5824
5825

Trump-related ‘hate crimes’ against white children omitted from liberal group’s report. ‘They left that result out because it would not fit their ideological narrative’ (washingtontimes.com)

coupdetaco が 投稿

上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Inquisitor777Ireland[M] [スコア非表示] stickied comment (15子コメント)

Ridiculous reports.

Edit:Kek

Edit #2, last time! Kek

[–]bonjouratous 587 ポイント588 ポイント  (106子コメント)

As a leftwing guy there is something I can agree with right wing people, The Southern Poverty Law Center is a fraud. They are ideologically driven and do not stand for what they pretend to fight for. They're a toxic organisation.

[–]Moth4Moth 195 ポイント196 ポイント  (89子コメント)

They put Ayaan Hirsi Ali on list of 'anti-muslim extremists'. Insane really.

[–]bonjouratous 125 ポイント126 ポイント  (22子コメント)

And Maajid Nawaz! Who is still a Muslim and not as controversial in his rhetoric than Ayaan is. He's just a believer who critics his own religion.

[–]Moth4Moth 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (18子コメント)

Guess we need a new SPLC-type org that normal people can get behind. I don't see how they think they can justify that and still expect to be taken seriously by any means.

[–]gustaveIebonFrance 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (15子コメント)

The SPLC is seen as a "reliable source" by wikipedia (what is reliable and what is not is decided by wikipedia editors, who are usually left-leaning), so the opinions and fraudulent reporting of the SPLC's anti-white racist employees are able to be added into wikipedia and taken as fact by normies.

[–]wetsneakers 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Like the Family Research organization... what a joke

[–]onewalleee 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Didn't realize that, thanks.

[–]gustaveIebonFrance 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Muhammad Abduh would be an extremist too for wanting more than a theocracy.

[–]Poppenhoffer 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

He's anti-Muslim? I saw a very good debate starring him and a few other great panelists and he was decidedly in favor of the religion, but had his criticisms about it.

[–]RichGunzUSABest Country Ever 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

To leftists any criticism of Islam, even by Muslims is a hate crime.

[–]CaptainObivous 59 ポイント60 ポイント  (40子コメント)

Ben Carson was put on their "Extremist Watch List" for his views against same-sex marriage.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/8/ben-carson-placed-on-southern-poverty-law-centers-/

[–]Atersed 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (39子コメント)

So the 20-30% of Americans who oppose same-sex marriage are extremists? 90 million extremists is a bit extreme.

[–]CornPlanter 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Extremism is supposed to be extreme! ;)

[–]armedburrito 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (3子コメント)

No more extreme than Muslims who believe other people should be subject to sharia.

[–]Prez_Material 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (1子コメント)

You are now on the SPLC list for extremist hate thoughts.

[–]mostnormal 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

He's arguing that opposing same-sex marriage is as extreme as imposing sharia law. I would think this would get him on their payroll.

[–]aDAMNPATRIOT 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Do you really think that opposition to same sex marriage is as extreme as belief in sharia?

Do you know any things?

[–]Larry_Sandoz 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Yeah what a shame. They should lighten the fuck up over that issue so we can get that number down.

[–]wayback000 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

for real, why do people give a fuck about the marriage thing, marriage existed way the fuck before jesus was even an idea in some arabic guys head...

why do xtians think they have the right to have marriage?

egyptians were marrying, Mesopotamian kings were married, marriage has been around forever, so the idea that this one religion thinks t gets to dictate what marriage is is hilarious, what about muslims, can muslims not get married?

[–]DwarvenPirate 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not in a catholic church they can't!

You have any evidence those old marriages allowed homosexual marriage?

[–]garrett940 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I mean christianity didnt start with jesus but ok

コメントをもっと表示する (29 返事)

    [–]FranzTurdinand 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Blame the victims, SPLC!

    [–]AcidicBlink 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (20子コメント)

    Why is that insane? (Don't know anything about it, was hoping you'd enlighten me)

    [–]jak_22 107 ポイント108 ポイント  (13子コメント)

    Ayaan Hirsi Ali

    Is a somali woman, islam critic and fights for female rights, especially against the perception of women in a muslim society.

    Her viewpoints are hardly extremist, she is a humanist of the best sort.

    [–]r_smart 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    She was forced into an arranged marriage, suffered female castration, and her film partner was murdered for the anti-Islam movie they were making. She pretty much has to live in fear for her life and came to the US to be safe. From what I understand anyway. She did a talk with Dave Rubin at one point, which you can just search YouTube for, for anyone who's interested.

    [–]Saxifrage_Russell 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    She was also on Sam Harris' excellent podcast recently.

    [–]r_smart 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I need to catch up with those. He is so good. Even when I disagree at the end of his argument he's worth hearing out.

    [–]518Peacemaker 62 ポイント63 ポイント  (9子コメント)

    She's an extremist to traditional Muslims.

    [–]jak_22 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (8子コメント)

    That makes traditional muslims the extremists, not the other way around.

    [–]518Peacemaker 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (7子コメント)

    I know. I was just pointing out that it calls into question the beliefs of an organization that labels her an extremist.

    [–]Moth4Moth 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Instead of taking my word for it, I'd encourage you to see her lectures online.

    [–]30plus1 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    And if you get the chance, read her book Infidel. It was the best memoir I've ever read.

    The story of a woman defying adversity to realize enlightenment. It's a beautiful thing seeing someone fall in love with the world and learning.

    [–]WardensOfTheNorth 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Google her. Jesus. Every comment can't teach you how to read too.

    [–]myrptaway 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Damn, I wish I could read.

    [–]PM_ME_YOUR_LURCH 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    And where do we find this Google.com?

    [–]WardensOfTheNorth 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Thanks for making it easy. ;)

    [–]CherryBlossomStorm 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    well.. she is anti-muslim. And in the Islamic world, supporting women's rights makes you an extremist. They're not too far off the mark!

    [–]DwellerMike 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Ayaan Hirsi Ali.. once a 'dutch' hero to many.

    [–]sfanetti 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    One of my primary reasons for rejecting the regressive left.

    [–]Au_Contrarian 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Right down to their misleadingly disarming name.

    [–]Awesomefusion 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (11子コメント)

    Why do they do it, do they not like white people or something?

    [–]maledictus_homo_sum 62 ポイント63 ポイント  (7子コメント)

    Do you know how people sometimes go on a diet and at first it is quite reasonable, they just avoid sugars and eating a lot of carbs. But they they get thin and it's not enough for them. They metiulously overanalyze every inch of their body looking for excess fat. They become nutrition nazis, they need to eat at specific times of day, they bring all their food with them in a tray, they cannot go out or if they do, they need the waiter to list every ingredient in the dish, then they will thoroughly track every calorie of that day in some kind of food journal and on top of all that they will talk constantly about it. Suddenly, they are not fun and you don't want to hand out with them anymore.

    Now substitute food with liberal virtue signalling and you get the idea.

    [–]Awesomefusion 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    haha nice example, thanks

    [–]Fugitivebush 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

    That's kind of a poor example because watching what you eat is a good thing. Even if they do it with every food they eat. Maybe they just don't wanna get fat again. Unless it is the only thing they talk about to you then maybe you're the one at fault who finds the little things people do intolerant.

    People obsess about things. As long as it isn't the only thing they talk about with you then get over it.

    [–]Cyhawk 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    That's kind of a poor example because watching what you eat is a good thing. Even if they do it with every food they eat. Maybe they just don't wanna get fat again.

    That's kind of a poor example because not being racist is a good thing. Even if they watch what they say and how they act in every interaction with people of other races. Maybe they just don't want to be racist again.

    Obsession is obsession. It's the same psychological disorder regardless of what they obsess about. Food, race, hair, sexual identity, cars, anime, whatever.

    Just because it's a "good" thing doesn't make it not an obsession. A "good" thing to obsess about is Hygiene too. . .

    It isn't a problem until you take it too far and it starts to effect your daily life in a negative way. The Southern Poverty law center has taken it too far and it has effected their goals. In this case their mission statement: "The Southern Poverty Law Center is dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry. . .". They don't seem to be doing that any longer if the source isn't how they want it (or the food how they want it, or the soap isn't the right scent, etc etc)

    It's a good example, though I would of gone with the Hygiene one myself, everyone knows at least one germaphobe.

    [–]Golden_DawnUnited States 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    As long as it isn't the only thing they talk about with you then get over it.

    Or choose higher quality associates.

    [–]milkhotdog 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I'm imagining high carb 100% raw fruit vegans right now.

    [–]Golden_DawnUnited States 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Do you know how people sometimes go on a diet...

    No. I've never known or associated with anyone like that. I'm sure they exist, but they don't qualify for association. Can't remember ever rejecting the application of one, so I'm guessing there are other tells that tend to dominate the personality of such a person.

    I agree with the point you're trying to make, but consider tightening your standards a bit? (Unless you don't actually know any of those people, and that was just an example.)

    コメントをもっと表示する (1 返事)

      [–]BuelldozerHoly See 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      I doubt that it's because they don't like white people rather its that they have trouble with the reality of white people being the victim of racially motivated "hate".

      [–]lowfunctioningautist 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Yes. It's a Jewish organization and they look at all white people as potential Nazis. I'm not joking.

      [–]Chappedtip 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Which is why the fbi no longer associates with them

      コメントをもっと表示する (1 返事)

        [–]FadingEcho 102 ポイント103 ポイント  (47子コメント)

        Because when the left does it, it's someone else fault.

        [–]r_smart 46 ポイント47 ポイント  (32子コメント)

        I was just thinking on my drive into work today that there's this weird dynamic going on where we have one faction opposed to guns that seems to not have much problem with violence and another faction that fucking loves guns but doesn't seem inclined to resort to violence.

        This excludes foreign policy where both factions just try to quietly kill as many people as possible while excoriating the other faction for it when it's their turn

        [–]pocketknifeMT 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (1子コメント)

        It's projection. Letting other people have guns seems like a bad idea when your concept of a gun is not protection but rather a tool for coercion.

        "why would anyone want a gun, except to be violent towards others?"

        While pro gun people want them as an insurance policy for self defense.

        [–]r_smart 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Well, plus they're fun :)

        [–]jvonkllr 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (16子コメント)

        IMO its because the group that loves guns know that resorting to violence is more serious for the whole group of gun lovers. Because we are being put under heavy scrutiny and any step out of line and we could become the next rallying call for guns to be banned.

        [–]r_smart 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (14子コメント)

        It's a new idea to me, but my thinking is that politics in this country has shifted so that the right is becoming more of the free speech faction, which makes them more willing to argue rather than fight. That coupled with the conservative respect for rule of law makes them less likely to punch somebody, even if they might like to.

        Another idea, young people tend to lean more to the left. Young men are usually the source of chaos and violence. Thus we end up with anti-gun violent people.

        I've got like 5 more ideas, but I'm on my phone and don't want to type them.

        [–]pocketknifeMT 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (3子コメント)

        The GOP have always been the party of free speech, at least in comparison to Democrats. Their multi-decade affair with the religious right is really the only blemish in this regard. It's definitely a big one though.

        Democrats have never been for free speech. They just say they are when it's speech they like. If it's something they don't like, the speaker is dangerous and possibly not really a person.

        [–]r_smart 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

        The last couple years has been an interesting time for me because a lot of my political views have been challenged and I've been critically examining a lot of them. I used to be a fairly rabid liberal, and it's interesting looking back on those years now.

        I think something that is shaping a lot of modern politics is the GOP's love affair with the religious right, it was a major one for me, because it drove a lot of their authoritarian attitudes throughout my life, and for basically anybody in Gen X or younger.

        The funny thing though, is that I look back now, and can remember such lovely things as Tipper Gore pushing for censorship, the chips Bill Clinton wanted put into televisions, specifically for censorship, the anti-illegal immigration platform, the harsh crime reforms, the bombings and the like (this is a list off the top of my head without research). I was apolitical at the time (and pretty young), so I wasn't terribly aware of this stuff. Then 9/11 happened and I became political, was staunchly conservative and pro war for like two weeks, then became a typical young person lefty. At no point did it seem odd to me the parties were the same but one pandered to the religious year round while the other only did it during elections.

        I think at some point the liberals in this country need to realize that the democratic party is not a liberal party. It doesn't represent them or their interests, it just learns to speak their language for the sake of their own benefit.

        [–]pocketknifeMT 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

        Yeah, the GOP used to be all conservative all the time, and it just happened that most of the people who go to church also tend to be fiscally conservative, value family, etc. A natural fit.

        Then the churches got political, and they could get their requisite votes just by pandering to the religious and assuming everyone else is going to look at the dems and vote GOP anyway, which is basically the case. It was their ring of power for decades. Now with religion on the decline and that faction shuffling off towards the grave while they are kinda lost.

        The Democrat's road to power of late is basically is identity politics and (coming soon, in a big way) out and out socialist policies. Because both of those things always work out well in the end?

        But we get 2 parties only, each one with half of a decent platform, and then a bunch of razor blades in the cotton candy.

        You got your choice of socially conservative/fiscally liberal and socially liberal/fiscally liberal.

        While most Americans will identify socially liberal/fiscally conservative when polled.

        [–]r_smart 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

        |You got your choice of socially conservative/fiscally liberal and socially liberal/fiscally liberal.

        Slow Clap

        コメントをもっと表示する (10 返事)

          [–]Poppenhoffer 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

          I think it might be because legal gun owners were taught proper firearm safety lol

          [–]AsteriskCGY 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (8子コメント)

          Well not enough to shoot people because of road rage.

          [–]r_smart 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (7子コメント)

          I have no idea what this argument is. How many road-rage related shootings are there? Like if it happens once it is some sort of representation of the group? Think carefully before you decide to set that up as your standard of evidence.

          [–]Hi_mom1 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

          we have one faction opposed to guns that seems to not have much problem with violence and another faction that fucking loves guns but doesn't seem inclined to resort to violence.

          Can you explain this to me?

          Who are these factions we are speaking about?

          [–]r_smart 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

          DNC & GOP. Backed by left and right respectively, though the parties don't really represent the ideologies for the most part.

          [–]Hi_mom1 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

          So you're saying the DNC loves violence?

          Is this related to the Clinton body count or the protests against Trump?

          [–]r_smart 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

          |So you're saying the DNC loves violence?

          I was saying both of them do in my reference to our foreign policy. I'm pretty sure there's an HRC email referencing 2 million deaths in the Middle East from our foreign policy. That lays at the feet of our past two presidents.

          Mostly I was trying to use a shorthand to represent large factions on the left and right that control a lot of public discourse & attention without tarring both sides as all being one way. The left and right are large tents with a lot of different philosophies.

          But yeah, I was kind of thinking about all of the riots and protests which have resulted in violence in the past year, as well as people agitating for violence. Most of that seems to be coming from the left (though again, I didn't want to lay it at the feet of everyone on the left, there are a lot of people who disagree with this stuff, myself included).

          [–]20th_LVL_Wizard 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

          No no no...it's their environment.

          Look at this graph on education...

          コメントをもっと表示する (12 返事)

            [–]Carverko 79 ポイント80 ポイント  (46子コメント)

            I just filtered the politics subreddit because you don't hear about this stuff on there. So frustrating.

            [–]mrdeadsniper 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (0子コメント)

            Yeah. I want pictures of cats and stuff. Not a rotating wheel of propaganda.

            [–]burdturgler1154 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

            I watched TV news last night, and in the middle of a story about someone graffiti tagging a sidewalk to say "Make America White, Again", they mentioned a bunch of anti-white graffiti as well.

            Definitely unexpected, but it was a nice surprise

            [–]codywestphal534RETARD -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (36子コメント)

            Do you not realize that it's literally the exact same thing on this sub? Where stuff is ignored or kept out of way more often than /r/politics?

            I'll never get the conservative trope: "So much media bias! Everything is fake news! Here's a price of news that says so to prove it. [insert Brietbart link]

            I mean... Can you guys honestly not see the egregious hypocrisy and laughable ignorance of that? Or is just fun to make up a narrative where you're always the poor, poor victim?

            [–]Carverko 35 ポイント36 ポイント  (11子コメント)

            If you look on the /r/politics sub, it's literally ALL anti-Trump. I'm not at all saying it needs to be pro-Trump but give me some fucking balance. Trump is not the only political presence on the planet and that sub doesn't seem to get that. I used to go there to learn about all things politics, now it's just about Trump.

            It's also funny how much you assume from my short post. I've never played the victim card here. I've never followed the "elections are rigged" platform though I do believe the DNC rigged her nomination over Bernie.

            You state how much of a hypocrisy the conversative party is but the truth is both sides are. Both sides pull stupid shit. Both sides have terrible people on them. This identity politics shit that this site and the media in general get people to play along with is absolute bullshit.

            You can be a liberal and not be a whiny bitch. You can be a conservative and not be a racist. That's fact. And fact is what I acknowledge.

            I voted for Trump and even I'm banned from /r/The_Donald for saying exactly what I'm saying now.

            I stated what I stated on here because I want to hear BOTH sides so I can make an informed decision based on the presented facts. However it seems like most of Reddit users, whether you are pro-Trump or pro-Hillary only want to hear facts that make them seem right and nothing that makes them seem wrong.

            I read a ton of what I see on multiple subreddits so I can get a better perspective from every angle.

            In short, shut your mouth when you have zero context on who I am or what I'm even talking about.

            [–]G_PetroniusItaly 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (4子コメント)

            Do you not realize that it's literally the exact same thing on this sub? Where stuff is ignored or kept out of way more often than /r/politics?

            Can you guys honestly not see the egregious hypocrisy and laughable ignorance of that? Or is just fun to make up a narrative where you're always the poor, poor victim?

            Holy shit the lack of self-awareness. Liberals have taken over neutral subreddits and turned them into hellscapes of mod censorship where conservative posts have a life expectancy of a few hours, and you call us hypocrites because in this free and uncensored refuge conservatives are the majority?

            [–]AshcubeF 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (4子コメント)

            Where stuff is ignored or kept out of way more often than /r/politics?

            Hahaha.

            [–]codywestphal534RETARD 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

            If you don't think this sub has an agenda then you honestly don't understand how the world works.

            [–]AshcubeF 26 ポイント27 ポイント  (0子コメント)

            I didn't say it didn't. But /r/politics is pretty extreme. In fact, all of these subs - /r/uncensorednews, /r/the_donald, they are all reactionary to the default subs of reddit that dominate the frontpage and have been doing this for years and years.

            Are we really going to pretend that some right-wing invasion created a bunch of subs on reddit out of the blue some 10 months ago, specifically to spam the frontpage and "recruit" people? Or do you think it's a result of the constant belittling, hateful rhetoric that anyone receives if they aren't on board with the political ideals of the rest of reddit?

            These things do not exist in a vacuum. They are a response to the utterly miserable conditions reddit itself has created for people who disagree with the political narrative, and they've gone out of the way (especially the_donald) to be as annoying as possible by being loud and spammy as hell, in order to mimic and point out the hypocrisy of things like /r/news, /r/politics, etc.

            If you don't realize that this was the inevitable result of the way power-mods have enforced their narrative, you don't understand how people work. Prevent them from speaking long enough, and they will hit back with a vengeance. They even did it within the same rules that the rest of reddit abused. That managed to prove, successfully, that eventually the admins would target them - unfairly - despite never going after other subreddits that broke the same rules, but held different political opinions. Why do you think the_donald gained 12k subs over thanksgiving? It's because people see whats been going on behind the scenes, not because they like Trump all of a sudden.

            [–]trananalized 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

            Anyone is welcome to post any news article to this sub. Whether it gains enough upvotes to gain some visibility is another matter. So if you don't like the agenda post an agenda you do like and let the thousands of subscribers decide whether they think it's worthy of an upvote.

            [–]Quancreate 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (12子コメント)

            Mediamatters.org

            [–]KLR08Oakland 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

            I don't need to come here to see news that's on cnn. I need to come here for news that isn't on CNN.

            It's not that complicated but you have to leave a long, stupid, exasperated post about how durrrr this subreddit has a bias.

            No shit

            コメントをもっと表示する (7 返事)

              [–]jfk_47 156 ポイント157 ポイント  (94子コメント)

              I saw an anti trump protest here on campus and the trump haters were much more aggressive and physical than they should have been.

              [–]Seductive_pickle 51 ポイント52 ポイント  (15子コメント)

              Same thing happened but throughout the downtown of my city. The police had to isolate the protesters because they were to violent and hateful, but they couldn't break up the protest without having to deal with a race war.

              It was a little surreal hearing "Die Whites Die" being chanted while the officers told us if we cross this line they will attack us. Facebook was the only virtually the only place where pictures posted.

              [–]TruthTellerBot 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (10子コメント)

              Wait, what the fuck!? "Die whites, die"?

              ?????????????

              What the hell is going on???

              [–]NimblythePede 40 ポイント41 ポイント  (9子コメント)

              Yessir. But don't worry it's not racist. It's definitely not assault when they punch Trump supporters. They are just voicing their frustration with their fists on your face. They are the movement of peace. Can't you tell? I mean I know I only think of peace when I see Palestinian flags and the good old Hammer and Sickle.

              [–]TruthTellerBot 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (5子コメント)

              This has nothing to do with Palestine or communism, though, does it?

              These people are legitimately fucking hateful racists. There needs to be outrage over shit like that. OUTRAGE

              [–]NimblythePede 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (4子コメント)

              It's community organization 101. Take all the "disenfranchised" and group them together. It's about numbers.

              Now make them hate Trump. Make them repeat the racist xenophobic bullshit. These groups have nothing in common. I literally saw pro LGBT and pro Islam marching hand in hand, all the while calling anyone that wasn't with them racist. It's bullshit Alinsky tactics.

              [–]TruthTellerBot 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (3子コメント)

              I think you might be on to something there, honestly. Some pretty scary stuff, though.

              [–]Quancreate 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (1子コメント)

              Go look up the Frankfurt school, critical theory, and marxism then apply what you learn to social justice. Fucking eye opener.

              [–]trananalized 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

              And then have your mind blown when you find out Hillary done her thesis on Alinsky and this lunatic nearly became president, and never mind all the other shit she's being implicated in.

              [–]NimblythePede 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

              It is literally what Rules for Radicals is. Step by step on how to do this. Big surprise, Obama and Hillary and BIG FANS of Alinsky.

              [–]Schembm 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

              There are people at my University who legitimately disbelieve in the existence of racism towards whites. Sure, it's much less prevalent than "conventional" racism, but dismissing its existence is flat-out ignorant. Since when is white-bashing a form of social justice? These people are performing the very acts they condemn. It's mind-boggling, really.

              [–]NimblythePede 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

              Olympic Gold in mental gymnastics is awarded to college liberals this year.

              [–]wayback000 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

              bash the fash

              [–]GoBucks2012 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (0子コメント)

              Yup. And this is why race relations in the US are getting worse (in my opinion). Black Americans actually have something to fight for yet they spend their time protesting (rioting) against justified police shootings. They (not all, but some) destroy other people's property and when the police show up, people bitch about the police being too militarized. It's a lose/lose because black leaders have lead these people down a treacherous path in an effort to maintain chaos. Because when you have chaos, you need government!

              [–]jfk_47 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

              Yea, the protest on campus was pretty sizeable and not too aggressive. There was another in our downtown area that was literally like 10 people and it was pretty low-key.

              [–]codywestphal534RETARD 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

              If it happened in your city and police were involved, can you send a link? No local media can cover up something you make sound so intense -- local news can't get away with that.

              When you say people were chanting "Die Whites Die" then say "but I can't show any proof it was only picture on Facebook"... It makes it pretty damn hard to believe a word you say. Especially since you're an over-sensationalist given your post history.

              [–]Seductive_pickle 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

              Just PMed you a source because it would reveal personal details about myself to post it under that comment. I hope my post history isn't too over-sensationalist, but I completely understand not wanting to believe a stranger over the Internet without a source.

              [–]EEFred 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

              Huh. It's almost as if douchebags on both sides of the political spectrum exist. Imagine that.

              コメントをもっと表示する (76 返事)

                [–]Emaldon7 364 ポイント365 ポイント  (302子コメント)

                Lately most hate crimes have been against Trump supporters, especially the minority ones. The left being shitty by censoring real facts is no surprise here.

                [–]Autistos 153 ポイント154 ポイント  (232子コメント)

                Source that a majority have been against trump supporters?

                Shame on you for making such an outlandish claim with no statistical backing. And shame on the people upvoting you too.

                [–]Cyphersphere 240 ポイント241 ポイント  (195子コメント)

                Here is a copypasta courtesy /u/onewalleee

                This is by no means exhaustive, cataloging all of them would take many hours more. I am only including politically motivated leftist violence for which there is verifiable evidence (police statements, videos, or photos):

                •15 year-old beaten by 4 classmates for wearing MAGA hat, punched, thrown to the ground and kicked, charges filed -- https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday.com/story/93991178/

                •69 year old woman left with bloody head wound after 27 year old man brutally beats her with a chair for supporting Trump -- http://www.observer-reporter.com/20161201/election_argument_ends_with_assault_donora_police_say
                •tolerant leftist Matthew Pugh charged with attempted homicide

                •man beaten by multiple assailants for voting Trump as they taunt him -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZ4_zVa2Uw4 (his description: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHWNV-6urmU)

                •hispanic man chased and beaten by a mob for wearing MAGA hat -- http://sendvid.com/t9nn151i

                •elementary student beaten by classmates, left in crutches for voting Trump in mock election -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52EoprTSouU

                •high school student beaten into critical condition for posting BlueLivesMatter on Facebook -- http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/03/alabama-teen-beaten-into-critical-condition-after-posting-blue-lives-matter-video/

                •mob of anti-police rioters attacking a young white man, cheering as they beat, drag and strip him -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7yYARGFKbM

                •Trump supporter shot during political argument -- http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/27/paul-jones-trump-supporter-shot-at-cleveland-bar-d/

                •female in high school being beaten by another student for posting pro-Trump Instagram comment, as classmates cheer -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgHt0s2UQHQ

                •Michael Sandford, British national, tries to assassinate Donald Trump, tries to steal gun from Las Vegas police officer at Trump rally -- http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/19/politics/trump-rally-gun-police-officer/

                •bloody violence against Trump supporters outside San Jose rally -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/06/03/ugly-bloody-scenes-in-san-jose-as-protesters-attack-trump-supporters-outside-rally/ [we should really break this into multiple items, one for each victim, here's a few]

                •teen chased by mob, tackled, hit multiple times for supporting Trump at a rally -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTrYhrHsG-s [two arrested]

                •man sucker punched, knocked to ground for supporting Trump at a rally -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlF1B1KeWJI

                •man struck with object from behind ends up bleeding, for supporting Trump at a rally -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmBXNE8gZvI

                •[ no time to see if this is all San Jose, but appears to document multiple individual assaults. Would appreciate help identifying video of the individual incidents -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RF_eGq6KKUs ]

                •anti-police rioters kicking a homeless man for being white near anti-police riot, all cheer -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4tdiYJNLNI

                •anti-police protestors trying to set reporter on fire, because they're mad -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfxCDnARNOI

                •man left bloody for attending a Trump rally, rocks thrown at cars, etc, in Costa Mesa, -- https://youtu.be/8K1wEgDdO64 (17 arrests from the riot)

                •two men beat Trump supporter for holding sign, police intervene to save him -- http://fox61.com/2016/11/12/meriden-officer-stops-assault-on-man-with-trump-sign-2-arrested/

                •62 year old man beaten with crowbar for wearing Trump shirt, in front of witnesses -- http://www.nj.com/essex/index.ssf/2016/08/man_attacked_by_stranger_who_questioned_his_trump.html

                Unclear or late-breaking incidents that I won't yet include in the above list:

                •Kansas City Man beat by six teens after they ask him who he voted for. -- http://fox4kc.com/2016/11/29/man-attacked-at-plaza-bus-stop-says-teens-asked-him-political-question-before-throwing-punches/

                •The victim, Robert Barrentine, told the teens he didn't vote for anyone, but speculated they confronted him because he was white. Police arrested one teen with previous charges for armed robbery. Will have to wait for more info to know if this truly belongs, but it looks that way.

                •32 year old Mitchell Mormon shot and killed during already raging argument where he voiced support for Trump -- http://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/atlanta/man-killed-woman-injured-in-shooting-outside-popular-atlanta-bar/467563214 •it's not yet clear whether the man would have shot him regardless of the Trump statement, information still developing. However, witnesses claim that the murder victim's antagonistic statement regarding Trump escalated the argument

                •a crowd surrounding, menacing, bumping and yelling at an old, homeless black lady, for supporting Trump who eventually falls over then jeer at her -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrqayR0Y4Pg

                •(this is the famous Hollywood star defender) Borderline violence, close enough. What do you think?

                •male teens driving around stealing Trump signs, rejoicing when a girl is getting beaten by another male ?
                http://www.theamericanmirror.com/video-california-woman-beaten-trump-yard-sign/ -- http://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2016/10/03/awful-watch-thugs-beat-up-woman-while-stealing-trump-signs-then-brag-about-it-video/ --

                •story is that she tried to stop them from stealing her sign, can someone confirm this?

                •man attacked, choked on subway by two men for wearing MAGA hat -- http://abc7ny.com/politics/man-wearing-trump-hat-choked-pinned-on-nyc-subway/1608588/ •this is an example of one that I'm not sure belongs, because I can't find anything about eyewitnesses or arrests. But I wanted it to be clear that I'm aware of it

                There are many more. Thanks in advance to anyone who helps me round out the list (or fix inaccuracies.) Would also like to use each victim's name.

                It really is worth providing a counter to the prevailing narrative that there has been a lopsided wave of right-wing, politically-motivated violence this year. In reality, the vast majority of folks on both sides are peaceful, but if we were forced to decide, the violent left is responsible for a greater number of vicious documented attacks than the right.

                [–]onewalleee 48 ポイント49 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                For the record, I have no idea how many hate crimes have occurred. How many are straight from /r/thathappened ? How many can now be found in /r/hatecrimehoaxes ?

                What I do know is that I couldn't find anywhere near the number of right-wing instances of documented violence as I could find left-wing instances of documented violence, especially when you start to differentiate between violent acts perpetrated by a single person and those acts involving groups of people.

                My main point is to challenge the ridiculous narrative that so many accepted uncritically regarding a mass wave of violence coming from Trump supporters.

                If we only use examples featuring videos, arrests, or cases with serious documented injuries, it appears that there is far more politically-motivated leftist violence. But I haven't done a proper study obviously. I just want both sides to realize that they have snakes in their camp and to unequivocally reject violence.

                And I want people to at least pause before sharing yet another article claiming that Trump supporters are out in force perpetrating violent hate crimes. Plenty of articles citing the SPLC bullshit don't even differentiate between violence and graffiti or alleged words. Words and graffiti matter, but they are completely different than violence and due to their nature are very, very hard to prove. Thus they are perfect fodder for hoaxes as well (of which we've seen several examples).

                Anyone can say someone screamed an epithet or tell a story about a friend of a friend seeing a bunch of men in white hoods with red hats on top. But we know a bunch of them are lies or hoaxes, so let's look to cases where there is actual evidence.

                [–]TheKharmeleon 37 ポイント38 ポイント  (18子コメント)

                They asked for proof of their claim not examples of it happening.

                [–]bassline8 58 ポイント59 ポイント  (6子コメント)

                Well it's kind of hard to have proof when the "authority" on hate-crimes excludes the anti-white ones, isn't it?

                [–]Fuck_love_inthebutt 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                Then how can one make the claim in the first place if there's no proof?

                コメントをもっと表示する (5 返事)

                  [–]30plus1 65 ポイント66 ポイント  (10子コメント)

                  Well when we're comparing people being shot and brutally assaulted in the street to cartoon frogs and swastikas (likely spray-painted by leftists) it's not hard to see the bias.

                  コメントをもっと表示する (106 返事)

                    [–]ttstte 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                    Hey it's not unverified or outlandish information. It's uncensored.

                    [–]ItsNotThad 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

                    Waiting for you to respond to all the souces bro. I got my popcorn ready. Man up.

                    [–]Autistos 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                    I have, numerous times

                    [–]Pannra 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

                    Shame on you for being so uninformed. Get off your fucking high horse.

                    [–]ABSTRVCTedits 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                    Yes I'd like to see this source

                    [–]The_Raging_Goat 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (3子コメント)

                    He's getting upvoted because most people here are aware of the reality, and don't need to be coddled like you do.

                    [–]czarist -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (12子コメント)

                    He's just going to show you three YouTube links of black people beating up a white Trump supporter and act as if that proves anything.

                    [–]EjaculationStorm 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (7子コメント)

                    Looks like he gave about 25ish. And those are real actual attacks with video evidence, not just some heresay story about harassment like what the SPLC published.

                    コメントをもっと表示する (4 返事)

                      コメントをもっと表示する (12 返事)

                        [–]cubs1917 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        What evidence do you have if this? Besides ancedotal evidence

                        [–]wayback000 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        bash the fash

                        [–]bbbeans 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

                        This is completely not true. You are making a totally unsubstantiated claim and getting upvoted by people that don't care whether what you say is true or not.

                        [–]midareashi 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        Claiming it isn't true is just as bad as claiming it is true without evidence to support your own claim.

                        I do agree with the second part of your post.

                        コメントをもっと表示する (64 返事)

                          [–]Laxidazical 86 ポイント87 ポイント  (24子コメント)

                          It's ideological hypocrisy. There are so many examples from the feminists listen and believe rape lynchings to the black "this is for slavery bitch" rapes, or "cultural enrichment" taking place in Europe.

                          I actually believe hate crimes against whites is probably far and away the majority

                          They say South Africa is now a paradise while the new president sings "kill whitey!" At political rallies. That's our media hypocrisy in a nutshell.

                          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHLTKZ05zM4

                          [–]solazyme_investor 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                          Immigrants in Sweden are four times more likely to be investigated for lethal violence

                          http://www.thelocal.se/20120227/2683

                          rip

                          [–]I_am_the_night 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (9子コメント)

                          believe rape lynchings to the black "this is for slavery bitch" rapes, or "cultural enrichment" taking place in Europe.

                          Okay, so I agree there's some a lot of hypocrisy on the left and Europe definitely leans left...but rapes "for slavery"? Do you have any evidence for that? I mean, maybe one isolated crazy person but that's certainly not a movement.

                          I actually believe hate crimes against whites is probably far and away the majority

                          I kind of doubt it. Hate crimes against minorities can be overblown but it's unlikely that the majority of hate crimes are against whites.

                          They say South Africa is now a paradise

                          Who says this? Especially in the American left? I've never heard that before.

                          [–]Laxidazical 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (1子コメント)

                          • 1

                          http://www.debatepolitics.com/law-and-order/259054-black-rapist-pisses-white-victim-and-says-400-years-slavery.html

                          This is a single incident as was the home invasion where four black men raped and murdered a pregnant pastors wife, or where they gang raped an ocegenarian, or whee they tortured and lit on fire their victims in a home invasion. Etc. etc. etc.

                          even though they specifically target white people and are viciously demonically evil they are probably not considered "hate" crimes.

                          Also all crime is a "hate" crime. Having your pregnant wife brutally gang raped murdered isn't worse just because because the 5 black men who did it said cracker.

                          http://m.nydailynews.com/news/crime/indiana-man-arrested-murder-pastor-pregnant-wife-article-1.2443803

                          http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/23/us/indiana-amanda-blackburn-killing-arrest/index.html

                          You will find white on black crime is prevalent racially motivated and and a buried inconvenient truth.

                          • 2

                          we will never know the true number of hate crimes because of accounting errors, bias, unreported hate crimes, and crimes motivated by "hate" but without enough evidence for them to be considered. Not only that but there are radical double standards at play.

                          • 3

                          on the olympics I had to watch how evil racial Segragation (apartheid) was and how the mother of Van Neikerk couldn't participate in the Olympics and now how a 74 year old white woman coached him And it was now a multicultural paradise.

                          What they didn't tell us was the truth about "modern" South Africa.

                          South Africa was basically first world.

                          In 20 Years it now has a "president" saying he needs to be dictator for "6 months"

                          http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/africa/article4394052.ece http://www.msn.com/en-za/news/other/zuma-if-i-was-a-dictator/ar-BBuEsAh

                          He had embazed hundreds of millions of dollars

                          https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/29/jacob-zuma-accused-corruption-south-africa

                          And he's destroyed the economy driven out native and foreign investment and reduced the nations bonds to junk.

                          http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-04/south-africa-junk-rating-a-matter-of-time-as-economy-falters

                          Best of all he sings kill whitey at political rallies!!!!

                          That's why I said there is no murder in paradise. It's a propaganda maxim. The cultural Marxists did this to South Africa so it cannot be a failure. It must be a success.

                          [–]I_am_the_night 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                          Okay, on point 1, that first link is to a message board, and to a youtube video that does not exist anymore. The crime it's describing is horrible, but it's not a hate crime.

                          Also all crime is a "hate" crime. Having your pregnant wife brutally gang raped murdered isn't worse just because because the 5 black men who did it said cracker.

                          Yeah, I'm not going to debate whether or not "hate" crimes deserve an aggravated or elevated status. A gang rape is horrible regardless of the reason.

                          I will say that the two main reasons that hate crimes are tracked and considered separate is that A. society is trying, in general, to get past hateful divisions based on race and B. hate, as a motivation for crime, is something we can work on. It's a lot more difficult to address the social and economic factors that are generally behind most criminal behavior. But hatred is something we can address in our lifetimes through cooperation, exposure, and understanding of each other's culture.

                          Hate crimes are, admittedly, also tracked because of the emotional and political outrage they produce, but I would argue the main reasons are those that I outlined above.

                          As for point 2, you're saying we'll never know the number of hate crimes that actually exist because errors, biased, lack of reporting, insufficient evidence, and double standards. But despite saying you have no evidence for your belief, you still believe that whites are the victims of more hate crimes than minorities? That doesn't make sense.

                          1. Yeah, I'm not arguing that Zuma is a great guy. I'm certainly not arguing that South Africa is a multicultural paradise. But the olympics are not the place to get an accurate impression of how the world views a country. Everybody puts on their best face for the olympics, that's half the point.

                          What you originally said is that "they" say "south africa is now a paradise". The only "group" you refer to in your entire original post is "feminists", but I assume you're generally referring to the "left". Either way, again, I don't really know of anybody (who is taken seriously or is a part of the groups that you mention) that is praising Zuma or South African race relations like you describe.

                          [–]coltninja 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (6子コメント)

                          He's making ridiculous shit up to fit his narrative. No one thinks that.

                          コメントをもっと表示する (13 返事)

                            [–]kayjaylayray 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (1子コメント)

                            How does someone work with this kind of group and not think to themselves, "what a piece of trash I am, I should just kill myself"?

                            [–]Quinnell 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                            For some it could just be a way to pay the bills.

                            [–]dhananzilla 45 ポイント46 ポイント  (15子コメント)

                            For a subreddit called uncensorednews, I expected the comment section to contain less subjective arguments. Some of you go to great lengths to justify your ideological views.

                            Are we not all interested in the discovery of empirical truths, though they may not fit our narrative?

                            [–]mueller723 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (4子コメント)

                            This is the first post in this sub I've seen. If this comment section is indicative of the average post here at all then this is pretty clearly not a place for any sort of neutral discussion.

                            [–]G_PetroniusItaly 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

                            I don't understand what makes people think that "uncensored" is supposed to mean "comments are neutral" or even "stories are neutral". It means "without censorship". That implies that all takes, including partisan ones, are equally welcome.

                            [–]mueller723 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

                            You're right, I can't really argue about that.

                            That implies that all takes, including partisan ones, are equally welcome.

                            This is a great sentiment, and it's what I think most people like myself who were disappointed were hoping to find when they saw the name of the sub. The problem is that when the user base is so slanted, like what's represented in this comment section, you're not going to get even close to an equal representation. Looking at the top posts of all time for this sub, it's obvious it's primarily a right wing echo chamber. Even if things aren't being censored, the userbase does it itself by being so heavily partisan. Again, not the goal of the sub, but not what I was hoping for.

                            [–]G_PetroniusItaly 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                            Mods have no means to change the composition of the userbase, nor that we'd try to if we could. The only ones who can make liberal viewpoints more prominent are liberals, who generally refuse to partecipate here and remain in subreddits where a liberal echo-chamber is enforced by the mods.

                            That's neither something we can change ourselves nor something that we feel ought to be changed. We make a simple offer, all comers welcome: an uncensored space for news and news discussion. On reddit, where most subreddits that are supposed to be non-partisan are under heavy left-wing censorship, our offer appeals far more to conversatives. That's something that's on places like /r/news and /r/politics to address.

                            [–]bokan 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                            This sub wasn't like this when I subscribed a few months ago. There's a much higher concentration of Trump people now. It's been taken over.

                            [–]madmax_410 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (1子コメント)

                            There's a guy further up who claims anything that makes trump supporters look bad is a false flag.

                            Very objective reasoning, there.

                            [–]thefalc0ns 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                            Can you link to that comment?

                            [–]BuelldozerHoly See 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (3子コメント)

                            You're looking for /r/neutralnews or perhaps /r/NeutralPolitics .

                            [–]dhananzilla 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

                            Thank you for pointing me in that direction. Now that is my kind of news! :D

                            [–]BuelldozerHoly See 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                            You're welcome!

                            [–]HooptyDooDooMeister 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                            Ha! Those are the subs I thought I was in. Unsubbing here and subbing to those. Thanks!

                            [–]mArishNight 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                            welcome to r/trumpnews

                            [–]thetompain 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                            What does censorship have to do with subjective arguments?

                            [–]imengun 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                            This is uncensored news. People are free to have bias to either side as much as they want. They just won't get censored for it here.

                            [–]elyankee23 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (12子コメント)

                            Also just to be clear: SPLC did not say it left it out because it "did not fit their narrative." The guy saying that was Hans Bader, a very pro-Tea Party lawyer who has spent 8 years railing against Obamacare and the IRS.

                            He absolutely has a right to give his opinions, but shame on the Washington Times for embedding his opinion in a supposed journalistic article and passing it off as fact.

                            The Times is pretty right-wing, but I usually expect better of them than that.

                            Edit: reread the article to make sure I hadn't missed it. Nope. There are no reports of the Times attempting to contact the SPLC for a response. Usually that's where you'd see "we contacted the SPLC and they declined to comment". So basically the Times is "reporting" on a NY Post (separate newspaper) investigation, while using only one very partisan person to comment.

                            [–]GodfreyLongbeard 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (7子コメント)

                            So why do you think they neglected to include those numbers if not to support their propaganda?

                            [–]Cannedcheese 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

                            Who knows. Because it doesn't fit the narrative is definitely a possibility. But (and I haven't actually looked into the article) if the point was to display the numbers of violence specifically for minorities, then it would make sense why they would not add the numbers against whites. Buuuut I also have a problem with that because focusing on how someting effects only certain people of color and not everyone in general is a bit counter productive and only helps to divide.

                            [–]GodfreyLongbeard 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

                            They are a very divisive organisation. Many would call them racists.

                            [–]Cannedcheese 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                            Very well could be. I have not had the time to look too deeply into them. It's funny how things starting with good intentions can turn around backwards like that

                            [–]want_to_join 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

                            They didn't, because it wouldn't 'support their propaganda.' Their position is that Donald Trump is a divider, and that hate crimes are on the rise. Do you really believe that they would not include hate crimes in their assessment of rising hate-crimes? That statistic completely supports their claim.

                            コメントをもっと表示する (1 返事)

                              [–]GonnaVote2 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

                              This is exactly how the ny times operates too

                              [–]elyankee23 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

                              It really is not. The NYT makes extensive efforts to contact all sources. And it wasn't (even recently) how the Washington Times operates. It's disappointing.

                              [–]GonnaVote2 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              Yea I call complete BS on this, the NY times has shown to purposely ignore original sources like actual footage on good morning america to site things like Politico so they can push a false narrative

                              [–]GonnaVote2 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              This is exactly how the ny times operates too

                              [–]myndzha 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

                              Just imagine America if Trump would have lost.

                              [–]HuffMar 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              Not every 'hate-incident' is on the basis of race at all.

                              [–]motivation150 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              This has happened so much this election cycle, it's ridiculous... but everybody wants to talk about fake news, right?

                              [–]FapsToYourMassages 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              The SPLC is a joke non profit.

                              [–]ToOurEnd 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              Tell me about your privilege, white people. Hate crimes against you are largely not considered hate crimes by an establishment which you are constantly told acts in your favor alone.

                              [–]Trump_is_a_bitch 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              Both sides are so retartedly biased.

                              [–]SynesthesiaBruh 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

                              Anybody else just fucking love cock?

                              [–]bestlaidplan 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              The problem is what they aren't saying. So there are white students getting harassed. I'd like to know what the harassment entails - is it trump supporting kids harassing other white kids that think trump is an idiot? Or is it that the white kids are trump supporter being harassed. There is no way of know what is actually going on because we don't have that vital piece of information.

                              [–]I_CARGO_200_RUSSIA 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              So you're saying that trump is most polarizing worthless sob?

                              [–]wayback000 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              good, bash the fash

                              [–]MediaInformationBot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              I am a bot, bleep bloop

                              Title: Untitled

                              Description: N/A

                              Views: 882924

                              Note:

                              Here are the places I found that have linked to this content recently (including your post) as of 12-6-2016 at 13:43 US Central Standard Time

                              I am a purely informational bot. You know what they say: don't hurt the messenger. If you see an error, please message me

                              [–]Ferenix2Italy 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              White genocide is the goal of the SPLC and all the Establishment

                              [–]Invalid_Target 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              bash the fash' offspring

                              [–]skankhunt__fortytwo 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              Something tells me the jews are behind this.

                              [–]Cyeric85 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

                              Both sides are full of shit and only care about their agenda.. End of story

                              [–]bumbuff 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              You are an enlightened person

                              [–]milkhotdog 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              They seem to fudge the white stats to either exaggerate their own cause or fudge the white stats to make what they do seem less bad.

                              Example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4IhQuz2pzc

                              [–]GymTanLoiter 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              Hate-crimes against white people? Turns out he's not a racist after all! Just an asshole like the rest of us! Go Trump!

                              [–]Zebzk 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (54子コメント)

                              This sub is shit, it's just become the donald 2.0 rather than a legit news sub. Sad, it could have actually been a good sub with real discussion instead of another circlejerk.

                              [–]G_PetroniusItaly 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (52子コメント)

                              You have 0 submissions and 1 comment here. Same as with most of the cunts that lament your views are not sufficiently reflected in this place. You don't want a sub where you're free to talk, you want a sub where someone else makes your opinion the majority.

                              Fuck off to some other place. This is the largest uncensored news community on the site, the only one with transparent moderation. "B-but conservatives are the majority" no shit, conservatives get banned from all the supposedly "neutral" subs if they dare not tow the line, their posts are removed, their comments silenced. Maybe if liberals didn't turn the rest of reddit into their own enforced echo-chamber uncensored spaces wouldn't immediately fill with conservatives, ever thought about that?

                              コメントをもっと表示する (1 返事)

                                コメントをもっと表示する (77 返事)