全 9 件のコメント

[–]Hickle [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

I really don't think anyone is saying that men have to be more emotional, but rather that they shouldn't be judged by society for being emotional. Maybe without that stigma, they'll be more in touch with their emotions and understand them more, even if they aren't the type to show them, just as some women are. The problem is that patriarchy tells men that it's feminine, and therefore inferior, to be in touch with their emotions at all.

showing your emotions as a man is hard, and while perhaps personally gratifying it is rarely immediately rewarded in society

It's probably hard because of patriarchy. Why does this have to be about social rewards? It's about equality and fostering a healthy culture.

but it's harder to say that about his anger, or fear, or bitterness. Because as much as we like to claim that Toxic Masculinity TM is to blame for all of this, these "bad emotions" are as much a part of everyday life as all the "good" emotions

Who is claiming that men can't have these emotions or that they're inherently toxic? That's not what toxic masculinity is. These emotions are okay so long as they aren't taken out on others, and I don't think anyone thinks they aren't

It is, plainly put, easier to be emotional as a woman than as a man

I take issue with the idea that this is not the result of toxic masculinity and patriarchy. I take issue that stoicism is an inherently masculine trait. Which is why we should challenge patriarchy.

I made the original post and it's left me cynical. As more and more of them responded to me, it became more clear that many if not most of them aren't looking to challenge gender roles and patriarchy, but rather feel that they thrive in that society, and even want to accelerate it. I left that thread having less respect for them than I did before.

[–]KaonPlus [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I really don't think anyone is saying that men have to be more emotional, but rather that they shouldn't be judged by society for being emotional.

This. I just spent ten minutes trying to express my thoughts on this subject, and that's what it really boils down to.

My great uncle died last week, and i got the call when i was in a study session with 4-5 other guys. Had i been on my own i know for sure i'd have had a good old-fashioned cry, but i forced myself to suppress that emotion for fear that i'd be judged if i didn't.

Indeed, this slots in with the wider conversation about male suicide rates - how can we expect men to value their lives more if we're telling them that they should feel ashamed to reach out for help.

This isn't about preventing men from being able to remain stoic under pressure - it's about equipping them to deal with their mental health when they no longer feel they can.

[–]Hickle [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm sorry about that :(. That's how I felt when my cousin died a few years. But later that day, my dad burst into tears right in front of us all. He was never very emotional, and I kept thinking about how brave he was to do that, when I did all my crying in the shower or after everyone had gone to bed.

[–]ThatPersonGu[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

First off, if they think that feminism wants them to be emotional as opposed to emotionally sensitive that is a failure of communication.

Pretend I used patriarchy instead of society in the original post. I shy away from the more academia-y terms because they in many cases distract from the point trying to be made. The point remains the same, it is easier in modern society (as a result of toxic masculinity and patriarchy and all that academia jazz) to pull off sensitivity as a woman because of existing gender cues and norms, which dissuades guys from trying it. And when I say "social rewards", I mean "not being called out socially for it".

I'd like to say that we just want men to be in touch with their emotions, and that rage and anger aren't really toxic masculinity, but whenever the subject is broached for examples in media that's immediately what it comes to.

Mary Sue (a site that I don't personally enjoy but has articles that tend to make the rounds in these circles) has an article talking about toxic masculinity in Star Wars The Force Awakens just like this. Blah blah Kylo Ren is toxic masculinity because he's insecure and really angry and those feelings are baaaad, and Finn is good masculinity because he doesn't like to kill and is cute sometimes. Or something something Steven Universe. Or how Jessie from Breaking Bad almost beats toxic masculinity because he's good with kids, but then he has to repress his feelings and be angry so it's bad again.

These are the examples used to teach people these very important concepts, examples that go beyond vague metaphors and into concrete detail about how these things work. If the examples are wack then the community is wack, and it kinda is. Cue montage of the daily "I got a boner in science class today, am I going to feminist hell?" posts.

That topic showed me that MRAs and Libb...libbers(?) have the same basic grasp on social cues with regards to emotional sensitivity. But while we run into the water to cross the river without knowing how to swim, they see the water, figure it's too deep for them, and stay there where they are.

[–]cold08 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

It's not so much "show your emotions" as it is having good emotional health, in that "rub some dirt on it and shove it down inside you" isn't a good way to experience emotions and often results in bad decisions.

Now this isn't necessarily gendered either. If you ever have worked with a woman that cries at the drop of a hat, you know that isn't an asset, and neither is a man who takes on way more than he can hope to accomplish because he is unable to effectively communicate that he is overwhelmed.

There is no shame in communicating your emotions so that they can be addressed in a productive matter.

Another example would be if you put on a few pounds and your partner teased you about it, which is something you were sensitive about. Now, if you think, as a man, you should be able to take it so you say nothing, and your partner thinks it's just playful teasing, your partner will continue to hurt you over and over again.

Or you could say "hey, it hurts me when you tease me about my weight" and a caring partner would stop teasing.

[–]ThatPersonGu[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I think we're both getting at the same thing here: There are two sides to every coin, moderation good, extremes bad, etc etc etc.

I do think that it is a necessary message here because of how focused this sub can and does often get on themes of sensitivity and tenderness, while not necessarily seeing them in the broader context of things.

[–]cold08 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Emotional health is a tad more nuanced than moderation, it's more communicating your emotions in a clear and productive manner. For example, crying to get what you want or to punish someone is not productive in the long term. It's manipulative and people see through that. Crying as a way of communicating that you are in pain so that those who care for you are able to acknowledge that pain, is productive because you are asking for something that those who care for you would likely be willing to give.

If we don't communicate effectively what we are feeling, we rely on subtext, which many don't pick up on, so we don't ask for more of what makes us feel good and ask for less of what makes us feel bad.

[–]derivative_of_life [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

The thing I dislike most about the whole "just express your emotions" advice is that it implies that men's problems are self-inflicted. It tells men that their unhappiness is caused by some internal issue which they need to work through. But that's not how a lot of men feel. Imagine a guy who's been put out of work because his job was made obsolete or shipped overseas, but he's still judged on his ability to be a successful provider. He can talk about that problem all he wants, and no matter how emotionally open he is and how sympathetic the listener is, it's not going to solve his problem. He's still going to be miserable afterwards. So when someone tells him that all he really needs to do is open up about his emotions, it feels incredibly dismissive and trivializing.

[–]Hickle [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Who's saying that emotional health will solve all of your problems? I don't know where you got that from tbh.