上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]Jewey 2908ポイント2909ポイント  (1791子コメント)

That's across the street from the Texas State Capital in Austin.

119 E 11th St

https://goo.gl/maps/sWspj4smwpo

Source: I apparently drink too much on dirty 6th.

[–]Ezili 4531ポイント4532ポイント  (785子コメント)

As somebody living in Austin theres some context to this most commenters don't see. You see all sorts of people occasionally wandering the around the capital (usually being tailed by cops) who are 'exercising their rights' just to remind people they are there. Austin is a real mix of views as a very liberal city in a very right wing state and it can be very polarised but not usually confrontational.

I take this protest by this group to be partially satirical. Reddit commenters are treating it as a very serious statement, when it's at least partly meant to be satire. I think that aspect of it doesn't translate over the internet well as it's a particular peculiar piece of Austin which you don't see in other parts of the US. As an Austin local I'd walk past this and give ita rye smile to see how they've coopted a right wing thing in response to the recent political shift following the election. They're turning the tables in a a way. It's a weird local event being put on a world stage without the local context. It's not as scary or aggressive as most non-Austin locals probably see it.

[–]Androob 1604ポイント1605ポイント  (129子コメント)

It's wry smile. Unless you are bread

[–]kirlandwater 63ポイント64ポイント  (2子コメント)

I thought these were Spider-Man with guns at first. Disappointed

[–]Thousands_of_Retiree 863ポイント864ポイント  (390子コメント)

I think it's partially as a statement about how people view open carry differently wether they agree with the person or not, often times when you see '2nd amendment activists' they applaud people like the Oregon rebels, but if they see Communists or African Americans with guns they feel afraid. edit- Spelling

[–]KID_LIFE_CRISIS 668ポイント669ポイント  (345子コメント)

Right. Ronald Reagan ramped up gun control laws when the black panthers started open-carrying.

Right wingers only support other ring-wingers having all the guns.

[–]satchelsofgold 211ポイント212ポイント  (111子コメント)

Now that you mention it, ive never seen a black open carrier... They probably know better, imagine the mayhem if a couple young black dudes with saggy pants and bandanas open carried. It would be a hilarious prank youtube channel bruh, a total social racism experiment!

Or they would get shot on sight....

[–]A_Kindly_Man 217ポイント218ポイント  (74子コメント)

People open carry at BLM protests. In Dallas when that guy attacked the officers, a black man who had been open carrying was falsely speculated as being involved. When it happened he found an officer and turned over his weapon to avoid confusion.

[–]Facistcommunist 16ポイント17ポイント  (35子コメント)

It's kind of funny, people pointed at this as some kind of reason why carrying a gun doesn't work to stop/prevent crime. The guy did the only reasonable thing, not making himself a target for the police. The first rule of self defense is to try and get away, right?

[–]A_Kindly_Man 25ポイント26ポイント  (34子コメント)

I think its because people on both sides mis-characterize the role a private citizen plays in these scenarios. The point of carrying a weapon is self defense. It isn't defense of the public.

[–]roman_fyseek 52ポイント53ポイント  (6子コメント)

Arlington, VA has a gun store that is owned and operated by a black brother and sister. They open carry. Nice shop, too.

[–]benzenene 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

There was a black open carrier at the Dallas BLM protest where the police were shot, there's a video where he immediately turned his guns in to the police. Must have been terrifying for him.

[–]Zaeron 185ポイント186ポイント  (148子コメント)

To be clear - though I guess I'm not a right winger anymore, sine you have to be totally batshit to qualify - I support strong 2a rights exactly because of groups like the black panthers. if nobody else will stand up for your community you should have the right to do it yourself.

If you cannot force the government to listen, it won't. it has no reason to.

[–]adrianmonk 209ポイント210ポイント  (91子コメント)

And for context, the area around the capitol building attracts all kinds of protesters, including some pretty crazy ones.

There's an annual KKK march, if I remember right. It's sad the KKK still exists, but it helps to know that they are usually vastly outnumbered by counter-protesters.

One year there was a parade of tractors and livestock to protest emminent domain of farmland for the Trans-Texas Corridor.

Basically, if among the 27 million people in Texas there are any who feel they need to get in their cars and drive hundreds of miles to stage a protest, that's the spot they're likely headed to.

Also, there was a White Lives Matter thing there in the last day or so. This could be a counter-protest to that.

[–]TaterNbutter 16ポイント17ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's sad the KKK still exists

They barely exist. Their only real new members are basically their own family members. It is quickly dying out, and has no power. It is just a bunch of sad old racists.

They got their old power by electing their members into local political and law enforcement seats. They really cannot do that anymore.

[–]310_nightstalkers 1256ポイント1257ポイント  (348子コメント)

Is it not illegal in Texas to conceal your face while open carry?

[–]Sefirot8 536ポイント537ポイント  (129子コメント)

while also carrying a sign declaring your intentions as being the cause of fear on top of that...

[–]tangoyango 1481ポイント1482ポイント  (53子コメント)

The guns are scary and all but how about that stitch pattern on the leggings!

[–]shartweekondvd 307ポイント308ポイント  (28子コメント)

Came here to talk about the leggings too. I need to find out where to get those!!

[–]SpeakLikeAChild04 370ポイント371ポイント  (12子コメント)

I need to find out where to get those!!

hot topic

[–]memberzs 102ポイント103ポイント  (9子コメント)

No now you will find TARDIS leggings and adventure time crap.

[–]iamnotnotarobot 19ポイント20ポイント  (6子コメント)

Sometimes you find some good, non-fandom related things there. It's rare, but it happens.

[–]KY_Jelly_Donut 16ポイント17ポイント  (5子コメント)

Their website is a lot better for stuff like that. My local store, however, is mostly Funko figures and old memes.

[–]sanitarySteve 47ポイント48ポイント  (0子コメント)

If I can't look hot, I don't want your revolution.

[–]fleetber 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

In Austin. Behind the sign.

[–]pokemaugn 53ポイント54ポイント  (0子コメント)

Looks great with those boots

[–]yesmaybeyes 2732ポイント2733ポイント  (709子コメント)

This is colorful, armed leftist communists in US, never thought I would see this.

[–]CodenameBlicero 645ポイント646ポイント  (60子コメント)

The Weather Underground wasn't all that long ago

[–]Jatravis 407ポイント408ポイント  (40子コメント)

So...should I quit using my weather underground app now? Because that shit gives some seriously good forecasts, but I also don't really want to be a communist or whatever...

[–]fucks_with_dolphins 278ポイント279ポイント  (17子コメント)

"You don't need a weatherman to tell which way the wind blows." - Bob Dylan. They used that lyric to name themselves.

[–]fluffykerfuffle1 107ポイント108ポイント  (13子コメント)

also "the revolution will not be televised" is relevant.

[–]bluegreencoyote 16ポイント17ポイント  (3子コメント)

"the revolution will be shared on social media" ~ bluegreencoyote keeping it real in the 21st century

[–]rocbolt 120ポイント121ポイント  (11子コメント)

Weather Underground, a corporate weather service, subsidiary of The Weather Company, and unrelated to the militant student organization; the name dates back to the service's founding as an offshoot of the weather database of the University of Michigan, where the original Weather Underground was also founded.

[–]michaelnoir 117ポイント118ポイント  (8子コメント)

CEO of Weather Underground, Mr. Baader-Meinhof, is unrelated to the communist revolutionaries of the same name.

[–]CannibalVegan 51ポイント52ポイント  (3子コメント)

Mr. Baader-Meinhof

I keep seeing that name everywhere.

[–]kwhitegocubs 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh, man, I remember just reading about the Weather Underground, and now I see all these references. How weird!

[–]venomRED 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

Better not check the humidity index for Monday, that'll get you on the watch list immediately, bro.

[–]BinaryHobo 87ポイント88ポイント  (32子コメント)

The far left (I'm not talking about democrats or progressives) tend to like the 2nd amendment because they believe they're going to need weapons to start the revolution.

[–]ivquatch 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

they believe they're going to need weapons to protect themselves when they start the revolution.

[–]AnEmptyKarst 111ポイント112ポイント  (32子コメント)

What do you mean? Communists aren't anti-gun.

[–]Odinswolf 61ポイント62ポイント  (8子コメント)

Indeed they are not, since armed revolution is rather central to most forms of the idea...but America has generally not been very leftists, Socialism/Communism isn't commonly advocated, so seeing Communists out with weapons publicly is odd.

[–]KID_LIFE_CRISIS 164ポイント165ポイント  (9子コメント)

"Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary." - Karl Marx

[–]Herman999999999 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

Here's a usual copy/paste that will clear any misunderstandings before any arguments start.

Ownership can range from cooperative, democratic, or social ownership (socialism), state ownership (state capitalism) , or private ownership (capitalism). Distribution is usually how the goods and services produced by these systems can be distributed in society. Some ways of doing this is either through a planned economy or a market economy.

Capitalism and Socialism are systems of ownership. Capitalism is a system of ownership where property is privately owned. The goods produced on that property do not belong to the workers, but the one who owns the property. In turn, the owner may pay the workers a wage for using that property while they can do anything they want with the goods produced. Wealth is efficiently produced but there's an issue as to where that wealth goes. Most countries in the world today are capitalist economies. Socialists reject this because it's an inherently exploitive system of ownership.

Socialism advocates for a system of ownership where workers or society democratically decide what gets produced, and those involved enjoy the product equally. A socialist business would be run democratically by the workers (someone who founds a business can have certain rights to their original intent); pay is also determined democratically, either through a representative for larger enterprises or directly for small businesses. This goes against the hierarchical structure of private property in Capitalism and State Capitalism (nationalized industry). You can include markets in both systems. Workers cooperatives do exist in modern society and ensures worker happiness and fair pay over fast paced and wasteful efficiency. The idea behind Marxism is that socialists should take control either through elections or revolutions to set up a transition state where essential industries would centralized. This transition state would move on towards socialism and eventually, communism.

Communism is a stateless, classless, and cooperative society where automation and rational production allows people to work less and focus on their own development. ANY political ideology that focuses on moving towards a classless, stateless, and cooperative society in which all major resources are held in common ownership are socialist, regardless of the approach that they want to take to get there. Let me expand on this further:

  • Socialism can't be built unless wealth has already been accumulated first under capitalism. Socialism has its place just like Capitalism and Feudalism have theirs.

  • China is not stateless but is still a socialist nation because they believe that they will achieve socialism through a transition state where they nationalize all or essential industry. This is typical of Marxist-Leninist states. Marxist-Leninism advocates for a general strike, or violent overthrow that sets up a state that sets policy for the good of the the people rather than the good of the elites. A technocratic transition state.

  • Anarchists are socialists who believe that dismantling the state and replacing it with a democratic manifestation of organization will lead to communism.

  • Social Democrats believe that gradually introducing non-profit institutions and cooperative businesses will lead to eventual socialism and then communism.

  • Socialists (Democratic Socialists or Market Socialists) believe that a democratically elected government can make way for the transition to a socialist, and eventual communist society.

Before WW1, there were two major types of socialists; revolutionary and evolutionary socialists. Both were influenced by Marxism as the unifying principle for socialism, and so they believed only the state can bring about change. Revolutionaries wanted to overthrow the state through a revolution, and Lenin was the only one who was successful at the time. Evolutionary socialists set up political parties called Democratic Socialist Parties, and believed winning elections can bring about change. Eventually, Lenin was the only one that succeeded and so others followed to start up revolutionary socialist parties called Communist Parties. With the devastating effects of WW1, the Soviets decided to delay the transition to socialism by setting up collectivist policies that would force farmers to urbanize and work in industry. Lenin called this, "State-Capitalism." State Capitalism is a term used by Lenin to describe the workers transition from going to jobs under an owner who owned a company, to the state that owned the company. By the time Stalin took power, Stalin moved on with state ownership of nearly all industry, and infamously declared, "this is socialism." People have been describing socialism as state owned industry ever since, even going as far as to call the Military a socialist institution. The reason for the harsh policies taken on by Marxist-Leninists was because of the fear of famine and invasion.

With the rise of the Internet, more people are starting to realize what socialism is. Here are some other key facts about socialism:

  • For a look into how socialist companies can work, look into Mondragon corporation which is the largest worker owned cooperative and one of the largest, most successful companies in Europe.

  • Socialism is generally seen as democratic socialism, which can include non-market socialism or market socialism. Non-Market socialists advocate for decentralized, local planning for local use, and centralized planning for large scale activities. These plans are made by a democratically elected government without the influence of capitalism. The idea is that the state would lose it's corrupt and bureaucratic function and retain it's administrative function to provide the peoples wants and needs from democratic input. This can include the concepts of industrial democracy or economic democracy. This may also include consumer planning. Some notable fictitious examples are included in Star Trek and Red Mars. Market Socialism is simply a market economy with large cooperatives.

  • Socialism operates under post-scarcity. There is always a scarcity for resources, but capitalism is a system that relies on scarcity while socialism acknowledges the limited resources we have, and sets up a rational system of distribution based on those resources. Socialists believe we are either close, or already at a point where we no longer have to work as much as we do. Socialists believe that anything is possible when a society rationally decides production and distribution, rather than based on market or capitalist principles.

  • Personal property is not the same as private property. Personally property includes your body, your house/car. Private property is used to produce wealth through private ownership. Things you buy, produce, and sell are your personal property, and you can do whatever you want with it.

  • You shouldn't take people seriously when they say a society is a mix of Socialism or Capitalism (or advocate for such a thing), as that doesn't make any sense. What people mean by this is a regulated capitalist economy. Capitalism =/= Markets.

  • Socialization would mean every citizen has a fair input and share of the product that is provided to them. It is where all of society commonly benefit from goods and services produced by it, and where a government only answers to the public, not the will of elites or a state. Socialization is organized democratically and is more transparent/responsive to citizen input. Nationalized industry switches the ownership of a private owner to a state run by private interests. Many socialist parties have tried to make nationalized industry more democratic.

  • Communist societies include Revolutionary Catalonia, Rojova (2016), and the Paris Commune. The USSR and China (among others) are not examples of socialism or communism since they were just transition states and never achieved socialism. They are examples of states that considered themselves socialist or communist for the purpose of achieving socialism.

  • Marx described in his manifesto the short term solution of nationalizing transportation, communication, and most essential industries as transition from capitalism to socialism. This does not mean a communist society will include these things as it is stateless. Marx is influential in the sense that his ideas of socializing certain industries for the sake of the people led to the social democratic parties developing the famous welfare states.

  • The Scandinavian models are welfare states with capitalist economies. There is no socialism here except for Marxist influences within the Social Democratic parties. Many of the views held by Social Democrats can be inline with most socialists/communists, but the economies of those countries is not socialism. These states actually have less regulated market economies than the US.

  • Anarchism is not a society without order, but one without a state. Concepts like Federalism and Confederalism are popular among anarchists. Famous examples also include Catalonia and today's Rajova. Anarchist societies simply see the state and capitalism as oppressive, and reject these hierarchical relationships.

  • Don't confuse communists and socialists for being against democracy because a few transition states claimed to be communist/socialist. The DPRK claims to be democratic yet we clearly don't consider them any sort of democracy.

  • Don't abuse the "No True Scotsman" This is an abuse of a generally helpful logical fallacy that can otherwise be used to organize arguments. If you know the history, kindly explain it to them so they will understand.

Please be informed of these before continuing an argument. It makes a lot of arguments shorter and less riddled with misconceptions. Cheers!

[–]JeremyHall 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm just glad both sides agree on something for once, and it just so happens to be in the Constitution.

[–]Zycosi 858ポイント859ポイント  (386子コメント)

Never heard of the Black Panthers?

[–]Millasdiosturd 972ポイント973ポイント  (322子コメント)

Might want to read up on what the Black Panthers were actually trying to achieve. They were pigeonholed as race war instigators, communists, etc. What it started with was community policing. They were tired of Oakland PD harassing their community, so they got guns (which they were allowed to open carry) and started standing around. White people lost their shit the group reacted accordingly.

In the beginning they just wanted to keep their own community safe, but that wouldn't be tolerated so shit hit the fan.

http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/09/movement-to-police-the-police-started-with-the-black-panther-party-for-self-defense/

[–]Zenmachine83 114ポイント115ポイント  (7子コメント)

And that is where Cali's strict gun laws come from. After the panthers starting exercising their constitutional rights St. Reagan, who was governor at the time decided it was time to crack down...

[–]superfudge73 129ポイント130ポイント  (26子コメント)

My dad was in the White Panthers in Detroit in the 60's mostly because he was a huge fan of MC5.

The White Panthers were NOT a white supremacist group btw.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Panther_Party

[–]Grinnedsquash 29ポイント30ポイント  (1子コメント)

Wow TIL. I had never heard of this. I'd love to learn more about specifically from your Dad's perspective as a memeber.

[–]superfudge73 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

He doesn't talk about anything specific, mostly a bunch of protests and civil disobedience. He claims he was so stoned much of it is a haze. He swears he never did anything illegal and after he graduated from U of M and married my mom he stopped going to meetings.

He told me a story one time how he was at a meeting and someone brought Iggy Pop to the meeting and he wouldn't talk to anyone and everytime anyone would try and talk to him he would start rolling around on the floor doing somersaults and shit so they threw him out.

So yeah. Iggy Pop ruined my dads White Panther party.

[–]kievaughn[🍰] 11ポイント12ポイント  (4子コメント)

Huh. The Weathermen, White Panther Party, the Unabomber... Lots of counterculture around Ann Arbor and Detroit

[–]broke-from-the-womb 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

There was also DRUM - the Dodge Revolutionary Union Movement, which was a revolutionary group of auto workers.

Look into the documentary Finally Got the News if you're interested.

[–]BrokenAlcatraz 506ポイント507ポイント  (157子コメント)

Yeah they started like that. Totally understandable to police racist police. But one of their main establishing points was to abolish capitalism. It's clearly defined in their founding document.

[–]nearlyp 21ポイント22ポイント  (1子コメント)

But one of their main establishing points was to abolish capitalism. It's clearly defined in their founding document.

MLK Jr. was also pretty outspoken about capitalism being inextricably tied up with civil rights abuses:

We must recognize that we can’t solve our problem now until there is a radical redistribution of economic and political power… this means a revolution of values and other things. We must see now that the evils of racism, economic exploitation and militarism are all tied together… you can’t really get rid of one without getting rid of the others… the whole structure of American life must be changed.

People water this down now when they talk about the civil rights movement but it was all very radical, even at its most accessible.

[–]gophergun 202ポイント203ポイント  (13子コメント)

To be fair, even MLK supported the abolition of capitalism. It seems like a common thread in the civil rights movement, which makes sense considering it's a movement based on inequality.

[–]PolPotato 156ポイント157ポイント  (5子コメント)

Revolutionaries will be hounded and hated during their lifetimes, but totally white washed and co-opted on their death

[–]justshutupandobey 181ポイント182ポイント  (12子コメント)

The Black Panthers were one of the chief reasons for gun control laws in California. Seeing black guys walking openly with guns drove the establishment crazy.

[–]symberke 169ポイント170ポイント  (15子コメント)

they also started a free breakfast program that fed 20,000 kids a day at its peak. along with other social programs to help the poor.

http://theplate.nationalgeographic.com/2015/11/04/the-black-panthers-revolutionaries-free-breakfast-pioneers/

[–]arturo_lemus 45ポイント46ポイント  (13子コメント)

Yup thats it but alot of people assume they were a racist hate group. The original BP party even stated that they have no relation or affiliation with the new Black Panther Party, they want nothing to do with them

[–]Highside79 46ポイント47ポイント  (3子コメント)

Armed leftists are the reason for most of the gun control that we have in America. Black panthers marched on just about every state capital that they could, openly carrying firearms. In response was a wave of laws prohibiting the carry of weapons and instituting permit systems.

[–]0xD153A53 177ポイント178ポイント  (95子コメント)

Considering neo-McCarthyism is making a comeback, you're going to see the government's response to it too..

[–]Thac0 12ポイント13ポイント  (5子コメント)

I do have to say it really warms the cockles of my heart! :D

[–]nov-20-2016 552ポイント553ポイント  (17子コメント)

Fat ninja on the left is fooling no one.

[–]ironicalballs 307ポイント308ポイント  (4子コメント)

He wants to keep the means of food production all to himself!

[–]YOLO_Swag_4_Jesus420 89ポイント90ポイント  (1子コメント)

Wow, I literally did not notice him and this is the third time I've seen this picture. Pretty good ninja skills to be able to hide such mass honestly.

[–]lil_mac2012 1595ポイント1596ポイント  (356子コメント)

Hmm, most states with open carry have a subsection in their open carry laws dealing with going armed in terror of the public. Wearing a mask that covers the face while open carrying is usually a part of that law. Even if it isn't illegal in TX, it's a really stupid idea...

[–]Licenseless_Rider 685ポイント686ポイント  (130子コメント)

You're correct. These gentleman in direct violation of Texas Penal Code, Title 9, Section 42.01

Source

[–]CatWeekends 274ポイント275ポイント  (88子コメント)

The relevant bit of the law you're referencing is this

commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly… displays a firearm or other deadly weapon in a public place in a manner calculated to alarm

There isn't a legal definition of "alarm," so it'll be one of those reasonable standard "know it when you see it" things. To some, simply standing there with masks and signs (indicating a protest) wouldn't be alarming. To others, the act of open carry itself is alarming.

The most relevant bit is the intent part. You'd have to prove that they're intentionally trying to cause alarm instead of just protesting.

Note: I personally think that open carry protests do little more than polarize people.

EDIT: Yes, there is a person holding a sign that could be alarming but that person is not carrying a gun. Should all protesters be held accountable for the actions of a single protester?

[–]wvboltslinger40k 153ポイント154ポイント  (29子コメント)

Prove intent, like maybe find a sign or something that they've made stating that they want to make people afraid again... That being said I think they'd be fine if they lost the masks

[–]aceinthehole001 10ポイント11ポイント  (3子コメント)

Ah but the lady with the sign does not appear to be open carrying a weapon!

[–]floppybeef 33ポイント34ポイント  (0子コメント)

But then people would know who they are!

[–]Sefirot8 28ポイント29ポイント  (13子コメント)

they are literally however carrying a sign stating the intended message is causing fear. i dont see how this cant be construed as intending to cause alarm in the immediate scenario

[–]CanIPNYourButt 48ポイント49ポイント  (10子コメント)

I didn't see anything about wearing a mask. Which part are you referring to specifically?

[–]mattkrueg 3215ポイント3216ポイント  (1510子コメント)

Hammer and sickle. That'll go well.

[–]westernmail 154ポイント155ポイント  (24子コメント)

"...But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, You ain't going to make it with anyone anyhow"

-Beatles, Revolution

[–]nwwaterpolo11 206ポイント207ポイント  (95子コメント)

Loving that Hungarian AKM variant

[–]EsmeAlaki 214ポイント215ポイント  (83子コメント)

to be a true hipster, you have to have a hipster gun. AR-15 is so -- burgeious -- and Russian SKS are so ordinary.

[–]Zerv14 76ポイント77ポイント  (16子コメント)

Should've been a vz.58, ultimate hipster "not an AK" rifle

[–]HowlingMadMurphy 39ポイント40ポイント  (11子コメント)

Vz58 is a better rifle altogether. 1lb lighter, milled receiver, lighter mags, takes SKS strippers, bolt hold open from the factory. You could say I'm a fan

[–]3ruid 7ポイント8ポイント  (6子コメント)

Vz has better features, but the aftermarket is really limited, and parts and accessories are mote expensive.

[–]YOLO_Swag_4_Jesus420 43ポイント44ポイント  (17子コメント)

SKS's are cheap though. The true proletariat weapon of choice.

[–]c3h8pro 10ポイント11ポイント  (4子コメント)

An Egyptian Hakim in 8mm or maybe a US Lee Navy 6mm with bayonet of course. The pro hipster would mount a Sharps breech loader with coffee grinder in the stock and of course he or she would cast the projectiles with lead free amalgam.

[–]eXXaXion 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Your comment just made me realize that these are all out of shape dweeps wearing oversized clothes. If any of those guys put as much effort into their body as they put into making sure not one else in a 300 mile radius owns the same gun as them, then they might be somewhat intimidating.

[–]MyZoum 14ポイント15ポイント  (1子コメント)

A SPECTRE IS HAUNTING AMERICA!

[–]AdmiralDakbar 515ポイント516ポイント  (81子コメント)

Not sure if it's been mentioned here yet, but this was likely in response to the "White Lives Matter" march organized to protest the Black History monument unveiled at the Texas Capitol this weekend.

[–]alexeye 65ポイント66ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, that wasn't mentioned yet.

[–]Hi_mom1 78ポイント79ポイント  (5子コメント)

Yeah or maybe one of the many times that white dudes have thrown on masks and guns and stood outside Muslim center

Where were y'all when this guy stood post outside a Muslim Center in Phoenix?

I don't remember hearing people complain about this guy either

I suppose this doesn't incite fear in anyone does it.

I doubt this woman feels threatened at all

Did someone arrest these people???

[–]parachuge 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thanks for this. All the shit talking in this thread about these protesters.

People aren't realizing the context and that it's in response to all this crazy shit that just been normalized and therefor doesn't make it to the top of r/pics or whatever.

[–]clayshoaf 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

We're these posted on Reddit? If so, I'd guess people probably had something to say about them. It's possible to think it's wrong regardless of who is doing it.

[–]kumquatlime 18ポイント19ポイント  (0子コメント)

Correct. Here's more info:

http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/local/african-american-memorial-white-lives-rally-planne/ns884/

I initially checked out the counter protest but was turned off by the "no place for peaceful protestors" rhetoric of the group running it so just went to the unveiling ceremony instead.

[–]SaintDane01 10ポイント11ポイント  (4子コメント)

That's cool and all, but I feel like explicitly having a sign saying you're specifically doing it to frighten or intimidate people (regardless of whether or not they deserve it) probably isn't the best idea. When right-wing open carriers do it, they're doing it to normalize and show people they don't have to be afraid of guns (for the most part.) This is very different.

[–]fulminousstallion 213ポイント214ポイント  (17子コメント)

Never has a group of armed people in masks been so horribly unintimidating.

[–]sirborksalot 69ポイント70ポイント  (0子コメント)

gets shot

with dying breath "Tell me... it wasn't... that kid in... the Chuck Taylors..."

[–]chipotlemcnuggies 36ポイント37ポイント  (3子コメント)

guy hugging his rifle, that chick's leggings, the fat dude standing in the back....idk what to feel to be honest

[–]Diabhalri 23ポイント24ポイント  (2子コメント)

Watch out, tub ninja back there might 360 noscope you after he fucks your mom.

[–]drazen007 98ポイント99ポイント  (23子コメント)

Hmm open carry communists with face masks... that'll end well.

[–]emanresumy 698ポイント699ポイント  (134子コメント)

I don't know a lot of racists that are afraid of a man wearing skinny jeans.

[–]The_BT 193ポイント194ポイント  (9子コメント)

I dunno, have you ever asked a racist to put on a pair of skinny jeans?

[–]The_Hoopla 39ポイント40ポイント  (4子コメント)

I own 4 pairs of skinny jeans, an Austin address, and a brand new saiga 12.

stopskinnyjeanhate

[–]wirecats 56ポイント57ポイント  (14子コメント)

What's wrong with skinny jeans? The generation that fought in the revolution and founded the US wore skin tight leggings...

[–]ParityClarity 29ポイント30ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is a hilarious argument for fashion.

"It was popular 250 years ago!"

[–]CajuNerd 721ポイント722ポイント  (510子コメント)

On the one hand, I support their 2nd amendment rights. On the other, they're wearing face cover, which is not okay.

Edit:

ITT: People who would be just fine walking down the same side of the road as these idiots, because terrorizing people while wearing masks is a-okay.

[–]bishbishbishbish 4149ポイント4150ポイント  (1843子コメント)

I'm liberal and pro gun, but this is fucking retarded. You're not supposed to use guns to frighten people. That's not what the second amendment is about. Guns are supposed to be for protection--not intimidation.

Edit: And the face masks make it so much worse. They're sabotaging their own message and using fear mongering to get people to listen. This is a great example of how the political spectrum is more in the shape of a horseshoe than a left to right line. They look like they belong to an alt-right group and probably have way more in common with the alt-right than with liberals. Here's a link describing the horseshoe theory https://masonologyblog.wordpress.com/tag/horseshoe-theory/

[–]FadingEcho 1177ポイント1178ポイント  (61子コメント)

They're ctrlLeft.

[–]ThirdDragonite 48ポイント49ポイント  (11子コメント)

Alt right. crtlLeft. All we need is some sort of centrist del and we'll open task manager.

[–]slim-pickens 61ポイント62ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is freaking hilarious. I'm using it with implied permission.

[–]hommesacer 783ポイント784ポイント  (256子コメント)

You're a liberal, not a leftist.

[–]SirCarlo 96ポイント97ポイント  (10子コメント)

ayy these guys would despise being associated with liberalism

[–]I-Downloaded-a-Car 31ポイント32ポイント  (7子コメント)

Liberals are almost worse than conservatives as far as communists are concerned.

[–]SirCarlo 23ポイント24ポイント  (5子コメント)

Well communists would consider conservatives to be liberals as well... But I get what you are saying

[–]Andreas_Scholl 633ポイント634ポイント  (216子コメント)

American political spectrum so bizarre, even liberals think they're leftist.

[–]Herculix 220ポイント221ポイント  (108子コメント)

I used to literally think left was synonymous with liberal and right was synonymous with conservative. In America it really is in a lot of people's cases.

[–]uhhrace 29ポイント30ポイント  (103子コメント)

Wait, it's not?

[–]Rather_Unfortunate 19ポイント20ポイント  (5子コメント)

In the UK, our Conservative Party are considered to be liberal conservatives: an oxymoron in the US. They're economically liberal; they favour a hands-off approach to the markets, but they're generally socially conservative and have a decidedly capitalist outlook on how things like benefits and the NHS should be run.

Confusingly, our Liberal Democrat Party are then socially liberal but economically centrist. And the sole remaining completely pro-EU party in England, but that's another matter.

US Libertarians are an example where the "liber-" (free) root word is still used there for economic liberalism.

See also: the Australian Liberal Party, which is very much socially conservative and economically liberal.

[–]earthfall 57ポイント58ポイント  (61子コメント)

In Denmark, liberal = libertarian, aka as far right as you can get in terms of economic policy

[–]RedditDelendaEst_ 39ポイント40ポイント  (26子コメント)

No. A liberal supports capitalism. It supports private ownership of the means of production, it supports a society divided in classes.

A communist does not support capitalism, he seeks to grant the control of the industry (ie: the means of production) to the workers. A communist wants a classless society.

Both the American DNC and the GOP are liberal party. Of course they are different since the former is a progressive-liberal and the latter is conservative-liberal, but in the end they stand for the same ideology and represent the same ruling class.

[–]ya-boy-apart 21ポイント22ポイント  (94子コメント)

I really don't get the labels. Do you have any thing that will help me make some sense of them?

[–]qatardog 31ポイント32ポイント  (23子コメント)

Far-Right: Fascists, Nazis, Theocrats, Monarchists, etc.

Hard Right: Conservatives, Traditionalists, Actual Capitalists.

Moderate Right: Liberals.

Far-Left: Communism.

Hard Left: Syndicalists, "Leninists".

Moderate Left: Social Democrats.

[–]ancientwarriorman 87ポイント88ポイント  (26子コメント)

Almost anything right of center counts as classical definition of liberal.

It's gotten skewed since McCarthy in the popular lexicon such that left = liberal.

Really, this is what liberal means. Yes, the donald is actually a liberal for the most part.

[–]ya-boy-apart 32ポイント33ポイント  (10子コメント)

Damn why'd people have to go and make all this crap so confusing.

[–]ancientwarriorman 34ポイント35ポイント  (7子コメント)

It was already like this, our teachers just simplified it to a single left/right axis so we conflate leftism with authoritarianism. Makes anti capitalism less attractive when freedom and markets both exist on one axis.

[–]Reverie_Smasher 8ポイント9ポイント  (6子コメント)

funny, I grew up (on CA coast) thinking the left was more liberal and right was authoritarian. It can get reduced either way depending on who's teaching you

[–]sosern 57ポイント58ポイント  (38子コメント)

Liberal = Supporter of capitalism, liberalism is the ideology

Leftist = Supporter of communism, anarchism, syndicalism, and similar.

Socialists are leftists, social-democrats are liberals.

[–]gophergun 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

America put liberals in my socialism!

[–]jokul 195ポイント196ポイント  (14子コメント)

I'm liberal

They're not. Not a communist either but I imagine they don't care what your opinion on the matter is.

[–]ReasonablyBadass 2485ポイント2486ポイント  (403子コメント)

Guns are supposed to be for protection--not intimidation.

Isn't one of the selling points that just knowing someone has a gun might deter a criminal? meaning it's protection through intimidation?

[–]Panaka 41ポイント42ポイント  (5子コメント)

Partially yes. But if you're concealed carrying, no one should know that. If you have a CHL and do anything that could be classified as intimidation, you will get fucked by the strong arm of the law.

What these people are doing are within their rights, but in my opinion any group that is doing this is doing it just for intimidation. Also I could have sworn you aren't supposed to have a mag open and the bolt closed when open carrying long rifles like that.

[–]Riddla26 1235ポイント1236ポイント  (233子コメント)

Yes. If you're the one feeling protected, you can be sure someone else feels intimidated.

[–]deputyshitbat 284ポイント285ポイント  (29子コメント)

That's a pretty bad analogy. Deciding not to commit a home invasion because you're 'intimidated' by the owner having a gun is different than being intimidated by a masked man holding a rifle on a street corner.

[–]SteveEsquire 47ポイント48ポイント  (10子コメント)

Exactly. This is enticing violence and fear. Quite a bit different than deterring someone that wants to harm you.

[–]Chief_Caliph_ 49ポイント50ポイント  (1子コメント)

You mentioning yourself being a Liberal is implying they are too, which I can tell you that leftists despise Liberals

[–]thetallgiant 167ポイント168ポイント  (31子コメント)

You're not supposed to use guns to frighten people. That's not what the second amendment is about.

The main purpose of 2A is to frighten politicians who might be getting a little tyrannical.

[–]0xD153A53 327ポイント328ポイント  (126子コメント)

Actually, that's precisely what the second amendment is for, only it's to frighten the government into not becoming a tyranny because of the response from an armed citizenry.

[–]Big-Brother 164ポイント165ポイント  (14子コメント)

Horseshoe theory is retarded and only people on Reddit believe it

[–]Slim_Charles 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

I learned about horseshoe theory in a poli sci class in college. It definitely exists outside of reddit.

[–]electonfiremage 156ポイント157ポイント  (26子コメント)

Yeah horseshoe theory has pretty much been debunked though.

[–]STDNW 64ポイント65ポイント  (21子コメント)

Yeah, but welcome to reddit where the argumentum ad temperantiam fallacy seemingly reigns supreme on matters of politics. Scary extremes guise, we need a bit of both amirite?

Jump on the jerk train - DAE think that Communists in Germany during the '20s and '30s who fought with Nazis on the street and used violence to shut down their rallies and meetings were literally the same as the Nazis? Extremism is bad guise, we need to get behind Bernstein. I may not agree with Hitler's opinions but I'll die defending his right to express theminBergenBelsen.

[–]fajardo99 19ポイント20ポイント  (2子コメント)

seriously, reddit loves basing their opinions on south park. it's really fucking annoying tbh

[–]Brive_ 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

I need to thank you and the other comrades on this thread. Thanks.

[–]MemeMeUpFamilia 47ポイント48ポイント  (0子コメント)

They aren't liberal numbnuts. They oppose you.

[–]darkage_raven 49ポイント50ポイント  (3子コメント)

Maybe I may be wrong but I am almost certain open carry doesn't count if you are masking your identity.

[–]SpermPowder 87ポイント88ポイント  (26子コメント)

OK well you still can't shoot people for being racists.

And i fully support this and all but i'm in an open carry state and the OC'ers don't need masks. Just sayin, that helps with perception. Masks make you look more like KKK.

Exercise your rights, but keep it chill