@housescience you are an embarrassment. Science *means* something. The scientific process & peer review mean something. Shame on you.
.@BreitbartNews: Global Temperatures Plunge. Icy Silence from Climate Alarmistshttp://bit.ly/2gINZNf
-
-
-
@anildash@HouseScience Why do NASA and NOAA have to change historical data to make their theories work . . . . ? Hmmmm -
@tomcoates@SirWoodtheGood@anildash@HouseScience@guardian Without adjustments there would be no scary Global graphpic.twitter.com/O18GgkqBtL -
@AndyOz2@SirWoodtheGood@anildash@HouseScience@guardian Do you understand why I personally trust the 95% of climate scientists... -
@AndyOz2@SirWoodtheGood@anildash@HouseScience@guardian ... governments of every political background, NASA and others over you? -
@AndyOz2@SirWoodtheGood@anildash@HouseScience@guardian I mean, your selective choice of a few graphs are interesting and everything... -
@AndyOz2@SirWoodtheGood@anildash@HouseScience@guardian ... and I'm quite happy to go and look at see where they come from... - さらに表示
-
-
-
.
@HouseScience Pro Tip: The U.S. Government shouldn't be getting its science from Breitbart. -
How to take action. (1) Find your representatives here: http://www.whoismyrepresentative.com/ (2) Are they on this Committee (see pic)? Call them!pic.twitter.com/M3Soi2HugH
-
Note: I've worked in a congressional office answering phones. If you're not in their district, the call basically doesn't matter. Check 1st!
-
Don't have a rep on the list? Email
@HouseScience and demand they get their science from reputable sources: https://science.house.gov/contact/email-us … -
@TheSpaceGal Emily, would you suggest calling the committee directly, as well?@HouseScience -
@complaina@HouseScience Definitely! I only suggest email because for many people that's a little less intimidating. lower barrier! -
@TheSpaceGal@HouseScience this info is awesome, thank you! - さらに表示
-
-
-
I wrote a brief, public rant on Facebook about that
@HouseScience tweet. h/t@hormiga@PeterGleick https://www.facebook.com/kejames/posts/10209545128558708 …pic.twitter.com/Y0PaU7TRhZ -
Digging into the
@HouseScience/ Breitbart thing a bit more… Breitbart cited Daily Mail who in turn cited NASA but didn't provide a link. 1/2pic.twitter.com/aBrqVHt46x -
2/3 I went to
@NASA'S website and found this https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/study-sheds-new-insights-into-global-warming-trends … which does NOT say what the Daily Mail says it does.@HouseScience -
@kejames@HouseScience Wait...so, does that mean Trump was right and NASA's climate research is worthless? Or was the house just lying? -
@rock_golem Daily Mail and Breitbart are lying and@HouseScience bought it, it would seem. -
@kejames@rock_golem@HouseScience They didn't "buy" it, they are confirming their bias. -
@amirsabanovic@rock_golem@HouseScience Sadly you're probably right. - さらに表示
-
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。もう一度試すか、Twitterステータス(英語)をご確認ください。