157
158

r/Wikileaks has deleted my comments questioning the legitimacy of the latest leaks and banned me from their subreddit (i.sli.mg)

pizzathrowaway777 が 投稿

全 33 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]sheabutter63 27ポイント28ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sounds like ts the start of a whole lot of worthless shit to discredit WL. If they were for real they could take criticism. The entire media is being silenced/censored on Julian's disappearance, why woud reddit be any different?

[–]KitKhat 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Either that or pure incompetence. WL's communication has been awful throughout this thing. Their severe lack of transparency is suspicious but could just be a sign of /u/Spez levels of being out of touch.

[–]ventuckyspaz 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

And that's why we are all here. I hope this sub doesn't get taken over also.

[–]Gonzo_Rick 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

We've got an awesome and sharp mod team, good tools to identify bots, backups of all the goings on here thanks to u/erktheerk, and a smart community that can think critically. I hope I'm not wrong in thinking that even a concerted effort to de-legitimize us, and overrun this sub with spam to try and shut us down, would fail here.

[–]hanknut42 -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

don't get distracted by the shilklys read the comment and its a shill simply respond I disagree to get the word out =!

[–]Ixlyth 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

Since you put this out there for public review, here are my 2 cents:

You made a pointless post with what appears to be a throwaway account that violates Rule 4 of the subreddit. My understanding is that with the banning of /r/pizzagate by reddit admins, mods are becoming increasingly sensitive to users calling other users "shills."

In fact, contrary to what you claim, no where in your post did you "question the legitimacy of the latest leaks." All you did was call people names.

They were correct to ban you. Please attempt to engage others in a more civil fashion in the future.

[–]Allah_Is_A_Faggot 3ポイント4ポイント  (8子コメント)

It's lose not loose. Did you make that typo?

I've found that admins have been editing peoples' posts and adding typos to make their arguments appear less credible.

[–]Parasymphatetic 2ポイント3ポイント  (6子コメント)

I've found that admins have been editing peoples' posts and adding typos to make their arguments appear less credible.

Even though your nickname already screams troll to me, i'm gonna bite: Source? Proof?

[–]Allah_Is_A_Faggot 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

Personal experience.

I always spell check my posts before commenting, I'm obsessive compulsive about spelling. A long time ago I noticed when I came back to read my posts a few hours later they were always riddled with spelling mistakes, and it seemed to only happen in r/conspiracy when I made conspiracy-related comments. I figured maybe I was just crazy; however, with the recent revelation that u/spez has been editing user posts it dawned on me that maybe I wasn't crazy. I'm now taking screenshots of every single post I make so I can compare.

[–]Parasymphatetic 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

And there is no chance that you missed a typo?
What important stuff do you say that an admin specifically targets you out of millions of users?
If there was anything of importance, don't you think they would change more than typos?
And typos make the "argument less credible" than your nickname?
I don't buy it.

[–]Allah_Is_A_Faggot -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

I have more accounts than this one, you plebbitors are too concerned with identities. And yes there's no chance I missed these typos, maybe one or two, butt not whin every othur werd is mispeled lyke this.

Always be critical of the actual information not the messenger. Who gives a shit about anyone's online nickname? Only a plebbitor. The chans know this, and this is why we're miles ahead of plebbit when it comes to pretty much everything.

[–]Parasymphatetic 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

plebbitors

....right.

And no i am not concerned with identities.

[–]AnneFrankFanFiction 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

proof or stfu

all edits are archived by many websites. post some examples of your obvious hyperbole

or should i say ur obvius hyprble

[–]cutol 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ha! Thats funny, as Ive had a couple of posts lately come up with spelling errors that I was certain I didnt make. I think its most likely that they were errors I missed, but now we can never know for sure. Helluva paranoia to tie to a conspiracy forum. 🌚

[–]1323e7329jd93qd 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Interesting I didn't notice that til just now I am almost sure I spelled it correctly.

[–]pizzathrowaway777[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (13子コメント)

SPEZ'D

[–]Wiedewiedewiet 24ポイント25ポイント  (6子コメント)

Dude you just proved you upvote yourself with alts you absolute moron

[–]TheAmericanBulldog 4ポイント5ポイント  (4子コメント)

On the other hand, regardless of content, the other poster stated 'new accounts get their posts deleted'. If that's true, that does explain it.

I mean, if they came in here and violated our rules, would it be wrong to ban them, or delete the offending post?

Edit: there is no mention in their rules as far as account age though...so that throws that theory out.

Here are their rules

  1. Be civil. Posts & Comments We're all human beings here; act as if you were talking to the person you're replying to in person rather than anonymously on the Internet.
  2. No memes or multi-line shitposts. Posts & Comments This sub was created to collect and share information about WikiLeaks. While these posts can be humorous, they don't fit with the purpose of this particular sub. Note: Concern trolling and/or meta drama (see: breaking the circlejerk) also fall under the umbrella of what we consider to be a shitpost.
  3. Do not link personal accounts or information. Posts & Comments While some of the leaks contain personal phone numbers and email addresses, please do not link to the sender's Facebook, Twitter, or other social media accounts. Furthermore, due to Reddit's rules, do not directly post email addresses or phone numbers, or your post will be removed automatically by our AutoModerator.
  4. Do Not Be Unreasonable or Harangue Users Posts & Comments While reviewing source data, you will be required to form your own opinion. We suggest reading all original sources of material, and making an informed judgement. Users who suggest knowledge is poison or biased, or insist vetted data is fabricated may be banned from commenting at moderator discretion. You will be allowed to continue to read and enjoy the sub. Thank you.

If I had to guess, you broke rule 4, specifically

Users who suggest knowledge is poison or biased, or insist vetted data is fabricated may be banned from commenting at moderator discretion.

[–]1323e7329jd93qd 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

They made that announcement after I said I was the creator of /r/pizzagate and that I was advising people to distrust Wikileaks.

They are putting their users in danger.

[–]TheAmericanBulldog -5ポイント-4ポイント  (2子コメント)

Well that's your answer then, that specifically goes against their rules. You don't have to like it, or agree with it, but it is their sub. If it was this sub, you probably wouldn't have had any action taken, but it's not.

It's sort of like when you go into another persons house, if they have a rule of "take your shoes off", do you ignore it, or take your shoes off. If you ignore it, how long before you get kicked out of the house?

[–]1323e7329jd93qd 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

They are encouraging people investigating Pizzagate to use resources that can not be trusted.

This is incredibly dangerous if the mods are not shills.

[–]TheAmericanBulldog 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree, but you have three choices.

1.) respect the rules of their sub.

2.) Break the rules and get banned.

3.) not post in their sub.

[–]hanknut42 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

pizzzzzzzzzzza its good to see you still fighting the good fight :D

[–]baineschile 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Loose

[–]aleister -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's going to make it hard to honeypot future leaks if WL credibility gets any worse.

As a side note, it looks like you have one account upvoting another. They shadowban for that.