>improperly-reopened case
You don't improperly reopen a case, you reopen when new data comes up
@malamoot @nytimes @jamisonfoser @decotodd
How @nytimes treated Clinton’s improperly-reopened case versus how they treat Trump’s fresh FRAUD SETTLEMENT (latter via @jamisonfoser)pic.twitter.com/6QI2JkLMiu
-
-
- その他の返信を表示
-
@MatanJeda@nytimes@jamisonfoser@decotodd I noticed within a few minutes that I had worded it poorly, but it was already taking off -
@MatanJeda@nytimes@jamisonfoser@decotodd it was improperly disclosed, not improperly reopened - その他の返信を表示
-
@malamoot@nytimes@jamisonfoser@decotodd the real improper part was rushing to close and reopen should have left open, less news & drama - その他の返信を表示
-
@MatanJeda@nytimes@jamisonfoser@decotodd I doubt Comey would’ve closed investgtn if he didn’t believe he’d really exhausted all prospects -
@malamoot@nytimes@jamisonfoser@decotodd it normally takes months to close, even when unnecessary -
@MatanJeda@nytimes@jamisonfoser@decotodd I think we already clearly see what happened, the way these things continue is just vexatious. -
@MatanJeda And irrespective of the content of that particular incident (notice how we’re focusing on it again?) the point here is media bias - さらに表示
-
-
-
@malamoot@jenneraustin@nytimes@jamisonfoser Trump loyalists in cabinet is a much bigger story, treated appropriately -
@technosailor@jenneraustin@nytimes@jamisonfoser it’s VERY very important! but optically troublesome. maybe better comparison pre-election -
@malamoot@jenneraustin@nytimes@jamisonfoser depends on what you find important -
@technosailor@jenneraustin@nytimes@jamisonfoser By that I meant that the cabinet-stacking story is very important, agreeing with you - その他の返信を表示
-
@malamoot@jenneraustin@nytimes@jamisonfoser right. If I'm an editor, I have to run stories that directly affect the country over opinion -
@technosailor@jenneraustin@nytimes@jamisonfoser I think putting these two frontpages together is more representative of a bizarre trend - その他の返信を表示
-
@malamoot@jenneraustin@nytimes@jamisonfoser I think putting these two front pages together is contrived and doesn't quantify realism -
@technosailor@jenneraustin@nytimes@jamisonfoser I will absolutely conceded that pre- and post-election confers some priority shift but >> - さらに表示
-
-
-
- その他の返信を表示
-
@MythicalRedFox@malamoot@noxypaws It is an issue they're also giving his golf course free advertising while downplaying his fraud. -
@SoPurpl@malamoot@noxypaws The article doesn't seem to downplay the fraud to me: http://nyti.ms/2f8G3CH And how is that free advertising? - その他の返信を表示
-
-
- その他の返信を表示
-
@MythicalRedFox@SoPurpl@noxypaws Context & character matter. Clinton shown in a period of high stress, Trump’s resort in relaxed victory. - その他の返信を表示
-
@MythicalRedFox@SoPurpl@noxypaws Part of the reason this sentiment emerges is because Trump is literally using his new status 2 sell rooms -
@MythicalRedFox@SoPurpl@noxypaws ^^ this is the key - さらに表示
-
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。もう一度試すか、Twitterステータス(英語)をご確認ください。