This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]awkwardtheturtleTurtle Justice Warrior[M] [スコア非表示] stickied comment (17子コメント)

Hi folks!

This is your reminder to abide by our sidebar rules:


Rule 3: Top level comments must contain a genuine and unbiased attempt at an answer.

Top-level questions are allowed in this thread, but don't just put a keyword and question mark; ask a full, direct, and unbiased question like you would ask another human being.


Rule 4: Follow reddiquette in both behavior and voting.

Be polite in your exchanges, vote based on contribution to the thread and not on opinions, etc. OOTL is supposed to be a helpful resource for confused redditors.


Shitposting will be treated harshly. If your top-level comment is just "fuck /u/spez" or something, we will ban you. We will not tolerate trolling, harassment or incivility in this thread.

If rule 3 and 4 violations become too much, we will be forced to lock the thread, so please behave for crying out loud.

Thanks!


Aaaand it's done. Thread is locked. Shitposting level became greater than 9,000.

[–]Rosseforp-Woem 1710ポイント1711ポイント  (284子コメント)

To explain what's happened to anyone not wanting to dig through the threads, Spez, the CEO of Reddit, has admitted to editing some comments on The_Donald. Specifically, he changed mentions of his name in insults to the usernames of The_Donald moderators. According to his comment, he did this for about an hour before stopping. His comment states that he was very stressed over dealing with the removal of r/pizzagate and being called a pedophile for it, resulting in him going out of line and making edits to comments. He also says that he won't do it again, and that the community management team is angry with him.

The Reddit admins have had a strained relationship with the moderators and users of The_Donald, for multiple reasons. For a lot of users there, this validates some beliefs about the admin's treatment towards them, specifically that they make an active effort to censor their content. Other users on the site feel like this sets a dangerous precedent, as it demonstrates the admins can and have edited comments without disclosure. Further users feel like, while Spez made a mistake, he was unfairly treated and harassed by TheDonald and his response was an understandable outburst.

Now, people around the site are wondering what the repercussions of this will be. Some question if Spez will be removed from his position over this. Some wonder if the admins will come forward and admit they've edited comments in the past. Others wonder if a significant population from The_Donald will migrate to Voat, a Reddit alternative.

[–]Rohaq 741ポイント742ポイント  (210子コメント)

What the hell is pizzagate?

[–]Grhmhome 778ポイント779ポイント  (63子コメント)

Pizzagate was a subreddit about an alleged pedophile ring involving members of the US government.

[–]Pollish-N-insert 663ポイント664ポイント  (59子コメント)

More specifically, it stems from the emails from Podesta, which included some odd code words, unless the man loves pizza.

[–]MarzMonkey 419ポイント420ポイント  (32子コメント)

Especially pizza related maps

[–]Sinjection 149ポイント150ポイント  (29子コメント)

I never understood what that actually meant. Is "map" code for something, because I cannot for the life of me figure out what it would mean in the context if it weren't code. And if it were, I'm not really sure what it could mean. It just sounds like gibberish to me.

[–]HapJak 332ポイント333ポイント  (7子コメント)

From the first day of reading through those Podesta emails I was wondering "Who the fuck talks like this?" They use a lot of strange language.

Like wtf Hillary Clinton asked for a hotdog without the buns, Obama spent $50,000 of taxpayer money on pizza. It is all very strange.

[–]BatmanIsSmartAf 101ポイント102ポイント  (0子コメント)

I ask for hotdogs without buns all the time... buns have carbs.

[–]Yanmega 33ポイント34ポイント  (5子コメント)

I thought the hotdog no bun thing was a joke from the surrealist side of twitter

[–]weblowinherseys 28ポイント29ポイント  (2子コメント)

Nah, just women candidate things (gotta cut down on those carbs!)

[–]docmedic 20ポイント21ポイント  (1子コメント)

I actually convinced my mom who was trying zumba and dieting (yay healthier lifestyle!) to cut buns from costco hotdogs, so urm, this hits a bit close to home.

[–]Zykium 148ポイント149ポイント  (4子コメント)

They're definitely using pizza as a codeword for something. Pizza related map hankerchief makes no sense.

[–]RifleGun 26ポイント27ポイント  (0子コメント)

Only if they are on handkerchiefs, which he will mail to you.

[–]Rosseforp-Woem 865ポイント866ポイント  (62子コメント)

R/pizzagate was a subreddit that spawned off The_Donald after theories circulated there claiming that some of the leaked emails sent by Podesta (a leading Democratic campaign member, previously the chairman of Hillary Clinton's campaign) revealed an elaborate pedophile ring among the Democratic party. These theories centered around the email's alleged use of pedophile code, mainly using the term "cheese pizza" to refer to child pornography. It also accused a pizza restaurant of being a meeting place for these pedophiles.

The merit of these theories vary widely depending on who you talk to, so I won't go too deeply into this for fear of becoming biased. The subreddit was banned a few days ago, as there was a lot of witchhunting, harassment, and doxxing going on even after the Reddit admins issued a warning to them.

[–]chain_letter 61ポイント62ポイント  (0子コメント)

using the term "cheese pizza" to refer to child pornography

Reminds me of on 4chan, there were threads requesting CP. Because that's against the rules, they'd get a thread full of anything that matched the CP acronym, cheese pizza, captain picard, captain planet, dumb shit like that.

[–]UsernameGoesHere122 504ポイント505ポイント  (28子コメント)

That's probably the most neutral summary of Pizzagate I've seen. Bravo.

To make a small addition, it wasn't The_Donald alone that theorized about PizzaGate. 8chan and 4chan helped as well as well as as well as Twitter and Voat to a lesser degree.

If you care to look at the source, you can check archived versions of /r/pizzagate or check out https://voat.co/v/pizzagate (where they all left after /r/pizzagate was banned). /r/conspiracy still has some threads related to it as well.

[–]b4hubcity 384ポイント385ポイント  (18子コメント)

as well as well as as well as

:|

[–]UsernameGoesHere122 229ポイント230ポイント  (14子コメント)

Lol. I don't know how I didn't catch that. It's funny so I'll leave it.

[–]_Love_DVA 347ポイント348ポイント  (9子コメント)

I'll be honest. I somehow only read "as well as" once.

[–]in_some_knee_yak 160ポイント161ポイント  (7子コメント)

Me too. Weird.

I blame spez.

[–]Zooduid 20ポイント21ポイント  (0子コメント)

the brain is dope as shit thats how

[–]IDontKnowHowToPM 22ポイント23ポイント  (1子コメント)

No, you're supposed to blame spez, that's how this works now!

[–]dalebonehart 36ポイント37ポイント  (0子コメント)

What the fuck. How did I not even notice that? I think my brain just froze and skipped it.

[–]Undercover_Mop 46ポイント47ポイント  (1子コメント)

Thank you making 100% unbiased posts. It's unfortunately something that's becoming very rare on this site.

[–]Gen_McMuster 217ポイント218ポイント  (31子コメント)

A wikileaked email fueled movement attempting to out pedophiles with connections to higher ups in the federal government. The sub it was being discussed on was banned for posting personal information of the parties of interest.

In my opinion their evidence was circumstantial at best and bordering on numerology-anomaly hunting at worst.

[–]Chiponyasu 271ポイント272ポイント  (15子コメント)

For one thing, it assumes a child-sex trafficking ring involving the highest levels of power in the US government advertised its child sex slaves on a ping-pong restaurant's instagram account.

[–]codeverity 48ポイント49ポイント  (0子コメント)

A lot of these conspiracy theories seem to hinge on people being incredibly evil and sly but also very dumb.

[–]fullofwind 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I just find this amazing to have all this bread trail following on nothing, but we just had a previous Speaker of the House go to jail for conspiracy to cover up his kid fucking, but these geniuses never wanted to investigate why Tom Delay was still defending Hasert.

[–]WdnSpoon 84ポイント85ポイント  (2子コメント)

I didn't see anything that ever reached your circumstantial at best benchmark. Nothing even close. Circumstantial evidence is finding that a suspect was in the victim's neighbourhood the night they were murdered. These are people linking a pizza-parlour's triangle-shaped logo as similar to a logo of a pedophile-group.

[–]Xalteox 59ポイント60ポイント  (8子コメント)

Basically a conspiracy claiming that Clinton and her friends are apparently running a paedophile ring.

[–]dauntlessmathHodor. James Hodor. 126ポイント127ポイント  (1子コメント)

He also says that he won't do it again

Oh, thank goodness. That really puts my mind to rest. /s

[–]natman2939 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Who's to say this hadnt happened before and simply not been caught?

Also how do we know other admins haven't done it?

[–]allthefoxes 2244ポイント2245ポイント  (701子コメント)

TL;DR:

Spez, likely in some amount of frustration, edited the comments of various The_Donald users. This is generally considered a bad move.

He is able to edit these comments likely because he has direct database access (Don't give your CEOs the passwords, kids) - My understanding of reddits tools means this would only really be doable by editing the database, making it extremely inefficiant and likely not a widespread thing. But, of course, things like this can be automated. I don't know what tools reddit has setup.

So, all in all, don't reddit while stressed, frustrated, and while having direct database access

[–]Immorttalis 795ポイント796ポイント  (172子コメント)

Spez just walked on a PR landmine when he went ahead and admitted having done the editing. I never trusted the adminship, but the CEO himself? Fucking hell, man.

[–]stml 605ポイント606ポイント  (135子コメント)

The worst part is that even if the admins were completely innocent, now the CEO has made all of reddit lose their trust in the admins at the same time.

He's going to step down or get fired within a week.

[–]PapaPetro 525ポイント526ポイント  (81子コメント)

The ramifications are pretty horrendous considering that an admin could potentially rewrite your posts and get you in trouble with the law.

For example, a user was recently arrested and fined on /r/unitedkingdom for a comment he made.

[–]RelynSeranoDunmer 287ポイント288ポイント  (52子コメント)

a user was recently arrested and fined on /r/unitedkingdom for a comment he made

That's not ok.
EDIT: I don't care what was said, this is a rights thing.

[–]Galil-chan 189ポイント190ポイント  (9子コメント)

[–]applejackisbestpony 137ポイント138ポイント  (9子コメント)

I never thought I'd see the day when it's safer to post in /r/Pyongyang, than it is to post in /r/unitedkingdom.

[–]2drawnonward5 98ポイント99ポイント  (8子コメント)

Holy shit, the UK is sounding scarier than America lately. Just when you think things can't get any crazier, it's Hilary vs Trump. Then Trump wins. Then the UK goes Final Form Big Brother Nanny State like they need to show their kid brother America how it's done.

[–]cdragon1983 98ポイント99ポイント  (4子コメント)

Holy shit, the UK is sounding scarier than America lately.

Americans get (justifiably) shit on for all the stupid FREEDOM memes. But nearly completely unabated free speech is one thing that the US does, in fact, implement in a much more laissez-faire/"free" manner than most of the rest of the world.

[–]anxiousgrue 24ポイント25ポイント  (0子コメント)

Honestly, it's one of the few reasons I'm proud of this country. Even if we have overpriced healthcare, a stupid voting system, gerrymandered districts, a very thin line between church and state, abortion legality roadblocks, loose gun restrictions, outdated drug laws...

...at least I know I have the freedom to bitch about it. And I value that deeply.

[–]sotech 42ポイント43ポイント  (1子コメント)

That's not ok.

Pretty much the UK in a nutshell lately.

[–]chodeboi 18ポイント19ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well they're banning more porn there now too, so make of those patsies what you will.

[–]Nexious 127ポイント128ポイント  (13子コメント)

All without leaving a trace that anything had ever been edited, too (no asterisk or last edited date). Could work the other way now as well, with Spez's admission anyone who does leave an unlawful remark can just blame Reddit CEO for sneak editing it lol. Really a mess.

[–]CurryMustard 28ポイント29ポイント  (5子コメント)

anyone who does leave an unlawful remark can just blame Reddit CEO for sneak editing it

But, not really. Reddit is being constantly archived. If a post is secretly edited, it's pretty easy to prove.

[–]syspig 49ポイント50ポイント  (0子コメント)

An archive means nothing if the forgery is a new post.

[–]deepwatermako 55ポイント56ポイント  (1子コメント)

Welp.. Guess it's time to delete reddit, hit the lawyer and hire the gym

[–]OPTLawyer 25ポイント26ポイント  (0子コメント)

hit the lawyer

...heeeeeey... :(

[–]tasty_pepitas 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

Or any user could argue that their post could have been edited, and that they didn't write it.

[–]seal-team-lolis 85ポイント86ポイント  (1子コメント)

2016 KEEPS ON GIVING AND WE STILL GOT OVER A MONTH LEFT!

[–]COPCO2 74ポイント75ポイント  (37子コメント)

It seems that being CEO of Reddit isn't worth it and takes a personal toll.

[–]CapnSippy 214ポイント215ポイント  (18子コメント)

Or they just need to find an adult who can actually handle the job. Plenty of CEO's around the world with harder jobs than this are doing just fine, in comparison.

Edit: What's with this site and finding just the worst people as its CEO? How many are they going to go through until they find someone who can actually watch over a community responsibly? For fuck's sake, this website's leadership is like a deer trying to walk on ice. At some point it's gonna stumble and fall so hard that it won't be able to get back up. This was a pretty big stumble.

[–]Toparov 26ポイント27ポイント  (1子コメント)

Any responsible CEO wouldn't want it, it's a disgusting mess that explodes at even the most basic attempts to keep it viable (like banning child porn). Any competent CEO would have to start with a massive purge.

[–]mainfingertopwise 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah. While I'm sure it is a stressful job, the particular thing he cited as being the last straw - being called a pedo - should not have caused this reaction. That's a heavy duty insult, but the sheer number of /r/The_Donald people spamming with that should have actually made it less powerful, not more. What's more, the name calling didn't start today - that's been going on for months.

So I feel for the guy - ideally, he'd never have been tempted to do something so stupid, and I doubt he's actually a pedophile. But that doesn't excuse his actions at all.

[–]pigeonburger 102ポイント103ポイント  (5子コメント)

From now on, reddit comments used in court cases have a very easy counter: "The admits could have changed it; the CEO admitted that he can and has done it."

[–]renegadecanuck 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Not necessarily. It would make things more complicated, but I imagine there is auditing of who accesses the database, and there's probably some way to audit what changes are made. If there aren't, you can bet some Reddit sysadmin or developer is working on that right now.

[–]worklederp 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

And those can be edited too. You can go quite far down the rabbit hole with trusting things in technology

You could say the same about phone companies and text messages, but at least there theres usually multiple companies working together to provide the service, so its harder to get shenanigans past people... whereas you could run reddit soley on computers owned only by you

[–]Luxily 33ポイント34ポイント  (1子コメント)

This never happened when Ellen Pao was ceo

[–]vashlion 30ポイント31ポイント  (2子コメント)

This would be the second CEO in a row that clearly shouldn't be a CEO. Jesus Christ what is Reddit's board thinking.

[–]naderslovechild 104ポイント105ポイント  (10子コメント)

If Reddit is anything like other companies I've worked for, the production database password is reddit123

[–]Chatmauve 59ポイント60ポイント  (3子コメント)

Hey, come on. We have strict security measures over here. The password is reddit2016. We change it every year. You would never guess what last year's was.

[–]willhughes 28ポイント29ポイント  (1子コメント)

Let me guess, it was reddit2008, because nobody CBFed updating it for a while?

[–]Chatmauve 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

ding ding ding we have a winner!

[–]MisterTruth 130ポイント131ポイント  (14子コメント)

To add, these are shadow edits so they only show up as edited if you're looking at archives. They don't show up as a typical edit where it mentions the comment was edited. This means literally all comments on the entirety of this site have no integrity that the account that makes the comment is actually responsible for the content of that comment.

[–]uyua 78ポイント79ポイント  (1子コメント)

This is indeed the scary part. For all we know, /u/spez is the best guy around and he's completely innocent, and I'm a stupid moron with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt smells and I like to kiss my own butt.

[–]Ledmonkey96 22ポイント23ポイント  (0子コメント)

HE'S COMPROMISED, TAKE HIM DOWN!

[–]biznatch11 55ポイント56ポイント  (0子コメント)

They've always had the ability to do this so the integrity of comments was never guaranteed, this is the case on many websites including places like Facebook and Twitter. But this is the first known example of someone actually using this editing ability on reddit.

[–]adescuentechable 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

This means literally all comments on the entirety of this site have no integrity that the account that makes the comment is actually responsible for the content of that comment.

For example, remember /u/stonetear (Clinton's e-mail admin who may have made incriminating posts on reddit)?

Now anyone can just say "that wasn't me, the admins edited that comment."

[–]SilasX 165ポイント166ポイント  (37子コメント)

I'm sure their investors and Board of Directors would love to know about the lackluster controls that are supposed to prevent unauthorized parties from having this kind of unsupervised, unrestricted access to the DB.

The CEO of PayPal is prevented, via internal controls, from being able to look up arbitrarily people's transactions without a valid reason. Why doesn't Reddit have something similar?

Edit: Contrary to what the reply claims, this comment does not depend on the existence of fiduciary duties to Reddit users.

[–]BardfinnF for Victoria 81ポイント82ポイント  (26子コメント)

Why doesn't reddit have something similar?

Probably because reddit doesn't have any sort of explicit fiduciary duty to their users.

Spez has explicit and implicit fiduciary duties to the corporation and shareholders. That isn't the same as the corporation having a fiduciary duty to users.

If the site shut down tomorrow because the board decided to do so, we have exactly jack and shit recourse under the law, under the User Agreement.

All I can imagine the User Agreement would provide to the end user is an inability for reddit to escape liability for copyright infringement, which would — under US law — likely be in the amount of provable damages.

If someone can prove in court that the edited comments caused them $$$ in damages, reddit and spez would probably just write that off.

If they could prove $$$$$$, that's a different thing.

But that's highly unlikely.

Tl;dr: those controls don't exist because there's no routine danger of an admin undertaking an action by editing user comments that opens the corporation to liability.

But there is now.

[–]SilasX 54ポイント55ポイント  (19子コメント)

You don't need a fiduciary duty to users for the CEO not to have unrestricted DB access. This level of unsupervised DB access should still be extremely disturbing to the board, because it subjects them to undesirable risk e.g. to misappropriation of company resources for the CEO's personal use.

See the PayPal example I gave. If you don't think that's relevant because money is involved and triggers a fiduciary duty, then consider Facebook and whether you think the board has controls that stop zuckerberg from editing posts and reading private messages (they do).

I get the concept of fiduciary duty and Reddit's lack of obligations to users, but you're misapplying when claiming that it implies that all ceos have unrestricted access to everything their company owns. You're replying as if I said that this entitles users to some kind of monetary compensation when I said nothing like that; I was addressing the lack of Board-required need-to-know controls.

[–]ZorbaTHut 72ポイント73ポイント  (9子コメント)

Used to work at Google. I had to do a privacy-related training course in order to gain supervised audited access to an anonymized version of a single day's search logs. And this was as a person who worked directly on the ad quality systems.

Any company that cares about privacy and reputation should have barriers in place to ensure that this doesn't happen. Spez changing people's comments isn't a "whoops, my bad" situation, it's a "your architecture is fundamentally insecure" situation.

[–]In_between_minds 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

And really, beyond the whole sketchiness of changing comments, unneeded access increases the chances of accidental (and possibly busness ending) fuckups.

[–]ZorbaTHut 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yep. Google had a few scares along those lines - I remember one case where a mistyped command started deleting an entire datacenter's worth of data, not all of which was recovered (though it was all logging and historical data so users never noticed - I think this was before gmail anyway.)

In all the cases I'm aware of, it was fixed by adding extra oversight for large-scale commands and/or reducing people's permissions.

People fuck up. Both emotionally and in terms of implementation. You can't fix people, all you can do is try to protect your users and business from the inevitable fuckups.

[–]BardfinnF for Victoria 9ポイント10ポイント  (3子コメント)

I agree. There should be controls in place.

You get the kind of example of LavaBit: in theory, Ladar Levison and/or his employee could, theoretically, alter emails crossing the server or stored on it.

In practice it would be extremely difficult for them to do so because Levison engineered their server to prevent easy access by any one superuser account to user's data, and they compartmentalised and provided encryption services for paying users. Levison argued that they could not simply drop in an FBI hardware surveillance device and give the FBI the access they wanted.

That kind of firewall shouldn't be necessary for reddit, but some sort of firewall should exist to prevent "accidents", or even to prevent a trojan on spez' machine from having its way with user data.

I wasn't trying to claim that CEOs should have unrestricted access; I was trying to answer the straight question of "Why doesn't this firewall already exist in reddit's systems?".

[–]In_between_minds 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

I work in a tech company. HR has more access than any of the C level people do. The board has access to onsite wifi, and that's it. If more access is needed, it can be granted, through a system that persists audit logs that we cannot erase. This setup makes our lawyers and insurance rep very happy. It also means that when a C level leaves (regardless of reason) it is safer for them (no one can claim they stole something they never had access to) and us (they can't steal anything worth taking).

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 901ポイント902ポイント  (277子コメント)

And don't edit comments if you're trying to contain a subreddit which has allegedly been harassing tons of moderators and administrators because your arguments will seem much weaker.

[–]SillyAmerican3 1439ポイント1440ポイント  (243子コメント)

The admin of this site admitted that he has the power to and has edited user posts. What else could they change? Favorites? Make whole posts in their name? This can be used to frame and slander people.

I mean we have CEOs, senators, celebrities, and even presidents that use this site. Spez has the power to modify that data. What if he gets frustrated at the_donald one day and modifies our president's account data? That can actually be incredibly dangerous, on an international scale.

Edit: to put it in perspective, imagine the fallout if it was discovered that Twitter or Facebook modified tweets/comments by their users. Arrest warrants can be issued over what users say. Modifying the data of users and putting words in their mouths is a legal nightmare that we haven't even discussed the ethics of yet.

If a user says something which gets him in legal trouble, what will happen if they claim the site modified/created the comment and not them? Sure the site can pull logs and IP data. But can we trust that data if they modify other data? Can the site blackmail people? Slander them?

This is a legal and ethical nightmare that hasn't even been discussed in the mainstream yet. You could write scholarly essays on this.

EDIT-2: subreddits have previously been banned for user comments and submissions. Should we now reconsider the validity of those posts?

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 383ポイント384ポイント  (46子コメント)

Probably they could change anything. I assume the PR/legal team will be taking away spez's rights or access to these things within the coming days. If not, that would be a very strange move.

Edit:

To respond to your edits, there are definitely a lot of negative implications of this, and as a moderator of a few big subs, I definitely am curious what the admins have changed before, and what will be done to ensure this doesn't happen again.

[–]maybe_there_is_hope 274ポイント275ポイント  (31子コメント)

Pretty sure the rest of the company will be really pissed off, this kind of stuff fucks the work of everyone probably.

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 232ポイント233ポイント  (23子コメント)

There is no doubt the rest of the company is pissed off. Just seeing how fellow mods have been acting about this, lots of people are really mad, even the ones who find it funny. And mods have much less to clean up than PR teams.

[–]Tony49UK 148ポイント149ポイント  (20子コメント)

Mods are ordinary users who start up a sub or help to run one. /u/spez is not a mod he's an admin. He's paid by Reddit which mods aren't and has access to loads of tools that mods don't eg. mods have no idea who's a member of their sub all they can do is mute, shadowban or ban a user. But have no idea what that users IP address is for instance, so a user can just make up a new user name and post in that sub again. Reddit staff can see IP addresses and can disable accounts if they think they can see vote manipulation etc. Say you and somebody else in your house are both on Reddit and you both upvote a post both accounts can be banned.

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 105ポイント106ポイント  (8子コメント)

I know; I'm a mod. I'm saying that considering how pissed off moderators, who can just log off and walk away, are about this, I can only imagine how pissed of admins are, whose livelihoods and jobs may be at stake because of this.

[–]uniqueguy263 54ポイント55ポイント  (4子コメント)

And investors are probably incredibly pissed off

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 25ポイント26ポイント  (1子コメント)

Oh yes. People working at reddit could be in a world of hurt. There's a chance it will blow over, but there's also a chance it won't, and that would suck for the people working at reddit who aren't doing arbitrary things like this.

[–]MoarBananas 50ポイント51ポイント  (2子コメント)

This can potentially be incredibly damaging. He was quoted just a few months ago saying "We know your dark secrets. We know everything." For a CEO to go boasting about the amount of personal data the site stores, and then to later access that data for less-than-legitimate purposes, is a massive breach of user trust no matter how lighthearted the intent was.

[–]BTechUnited 72ポイント73ポイント  (3子コメント)

He's not "only" an admin - he's the CEO.

[–]isakmp 31ポイント32ポイント  (2子コメント)

And not just the CEO, he is one of the co-founders.

[–]SillyAmerican3 43ポイント44ポイント  (6子コメント)

That's a really quick way to be sued for everything you own. Hell, they'll probably pull a Hulk Hogan and end up owning Reddit

[–]GilbertHamilton 55ポイント56ポイント  (5子コメント)

You act like the SA password to the database isn't "password" and that people log in with individual accounts and respect schemas...

We all know this is an overgrown phpBB and accounts at the db level are probably all shared.

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 20ポイント21ポイント  (0子コメント)

I wouldn't know, but I sure hope that if you're right, they change it.

[–]cptnpiccard 27ポイント28ポイント  (0子コメント)

overgrown phpBB

top kek

[–]RickSanchez_ 156ポイント157ポイント  (74子コメント)

Holy shit, can you imagine the shit storm if Trump did an AMA and has his comments edited?

[–]czechmeight 125ポイント126ポイント  (66子コメント)

Who's to say this hasn't happened already?

[–]RickSanchez_ 99ポイント100ポイント  (61子コメント)

I know what you're getting at, but I don't feel like spez has done anything like this until now. If he was really constantly getting called a pedo and told by his users how much they hate him I could see that being enough to push him over the edge and edit the posts; however ill-thought the idea was.

Or I could be completely wrong and he likes to troll users when drinking.

[–]czechmeight 179ポイント180ポイント  (34子コメント)

And everyone felt like Unidan wasn't engaging in vote manipulation either. But he was, in small bits until it got to the point where it was so prominent that he was found out.

[–]RickSanchez_ 106ポイント107ポイント  (32子コメント)

Yourself and /u/tjrou09 could be right - and that's what really sucks about this situation. I don't think there is any way spez could prove he hasn't done this before and now I'm sure tons of users are going to be worried they might be affected somehow.

It's like finding someone in your family listening in on you. You wonder how long they've been doing it, and if they are going to do it again.

[–]BardfinnF for Victoria 35ポイント36ポイント  (6子コメント)

The Chilling Effect.

[–]the_strat 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

When Assange went missing many people said that the plane they tracked was on the 21st of October. Now the comments say the 17th...

[–]Tony49UK 37ポイント38ポイント  (24子コメント)

If voat.co could actually handle a Reddit migration this place would have died a hundred times by now. As it is any time that something happens like Pizzagate they're servers roll over and die.

[–]RickSanchez_ 22ポイント23ポイント  (9子コメント)

Has voat improved at all? I remember registering and immediately hating it for some reason.

[–]______DEADPOOL______ 27ポイント28ポイント  (6子コメント)

EDIT-2: subreddits have previously been banned for user comments and submissions. Should we now reconsider the validity of those posts?

A reddit-wide audit? Someone can make a script to compare archived posts to "current" reddit posts.

[–]McFuckNuts 49ポイント50ポイント  (11子コメント)

The admin of this site admitted that he has the power to and has edited user posts.

This shouldn't be a surprise. They have full root (and possibly physical too) access to the database. Of course they are able to edit anything.

[–]poo-poo 40ポイント41ポイント  (4子コメント)

It's not a surprise that they can, it's a surprise that he actually did it, unashamedly.

[–]mki401 15ポイント16ポイント  (2子コメント)

Or that he apparently has such unfettered access that he can do it on a whim as a "troll".

[–]vashlion 9ポイント10ポイント  (2子コメント)

I think the shock comes from the fact that he admits to using it. I.e. The President has the power to Ok a nuclear attack, that doesn't mean he does that.

[–]Yare_Owns 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

All of the data for every website sits in a database somewhere and every company can access it because obviously their webserver have the credentials to decrypt/read/modify it.

[–]smileedude 47ポイント48ポイント  (12子コメント)

This incident will hopefully nullify that threat. Hopefully nothing said on reddit will ever be that big of a deal because it can never be taken 100% accurate.

Leave reddit as it should be, mainly a site for entertainment.

[–]Eggmont 20ポイント21ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hell if anything this is a good thing. It makes people aware of the issue in a benign way

[–]sm0kie420 53ポイント54ポイント  (17子コメント)

They can change anything. Reddit loved Sanders so much and hated Hillary. Then overnight, the mods of /r/politics get replaced, and suddenly everyone loves Hillary and the Bernie posts are gone. And suddenly a 9k upvote post of Hillary clinton surprised at balloons GIF appears at the top of reddit. And it's full of loving comments, when just a few hours ago everyone hated her guts.

[–]natman2939 124ポイント125ポイント  (16子コメント)

This really is a huge huge deal

And it's borderline hilarious (by which I mean horrifying) that they locked the discussion in r/technology and said "well we think we should just let this blow over and not let it get out of hand. There's no need to call for blood"

Uh..... Yeah there actually is. Spez just committed one of the biggest acts of abuse of power I've ever seen on the Internet ever

( Seriously name some that are worse )

It's bad enough to censor people but he literally edited people's posts....

Now of course you could try to write it off as "oh well it's those trolls at the_donald so who cares?"

But the ramifications are clear. If he did this to anyone, no matter how bad they are or what you may think of them, he could do it to anyone

Reddit needs to seriously address this. Put in safeguards against it and frankly spez needs to step down

[–]matthewjpb 38ポイント39ポイント  (7子コメント)

They probably locked the thread because the sub is about discussing technology, and that's not what the discussion here is actually about at all. They have links in the main post to discussion threads like this and others.

[–]CapnSippy 40ポイント41ポイント  (4子コメント)

They locked the thread so they could move the discussion to a smaller sub like this one where fewer people would find and talk about it. News like this is more important for the website in general than any one subreddit topic. The entire website should be talking about this in every major sub. This is scary to learn about, I'm nervous just typing this comment now.

And they just want to let it blow over and do nothing about it. Unbelievable. They're acting like we're little children throwing a tantrum because daddy accidentally let slip that Santa doesn't exist. That's so incredibly insulting and disrespectful to the very people who keep this site alive and relevant. Fuck /u/spez and any admin who wants to sweep this under the rug. Grow a pair of fucking balls and take responsibility for your horrible actions.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

[–]matthewjpb 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

But they linked to this thread directly in the top of that thread...

As someone who goes on that sub (and not really this one much) I go there to learn about cool technology stuff and not reddit drama. I can come here for that if I want. It's one of the tighter-controlled subs (like /r/AskHistorians, but not at the same level) so they can keep quality of posts high and discussion relatively focused.

[–]baconcharmer 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

For the record, this story is absolutely dominating the top of all. This would be like trying to stop a wave by holding up your hand. The discussion will not be missed just because technology closed it. I actually got here because the technology post was the one I chose to read and it referred me here.

[–]DNamor 135ポイント136ポイント  (18子コメント)

The question isn't "Did he troll a few members of The_Donald?" Nor even "Can admins edit posts?" Yes he did and of course they can (you'd be surprised how many people don't realize that Mods can't)

The question is "How often have admins been doing this?"

"Is this just the most obvious/public showing of something that's been going on?"

[–]moeburn 48ポイント49ポイント  (15子コメント)

The question is "How often have admins been doing this?"

Well I'd think people would start to notice if their comments were being changed. Either just by looking at their own comments that they have written, or people replying to them going "Why did you say X?" and then they go "I never said X, hey wait a minute!"

I don't think you can just go around and edit people's posts without it being caught very very quickly. And in this case, it was.

[–]2ndComingOfAugustus 70ポイント71ポイント  (11子コメント)

What % of your comments do you reread? Especially days or weeks later?

[–]Tacoman404 16ポイント17ポイント  (5子コメント)

The ones that were well received.

[–]thombsaway 51ポイント52ポイント  (4子コメント)

So... zero percent?

[–]Blast_B 12ポイント13ポイント  (3子コメント)

To save you the trouble of rereading this comment later, I'm refraining from giving you an upvote.

[–]thombsaway 8ポイント9ポイント  (2子コメント)

I periodically check all my posts to make sure they have enough water and biscuits.

[–]lastpieceofpie 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

All the time, especially if they had upvotes. I'm vain like that. I probably wouldn't notice unless it was completely opposite of what I said.

[–]hascogrande 40ポイント41ポイント  (2子コメント)

On top of that, he went into the_donald and outright admitted it. A stupid move that got worse

[–]idleRAT 34ポイント35ポイント  (5子コメント)

My understanding of reddits tools means this would only really be doable by editing the database

Surely admins just have edit & delete links under everyone's posts as if they'd written them themselves? That's how it works pretty much everywhere else, I don't see why reddit would be set-up differently in that respect. Sometimes you do want it to be possible for an admin or dev to edit someone else's post for a legitimate reason, so it's logical to assume they've always had that ability and it was coded in at the start.

I could be wrong, but there's no real reason for them not to have that functionality available.

I'm a bit shocked that he abused his position/admin tools in this way, he could've banned those users(or had someone else review the situation and ban them) for harassment if he was being harassed and no doubt most users would've considered that fair, but childishly editing their posts is never going to be a good move, especially on a site the size of reddit(on a forum with you and five of your friends, sure, dick around all you want).

[–]allthefoxes 21ポイント22ポイント  (3子コメント)

delete functionality, yes. Edit? Eh, probably not. In all my workings with admin, I've never seen them actually edit anything. I strongly believe its just lower level. Maybe not raw SQL quieries (maybe just a wrapper.) - Generally, admins can remove just like a mod can (and it will show in the logs for the subreddit) or get deeper in the database.

Obviously, I can't say for sure, but thats just what I know keeping reddits code, my reddit instance, and my past workings with admin

[–]yuhong 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

In this case, don't forget that there is no "star" around many of the edited posts.

[–]I_divided_by_0- 35ポイント36ポイント  (1子コメント)

This is generally considered a bad move.

The story so far: In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

[–]Hyperdrunk 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

likely not a widespread thing.

So... I can't blame him for my grammar and spelling mistakes?

[–]centexAwesome 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

update comment_table a set a.comment_detail ='f$&@ u/the_donald_mod' where a.comment_detail = 'f$&@ u/spez' and a.activity_date > sysdate-.5;

I am too lazy and incompitent to type out the parsing logic to get any mention of u/spez without code hints on my machine at work.

You could update lots of comments in a short amount of time.

[–]FireworkFuse 17ポイント18ポイント  (1子コメント)

Wow what a clown. If you're gonna have that kind of power be an adult about it.

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 632ポイント633ポイント  (320子コメント)

Spez, the CEO of reddit, admitted to editing comments in /r/the_donald. This comes after months of the subreddit gaining popularity among hundreds of thousands of redditors, and very shortly after Donald Trump was voted in as the president of the United States.

From the point of view of The_Donald users, this is a massive violation. Their comments were literally edited, and could potentially be edited to say anything spez felt like, on any other day he felt like trolling or messing around. As spez said in his comment, plenty of other admins were very upset at him for doing this.

From the point of view of some moderators, and spez (paraphrasing what he said to default moderators in private), this was after tons of harassment, and spez reached a breaking point. As is mentioned in the thread, tons of users were saying "fuck spez" and calling him a pedophile, and /r/The_Donald has had users in the past harass other moderators. Some of my fellow moderators have gotten unpleasant messages and threats from users claiming to be from /r/the_donald, and the admins have made messages in the past about apparent brigading coming from the subreddit, but not to the extent to actually ban it.

[–]Sloppy_J03 166ポイント167ポイント  (154子コメント)

Why was /u/spez being harassed and called a paedophile?

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 489ポイント490ポイント  (130子コメント)

A subreddit dedicated to outing an alleged pedophile ring (/r/pizzagate) was recently banned. The allegations stem from leaked emails which some people have taken to mean there is a pedophilia ring occurring among people who are high up in the US government. The subreddit itself contained personal information, which some users allege was publicly available anyway. The admins banned the subreddit on the basis of the personal information, which is wildly against reddit rules.

As such, some users have claimed that spez is defending pedophiles, and called him a pedophile himself.

[–]NsRhea 426ポイント427ポイント  (59子コメント)

You forgot to mention that /r/the_donald feels heavily slighted by /u/spez.

During the US election cycle reddit changed their algorithm of how a post reaches the top of /r/all. Basically a direct "attack" as some felt in /r/the_donald because it was /r/the_donald's posts that were consistently reaching the top (mostly shitposts).

Then about a month and a half to month before the conclusion of the presidential race, /r/the_donald was told specifically that they can no longer link to /r/politics threads or mention the sub at all because it would be construed as brigading. It was so prevalent that apparently the whole sub was being labeled as a threat to reddit and would be taken down if the moderators of the sub didn't make a post and start censoring said links.

This lead to the rise of both "FUCK /U/SPEZ" and "/r/redacted" in reference to /r/politics.

[–]Tubal 229ポイント230ポイント  (6子コメント)

You forgot to mention the part where Donald Trump did an AMA in the Donald, and it went from #1 in /r/all to third or fourth page instantly while it was live.

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 94ポイント95ポイント  (39子コメント)

Admins said there was evidence that T_D was brigading politics, right? I can't seem to find that thread right now.

But yes your point is 100% true. T_D feels very slighted by the admins.

[–]NsRhea 158ポイント159ポイント  (25子コメント)

I'm sure some people were brigading, don't get me wrong, but to arbitrarily enforce rules on one subreddit instead of just banning the user is pretty bias when say... /r/hillaryclinton had pockets of it as well. Obviously that's not a metric of the sub as a whole, but the point is why not just ban the users responsible, or give them temp bans instead of threatening the entire sub?

[–]TrojanAttorney 191ポイント192ポイント  (4子コメント)

as long as srs exists i don't want to hear shit about brigading on this site

[–]TheScoresWhat 95ポイント96ポイント  (3子コメント)

How can supporters of a presidential candidate be called brigaders for wanting to comment in a sub called politics? It's only brigading if the admins and mods concede that r/politics is bought and paid for by CTR and other opinions are not allowed.

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 56ポイント57ポイント  (2子コメント)

Admins have an interesting definition of brigading, and apparently have tools to see how users go from thread to thread, but I've never seen it so I'm not sure.

Very safe to say the admins are wishy-washy at best about this, and they are definitely very inconsistent.

[–]RungeKatta 127ポイント128ポイント  (6子コメント)

This needs to be an episode of Silicon Valley. Like some senator accidentally uploads his pedophile photos to Pied Piper, and this exposes a huge pedo ring hosted on Pied Piper. So Richard and Erlich have to figure out how to report this to the cops without making Pied Piper look bad.

[–]EuroTrash69 15ポイント16ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think some of it stems from people's surprise that sub like r/pedofriends exists: banning pizzagate + editing user comments + pedofriends = spez is a pedo.

This is just my guess and probably does not cover the whole of it.

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's definitely a part of it.

[–]meepmeepmeepmeepmeed 108ポイント109ポイント  (39子コメント)

He left up the sub /r/pedofriends so that looks sus as fuck.

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 61ポイント62ポイント  (8子コメント)

True, but the admins also have never been great about deleting criminal or questionable subs, since years ago. Even /jailbait required an Anderson Cooper segment to get shut down, if my understanding is correct.

[–]Thesilense 95ポイント96ポイント  (11子コメント)

From the point of view of The_Donald users, this is a massive violation.

How is it not a massive violation from the point of view of EVERY user?

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 80ポイント81ポイント  (142子コメント)

Bias:

In the future, this may lead to users leaving reddit since they don't feel the CEO/admins can be trusted, or this may lead to an exodus of /r/The_Donald users from reddit since they don't see it a place worthy of their traffic, or the admins may even find a way to twist this and blame /r/The_Donald, but all of this is just speculation.

[–]LutzExpertTera 132ポイント133ポイント  (67子コメント)

or this may lead to an exodus of /r/The_Donald users from reddit

I'm more inclined to think this will cause those users to dig their heels in deeper. If they feel their "freedom" for lack of a better word is being attacked, it will only reinforce their commitment to their cause. Taking the fighting avenue when faced with fight or flight.

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 34ポイント35ポイント  (7子コメント)

I could see that. I'm sure some of them will stick around just to not give admins and mods the satisfaction of letting them leave. I don't mind most T_D users, but some show up in modmail just trying to start fights, and bringing out their big-boy pants saying "you can't ban me since I'll just make a new account!"

[–]WdnSpoon 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

this may lead to an exodus of /r/The_Donald users

God willing. The obnoxious memes can be forgiven, but the organized spam and google-bombing needs to go.

[–]A-GPSSuch a lust for revenge! 27ポイント28ポイント  (9子コメント)

Counter-bias

an exodus of /r/The_Donald users from reddit

Will never happen.

[–]IranianGeniusi mod stuff 23ポイント24ポイント  (6子コメント)

That's what people thought about digg.

[–]strikerougeAny sufficiently crowdsourced AI will eventually become a Nazi. 20ポイント21ポイント  (4子コメント)

Digg had an alternative. Reddit was willing and able to receive new members and grow their userbase. What alternative do you propose to Reddit? Voat? That place couldn't hold up to the FPH/Coontown traffic their bans caused, and they weren't nearly as populous as T_D. The CEO said he's basically given up on this personal project because it's so full of shitheads now.

If somebody wants to build a better Reddit alternative with actual proper server infrastructure that isn't just a bitcoin mining rig in their basement, they can go for it. Until then, Reddit will literally never have a mass exodus because there's no good content curation sites that operate like Reddit.

[–]jon909 121ポイント122ポイント  (15子コメント)

I have a serious set of questions:

  1. Can admins send private messages on my behalf without me knowing?
  2. Do admins have my password to this site?
  3. Can admins edit my private messages?

If so this is fucked. I cannot trust this site. If an admin gets frustrated and has done this in the open what has he done more vindictive in private?

[–]monkeypancakes 109ポイント110ポイント  (10子コメント)

Can admins send private messages on my behalf without me knowing?

Yes they have access to the database

Can admins edit my private messages?

Yes they have access to the database

Do admins have my password to this site?

Hopefully not. Assuming their database structured properly, only a salted hash of your password is stored. They have access to that, but don't have access to your actual password.

[–]jon909 44ポイント45ポイント  (4子コメント)

Great. Thanks. The scary thing is the Washington Post cited the edited comments by /u/spez. Wonder how many false edited comments are floating around out there.

[–]yrulaughing 137ポイント138ポイント  (29子コメント)

He edited multiple comments on /r/The_donald saying things like "Fuck /u/Spez" to say various /r/The_donald moderators instead of his username. Obviously this breaches the trust that users have in the admins and is a blatant misuse of power. There's no telling what else the admins have edited in the past without telling the users. All-in-all it was a bad PR move by him.

[–]deleteandrest 66ポイント67ポイント  (3子コメント)

Also the edited comment did not have a * in the end.

[–]ForceBlade 14ポイント15ポイント  (1子コメント)

That makes sense. Change the db entry of the original data. Don't tick the edited flag

The site code doesn't even see this change

[–]kleep 92ポイント93ポイント  (12子コメント)

How long has this been going on? What other posts have been edited throughout the years?

[–]aj_thenoob 77ポイント78ポイント  (9子コメント)

Nobody knows. And that's the real problem. An admin can ban subs they don't like just by editing a few posts or comments.

[–]seal-team-lolis 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well there is zero proof to know unless someone archived them like they did with u/spez today so its possible.

[–]MalmoWalker 27ポイント28ポイント  (1子コメント)

According to Reddit's TOS:

You are solely responsible for the information associated with Your Account and anything that happens related to Your Account.

Additionally, the TOS says:

We take no responsibility for, we do not expressly or implicitly endorse, and we do not assume any liability for any user content submitted by you to reddit.

I do not believe it is right for /u/Spez to edit comments of users. I have been a member of Reddit for 8 years. I have lost all trust in this website. I am truly disappointed in Reddit's leadership with the fact that the CEO, or anyone for that matter, has the ability to edit comments.

[–]Pikabuu2 182ポイント183ポイント  (25子コメント)

Spez quite literally showed he has the ability to edit user's past comments or create ones. Add this to the fact he did so against The_Donald, who already hates him already (me included) this has caused a shit-storm.

Even if you don't like The_Donald it's still a pretty big deal that spez went and did this just because "he's angry"

[–]stevestgermain 121ポイント122ポイント  (0子コメント)

And he literally did it the night before Thanksgiving. Really bad form...he likely ruined his whole staffs chances of a relaxing holiday weekend with this incredibly stupid action. If these are the types of decisions you make as CEO, you should not be one.

[–]EmeraldKnight92 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm too lazy to read through the comments right now to see if this has already been said, but here's a semi-technical overview of the issue that assumes little to no technical experience:

Reddit, by its very nature, is a software system. And because it's software, the people who control it are able to do absolutely anything they want with it. Database entries can be altered with no evidence of this being the case (the issue being discussed right now), code can be updated as necessary to add, update, or delete features, etc. Furthermore, every single thing you do on this website, and every single thing that happens as a result of your actions, is by design. This includes when users edit or delete their own comments, or when mods/admins do so for rule violations. Many of these design decisions, such as the little asterisk that appears when you edit your comments, are implemented for the sake of transparency. When you design a system like reddit, you want people (both mods and users) to be able to modify content as needed (e.g. you made or typo or worded something poorly and need to revise) and to see when someone has modified content (e.g. if someone make an inflammatory statement then edits it shortly after to fraudulently make other users look like asshats).

That being said, none of these design decisions are in any way mandatory, but since software and data may be accessed and/or altered at any time without anyone's knowledge, it's important that trust be established between the people who develop, maintain, and own the website and the people who use it. Without this trust, users wouldn't stick around. No one likes to have their privacy invaded or their trust broken. So usually these sorts of design decisions are put in place for transparency and so that an "official" process is in place that all users are aware of to help establish that trust, and additional things like privacy policies give users some peace of mind in knowing that there is a written, legal agreement between them and the website. Even so, it often takes a long time to really build trust, maybe even years, as users slowly accumulate over time and the company's reputation (hopefully) continues to improve.

What Spez did circumvented the established processes put in place for modifying content and even violated policies put in place regarding content. Odds are he even violated company policy and/or circumvented existing company procedures. These policies and procedures which have existed to establish and build trust between reddit and its community have been completely ignored, which has broken the users' trust. Aside from the unprofessional and disrespectful nature of his actions, years of effort in building users' trust and in establishing a positive reputation have been jeopardized at best, and irreparably ruined at worst. Even content used as evidence in investigations may now be put into question.

In short, a company requires a good reputation and a sufficient level of trust established between it and its users/customers. Spez just spat in the face of both of those with his conduct. This was, quite frankly, one of the dumbest things you could ever do as CEO.

[–]eviljordan 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

I did a quick search for some keywords in this thread, and didn't see it mentioned, but, at this point, this will probably go unnoticed:

This is what the blockchain is perfect for. Here's how it could work:

Every post, on submit, generates a hash. That hash is published to the blockchain. Post gets edited? New hash to the blockchain. You now have a virtual paper-trail, shared by everyone, of truth.

Of course, this relies on the code handling the hashing/publishing to be well-formed, running, and verifiable, but that is something users must demand.

Anyway, just my two cents and someone who is a supporter of cryptocurrencies and their underlying technology, where non-supporters are often looking for examples where the tech is actually useful in the real-world.

[–]RickSanchez_ 127ポイント128ポイント  (122子コメント)

Heres what I don't get: If /r/the_donald is as terrible as spez makes it out to be, why not just ban the entire sub? Reddit has no obligation to keep any sub active.

Bad form all around.

[–]Rosseforp-Woem 53ポイント54ポイント  (1子コメント)

There are a lot of problems that would spawn from banning them completely. The main one is that users from there will complain about it in other subs, decreasing the quality of large, unrelated subreddits. This happened after r/fatpeoplehate was banned, and it would most likely happen on an even bigger scale if The_donald was banned.

Another worry would be the decision creating negative media coverage. It will look very bad for Reddit if news outlets start covering this, as it will imply that only some political views are tolerated on the site. In general, it just won't be worth it to ban them unless the subreddit does something inexcusable.

[–]DHSean 152ポイント153ポイント  (37子コメント)

The million dollar question.

I think it's because keeping it open keeps the drama in that subreddit and they stick to their own thing.

If you delete it then drama is going to go into every subreddit and people are gonna be fragmented all over the place.

[–]billyK_ 162ポイント163ポイント  (19子コメント)

No, that's literally it

The million dollar question

The subreddit, whether you care about it or not, is the most active non-default sub. By that sheer statement, it's going to be generating a ton of ad revenue. Yes, people will use ad blockers, but as a whole, T_D is a massive money sink for Reddit. If Reddit was to remove it, not only would a massive chunk of Reddit break off in sheer rage, but a giant money hole would need to be filled somehow

Admins more than likely don't keeping it, but it's keeping money pouring in will keep it open till something actually breaks the rules

[–]ndfan737 70ポイント71ポイント  (31子コメント)

Because even outside of the shit that would go down inside Reddit, it would be a PR shitstorm. Banning the subreddit of just one political candidate? It would just look like censorship, and you can draw easy parallels to what Facebook did and they were crucified.

[–]feared_rear_admiral 84ポイント85ポイント  (20子コメント)

Banning the subreddit that is basically the fan club of the president elect at this point is utter insanity. It just reeks of utter desperation and complete lack of morals.

[–]Hollacaine 51ポイント52ポイント  (5子コメント)

Banning the sub for no reason isnt a good idea either. If the sub is breaking rules or if users are breaking rules then that should be dealt with.

Reddits an interesting case study that shows why you shouldnt let technically proficient inexperienced 20 somethings run a business. While Ive no love for the sub and Id be quite happy if the alt right never ventured on the internet again, reddit admins should be able to manage these issues without being so childish.

The amount of times in the last 2 years reddit admins have posted mea culpa threads is ridiculous and they're seemingly incapable of learning from past mistakes. If this was any company other than a tech company this level of performance wouldnt fly. What they need is basic strategies and training to deal with issues on reddit without making things worse.

Now wheres the popcorn?