4921
4922

"She won the popular vote" (i.redd.it)

nimble_navigator14PA が 投稿

上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 341
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]TrappedLabRatUSA 755ポイント756ポイント  (25子コメント)

2D CHESS

[–]fuck-u-spez 183ポイント184ポイント  (2子コメント)

DNC = Flatlanders confirmed!

[–]Scarsity 60ポイント61ポイント  (7子コメント)

Beaten at chess?

Can we play checkers instead?

[–]dreddit_isrecruitingMN 31ポイント32ポイント  (3子コメント)

Maybe elections aren't your game

I know! Let's have a crying contest!

[–]DongeRed 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

"Everyone's been playing checkers, but I've been playing chess for years."

コメントをもっと表示する (2 返事)

    [–]95wave 46ポイント47ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Its the most complex things hillfire missles can understand

    [–]palmsiberia 91ポイント92ポイント  (0子コメント)

    So primitive.

    [–]mrr1 23ポイント24ポイント  (4子コメント)

    The white pieces gets first move. CHESS IS RACIST!!!

    [–]The_PunniestNY 17ポイント18ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Fucking white privilege.

    [–]jetboyterpNY 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I guess that's what they mean when they demand "check your white privilege!".

    コメントをもっと表示する (1 返事)

      [–]trumpisgonnawin 18ポイント19ポイント  (1子コメント)

      they have 2 Ds now?

      [–]SamroganCAN 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Basic 2D bitch

      [–]ZeNinja864CA 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

      LOW ENERGY

      コメントをもっと表示する (3 返事)

        [–]polysyllabist2 497ポイント498ポイント  (67子コメント)

        And if you lost the popular vote, you could parse the totals and push the narrative that you won with younger voters, ie the future generation. And if you lost with them you could show that you won with the college educated demographic, the smartest and most qualified electorate. And if you lost with them you could say you won the popular vote among economists, and whose vote matters more when the economy and jobs are so important now? And if you lost there, you could say you won in states with the highest economical growth, suggesting that those who understand what it takes to "make america great again" believe you best understand it. And... and...

        It's all goal post moving. It means little.

        [–]KrailqegUSA 53ポイント54ポイント  (1子コメント)

        This is exactly what happened with Brexit.

        [–]mainfingertopwiseUSMC 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Yeah, that's what immediately came to mind for me, too. And for the first few days after they voted, the flat out hatred towards anyone who voted to leave is also pretty familiar.

        [–]120811049008CAN 136ポイント137ポイント  (33子コメント)

        Very perceptive reply. You are right, this is exactly what they would do. When in doubt, double-down and value certain citizens over others!

        [–]SunshineBlind 20ポイント21ポイント  (1子コメント)

        They already do that.

        [–]umilmi81MI 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Identity politics. It's the beating heart of Marxism. All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

        [–]wilbertthewalrus 9ポイント10ポイント  (27子コメント)

        But if the goal is for everyone's vote to be weighted the same, wouldn't the popular vote be the most logical choice? Obviously that wouldn't affect this election, but in the future?

        [–]kiraxa1NC 46ポイント47ポイント  (8子コメント)

        Every vote being weighted the same means say goodbye to 80% of the landmass of the country. Look at how disdainful people in NYC and California are of all the states that are not NYC and California. And then realize they would decide every election from now on. We are NOT a democracy. Direct democracies lead to tyranny of the majority and are terrible.

        [–]MAGA-MANOH 21ポイント22ポイント  (7子コメント)

        The US is a republic with democratically elected officials

        [–]kiraxa1NC 11ポイント12ポイント  (6子コメント)

        To be specific, the US is a Constitutional Republic, with SOME democratically elected officials. The president is NOT one of those.

        [–]ktwaco 10ポイント11ポイント  (5子コメント)

        Treat each state like it's an individual country, they already have their own government. The federal government's role is to facilitate safe and easy trade between the states and to defend the borders. Look at the EU, you would never say that Germany and France are the same country or deserve unequal representation in the EU, but they are part of the same trade organization. This may not be a completely accurate comparison, but I think that it is an important idea to translate how to understand the idea of state representation. The states agreed to be part of the union, but are strong armed into not leaving and have constitutional right to leave.

        [–]buttfacebonerbuddy 8ポイント9ポイント  (4子コメント)

        Look at the EU, you would never say that Germany and France are the same country or deserve unequal representation in the EU,

        • Laws made in Brussels effect France and Germany the same

        • The EU is not democratically elected

        • France and German don't control their own borders or immigration policy

        mfw ppl still think that France and Germany are their own country

        [–]bydy2UK 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

        I live in Germany, border controls aren't illegal, but only Bavaria does it (and occasional border controls to the Netherlands and Poland).

        Germany is still pretty much it's own country (other than fishing/borders/ECB influence), having better standards of living than most European countries, as Germany likes to shit on the EU regulations they make other countries abide to.

        Germany controls it's own immigration policy, the government is willingly taking in refugees (and are dumping them on towns, telling German cities they have to accomodate the refugees AND pay for them)

        コメントをもっと表示する (3 返事)

          [–]120811049008CAN 9ポイント10ポイント  (13子コメント)

          I see merits to the electoral college and the popular vote models. Neither is perfect, but neither is horrible. Besides, it is pointless to discuss models when the issue of voter fraud can kill both systems. I still cannot believe Americans can vote without ID, and I cannot believe the lack of security at voting stations.

          But all of this kind of misses the point, u/polysyllabist2 is saying that it doesn't matter what the rules are, the globalists will still complain instead of admitting defeat. All citizens should accept the leader, and wait until the next election.

          [–]CantContheDonMAGA 12ポイント13ポイント  (9子コメント)

          Without ID? That's nothing.

          In Cali they sign illegals up to vote when they give them driver's licenses. They openly court it. They don't care.

          [–]120811049008CAN 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

          That just blows my mind.

          In Canada you register online or by mail. Either way you need to provide valid ID.

          Then, they day of the election, you go to your voting station. You present your ID, and then some very old person (likely a volunteer) searches through an entire book of names for people registered to vote at that station. They find your name, take a ruler, and cross it out with pen. Then you get your paper ballot and you can vote.

          Try to vote at another station? Sorry, go to your registered one, you aren't on the list.

          [–]omgfmlihatemylifeWA 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

          Voter ID laws are racist against people without IDs though!

          Edit: /s

          [–]HATA111CAN 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

          Exactly. Our system isn't perfect, but realizing the US one is not even as good really boggles the mind.

          コメントをもっと表示する (5 返事)

            [–]AlzeronNE 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

            While the Electoral College could use some work (more in making the "Winner Takes All States" go to the "Maine Way" that Nebraska and Maine use), it's still infinitely better than popular vote. Remember the United States is just that. A federation of STATES. The whole point of the Electoral College is States' rights, so that smaller states like Nebraska or Kansas, etc, have at least some sort of say rather than states like California, New York, and Texas overpowering them completely.

            To put it in larger terms. If the world did popular vote, China and India would force their desires on everyone else.

            [–]polysyllabist2 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

            Such an argument could be made. But retroactive, as many are claiming, even from a "mandate" standpoint is dicey.

            [–]CantContheDonMAGA 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

            So California can keep letting the entirety of Mexico in and signing them up to vote?

            NO THANKS

            コメントをもっと表示する (2 返事)

              [–]cancutgunswithmind 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

              Sometimes it's not even citizens!

              [–]Z0diUSA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

              ...That's literally what we're doing with the Electoral College.

              コメントをもっと表示する (1 返事)

                [–]NeonAardvark 31ポイント32ポイント  (0子コメント)

                And if you lost the popular vote, you could parse the totals and push the narrative that you won with younger voters, ie the future generation.

                That was the post-Brexit vote narrative, along with the concept of "voting regret" - the media would interview random people who apparently regretting voting for Leave (but never vice versa) even though polls afterwards showed most people were happy with the decision and did not want a "second referendum".

                I'm guessing you would have seen something similar to this also.

                [–]ColSandersForPrez 25ポイント26ポイント  (1子コメント)

                Also, the electoral college exists because states exist. Yes, those pesky states that keep the federal government from just doing whatever it wants. Those same states would never have agreed to form a union if they were simply going to always be outvoted every time by more highly populated states. You can't tell Minnesota that California, New York and Texas are going to be deciding all of their laws and not expect Minnesota to scream, "taxation without representation!" The popular vote is of interest only to big government, globalist types, that want to easily control the country. Sorry, but, our ancestors were not idiots.

                [–]NationalConservativeNOR 15ポイント16ポイント  (12子コメント)

                To even boast about winning the young votes which has the least amount of life experience, knows the least amount about politics and which have a large percentage not even working is quite laughable at best.

                [–]RonDeGrasseDawtchinsMAGA 14ポイント15ポイント  (11子コメント)

                From what I've seen on Facebook, a lot of young people voted for Hillary just because the celebrities they follow were Tweeting about her all the time. Either that, or they bought into the whole SJW "Trump is literally Hitler" narrative.

                They seem to know very little about the actual politics.

                [–]NexVeho 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

                I know, my Generation is fraked man. I'm at the tail end of the young group but I look around at work and people are still taking time off to adjust to Trump having won. It's the biggest joke in the history of the United States. Frelling time off of work to adjust to the outcome of a presidential race! http://i.imgur.com/MMaciGr.gif

                Edit: just noticed the edit button is called spez. I lold

                [–]TellsyouajokeME 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

                It's stupid as shit. I was watching the election in a college dorm room with friends, and a Clinton supporter asked what I would do if she won. I said I'd probably swear but then carry on with my life, knowing America voted for what it wanted. Then the next day I hear from friends at other schools that they didn't have to take MIDTERMS, if the results distressed them that much. I'm scared for how thin skinned and entitled my generation has become

                コメントをもっと表示する (1 返事)

                  [–]NationalConservativeNOR 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

                  Exactly.

                  コメントをもっと表示する (7 返事)

                    [–]Duderino732USA 20ポイント21ポイント  (4子コメント)

                    Haha goalpost moving at the highest level. Only thing SJWs know how to do.

                    [–]Cybiu5CHE 9ポイント10ポイント  (3子コメント)

                    Or salty, cucked losers.

                    Source: visited r/EnoughTrumpSpam

                    [–]buttfacebonerbuddy 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

                    lmao at how cucked that sub is.

                    I haven't even looked at it yet, but it's begging in the first word.

                    "Enough, please!"

                    LOW Energy

                    コメントをもっと表示する (2 返事)

                      [–]coralsnake 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

                      Shall we change the results for the World Series?

                      [–]FatalTypingAccident 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

                      All they're really saying is that Hillary won California and New York.

                      [–]Cross_of_CoronadoDEU 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

                      I like this and will use this.

                      [–]USA_akbarUSA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                      Great reply.

                      Never forget, too, that Trump WON the popular vote by millions of legal votes.

                      [–]Scroon 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                      It's all goal post moving.

                      Sounds like many a conversation I've had with "liberal" types.

                      コメントをもっと表示する (4 返事)

                        [–]ChrisOfAllTrades 150ポイント151ポイント  (26子コメント)

                        Chess is racist because white goes first, and sexist because the King is the most valuable piece.

                        [–]Top_TrumpPOW 94ポイント95ポイント  (8子コメント)

                        But the queen can move anywhere and gets around all over the board!

                        Dirty slut.

                        [–]ChrisOfAllTrades 38ポイント39ポイント  (7子コメント)

                        Oh so now you're shaming a sex-positive womyn just because she has some power?

                        [–]my__wank__account 21ポイント22ポイント  (1子コメント)

                        Sluts are sex-positive? I can think of another something-positive they'd be.

                        [–]TriggerWarning595TX 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        They can positively be on mah dick

                        [–]krackle_wins 10ポイント11ポイント  (4子コメント)

                        And you just assumed the queen's gender... Haven't we learned our lesson yet?

                        [–]ChrisOfAllTrades 9ポイント10ポイント  (3子コメント)

                        Actually I asked her what her preferred pronouns were before the game as well as reaffirming consent to touch her before every move, shitlord

                        [–]pure_energy18GA 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        But did you ask for permission to ask for her consent? You raped her with your words.

                        [–]cancutgunswithmind 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

                        I talked to zer and zhe retroactively withdrew consent. That was assault, you pig.

                        [–]irish_lad_ediIRL 15ポイント16ポイント  (5子コメント)

                        The Bishops triggers A&A types. The Knight triggers animal rights groups. It's a mess.

                        [–]WolfessStudiosAZ 18ポイント19ポイント  (2子コメント)

                        Who does the rook trigger? Open border supporters?

                        [–]Adam_MarxCAN 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

                        What is a &a?

                        [–]irish_lad_ediIRL 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        Atheists and agnostics (the shrill ones, not your average ones).

                        [–]eamonn33 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

                        and ablist because some pieces can only move one square.

                        However, it is trans*-tolerant as a pawn can become a queen.

                        [–]ChrisOfAllTrades 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

                        But that pawn can never be a king, symbolic of the struggle of the proletariat against the bourgeoisie, the other pieces need to organize and rise against the 6.25%!

                        [–]ShinyMAGAkarp 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        But they can become either a Bishop/Knight (He), Queen (She), or Rook (Zhe) - which may lead you to believe that Chess is up with the times - but it's still forcing gender norms like only males being Bishops or females being Queens.

                        [–]idontthinksoredditISR 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

                        http://gatherer.wizards.com/Handlers/Image.ashx?multiverseid=247&type=card

                        [–]Gurren_LagganOR 3ポイント4ポイント  (5子コメント)

                        It was my understanding that the dark pieces got to move first? I always have played by the "smoke before fire" mentality

                        [–]ChrisOfAllTrades 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

                        You've been playing Harlem Chess?

                        [–]Adam_MarxCAN 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        Wait, that's a thing?

                        [–]Brother_YT 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

                        Fire always comes before smoke though.

                        [–]BruteDoc1NAVY 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        Pft, show me one instance right now where fire comes before smoke. Right now. Go. Now. Now. Go.

                        Exactly, thought so. I can show you an example of the opposite: smoke machines. Smoke before the fire. Ha! Gotcha smelly liberal.

                        [–]Gurren_LagganOR 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        No it doesn't. If you've ever had to make a fire using kindling or indirect heat (like rubbing sticks or magnifying glass) it starts to smoke before it catches fire. Things can smoke without catching fire like wax or plastic

                        [–]c0brac0mmand3r 202ポイント203ポイント  (47子コメント)

                        Good job. This is a great way for me to explain our election process to others who don't quite get the full complexities of /why/ we have the type of democracy we have.

                        [–]Deus_GMAGA 77ポイント78ポイント  (40子コメント)

                        Would these people you are referring to even understand what is happening on the board though? Might want to make a snake and ladders version for them.

                        [–]AWhiterHotterFireDC 46ポイント47ポイント  (8子コメント)

                        The answer is no. Chess is ablist or some shit

                        [–]elopez4024 54ポイント55ポイント  (7子コメント)

                        Chess is racist because white moves first = I've actually heard this from SJW's.

                        [–]sloman8000 26ポイント27ポイント  (3子コメント)

                        Remember: everything is racist, everything is sexist, everything is problematic and you have to point it all out.

                        [–]Adam_MarxCAN 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        Especially sjws

                        [–]theinvincibleweaselUK 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXSEDUvib8U

                        [–]_the_shape_ 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        What I'd like to know is that I fully understand that you must "check your privilege" (especially if you are a White cis-male aka the embodiment of "pure evil"), but how is it done? Are you expected to quit your job out of the blue and take a stab (no pun) at selling rocks on street corners? Do you have to wear an "I'm sorry" t-shirt every Friday to work? Do you offer blowjobs to minorities? Do you give $5 to every Black person you come across?

                        What specifically do these assholes kind, tolerant, open-minded, non-violent, gentle folk expect from those compelled to check their privilege? Are you expected to check your privilege indefinitely (as in, the entire duration of your life) or is their a certain point where equity is reached and you no longer have to check your privilege? If someone has to check their privilege with no end in sight, is suicide preferable?

                        [–]JediMasterMurph 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

                        I thought black always moves first in chess.

                        [–]desync_UK 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        What, are you implying that blacks are aggressive and that whites are victims? Shitlord.

                        [–]youssarianKS 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        Still racist

                        But you won't hear SJWs complaining about that!

                        [–]atgjohn 10ポイント11ポイント  (27子コメント)

                        or use LGBTQ symbols

                        [–]atgjohn 13ポイント14ポイント  (26子コメント)

                        wait on that I'm confused...is it LGBTQ or LGBTQHDMCR now??? someone please explain!

                        [–]urbjhawk21IA 9ポイント10ポイント  (23子コメント)

                        They actually use LGTBQIA now. They throw in a new letter every year or so.

                        [–]MAGAMAN_EXE 3ポイント4ポイント  (20子コメント)

                        I've actually heard of LGBTQIAPK. No joke. The pk stands for "pansexual" and "kinkiness".

                        [–]nobrakesfortendiesCA 13ポイント14ポイント  (1子コメント)

                        So I'm protected as a faggot now because I have a pair of handcuffs for the bedroom? Dope

                        [–]GuyWithNoName67CAN 9ポイント10ポイント  (9子コメント)

                        The fuck is pansexual? People fuck frying pans now?

                        [–]jmf102CAN 15ポイント16ポイント  (6子コメント)

                        "pan" is the Greek word for "all". Refers to people who are attracted to all genders, so in reality is no different than bisexual, except these loonies think there's more than two genders.

                        [–]cgmortonMAGA 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

                        A real pansexual is aroused not just by both genders, but by all sorts of other things.

                        Of course this includes androgynes and furrikin and etc but it can also just be, like, a suggestive tree.

                        [–]Fzohh 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        I was going with the "sexually attracted to bread", but this makes more sense

                        [–]GuyWithNoName67CAN 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        You'd think I'd have gotten that, being Greek. Damn these people are strange, making up more words to mean the same thing.

                        [–]MAGAMAN_EXE 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

                        It means you sexually identify as cookware.

                        コメントをもっと表示する (1 返事)

                          [–]timedragon1USA 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

                          kinkiness

                          TIL We're all apart of the LGBT Community.

                          [–]Cybiu5CHE 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

                          What about the RGB community

                          [–]an_angry_daveUSA 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

                          Pansexual gargle blaster.

                          [–]coralsnake 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

                          LGBTQWMOUSE

                          [–]SPAKMITTEN 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                          if everyone is a minority group then NO ONE IS

                          コメントをもっと表示する (1 返事)

                            [–]DeathMetalDeath 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

                            how is there no X for Xe or Xer?

                            コメントをもっと表示する (2 返事)

                              [–]PronounciationIsKeyCA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              This could totally be done with donald taking ladders but hillary moving more through just rolling and its unfair that she rolled a snake

                              [–]DAR1776USA 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

                              candyland? It's easier. Haha just edited and noticed the "spez"

                              [–]ozric101 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              We have a Constitutional Republic.

                              [–]Mint-berry-crunch33TX 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

                              Link them to some PregarU videos on the electoral college. There are a few and they are all around 5 minutes. The videos are very easy to follow, so it should help with these challenged people lol.

                              [–]WolfessStudiosAZ 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              Yes as a chess enthusiast it rings through very clearly.

                              [–]We_Are_Legion 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                              Great persuasion.

                              コメントをもっと表示する (1 返事)

                                [–]CHAD_J_THUNDERCOCK 56ポイント57ポイント  (4子コメント)

                                I made the original and this new one is much cleaner. Great job. Hope it keeps spreading!

                                [–]fuckprogress 57ポイント58ポイント  (7子コメント)

                                Hillary won the total vote count by 2 million. 45 times this many people didn't even vote. There is no way to know how they would have responded if they knew that their vote counted regardless of if they were in a safe democrat or safe republican electorate.

                                So not only do the campaign teams have different strategies if the goal is different, but the voters do as well.

                                Their argument is dumb. They don't even know why they say it, they were just told to say "mention the popular vote" by Michael Moore.

                                That is a great analogue you used by the way.

                                [–]Keiichi81 30ポイント31ポイント  (2子コメント)

                                Exactly. How many Republican voters didn't even bother going to the polls in heavily blue states like California because they knew their vote was worthless and didn't matter? Switching to a "popular vote" argument after the fact is not only unfair to the candidates who would have campaigned differently if that was the goal, but also unfair to the voters. If they want to switch to a popular vote system, they'd need to essentially have a whole new election, campaign and all.

                                [–]Jizzlobber58NJ 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                The only reason I usually voted in NJ was to troll my brother and cancel out his votes. Having my voice count in the national election would change that significantly.

                                [–]fucks_with_toastersARMY 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                I live in the Bay Area and every Republican I know went out to vote. It's a civic duty, people tend to take that seriously even if it ends up being an empty gesture because of where we live.

                                [–]CBruceIL 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                There's still more people who voted against Hillary than voted for her.

                                コメントをもっと表示する (3 返事)

                                  [–]AidsFrodo 31ポイント32ポイント  (3子コメント)

                                  But how can they expect to beat him in 66D intergalactic kalaha if they can't even beat him in 2D chess?

                                  [–]Jynmagic 28ポイント29ポイント  (1子コメント)

                                  You're overestimating liberals. Like they could understand simple 2d chess

                                  [–]TheAC997USCG 15ポイント16ポイント  (5子コメント)

                                  Years ago, my girlfriend at the time was butthurt that I kept beating her in chess, so one time she actually started winning and got 4 queens just to prove a point. It ended up being an accidental stalemate because I couldn't make any legal moves.

                                  I'm sure that's relevant somehow.

                                  [–]basedlordpepe 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                  Yes. It's forgetting the game you're playing and trying to grandstand - it ends in your detriment. Don't try and take North Carolina when you're at risk in Michigan, for example.

                                  コメントをもっと表示する (4 返事)

                                    [–]EmperorOfBritainUK 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

                                    [deleted]

                                    Disclaimer: This user cannot verify whether or not this comment has been edited by /u/spez

                                    [–]Crooked_Shillary 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                    She did. California is an embarrassment to the country.

                                    [–]chckiFL 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                    Except her 'Pieces' are going to be captured by ICE & deported!

                                    [–]twistynip 25ポイント26ポイント  (2子コメント)

                                    Don't believe that she really got more votes..

                                    Been saying this for a while now. If they ever REALLY audited the votes in this election, that cheating hag would lose millions of votes (illegals, ppl voting multiple times, other assorted schemes).

                                    No rational thinking human could possibly believe that an arch criminal who held 3 rallies per week and garnered between 300-1500 ppl @each, could possibly get more votes than a Man who held 12 rallies/week which all attracted an average of 8000 ppl each with some getting as much as 30,000..

                                    Logic defied.

                                    [–]SnazzyD 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                    3 rallies per week? I don't think she had more than that after the 3rd debate right up until the election.

                                    コメントをもっと表示する (1 返事)

                                      [–]BronzedWarGod 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Andy Roddick was ROBBED of a Wimbledon title in 2009. He won 39 game points to Nadal's 38. Yet Nadal was "delcared" the winner.

                                      [–]DragofireheartNH 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Perfect.

                                      [–]cosko 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      This is genius.

                                      [–]DSice16TX 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

                                      What I think is funny is that Hillary has been silent. Haven't heard a peep from her in over two weeks, yet these losers are still fighting to take the presidency away from Trump because they can't imagine not getting their way.

                                      Every article I see suggesting recounts and the college not accepting Trump just make me smile. Victory has the sweetest flavor.

                                      [–]JBJesusME 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

                                      Im impressed. Shes taken it like a champ. Its good that she isnt acting like her supporters, I'll give her that.

                                      *Disclaimer: not like a champ. She lost!!!

                                      [–]TrumpRules 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Guy you're being too harsh. Maybe liberals just want participation ribbons.

                                      https://i.sli.mg/3fR4dr.jpg

                                      https://i.sli.mg/QNUUTi.jpg

                                      https://i.sli.mg/B3pNHg.jpg

                                      https://i.sli.mg/K99EOp.jpg

                                      [–]InPepeWeTrust 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      The United States of America is a Republic consisting of 50 states. President-Elect Trump won the popular vote in 30 of the 50 states. Whether a couple million more illegals and dead people cast votes in California has not bearings on the overall outcome of the election.

                                      Trump won. Fuck off, losers.

                                      [–]kreegz2USMC 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

                                      Yesterday's Cowboys-Redskins game the Cowboys won 31-26. However, the Redskins got more total yards, 505 to Dallas' 353. Don't you think that the Redskins' deserved the win guys? It's only fair.

                                      [–]TheJuicyJuan 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

                                      Maxwell Kek the III

                                      [–]Green_Go5NAVY 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

                                      Checkers and Chess folks, Checkers and Chess.

                                      [–]vic370 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Love this.

                                      [–]Jonnoofcarltonnorth 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

                                      The same situation can occur in a parliamentary system. A party/coalition can get more total votes than its opponents, yet lose in the number of seats won in parliament (winner chooses the Prime Minister). And it has happened.

                                      In the 2015 UK elections, the Scottish Nationals got less votes than the Liberal Democrats (4.7% vs. 8%). Yet the SNP won 56 seats while the LD's only got 8 seats.

                                      In Canada, the winning Liberals got 7.5% more total votes than the Conservatives, but won nearly twice the number of seats.

                                      [–]In-1985UK 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      UKIP (Farage's party) got 12.6% of the vote and ended up with one seat.

                                      [–]elopez4024 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Chess is racist because white moves first ----> I've actually heard this from SJW's.

                                      [–]Trolly-bus 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Shameless plus at /r/chess! Come watch and discuss the world championship with us. We're also trending! (I see you're using Lichess.org)

                                      [–]hailgengarkhanZAF 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      I don't recognize this dimension.

                                      I do, however, recognize winning, as my President Donald Trump has continued to do so from Day 1.

                                      [–]MKEBuckWI 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      It doesnt surprise me at all that the left doesnt understand how the country works

                                      [–]Barshki 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

                                      I wonder what argument they would be using if we got the popular vote too.

                                      [–]Prsop2000 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

                                      I say it's a good point. They're already declaring that she "won" the popular vote, when the fact that a popular vote contest would have been run differently.

                                      So why not make up a scenario where Trump won both and debate that. If they can invent a reality, then we can play too! ;)

                                      [–]GSD_SteVB 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Dammit I was literally moving the pieces on the board to make this argument before I saw this.

                                      [–]kilkylEd 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Sounds like something donald would of said it he won the popular vote and lost the election.

                                      [–]FreedomNorseNOR 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

                                      Go Magnus Carlsen!

                                      [–]SupremeAuthority 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Pls remake this in 3d.

                                      [–]ashishduhh1 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Maybe they'll let her live in the Popular House at 1600 Popular Avenue.

                                      [–]EthlinME 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Actually those 2 Rooks are right, she just used illegals and dead people to turn them black (No that was not meant as a race term).

                                      [–]my__wank__account 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Hillary conceded defeat the night of her loss. Reading the popular vote whining just makes me wonder how long it will take for the faggot killary supporters to take the MAGA dildo from their ass.

                                      [–]maga_nrg_man 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Hillary Clinton is the new Al Gore.

                                      Bitching about the popular vote for years after the defeat.

                                      Hopefully not too many years left with her ailing health.

                                      [–]iammisterpicklesUK 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      This is quite literally checkmate on that argument.

                                      [–]Coat_Taker 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      30K CHESS

                                      [–]curiously_Altoids 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Good meme... good good meme

                                      [–]Hyperion_DarkUSA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      She didn't even win the popular vote if you take out all the fraudulent ones.

                                      Remove California and she gets destroyed.

                                      [–]APredictableUsername 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      She got a plurality of the vote not a majority, small but very important difference

                                      [–]JuiceBustersSCT 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      It's cute how suddenly the popular vote is being talked about by Hillary people "as if" it were the real secret vote and now there is a controversy or real legitimacy issue.

                                      IF they want it to be by popular vote that's fine. Trump movement would have focused on just California and NY and maybe won by a bigger margin than ever before.

                                      Until then, its not a popular vote nationwide. So nobody was campaigning that way. Trump faked them out early on by saying he was going to go big in California and New York... Hillary Team panicked and dumped massive time and resources on those in the beginning giving Trump a big head start on 'swing states'.

                                      Trump 1000 Hillary Zero

                                      [–]EuroTrash69CA 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      I'm not convinced. Can someone please ask Jill to recount the remaining pieces?

                                      [–]medi3val5 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Mind = Blown

                                      [–]NotAllShitposters 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Donald Trump won the tax base. Isn't that more important? ;)

                                      [–]Xl3nt 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

                                      You know what else was a rule for centuries that is now outdated? The hate of gays, anti abortion laws and discrimination against other religions. Oh wait you stand for that😂 racists

                                      [–]totodee 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Trump campaigned to win the Electoral College. So did Hillary for that matter. If the direct popular vote had decided the election, then Donald would have run a different kind of campaign and may have well won the popular vote. Of course we'll never know, but one thing is clear. Trump played by the rules and won the Electoral College and he will be our next president.

                                      [–]blkrctnglCAN 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

                                      Great post, but is that a possible chess arrangement? How'd the king get there without getting into check?

                                      [–]televaughn 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Same pussies who cried wolf in 2012 with romney are here again.

                                      [–]KiirosagiUSA 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Trump won 84% of all US counties, THAT is the reason the electoral college exists, it's comparable to Inda, China and Nigeria deciding elections in a hypothetical United States of the Planet.

                                      [–]KaizenGamer 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      It's like at the end of a football game the losing team wants to instead decide the winner by who had the most total yards offense instead of points.

                                      [–]lonelyyouknow 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

                                      I do not begrudge Trump the election one bit, and fully agree he won fair and square and should be the next president. But I still support eliminating the electoral college, and even Trump himself has expressed support for eliminating it, despite the fact he just won the election based on it. I think that actually shows very strong moral integrity, that he wasn't fully moved on that issue despite the fact that he benefited from it. I was against the electoral college before this election and would have been against it if Clinton won without the popular vote as well. Don't kid yourselves, everyone on /r/the_donald would be absolutely livid if Clinton won without the popular vote. This has nothing to do with anyone 'unfairly' winning. It has to do with the fact that the popular vote is a more fair and democratic system. And in case I get downvoted, keep in mind Trump himself holds this view.

                                      [–]nimble_navigator14PA[S] 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

                                      He expressed support in 2012 when he wasn't a politician.

                                      Now that he understands why it exists (to put more states into play) he doesn't want to change it.

                                      [–]mrr1 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      If the election was by popular vote, Trump would've campaigned differently. (i.e. fewer rallies in states like New Hampshire, Iowa, Ohio, and Florida, and more rallies in states like California and New York).

                                      [–]mrdarkshineNC 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      If only black could've gotten in Bh5 double check

                                      [–]Tank2799 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      She's not really trying to backpedal on the rules

                                      [–]RugsMAGATX 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

                                      I am the only one that checks these to verify if they are checkmates?

                                      [–]readonlypdfVA 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      No.

                                      Are you watching the Championship right now?

                                      [–]Freeman1984 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      They can't even handle regular 2d chess.

                                      [–]lovelybac0nNOR 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      This! LMAO

                                      [–]brazil84 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      There was a post on /r/HillaryClinton a few days ago talking about how Hillary was "surging" in the popular vote totals.

                                      [–]EthlinME 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Sounds about right.

                                      [–]Gashate 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

                                      Keks to e-4

                                      コメントをもっと表示する (81 返事)