night I had to crane my head up to see it sitting super high in the sky.

Why is it doing this? I don't recall the moon behaving like this before, I know there is a slight wobble that can make it seem like it's going up and down but this looks like it's two different moons, or something. it's crazy

Anyways, anyone notice this? just me? or?

全 23 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]ermahgerddon 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

We are near winter solstice.

[–]LSKTheGreat1 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Well, I can tell you that it is in fact, not made of green cheese. But, the real question is, what if it was made out of barbecue spare ribs? Would you eat it then?

[–]Setonrebel 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Polished off by a tall cool budweiser

[–]clickity-click 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You may want to consider taking a class in astronomy to supplement what education you already have.

[–]whyd_you_kill_doakes -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (19子コメント)

The moon does not stay in the same place in the sky 24/7

Just like the sun, it rises and sets

[–]The_Watterboy 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (5子コメント)

I think he means to say that the trajectory of the moon is significantly different from day to day. when looking at the moon at the same time of day, everyday, it is in a drastically different spot.

[–]Glassclose[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You are correct! :)

[–]whyd_you_kill_doakes -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (3子コメント)

He didn't say he was looking at it at a specific time

[–]Glassclose[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

it's pretty much the same time every night cause I go out to feed my cat pretty much same time every night

[–]whyd_you_kill_doakes -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thank you for that information. If you hadn't responded like a douche in your other comments I'd be more than happy to discuss some possibilities of what you may be observing. But since you're a "you don't believe what I believe so fuck you" kinda guy, I'm not gonna entertain a discussion with you

[–]flartibartfast 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

yes, we are missing some information here.

[–]Glassclose[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (10子コメント)

after reading through your love to defend potential pedophiles, it's quite clear your aim and objective on this sub.

[–]whyd_you_kill_doakes -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Lol wow. I've been here 4 years, before your pizzagate shit took it over. Assume what you want because you have no evidence of a crime and your theory relies on a fucking 4chan post

[–]Glassclose[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (8子コメント)

What? can't hear you over your love of pedo culture.

[–]whyd_you_kill_doakes 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Proof of your assumption?

Oh you're just trolling. Cool

[–]Glassclose[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (6子コメント)

"whyd_you_kill_doakes 1 point an hour ago Has pizzagate been confirmed? No. Then no one has been a victim."

Thanks for settling that for us, we can all put this behind us now, clearly 'No one has been a victim.'

Case Closed, Move on Everybody.

[–]whyd_you_kill_doakes 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Ok, and?

You think there weren't people saying "Sunil Tripathi is not the Boston Bomber" when that happened? Of course there were. But just like with pizzagate, everyone was so damn sure they were right and so invested in it because "OMG we did it Internet!" that they wouldn't listen to reason. How'd that work out? Oh yeah the Internet was fucking wrong. Maybe it was Djokhar and Tamerlan. Maybe it was Academia/blackwater. Maybe it was DHS. Maybe it was the FBI. But it sure as shit wasn't Sunil Tripathi.

Just an example to show you that, yes, the hive mind can be wrong as fuck sometimes.

And I will continue to ask for evidence as any rational person should. There isn't one piece of evidence that implicates anyone to a specific crime. Only conjecture. I've said it before and I'll say it again, when I'm presented evidence that implicates someone, I'll be right there with you guys. Until then, I will keep asking for evidence and informing people that they don't have a damn thing other than a collection of wild rabbit holes.

That was me yesterday.Maybe go a bit deeper into my comment history before you make assumptions about me?

But I'm assuming you have proof of someone having committed a specific crime? Who was it? When and where? Who was the victin? You're gonna be the biggest hero in pizzagate

And your fucking code words started on 4chan. real credible source you have there

[–]Glassclose[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Hey, you said no one's been a victim, it's over right there, you solved it.

[–]whyd_you_kill_doakes 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Oh so you can't answer my questions? You realized you're wrong about your assumptions about me?

Then stfu

[–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]whyd_you_kill_doakes 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Watch me all you want.

    Great thing about the scientific method is it provides results